FORMAT FOR THE PROPOSAL FOR FINANCE DIVISION

1. State/UT concerned Uttarakhand

2. Zone concerned in RW P-2
3. Proposal Construction of Silkyara Bend Tunnel from Km. 25.400 to Km. 51.00
of NH-134 (Old NH-94) of district Uttarkashi in the state of
Uttarakhand.
4. Existing carriageway width
(including length). Carriageway (in m) Length (in km)
3.75 25.6
5. Proposed Tunnel construction 4.851 km long /7.0m with 1.5m Paved Shoulder on both sides
with approach road of
carriageway width (including
shoulder width)
6. Funding under Plan/Non-Plan. Plan
7. Under which scheme. Chardham
8. Last work of original nature done New work
on the stretch.
9. Defect Liability Period, up-to 4 years
what date/year.
10. Type of maintenance work done N/A in view of para-8
last.
11. Year during which the above N/A
maintenance work was
completed.
12. Is the proposed work premature? No
13. If so, the reasons for the same. N/A
14. Defect Liability Period proposed 4 years
for the instant work.
15. Traffic on the stretch. 1100 PCU, based on the traffic census carried out in 2014-2015.
16. Whether being tolled or N/A
proposed to be tolled.
17. Length of the proposed stretch. 4.851 km (Including approach road 4.531 km long tunnel + 320 m
long approach road
18. Major/Minor structures being Minor Bridges: 1 no.(Reconstruction)
proposed for original Slab Culverts: 1 no. (New Construction)
work/repair on the stretch.
19. Total cost of the project. 1131.24 Crore
20. Phasing. Year Physical Financial
2017-18 13.2 % 149.47 Crore

2018-19 11.90 % 134.60 Crore

2019-20 30.90% 349.89 Crore

2020-21 44 % 497.27 Crore

21. Per Km. Cost of the project. N/A

22. Per Km. Cost of the road work. N/A
23. Per Km. Cost/cost of other N/A
structures on the stretch.
24. If cost is on the higher side, the Construction of Tunnel will provide all weather
reasons for the same. connectivity between Silkyara and Barkot without
compromising with nature. It will ease traffic flow and
provide smooth passage to destination. It will significantly
reduce time hence less consumption of fuel and carbon
emission.
25. Is LA/Utility shifting involved, if LA cost is included while there is no utility shifting is envisaged.
so, the details.
26. Whether feasibility report/DPR Yes
available.
27. The status of the adjoining N/A
stretch (including last treatment
thereof, length of the stretch,
year of completion of the
project).
28. Whether the stretch is identified. Chardham
under NHDP/NHIP/or some
other scheme.
29. If so, whether status of the N/A
proposal under NHDP indicated,
and file referred with
justification, with the approval of
DG (RD).
30. BOS (with all relevant details) N/A

31. Whether file seen by IFD earlier No

(page number of note portion).
32. If so, whether its N/A
queries/observations have been
duly responded to
33. Whether included in approved Yes
Annual Plan of the year.
34. Special features, if any, of the Construction of 4.531 Bi-directional Tunnel with Egress pass and
proposal. parallel ventilation system.