Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Program Evaluation
Name
Course
Date
Program Evaluation 2
Question 1
The logic model will prove as an easy way for the philanthropists to establish what the
nonprofit does and how it affects the community. The logic model is developed through several
steps. The logic model is often used as a tool for program planning. It is also used for the
implementation and performance management. The model defines how the program will
function and links the output of the theoretical assumptions and processes of the program1. The
i. Target population - Individuals who will benefit or gain from the program.
ii. Underlying assumptions - The theoretical basis of how the program will work. It involves
objectives.
Population resources
1
Frechtling, J. A. 2007. Logic Modeling Methods in Program Evaluation. Vol. 5. New York: Jossey-Bass Inc Pub. 10-
60
Program Evaluation 3
A decreasing rate
Increased of homelessness
services Provision of
homeless
The logic model guides evaluation as it details what the program will do and its
resources, and how they are related to the program. It also provides a means to make
Program Evaluation 4
assumptions about the project in an explicit manner. Specifically, gaining stakeholder agreement
means that they will support the specifics of the logic model. It is a way to ascertain program
effectiveness. Furthermore, some stakeholders would want to look at how the program operates
before they can support it2. It would ensure that the program meets their needs.
Question 2
apply several strategies to recruit, enroll, and retain sufficient numbers of ESL students and
adults for the comparison group to be used in the evaluation. Recruitment and retaining the
individuals for the comparison group will first begin by considering various variables to enroll
the participants. These includes the background, communication skills among the learners,
interpersonal qualities, training and supervision. These variables will be used to limit the number
of participants required for the comparison group and ensure that they are eligible. The pretest
group comprises of top scores in ESL. The post-test group is comprised of the second measure.
The control group are the participants who act as the standard for comparing if the ESL has any
impact. Furthermore, the pretest-posttest control group design will involve the XO notation. O is
an observation while X is the ESL program. R is defined as the subjects randomly assigned to
2
Frechtling, J. A. 2007. Logic Modeling Methods in Program Evaluation. Vol. 5. New York: Jossey-Bass Inc Pub. 10-
109
Program Evaluation 5
The input will involve the background which will consider their experience with English
in the past. Furthermore, the variable in regards to communication skills will look at how the
ESL program has affected the participants3. Interpersonal qualities will also be considered to
determine how the students interact, considering they are still learners of English. Finally,
training and supervision will look at how the program is carried out, and the mechanisms in pace
to ensure its effectiveness. The output is how the ELS program affects the learners. Finally, the
outcome is the advantage of the program or the arising benefits. A major pitfall arising during
the recruiting and retaining recruitment and retention of participants arises from characteristics
inherent in the sample. It would influence them not to the participant. The various issues that
influence them to decline participation include fear, being busy, apathy, suspicion, and
unpleasantness. In the case of busy participants, as would be the case with the adults, they should
be encouraged to make time for the study. On the other hand, the participants who decline to
participate due to privacy issues can be assured of the confidentiality of the study. Suspicion is
also dealt with by using professional and conversational tone. The unpleasant feelings can be
addressed by providing an opportunity for another attempt in future. Finally, issues of fear can
be resolved by carrying out the study based on the terms of the participant.
Question 3
A survey is an effective evaluation tool. The survey being created as an evaluation of the
activities of the Small Business Office of the National Institute of Health. The creation of the
survey will involve the representation stage. The survey seeks to look at the specific attributes of
the business owners who attend the monthly seminar. The first step entails choosing the target
3
Wholey, J. S., H. P. Hatry, and K. E. Newcomer. 2010. Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. Vol. 19. New
York: John Wiley & Sons. 49-151.
Program Evaluation 6
population. For example, the small businesses are the target population. The second step is the
sampling frame. It is where the specific participants are accessed from the larger target
population. The contact information will be used as part of the sampling frame4. The next sample
is accessing the sample. These are the businesses that are part of the survey. Specifically, a
proper sample will be obtained from the randomly picking seventy phone numbers from the
contact information recorded by the office. The next step entails choosing the respondents,
which comprise about 50 individuals who represent the businesses. Finally, the post-survey
adjustment is carried out5. It consists of 50 representative businesses. The survey questions that
would be posed to the participants would seek to determine the effectiveness of the program. An
example of survey question is; Does the seminar encourage repeat attendance? How has the
seminar been of benefit? The steps outlined will prove beneficial in creating a conclusive survey.
The validity and reliability of the data will be guaranteed by using contact information that is
valid (internal validity). Furthermore, the selection of participants will be random in nature. A
focus group will also be used comprised of a few businesses. It would ensure that the data of the
4
Frechtling, J. A. 2007. Logic Modeling Methods in Program Evaluation. Vol. 5. New York: Jossey-Bass Inc Pub. 10-
109
5
Wholey, J. S., H. P. Hatry, and K. E. Newcomer. 2010. Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. Vol. 19. New
York: John Wiley & Sons. 49-151.
Program Evaluation 7
References
Frechtling, J. A. 2007. Logic Modeling Methods in Program Evaluation. Vol. 5. New York: