Survey On Communication Applications: Mushtaque Ahmed

Survey on Communication Applications
Submitted To:
Mushtaque Ahmed
Associate Professor
Institute of Business Administration
University of Dhaka
Submitted By:
Mahbub Rahman Nafee (ZR-05)
Tushar Ahmed Nishu (ZR-35)
Rawnak Zaheen Wasi (ZR-45)
Monami Anika Fariha (RH-46)
Rehnuma Sabrin Arpy (RH-49)
Course: Business Statistics

Course Code: K202

University of Dhaka
Business Statistics
Communication Applications
Letter of Transmittal
January 9th, 2016
Mushtaque Ahmed
Associate Professor
University of Dhaka
Subject: Letter of Transmittal for Business Statistics course term paper
Dear Sir,
We are pleased to submit this business statistics report titled Survey on Communication
Applications. We have carried out our survey in accordance to your instructions as best we
could and have provided the relevant the statistics from the survey. The survey has been
conducted through the use of a questionnaire.
This report has been prepared under your supervision. Without your permission, no part
of this report can or will be revealed. This report never has been, and never will be,
reproduced for any other IBA course.
We sincerely hope that we were able to fulfill the course requirement successfully through
the submission of this report. We have put in our best efforts to contribute towards the
successful completion of this paper. We hope that you will accept our report and that it will
reach your level of expectations. We have tried to make the report as comprehensive as we
possibly could but we would appreciate you contacting us if you find any imprecision.
Sincerely,
Mahbub Rahman Nafee (ZR-05)
Tushar Ahmed Nishu (ZR-35)
Rawnak Zaheen Wasi (ZR-45)
Monami Anika Fariha (RH-46)
Rehnuma Sabrin Arpy (RH-49)
2
Business Statistics
Contents
Executive Summary ........................................................................................... 4

Objective of the Survey ..................................................................................... 5
Questionnaire ................................................................................................... 6
Descriptive Statistics ....................................................................................... 11
Hypothesis Tests ............................................................................................. 31
Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 37
Business Statistics
Executive Summary
Communication is a key aspect in modern life. The need for quick, safe and responsive
communication methods have become vital. To aid this, many communication applications,
such as Facebook, Whats App, etc. have been developed and this report focuses on a
survey regarding these applications.
Our survey on communication applications looks to understand which communication
applications people prefer, why they prefer it and how these applications have affected
their social and individual lives.
The survey has been conducted via then use of a detailed questionnaire, with mostly closeended questions. The results of the survey have been given through the use of descriptive
statistics (Frequencies, charts, etc.). Based on the results, some hypotheses have been
developed and tested, using Chi-Square, ANOVA, T-tests, etc.
Business Statistics
Objective of the Survey

The current lifestyles of people are highly influenced by communication applications. There
are a variety of applications and almost everyone has access to them. Our objective of
preparing this report encompasses three major components we aim to ascertain
Which apps are the most preferred - Choosing from Facebook/Facebook Messenger,
Whats App, Viber, Skype, Line Messenger, Tango, Twitter and Snapchat
Why they are preferred - What are the factors that determine their choice? These
factors may range from user friendliness, responsiveness, safety and design of the
application
What are the effects of these apps on peoples lives - How often do they use these
applications, among what group of people do they use them, how dependent they
are on such applications and how these applications have affected modern life
We have conducted a survey with a constructive questionnaire pertinent to our objective.
This report provides insight into the questionnaire, descriptive statistics from our findings
and some hypothesis that we have developed and tested.
Business Statistics
Questionnaire
A short survey on Communication Applications such as Facebook, Viber, Whats App, etc.
*Required
1. Age *
15 or Below
16 to 20
21 to 25
Above 25
2. Gender *
Male
Female
3. Which of these applications do you use, or have used? *
Facebook / Facebook Messenger
WhatsApp
Viber
Line Messenger
Tango
Skype
Snapchat
Twitter
Required
4. Which of these applications are currently installed on your phone?
You may answer multiple options

WhatsApp
Viber
Line Messenger
Tango
Skype
Snapchat
Twitter
5. Do you use any application other than these for communication via the internet?
Yes
No
6. If yes, which application?
Business Statistics
7. Which application do you prefer the most? *

Answer only one

WhatsApp
Viber
Line Messenger
Tango
Skype
Snapchat
Twitter
8. How long have you been using your preferred app?

Less than a year
1 to 2 years
3 to 5 years
More than 5 years
9. Rate your preferred application on the following
1 (Lowest)
2
User Friendliness
Responsiveness
Safety
Design
10. Does your preferred app have room for improvement? *
Yes
No, I like it as it is.
11. If yes, how can it improve your communication?
Improve the interface
Allow group conversations
Increase privacy
Include more fun features
Increase responsiveness
Exclude advertisements
Improve the design
Other:
12. Which communication option do you use the most? *

Text Messaging
Video Chat
Voice Call
Other:
4 (Highest)
Business Statistics
Required
13. Do you use different applications for different purposes (Texting, calling, etc.)?
Yes
Only use one app for all purposes
14. What is your preferred application for each of these purposes?
FB
Whats
Messenger App
Viber
Line
Tango
Messenger
Skype
Snapchat
Twitter
Text
Messaging
Voice
Calling
Video
Chatting
15. How did you form these preferences?

Stuck with the first application I used
Heard of the app from friends/family
The app is relatively fast
Good experience
Saw an Indian ad, so I avoid the app
16. Which applications do you feel safe using?
Whats App
Viber
Line Messenger
Tango
Skype
Snapchat
Twitter
17. How many hours do you spend on these applications on a daily basis? *
3 hours or less
4 to 6 hours
7 to 9 hours
Always Online
18. Does the aesthetics (outlook) of the application make a significant difference to your
choice of use?
Yes
No
Indifferent
Not sure
Business Statistics
19. What do you use these applications for?

Communication with friends and family
Professional Work
Other:
20. How many countries do you communicate in using these applications?

1 (Within Native Country)
2
3
4
More than 4
21. What would you do if your preferred application started charging a fee? *
Shift to another application
Pay for the application
22. How important is ease of access when determining preference?

Very
Somewhat
Not much
23. What kind of internet apparatus do you use to support your application usage? *
Mobile Data
Wi-Fi
Required
24. If you have chosen Mobile Data above, how much do you spend on data for these
applications on a monthly basis?
Less than Tk. 100
Tk. 100 - 300
Tk. 300 - 500
Tk. 500 - 700
More than Tk. 700
25. What do you think is the biggest impact of using communication applications among the
following?
Saves time
Online interviews
Less normal phone calls
Less paperwork
Increase in socializing
Decrease in socializing
Generation gap
9
Business Statistics
Increased knowledge
26. Have these applications significantly affected your social life?

Yes
No
27. How helpless would you feel without these applications?
Can't live without them
Could manage somewhat
I'm ready to go back to the dark ages
10
Business Statistics
Descriptive Statistics
Age
N
Valid
101
Missing
Age
Valid
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
15 or Below
7.9
7.9
7.9
16 to 20
33
32.7
32.7
40.6
20 to 25
2.0
2.0
42.6
21 to 25
52
51.5
51.5
94.1
Above 25
5.9
5.9
100.0
Total
101
100.0
100.0
More than half (51.5%) of our survey results are from individuals aged between 21
and 25, followed by the age group of 16-20 at 32.7%
11
Business Statistics
Gender
N
Valid
101
Missing
Gender
Valid
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Female
29
28.7
28.7
28.7
Male
72
71.3
71.3
100.0
Total
101
100.0
100.0
The majority of these individuals are male (72%)
Do you use any application other than these

for communication via the Internet?
N
Valid
101
Missing
12
Business Statistics
Do you use any application other than these for communication via the
Internet?
Valid
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
No
59
58.4
58.4
58.4
Yes
42
41.6
41.6
100.0
Total
101
100.0
100.0
58.4% of these individuals have confirmed that their modes of online communication
are limited to the applications we have listed in the survey. On the other hand, a
significant 41.6% uses other applications such as Telegram, Hangouts etc. for
communication
13
Business Statistics
Which application do you prefer the most?

Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
2.0
2.0
2.0
55
54.5
54.5
56.4
Skype
4.0
4.0
60.4
Snapchat
1.0
1.0
61.4
Twitter
2.0
2.0
63.4
Viber
4.0
4.0
67.3
Whats App
33
32.7
32.7
100.0
Total
101
100.0
100.0
Valid
People mostly prefer Facebook/Facebook messenger (54.5%) followed by Whats app

(32.7%)
Statistics
How long have you
been using your
Rate on User
Rate on
preferred app
Friendliness
Responsiveness
Rate on Safety
Rate on Design
Valid
101
87
87
80
77
Missing
14
14
21
24
14
Business Statistics
How long have you been using your preferred app

Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
2.0
2.0
2.0
1 to 2 years
31
30.7
30.7
32.7
3 to 5 years
35
34.7
34.7
67.3
Less than a year
6.9
6.9
74.3
More than 5 years
26
25.7
25.7
100.0
Total
101
100.0
100.0
Valid
Most have formed their preferences by using the application for a significant period
of time. Only 7% have used their preferred application for less than a year
Rate your preferred application on Friendliness
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
18
17.8
20.7
20.7
5.0
5.7
26.4
25
24.8
28.7
55.2
39
38.6
44.8
100.0
Total
87
86.1
100.0
System
14
13.9
101
100.0
Valid
Missing
Total
15
Business Statistics
Rate your preferred application on Responsiveness

Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
19
18.8
21.8
21.8
13
12.9
14.9
36.8
21
20.8
24.1
60.9
34
33.7
39.1
100.0
Total
87
86.1
100.0
System
14
13.9
101
100.0
Valid
Missing
Total
16
Business Statistics
Rate your preferred application on Safety

Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
15
14.9
18.8
18.8
16
15.8
20.0
38.8
32
31.7
40.0
78.8
17
16.8
21.2
100.0
Total
80
79.2
100.0
System
21
20.8
101
100.0
Valid
Missing
Total
Rate your preferred application on Design

Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
6.9
9.1
9.1
11
10.9
14.3
23.4
35
34.7
45.5
68.8
24
23.8
31.2
100.0
Total
77
76.2
100.0
System
24
23.8
101
100.0
Valid
Missing
Total
17
Business Statistics
64% of people think their preferred application is highly user friendly, 55% think it is
safe, however 35% think it is moderately well designed
Does your preferred app have room for improvement?
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
2.0
2.0
2.0
No, I like it as it is.
24
23.8
23.8
25.7
Yes
75
74.3
74.3
100.0
Total
101
100.0
100.0
Valid
Despite being the most preferred application, a significant 75% think that it still has
room for improvement
18
Business Statistics
Which communication option do you use the most?
Valid
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Messaging
4.0
4.0
4.0
Text Messaging
71
70.3
70.3
74.3
Text Messaging, Video Chat
1.0
1.0
75.2
Text Messaging, Voice Calling
6.9
6.9
82.2
Text Messaging; Video Chat
1.0
1.0
83.2
Text Messaging ;Voice Call
5.9
5.9
89.1
Video Chat
1.0
1.0
90.1
Video Chat, Voice Call
1.0
1.0
91.1
voice call
1.0
1.0
92.1
Voice Call
7.9
7.9
100.0
Total
101
100.0
100.0
19
Business Statistics
Do you use different applications for different purposes?

Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
6.9
6.9
6.9
Only use one app for all

purposes
11
10.9
10.9
17.8
Yes
83
82.2
82.2
100.0
Total
101
100.0
100.0
Valid
Text messaging is the most used option for communication. And 83% people have
separate applications for different purposes, which means more people opt for text
messaging even if they use separate applications for different work
What is your preferred app for Video Chatting?
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
32
31.7
31.7
31.7
Facebook
2.0
2.0
33.7
Skype
49
48.5
48.5
82.2
Snapchat
3.0
3.0
85.1
Viber
14
13.9
13.9
99.0
Whats Ap
1.0
1.0
100.0
Total
101
100.0
100.0
Valid
20
Business Statistics
48.3% of the people prefer using Skype for Video Chatting

What is your preferred app for Voice Calling?
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
25
24.8
24.8
24.8
Facebook
4.0
4.0
28.7
Skype
13
12.9
12.9
41.6
Snapchat
2.0
2.0
43.6
Tango
1.0
1.0
44.6
Viber
35
34.7
34.7
79.2
Whats App
21
20.8
20.8
100.0
Total
101
100.0
100.0
Valid
21
Business Statistics
34.7% prefer using Viber for Voice Calls, followed by Whatsapp (20.8%) and Skype
(12.9%)
What is your preferred app for Text Messaging?
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
21
20.8
20.8
20.8
43
42.6
42.6
63.4
Skype
1.0
1.0
64.4
Snapchat
3.0
3.0
67.3
Viber
6.9
6.9
74.3
Whats App
26
25.7
25.7
100.0
Total
101
100.0
100.0
Valid
42.6% people prefer using Facebook/Facebook Messenger for Text Messaging,

followed by Whatsapp (25.7%)
22
Business Statistics
How many hours do you spend on these applications on a daily basis?

Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
23
22.8
57.5
57.5
14
13.9
35.0
92.5
3.0
7.5
100.0
Total
40
39.6
100.0
System
61
60.4
101
100.0
Valid
Missing
Total
57.5% of the individuals claim that they spend 3 hours or less on these applications
on a daily basis
How many countries do you communicate in using these applications?
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
7.9
14.3
14.3
20
19.8
35.7
50.0
19
18.8
33.9
83.9
8.9
16.1
100.0
Total
56
55.4
100.0
System
45
44.6
101
100.0
Valid
Missing
Total
23
Business Statistics
85.7% people communicate outside the country using these applications

What kind of internet apparatus do you use to support your application usage?
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
1.0
1.0
1.0
Mobile Data
6.9
6.9
7.9
Mobile Data, Wi-F
22
21.8
21.8
29.7
Mobile Data;Wi-Fi
28
27.7
27.7
57.4
Wi-Fi
43
42.6
42.6
100.0
Total
101
100.0
100.0
Valid
A significant number of people use both apparatus (Wi-Fi and mobile data) to access
these applications
24
Business Statistics
Have these applications significantly affected your social life?

Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
4.0
4.0
4.0
No
18
17.8
17.8
21.8
Yes
79
78.2
78.2
100.0
Total
101
100.0
100.0
Valid
25
Business Statistics
What do you think is the biggest impact of using communication applications?

Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
4.0
4.0
4.0
5.0
5.0
8.9
Generation gap
1.0
1.0
9.9
Increase in socializing
36
35.6
35.6
45.5
Increased knowledge
3.0
3.0
48.5
Less normal phone calls
17
16.8
16.8
65.3
Less paperwork
2.0
2.0
67.3
Online interviews
2.0
2.0
69.3
Saves time
29
28.7
28.7
98.0
1.0
1.0
99.0
1.0
1.0
100.0
101
100.0
100.0
Valid
Saves time; Less normal phone

calls; Generation gap; Increased
knowledge
Saves time; Less paperwork;
Total
35.6% people think that these communication applications have caused people to
socialize more, and yet led to less regular phone calls (16.8%) and reduced time
consumption (28.7%). These are the 3 biggest impacts of using communication
application as found in the survey
26
Business Statistics
How helpless would you feel without these applications?

Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
3.0
3.0
3.0
Can't live without them
30
29.7
29.7
32.7
Could manage somewhat
60
59.4
59.4
92.1
I'm ready to go back to the

dark ages
7.9
7.9
100.0
Total
101
100.0
100.0
Valid
60% of people believe they could have managed without these applications,
although 30% feel that these are an absolute necessity in their lives
Descriptive Statistics for No. of hours spend on these applications
N
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Deviation
74
3.76
1.225
How many hours do you

spend on these applications
on a daily basis
Valid N (list wise)
74
27
Business Statistics
Other Statistics
Other applications used:

Reddit, Wechat, Gmail, Hangouts, The Telegram, Evernote. Trello, Tumblr, Kik Messenger,
Face Time, IMO, Google +, Steam, True Caller
28
Business Statistics
29
Business Statistics
30
Business Statistics
Hypothesis Tests
#1 Hypothesis
People aged 25 and above do not spend much time on these applications.
Null Hypothesis (HO): Mean no. of hours spent on these applications <= 4 hours
Alternative Hypothesis (HA): Mean no. of hours spent > 4 hours
Statistics
How many hours do you
spend on these applications
on a daily basis?
N
Valid
74
Missing
29
Mean
3.76
Std. Deviation
1.225
Sum
278
z-value = (3.76-4) / (1.225/74^0.5)
= -0.196
Probability Associated with test statistic, P = 0.5 - 0.4545
= 0.0455
P = 4.55%
So at = 1%, we reject the null hypothesis, meaning that people aged 25 and above, do
spend more than 4 hours on these applications.
P = 4.55%
So at = 5%, we do not reject the null hypothesis, meaning that people aged 25 and above,
spend less than 4 hours on the communication applications.
31
Business Statistics
#2 Hypothesis
Peoples rating on User Friendliness for their preferred application will be at least 3.
Null Hypothesis (HO): Rating for User Friendliness => 3
Alternative Hypothesis (HA): Rating for User Friendliness < 3
One-Sample Statistics
User
Friendliness
Mean
Std. Deviation
Std. Error
Mean
87
2.98
1.161
.124
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 3
User
Friendliness
-.185
df
86
Sig. (2Mean
tailed) Difference
.854
-.023
95% Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
Lower
Upper
-.27
.22
Probability associated with test statistic, P (for one tailed) = 0.854/2

= 0.427
Therefore, P = 42.7%
So, at = 10%, there is significant evidence to reject the null hypothesis (HO), meaning that
people will rate their preferred application less than 3 on User Friendliness. Therefore,
factors other than User Friendliness influence their preference.
32
Business Statistics
#3 Hypothesis
ANOVA
People who spend more time on their preferred application will rate the application
similarly on user friendliness, responsiveness and safety.
Null Hypothesis (HO):
Mean rating on User Friendliness = Mean rating on Responsiveness = Mean rating on Safety
Alternative Hypothesis (HA): Any one of the means is different
ANOVA
Responsivene
ss
Safety
User
Friendliness
Sum of
Squares
df
Mean Square
Sig.
Between
Groups
12.348
6.174
5.377
.007
Within Groups
71.190
62
1.148
Total
83.538
64
Between
Groups
1.492
.746
.818
.447
Within Groups
50.164
55
.912
Total
51.655
57
Between
Groups
3.751
1.875
1.603
.210
Within Groups
70.186
60
1.170
Total
73.937
62
Probability associated with test statistic, P = 0.007 + 0.447 + 0.210 = 0.657

Therefore, at = 10%, there is significant evidence to reject the null hypothesis (HO), which
means that someone may rate their preferred application differently on certain measures,
such as user friendliness, responsiveness and safety.
33
Business Statistics
#4 Hypothesis
CHI-SQUARE
The no. of countries an individual communicates in is independent of the individuals age.
Null Hypothesis (HO): No. of countries communicated in is independent of the age of the
individual.
Alternative Hypothesis (HA): No. of countries communicated in IS dependent on the age of
the individual.
34
Business Statistics
Cross-Tabulation
How long have you been using your
preferred app (Years)
1 to 2 3 to 5
Preferred
Application
Facebook /
Facebook
Messenger
Skype
Snapchat
Twitter
Viber
WhatsApp
Total
<1
>5
Total
Count
Expected
Count
.2
1.2
1.4
.3
1.0
4.0
Count
19
23
55
Expected
Count
2.1
16.6
18.7
3.7
13.9
55.0
Count
Expected
Count
.2
1.2
1.4
.3
1.0
4.0
Count
Expected
Count
.0
.3
.3
.1
.3
1.0
Count
Expected
Count
.1
.6
.7
.1
.5
2.0
Count
Expected
Count
.2
1.2
1.4
.3
1.0
4.0
Count
18
13
33
Expected
Count
1.3
9.9
11.2
2.2
8.3
33.0
Count
31
35
26
103
Expected
Count
4.0
31.0
35.0
7.0
26.0
103.0
35
Business Statistics
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig. (2sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
1.399E2a
24
.000
Likelihood Ratio
79.827
24
.000
N of Valid Cases
103
For df (Degree of Freedom) = 24 and = 5%, Chi-square gives a value of 36.415.

Comparing this with the value of 79.827, there is significant evidence to reject the null
hypothesis (HO). Therefore, the number of countries communicated in IS dependent on the
age of the individual.
36
Business Statistics
Conclusion
This report was made with the intention of gathering data with regards to use of
communication applications and their impacts on our lives. It was compounded with the
development of several hypothesis which were tested using tests, such as Chi-Square and
ANOVA.
One of the hypothesis was the number of countries communicated in is dependent on the
age of the individual. This seems natural as, with age, the opportunity to travel and in doing
so forming cross boundary bonds seems inevitable. Therefore, someone who had more time
to travel and make friends will most likely have a friend circle spanning several continents.
On the other hand, on that same logic, one would expect older individuals to spend more
time engaged in communicating with other individuals, as they have had more time to form
those relationships. On top of this, the reasons for using the apps in the first place,
socializing and work, applies even more to this demographic, with special emphasis on
work. Despite this rather obvious connection, the test findings contradict our natural train
of thoughts, and suggest that individuals above the age of 25 spend less than 4 hours using
these apps, while those aged under 25 use them for more than 4 hours.
What we have seen throughout the report is the growing influence communication apps
have on our lives. There is no denying the way these services have changed our behavior,
and this report was an attempt to quantify that data and lend meaning to these newly
formed relationships.
The sample in question is generic, and can be considered an adequate representation of our
population. Albeit a little unbalanced with regards to the distribution of sex, this can be
contributed to either statistical bias arising from convenience based on the ease of survey,
or a reflection of communication app use among the different sexes.
It is unclear if a more even sample (which in itself is biased, as the sample has been
intentionally engineered to contain an equal or near equal fraction of men and women) will
yield results that are different from the ones obtained through this survey. While common
conjecture is that behavioral patterns are independent of sex, without further surveys and
data, drawing a statistically sound conclusion would be unadvisable and impossible.
The age spread can be considered too narrow as social changes have forced many adults to
pick up their phones and learn to navigate the various channels of communication. This
would also open possibilities of exploring other relationships that are age specific, and can
reveal previously unknown connections that define how we view communication
applications as we age in a whole different light.
While it is unclear if a more diverse age group would have led to significantly different
results, it is obvious there is a tangible relationship between age and our communicating
behavior, based on the few questions that did have age as a deciding factor.
37

Survey On Communication Applications: Mushtaque Ahmed

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Survey On Communication Applications: Mushtaque Ahmed

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Survey on Communication Applications

Course: Business Statistics

Institute of Business Administration

Executive Summary ........................................................................................... 4

Objective of the Survey

Facebook / Facebook Messenger

6. If yes, which application?

7. Which application do you prefer the most? *

Facebook / Facebook Messenger

8. How long have you been using your preferred app?

12. Which communication option do you use the most? *

15. How did you form these preferences?

19. What do you use these applications for?

20. How many countries do you communicate in using these applications?

22. How important is ease of access when determining preference?

26. Have these applications significantly affected your social life?

The majority of these individuals are male (72%)

Do you use any application other than these

Which application do you prefer the most?

Facebook / Facebook Messenger

People mostly prefer Facebook/Facebook messenger (54.5%) followed by Whats app

been using your

How long have you been using your preferred app

Less than a year

More than 5 years

Rate your preferred application on Responsiveness

Rate your preferred application on Safety

Rate your preferred application on Design

No, I like it as it is.

Which communication option do you use the most?

Text Messaging, Video Chat

Text Messaging, Voice Calling

Text Messaging; Video Chat

Text Messaging ;Voice Call

Video Chat, Voice Call

Do you use different applications for different purposes?

Only use one app for all

48.3% of the people prefer using Skype for Video Chatting

Facebook / Facebook Messenger

42.6% people prefer using Facebook/Facebook Messenger for Text Messaging,

How many hours do you spend on these applications on a daily basis?

85.7% people communicate outside the country using these applications

Mobile Data, Wi-F

Have these applications significantly affected your social life?

What do you think is the biggest impact of using communication applications?

Less normal phone calls

Saves time; Less normal phone

How helpless would you feel without these applications?

Can't live without them

Could manage somewhat

I'm ready to go back to the

How many hours do you

Other applications used:

Probability associated with test statistic, P (for one tailed) = 0.854/2

Probability associated with test statistic, P = 0.007 + 0.447 + 0.210 = 0.657

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

For df (Degree of Freedom) = 24 and = 5%, Chi-square gives a value of 36.415.

You might also like