Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Codes4 PDF
Codes4 PDF
Louis E. Hayden, PE
President, Louis Hayden Associates
Bethlehem, PA, USA
J Robert Sims
Becht Engineering Co., Inc.
Liberty Corner, NJ, USA
INTRODUCTION
4
CODE HISTORY
5
CODE HISTORY
6
DEVELOPMENT OF THE REWRITE
OF SECTION VIII, DIVISION 2
Some of the new technologies incorporated into the new Section
VIII, Division 2 Code rewrite include:
Adoption of a design margin on the specified minimum ultimate tensile strength
of 2.4
Toughness requirements based on the fracture mechanics approach provided in
API 579-1/ASME FFS-1
Design-by-rule for the creep range
Conical transition reinforcement requirements
Opening reinforcement rules
Load case combinations for elastic, limit load, and elastic-plastic analysis
Local strain criteria for design-by-analysis using elastic-plastic analysis
7
DEVELOPMENT OF THE REWRITE
OF SECTION VIII, DIVISION 2
New Technologies (Continued)
Limit load and plastic collapse analysis,
Ultrasonic examination in lieu of radiographic examination.
Fatigue design for welded joints based on the Master S/N
Curve and the Structural Stress Method, and
Ultrasonic examination in lieu of radiographic examination.
8
DEVELOPMENT OF THE REWRITE
OF SECTION VIII, DIVISION 2
Some enhancements included in the new Division 2:
Alternatives to U.S. and Canadian Registered Professional Engineer (RPE)
certification of the User Design Specification (UDS) and Manufacturers Design
Report (MDR) provided to accommodate Manufacturers outside of North
America,
Introduction of a weld joint efficiency factor and the use of partial radiographic
and ultrasonic examination,
Significant upgrade to design-by-rule and design-by-analysis procedures,
User-friendliness; extensive use of equations, tables, and figures to define rules
and procedures, and
ISO-like format; logical paragraph numbering system and single column format.
9
SECTION VIII, DIVISION 2
10
DESIGN BY RULE REQUIREMENTS
14
DESIGN COMPARISON DIV.1 vs. DIV. 2
NOZZLE IN A CLYNDRICAL SHELL
Design Parameter Division 1 Division 2
. Nozzle Material SA-105, 2009 SA-105, 2009
Inside Diameter 18.0 in 18.0 in
Thickness 1.50 in 1.50 in
Allowable Stress @ 20,000 psi 21,200 psi
Design Condition
External Nozzle Projection 15.0 in 15.0 in
Corrosion Allowance 0.125 in 0.125 in
Weld Joint Efficiency 1.0 1.0
Nozzle Type Inset With no Internal Projection Inset With no Internal Projection
Reinforcing Pad 31.0 in 31.0 in
Outside Diameter
Reinforcing Pad 21.0 in 21.0 in
Inside Diameter
Reinforcing Pad 1.25 in 0.875 in
Thickness
15
DESIGN COMPARISON DIV.1 vs. DIV. 2
SPHERICAL SHELL
.
Design Parameter Division 1 Division 2
Material SA- 537Cl. 1, 2009 SA 537Cl. 1, 2009
Design Condition 500 psig @ 300F 500 psig @ 300F
Inside Diameter 180.0 in 180.0 in
Corrosion Allowance 0.125 in 0.125 in
Allowable Stress 19,700.00 psi 29,000 psi
@ Design Condition
Weld Efficiency 1.0 1.0
Shell Thickness UG- 27(d)(1) Paragraph 4.3.5
t = 1.147 in t = 0.780 in
t = 1.147 + 0.125 =1.272 in t = 0.780 = 0.125 = 0.905 in
Use t = 1.375 in Use t= 1.00 in
16
SECTION VIII, DIVISION 3
17
BACKGROUND OF DIV. 3
18
SOME CURRENT APPLICATIONS OF
DIV. 3
20
COMPOSITE WRAPPED PRESSURE
VESSELS
21
ADVANTAGES OF COMPOSITE
WRAPPED PRESSURE VESSELS
22
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS FOR HOOP
WRAPPED COMPOSITE VESSELS
23
LAMINATE PROCEDURE
QUALIFICATION TESTS
24
HYDROGEN SERVICE
26
SUMMARY
27