How can reason be translated into action?

Reason is always a part of our Lives... And Reason is Thinking and Thinking requires Brains. We use
Reason a lot in every aspects of our Lives,but it has no use without action. Whatever has purpose has to
do with action. Reason must have action.

If there were no intellect there would be no will?

This has something to do with thinking and acting. "Intellect" is associated with thinking and "will" is
with acting. If you don't think, you'll not be able to act for something. Through our ideas we're able to
create great things and give solutions to the necessities this world have. Scientists and inventors are
good examples of this. Just imagine how people would be able to survive with their constantly changing
needs if no one has to think of it. With that comes the will.. the will to act upon what they think.

Relate peace and freedom as necessary for the state?

A clear understanding of reasons for action in their justifying, motivating and explanatory functions is of
relevance to the philosophy of action, to ethics, political philosophy and the philosophy of law. The
essential issues about reasonswhat they are, and how they relate to human actionsare of wider
concern.

I think inspiration translates into action a lot more than we may give it credit for doing so. Look around,
just about everything you can see, touch, taste, listen to was once in the form of "inspiration" only.
Perhaps it's a little simplified way of looking at it, but when I hit send and my answer to this question
goes live on Quora, I'll have taken an inspiration and added action.

Peace is a certain quality of existence which has been sought after, yet seldom found in a long
enduring form, since time immemorial. In a behavioral sense, peace is generally understood to be a
lack of conflict and freedom from fear of violence between heterogeneous social groups. Throughout
history benevolent leaders have often exhibited a certain type of behavioral or political restraint,
which in turn has often resulted in the establishment of regional peace and/ or economic growth
through various forms of agreements and/ or peace treaties. Such behavioral restraint has often
resulted in the de-escalation of conflicts, or in multilateral or bilateral peace talks. The avoidance
of war or violent hostility is often the result of compromise, and is often initiated with thoughtful active
listening and communication, which may tend to enable a greater genuine mutual understanding.
In a psychological sense, peace is perhaps less well defined but at least of an equal value to, or of a
greater value than, "behavioral peace." Peaceful behavior has often been found to have been the
result of a certain type of a "peaceful inner disposition" on the part of some. Some have expressed
the belief that peace is a certain quality of inner tranquility which does not depend upon the
uncertainties of daily life for its existence.[1] The acquisition of such a "peaceful internal disposition"
would seem to possibly be a valuable asset, capable of assisting in the resolution of otherwise
seemingly irreconcilable competing interests.

Such individuals are sometimes known to de-escalate conflicts or to improve emotions through
compliments or generosity. Small gestures of generosity that are reciprocated may be followed with
even more gestures. Benevolent generosity can eventually become a pattern that may become a
lasting basis for improved relations. Peace talks often start without preconditions and preconceived
notions because they are more than just negotiating opportunities. They place attention on peace
itself, over and above what may have been previously perceived as the competing needs or interests
of separate individuals or parties, in a way which can sometimes derive unexpected, yet beneficial
results. Peace talks are sometimes also uniquely important learning opportunities for the individuals
or parties involved.

the ability to do as one wills and what one has the power to do; whereas liberty concerns the
absence of arbitrary restraints and takes into account the rights of all involved. As such, the exercise
of liberty is subject to capability and limited by the rights of others.