Review Project Rubric (10% of grade; 100 points)

Categories Excellent (A) Effective (B) Adequate (C) Developing (D)

Product Review Review vividly describes the experience; Review describes the experience in Review describes the experience in Review does not describe the
clearly presents writers criteria for detail; presents writers criteria for some detail; presents some criteria; experience in any detail; presents
evaluation; carefully and effectively evaluating; defines, explains, and defines, explains, and/or applies few or no criteria; inadequately
defines, explains, and applies each criterion applies each criterion some criteria defines, explains, or applies criteria

Experience Questions Thoroughly and thoughtfully answers all Thoroughly and thoughtfully answers Answers all questions while Does not answer all of the
questions. Gives explicit detail to help the all questions. Gives some detail to aid providing little to no detail about questions and uses little to no
reader gain knowledge of the project the audience. the experience to help the reader. details about the experience.
experience.

Product Production Worked as a team to design a product that Worked as a team to design a product Did not effectively work as a team Did not work as a team. Did not
is unique and interesting. Has potential to that is interesting. but still produced a unique product. develop a product that is new and
perform a function for the user. unique. Product potentially missing.

Style and Conventions Graceful language; exceptional control of Control of writing and citation Some control of standard writing Little control of standard writing
standard writing and citation conventions conventions for this audience and and/or citation conventions for this and/or citation conventions for this
appropriate to audience and genre; very genre; few errors dont significantly audience/genre; errors frequent audience and genre; frequent errors
few errors impede readability and/or impede readability significantly impede readability

Delivery Attractive, easy-to-read document meets Easy-to-read document meets format Document only somewhat easy to Document may not be easy to read
format/ length expectations (Or changes and length expectations read and/or meets most but not all or and meets few format and length
meet audience needs better) format and length expectations expectations

Post Write Reflection Thoughtfully explained revision choices and Explained revision choices and Explained some revision choices Explained few revision choices and
answered questions in detail; carefully answered questions in detail; reflected and answered questions answered some questions; minimal
reflected on the writing process and on the writing process and product. perfunctorily; reflected on the reflection on the writing process
product writing process and product and product

Comments:

HMN 2016 - 2017