Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prosthodontics Continues
John A. Sorensen, DMD, PhD, FACP
The rate of innovations in prosthodontics has been picking up considerable
momentum and products have emerged, demonstrating superb strength and high
esthetics. Trends indicate a preference for metal-free restorations, as the offerings
of zirconia products have become more nuanced. Also, innovative scanning
systems provide dental teams a greater flexibility and enhanced productivity.
The integration of materials and digital technologies has facilitated enormous
advancements in fixed and removable prosthodontics in the last 4 years. This
synergistic combination has helped the specialty evolve to provide both the
clinician and dental laboratory technician with enhanced prostheses possessing an
increased clinical reliability while enabling fabrication with increased efficiency,
reduced fabrication times, and better economy. This is all while providing greater
precision and a superior restoration for the patient.
At no other time in dentistry has there been such a rapid rate of development in
prosthodontic materials, digital technology, software, and the integration of
systems. The products that have benefited the most from the convergence of these
elements are single-tooth implant surgical/prosthodontics and posterior
conventional crowns. Dentistry has witnessed an ease of fabrication of posterior
restorations using high-strength ceramics that are highly esthetic, possess a
monolithic structure, and have excellent occlusal anatomy.
Scanning Systems
Since the introduction of intraoral scanning (IOS) systems and other digital
prosthodontics systems at the 2013 International Dental Show in Cologne,
Milling
Many improvements have occurred with milling machines such as high-capacity
systems holding eight milling disks (Wieland Zenotec select hybrid, Ivoclar
Vivadent) and high-capacity wet-milling machines for lithium disilicate restoration
fabrication (IPS e.matrix, Wieland, Ivoclar Vivadent). Another high-capacity
system is the M4 Milling Unit (Zirkonzahn, www.zirkonzahn.com), which has an
extra-large milling area (15 inches by 7 inches) suitable for production of up to 20
full arches at once. The tool-changer function holds up to 32 milling tools, and a
large variety of materials can be processed in one milling process.
In addition to the developments for large milling centers, even more exciting was
the introduction at the 2015 International Dental Show of 4-axis wet-milling
machine systems in the mid $20,000 range (Biodenta DS 1300,
Biodenta, www.biodenta.net). Also, a similarly affordable system was introduced
at the recent Chicago Lab Management Today meeting (DWX-4W, Roland
DGA, www.rolanddga.com). This affordability greatly expands the use of
CAD/CAM systems to smaller dental laboratories and to dental practices for
chairside applications to mill ceramics, PMMA, composite, and titanium.
A masters degree thesis project measured the accuracy of chairside milling of
custom titanium abutments to within 25 m to 30 m for precision. 10 With the
economical wet-milling machines, IOS, and available software, the concept of a
desktop dental lab was introduced in December 2015 in which a clinic could use
software to integrate the cone-beam computed tomography and IOS scans,
treatment plan implants, mill out a surgical guide, design and mill a provisional
crown, and design and mill an abutment and crown from a variety of materials. 11
Digital Workflows
Digital technologies have also touched removable prosthodontics. To varying
degrees, the Avadent (www.avadent.com), DENTCA (www.dentca.com), and
Digital Denture (Ivoclar Vivadent) systems have incorporated digital workflows.
The Ivoclar Vivadent system is cleverly designed in that the dentist can work at a
traditional level of analog border-molded impressions and, through the process,
merely make a few numeric settings that allow the dental laboratory to work in a
nearly completely digital workflow. With all these systems, the denture base is
milled from a factory-fabricated pink PMMA disk that is dense and free of voids
and flaws. The fit of the intaglio surface of the milled base is perfect, unlike
traditional heat-processed PMMA in which the 8% to 9% polymerization shrinkage
pulls away from the palatal aspect creating poor adaptation. DENTCA introduced a
3D-printable denture base system.
Other exciting developments in removable prosthodontics include a system in
which the doctor could perform an intraoral scan of the prepared teeth and soft
tissues, and then send STL files to the laboratory. The laboratory would then 3D
print the resin model, use software to design the RPD framework, and then print
the CrCo metal framework. Finally, the powder alloy is laser sintered to produce a
precise-fitting metal framework (3DRPD USA, www.3drpd.com).
Conclusion
Recent innovations in modern materials, digital technology, software, and
integration of systems make the future appear bright for prosthodontics. With the
control, reduced capital investment, added capabilities, increased flexibility, and
the precision available, never has there been a more exciting time in fixed and
removable prosthodontics.
References
1. DiTolla M. Glidewell Laboratories website. The BruxZir Phenomenon-A
Clinician's Perspective. http://glidewelldental.com/wpcontent/uploads/2016/02/bruxzir-solid-zirconia-science-guidea.pdf. Accessed May
9, 2016.
2. LMT Research Department. The Answers Issue. Lab Management Today. March
2016.
3. Sorensen JA. Three-body wear of enamel against full crown ceramics. J Dent
Res. 2011;90: Spec Issue abstract 1652.
4. Stawarczyk B, zcan M, Schmutz F, et al. Two-body wear of monolithic
veneered and glazed zirconia and their corresponding enamel antagonists. Acta
Odontol Scand. 2013;71(1):102-112
5. Yavuz T, Aslan MA, Akpinar Y, et al. Evaluation of femtosecond laser treatment
on zirconia-resin cement bonding. J Dent Res. 2015; Spec Issue abstract 174.
6. Yavuz T, zyilmaz, Dilber E, et al. Effect of different surface treatments on
porcelain-resin bond strength. J Prosthodont. 2015 [published ahead of print].
7. Hack GD, Patzelt SBM. Evaluation of the accuracy of 6 intraoral scanning
devices: an in vitro investigation. ADA Professional Product Review. A Publication
of the Council on Scientific Affairs. September 25, 2015.
8. Mehl A, Ender A, Mrmann W, Attin T. Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D
camera. Int J Comput Dent. 2009;12(1):121-128.
9. Sorensen JA. Accuracy of full-arch scanning with intra-oral scanners. J Dent
Res. 2014;93: Spec Issue Abstract 52.
10. An H. Accuracy of milled custom abutments fabricated from a semiprefabricated abutment blank. MSD Thesis, Graduate Prosthodontics, University of
Washington. 2015.
11. Sorensen JA. The desktop dental lab. Inside Dentistry. 2015;11:54-61.
- See more at: https://www.dentalaegis.com/cced/2016/06/the-evolution-andrevolution-in-prosthodontics-continues#sthash.lCb2cynt.dpuf