Professional Documents
Culture Documents
College of Law
Diliman, Quezon City
CRIMINAL LAW I
OUTLINE BOOK I
Ra m o n S . E s g u e r r a
1 Semester, AY 2006-200;
st
A. Definition
1. Sources
Constitution (1987), Art. II, Sec. 5
Constitution (1987), Art VI, Sec. 1
CASES:
People v. Santiago, 43 Phil 124 (1922)
US v. Pablo, 35 Phil 94 (1916)
2. Limitations
Constitution (1987), Art. III, Secs, 1, 14111
2000 Revised Rules on Criminal Procedure, Rule 115
Civil Code, Art. 2
Visiting Forces Agreement
CASES:
Pesigan v, Angeles, 129 SCRA 174 (1984)
C. BASIC PRINCIPLES
CASES:
US v. Sweet, 1 Phil 18 (1901)
Liang iang vs. People 355 SCRA 125
I
2. Territoriality of Criminal Law
RPC, Art. 2
Constitution (1987), Art. 1
VFA, Art. V
(See Art. 163 & 166, RPC)
CASE:
US v. Ah Sing, 36 Phil 978 (1917)
Miquiabas v. Commanding General, 80 Phil 262 (1948)
CASES:
D. GENERAL PROVISIO~sS
RPC, Art. 1, 2
1:.
I FELONIES
A. FIC)"'JCOMP-M-FTED
I. Dolo,
RPC, Art. 3
a. Elements
b. Presumption of Criminal Intent
c. General and specific intent
d. Intent and motive
CASES:
People v. Temblor, 161 SCRA 623 (1988) People
v. Hassan, 157 SCRA 261 (1988) People v.
Delos Santos, 403 SCRA 153 (2003)
2
e. Mistake of Fact
C AS FES ~
US v. Ah Chong, 15 Phil 488 (1910)
People v. Oanis, 74 Phil 257 (1943)
2. Culpa
RPC, Arts. 3, 365
a. Elements
b. Distinguished from dolo
CASE:
People v. Buan, 22 SCRA 1383 (1968)
People vs. Pugay, 167 SCRA 439
1
C. C1 01'OES DEFINED AND PENALIZED BY SPECIAL LAWS
CASE:
Estrada v. Sandiganbayan 369 SCRA 394 (2001)
CASES:
Padilla v. Dizon, 158 SCRA 127 (1988)
Padilla Collet ol Appeals, 259 SCRA 402 (1997)
People v. Sa l ey, 291 SCRA 715 (1993)
People v. 'Dimon, 234 SCRA 555 (1994)
Ladonga v. People, 451 SCRA 673 (20015)
People v. Bustinera, 431 SCRA 284 (2004.)
Wrongful act
different from that intended
RPC, Art. 4(1)
CASE:
People v. Sabalones, 294 SCRA 751 (1988)
2 .
O m i s s i o n RPC, Arts. 116, 137, 208,
223, 2234,A
+, 275
Pres. Dec. Nos. 953, 1153
3 .
Proposal and Conspiracy
RPC, Arts. 8, 115, 136, 141, 186, 306, 340
CASES:
US v. Bautista, 6 Phil. 581 (1906)
People v. Vengco, 127 SCRA 242 (1984)
People v. Valdez, 159 SCRA 153 (1988)
People v. Escober, 157 SCRA 541 (1988)
People v. Elijorde, 306 SCRA 188 (1999)
People v. Fabro, 325 SCRA 285 (2000)
People v. Bello, 428 SCRA 388 (20.04) Li v.
People, 427 SCRA 217 (2001) People v.
Bagano, 375 SCRA 470 (2002) People v.
Bangcado, 346 SCRA 189 (2000) People v.
Ramos, 427 SCRA 299 (2004)
4. Attempt
RPC, Art. 6
CASES:
People v. Lamahang, 61 Phil 703 (1935)
People v. Dio, 130 SCRA 151 (1984)
People v. Trinidad, 169 SCRA 51 (1989)
People v. Campuhan, 329 SCRA 270 (2000)
People v. Listerio, 335 SCRA 40 (2000)
5 . Frustration
RPC, Art.6
CASES:
People v. Erinia, 50 Ph: ; !. 998 (1927)
People v. O-.i'La, -184 SCRA 105 (1990)
People v. Caballero, 400 SCRA 424 (2003)
6 . Consummation
RPC, Art. 6
CASES:
US v. Adiao, 38 Phil 754 4 (1955)
People v. Hernandez, 49 Phil 980 (1925)
D. Classification of Felonies
1. Grave
'2. Less Grave
3. Light Felonies
RPC, Art. 9
RPC, Art. 7
, 1
11 1 . CRIMINAL LIABILITY
A. How incurred
4
1. Commission of felony
1. Wrongful act different from what was intended
2. Impossible crimes
RPC, Art. 4
CASES:
U rba no v. IAC, 157 SCRA 1 ( 1998)
Intod v. CA, 215 SCRA 52 (1992)
Quinto vs. Andres, 453 SCRA 511 (2005)
People v. Valledor, 383 SCRA 653 (2001)
1. Justifying circumstances
RPC, Art. 11
CASES:
People v. Narvaez, 121 SCRA 389 (1983)
People v. Bohol st-Ca ba I lero, 61 SCRA 180 (1974)
People v. Alconga, 78 Phil 366 (1947)
People v- Sumicad, 56 Phil 643 (1932)
People v. Luague, 62 Phil 504 (1935)
People v. Dela Cruz, 61 Phil 344 (1935)
People v. Jaurigue, 76 Phil. 174 (1946) U~
v. Bumanglang, 14 Phil. 644 (1909) Toledo v.
People, 439 SCRA 94 (2004) People vs.
EnIfectana 381 SCRA 359 (2002) Cano v.
People 413 SCRA 92 (2003) Balunueco v. CA,
401 SCRA 76
People v. Dijan, 383 SCRA 15 (2002)
CASES:
People v. Deli a, 46 Phil 738 (1922)
People v. Oanis, 74 Phil 257 (1943)
Pomoy v. People, 439 SCRA 439 (2004)
People v. Ulep, 340 SCRA 688 (2000)
CASES:
People v. Beronilla, 96 Phil 566 (1955)
Tabuena v. Sandiaanbayan, 268 SCRA 332 (1997)
2. Exempting Circumstances
RPC, Art. 12
CASES:
In Re: M'Naghten, 8 Eng. Rep. 718 11
MINORITY
CASE:
People v. Doquena, 68 Phi: 580 (1939)
Jose v. People, 448 SCRA 116(2005)
Llane v. People, 438 SCRA 376 (200,S)
e. ACCIDENT
3. Mitiaatina Circumstances
RPC, Art. 13
INCOMPLETE JUSTIFICATION/EXEMPTION
UNDER 18 OR OVER 70 YEARS OF AGE
NO INTENTION TO COMMIT SO GRAVE A WRONG
CASES:
People v. Ural, 56 SCRA 138 (1974)
People v. Amit, 32 SCRA 95 (1970) People
v. Regato, 127 SCRS 287 (1984) People
v. Collet, 382 SCRA 43 (2002)
PASSION OR OBFUSCATION
CASES:
People v. Coronet, 17 SCRA 509 (1966)
People v. Pinta, 318 SCRA 270 (1999)
People v. Amaguin, 229 SCRA 166 (1994)
People v. Dulos, 237 SCRA 141 (1994)
Andrade v. People, 452 SCRA 685 (2005).
PLEA OF GUILT
PHYSICAL DEFECTS
ILLNESS
4. Aggravating
Circumstances
RPC, Art. 14
CASES:
People v. Antonio, 393 SCRA 169 (2002)
People v. Sueia, 373 SCRA 163 (2002)
People v. Mendoza, 327 SCRA 695 (2000)
CASES:
People v. Capalac, 1117 SCRA 874 (1082))
People v. Gapasin, 231 SCRA 728 (1994)
People v. Villamor, 373 SCRA 254 (2002)
L-
CASES:
People v. Jose, supra
People v. Desalisa, 229 SCRA 35 (1994)
People v. Silva, 387 SCRA 77 (2002)
Peoplev. Ancheta, 431 SCRA 42 (2004)
People v. Librando, 335 SCRA 232 (2000)
ON OCCASION OF A CALAMITY
AID OR ARMED MEN OR MEANS TO ENSURE IMPUNITY
RECIDIVISM
RPC, Art. 160
CASE:
People v. Molina, 336 SCRA 400 (2000)
People v. Dacillo, 427 SCRA 528 (2004)
R'-HiTERACION OR HABITUALITY
RPC, Arts, 62(5), 160
CASE:
People v. Gaorana, 289 SCRA 652 (1998)
People v. Villapando, 178 SCRA 341 (1989)
People v. Cajara, 341 SCRA 192 (2000)
9
CRAFT, FRAUD OR DISGUISE
TREACHERY
IGNOMINY
218 (1993)
10
SPECIAL AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCE / QUALIFYING
CASE:
k' )2000
People v. Balgos, 323 SCRA 3 2
7
i
People vs Ladjaalam, 340 SCRA 617 (2000)
5. Alternative Circumstances
RPC, Art. 15
RELATIONSHIP
CASE:
People v. Atop, 286 SCRA 157 (1998)
People v. Marcos, 349 SCRA 537 (2001)
INTOXICATION
a. Effect of Pardon
RPC, Art. 23
Rep. Act No. 8353
b. Absolutory Causes
RPC, Arts. 6(3), 7, 20, 16, 247, 280, 332 344
CASE:
People v. Veneracion, 249 SCRA 244 (1995)
IV. PERSONS CRIMINALLY LIABLE
1. Principals
RPC, Art. 17
a. by direct participation
CASES:
People v. Nunag, 173 SCRA 274 (1989)
People v. Dela ' Cerna, 21 SCRA 569 (1967)
People v. Dacillo, 427 SCRA 528 (2004)
b. by induction
c. b y i n d i s p e n s a b l e c o o p e r at i o n People v.
2. Accomplices
RPC, Art. 18
CASES:
People v. Mandolado, supra
People v. Doctolero. 193 SCRA 632 {1991)
People v. Roche, 330 SCRA 91 (2000)
People v. Pilola, 405 SCRA134
People v. Garcia, 373 SCRA 134 (2002')
1
3. Accessories
RPC, Arts. 1n.
Presidential Decree No. 1612
CASE:
People v. Talingdan, 84 SCRA 19 (1978)
People v. To!entinc), 380 SCRA 171 (2002)
People v. Mariano, 347 SCRA 109 (2000)
B. In Light Felonies
V. PENALTIES LTIES
A. General. Principles
CASES:
In Re: Kay Villegas Kami, 35 SCRA 429 (1970)
People v. Ferrer, 48 SCRA 382 (1972)
People v. Bracamonte, 257 SCRA 380
People v. Valdez, 304 SCRA 611 (11999)
2. Prospectivity; Exception
RPC, Arts. 21, 22
Civil Code, Art. 4
CASES:
People v. Gallo, 315 SCRA 461 0999)
People,,,-. Patalin, 311 SCRA 18-t (1999)
a. With reenactment
b. Without reenactment
CASE:
People v. Pimentel, supra
1. Principal Penalties
2. Accessory Penalties
1. Capital Punishment
Republic Act No. 9 13-.0 ~,-;ng, the imposition oft de-ath penalry"
Republic Act No. 7659
Republic Act No. 8177 and Implementing Rules a,-i.d Reg-ilations
Constitution (1987), Art. III, Sec. 19
RPC, Arts. 40, 47, 81-85
CASES:
People v. Echegaray, 257 SCRA 5,51 (11996)
Echegaray v. Secretary of justice, G.R. No. 132601,
Resolution dated 4 and 19 January 1999
301 SCRA 96
People v. Esparas, et al. 260 SCRA 539 (1996)
People v. Munoz, 170 SCRA 107 (1989)
2. Afflictive Penalties
RPC, Arts. 27, 41-42
a. Reclusion Perpetua
13
i. As Indivisible Penalty
CASE:
People v. Gatward, 267 SCRA 785 (1997)
People v. Ramirez, 356 SCRA 595 (2001)
ii. Di s ti ng ui s h f r o m L i fe I mp r i so nm e n t
b. Reclusion Temporal
c. Prision Mayor
3. Correctional Penalties
a. Prision Correcciona!
a. Arresto Mayor
RPC, Arts. 27, 39, 43, 44
4. Light Penalties
a. Arresto Menor
b. Public Censure
RPC, Arts. 27, 39, 44
a. Fine
b. Bond, to ke=p the peace RPC,
Arts. 25, 26, 35, 66
C. Accessory Penalties
RFC, Arls. 41-45
cr Temporary Absolute Disqualification;
2. Perpetual or Temporary Special Disqualification;
from Public Office, t y re Fight to Vote and be Voted for, t
' ;z? Right to Practice a Profession or Calling;
4. Civil Interdiction;
5. 1.-d mnh-tcat on or Confiscation oflnstruments or Proceeds of the
.-e . -anon
Offense
6. Payment of Costs
1. Generally
14
RPC, Arts. 28, 29, 46
CASE:
People v. Formigones, 87 Phil. 658 (1950)
CASE:
People v. Campuhan, supra
F. Special Rules
1. Complex Crimes
RPC, Art. 48
CASES:
People v. Escober, supra
People v. Hernandez, 99 Phil. 515 (1,9561.
People v. Geronimo, 100 Phil. 99 (1956)
Ponce Enrile v. Salazar, 186 SCRA 217 (1990)
People v. Tol~ng, 62 SCRA 17 (1975)
!`J`onteverda. v. People, 387 SCRA 196 (2002)
People v. Gonzalez, 359 SCRA 362 (20011)
-People v. Comadre, 431 SCRA 366 (2004)
People v. Delos Santos, 355 SCRA 415 (2001)
People v. Velasquez, 345 SCRA 728 (2000)
4. Impossible Crimes
RPC, Arts. 4(2), 59
15
6. Where the offender is below 18 years old
RPC, Art. 68
Presidential decree No. 603, Art. 192
CASE:
Mejorada v. Sandiganbayan, 151 SCRA 339 (1987)
CASES:
Dela Cruz v. CA, 265 SCRA 299 (1996)
People v. Campuhan, supra
People v. Saley, supra
2. E f f e c t s o f P r o b a t i o n L a w Presidential
Decree No. 968 (as amended)
CASES:,
Llamado v. CA, 174 SCRA 566 (1989)
Baia v. I'vIlartinez, 181 SCRA 459 (1990)
S
algado v. CA, 189 SCRA 304 (1990)
Office of the Court Administrator v. Librado,
260 SCRA 625 (1996)
A. Total Extinction
RPC, Arts. 89-93, 36
CASES:
I6
Monsanto v. Factoran, 170 SCRA 190 (1989)
Presidential Ad Hoc Fact-Finding Committee on
Behest Loans v. Desierto, 363 SCRA 489 (2001)
People v. Abungan, 341 SCRA 258 (2000)
Recebido v. People, 346 SCRA 881 (2000)
Del Castillo v. Torrecampo, 394 SCRA 221 (2002)
People v. Patricia 341 SCRA 464 (2000)
A. General Rule
RPC, Art. 100
Civil Code, Arts. 20, 1161, 2176, 2177
2000 Rules on Criminal Procedure, Rule 111
CASES-
Quinto v. Andres, supra
Chua v. CA 443 SCRA 142 (2004)
Basilio v. CA, 328 SCRA 341 (2000)
Philippine Rabbit v. People 427 SCRA 526 (2004)
B. Special Cases
1. State of Necessity
2. Irresistible Force, Uncontrollable Fear of Greater or Equal Injury
RPC, Art. 101
3. Innkeepers and Similar Persons
RPC, Art. 102
4. Subsidiary Liability of Other Persons
RPC, Art. 103
CASE.
Carpio v. Doroja, 180 SCRA 1 (1989)
i7