Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a
Private practice, Los Angeles, Calif.
b
Private practice, Los Angeles, Calif.
c
Private practice, Los Angeles, Calif.
d
Private practice, Oxnard, Calif.
Figure 1. Panoramic radiograph of initial patient presentation. Figure 2. Patient presentation 4 months after implant surgery with
maxillary removable dental prosthesis and mandibular interim complete
fixed prosthesis.
Figure 5. Frontal intraoral view of evaluation of milled denture tooth Figure 6. Frontal view of laboratory wax pattern for heat-polymerized
arrangement on framework. denture base resin veneer.
Figure 7. Frontal intraoral view with definitive prostheses. Figure 8. Panoramic radiograph with definitive prostheses in place.
superimposed by using soft-tissue and prosthetic land- modifications to improve occlusion and anatomy. The
marks on the casts and restorations. Care was taken during tooth arrangement was then adapted to passively overlay
the design process to ensure that sufficient space was buccal and lingual aspects of the bar and screw access
available to subsequently accommodate teeth and denture holes to improve rigidity and stability of the milled tooth
base acrylic resin. By using the superimposed scans, a 3.0- acrylic resin (SR Vivodent CAD Multi; Ivoclar Vivadent
mm-wide by 6.0-mm-high rectangular bar framework was AG). This design also allowed visual seating intraorally
designed for passivity and rigidity; the design was then when the vertical dimension of occlusion, centric relation,
milled (CORiTEC 350i; imes-icore) in cobalt-chromium phonetics, and esthetics was verified (Figs. 4, 5).
alloy (Argen Cobalt Chrome 275; Argen). After the trial tooth arrangement and making necessary
The framework was then minimally finished to occlusal adjustments, the acrylic resin tooth arrangement
remove milling struts and seated intraorally by using the was manually modified to accommodate pink baseplate wax
1-screw Sheffield test.12 Periapical images were made of for esthetics and retention. Pink baseplate wax was adapted
each implant abutment to ensure seating of the frame- to the buccal, lingual, and intaglio aspects for flasking and
work to verify fit and passivity before subsequent design heat-processing procedures for adaptation of denture base
procedures. Upon verification, the framework was seated resin (Lucitone 199; Dentsply Sirona) (Fig. 6). Finishing
on the definitive cast and scanned. The scan containing procedures of the prosthesis involved removing all concav-
the interim mandibular prosthesis was then super- ities on the intaglio surfaces and polishing on a lathe. The
imposed onto the framework scan to finalize the space definitive restoration was inserted, and occlusion adjusted as
available for acrylic resin and to design the tooth needed (Fig. 7). Multiunit abutment screws were tightened
arrangement (Fig. 3). The tooth form was a clone of the to 15 Ncm on initial insertion and then retightened after 2
preexisting interim prosthesis, with freeform digital weeks. Screw access holes were filled with