Professional Documents
Culture Documents
the Tucsons programs success and its significance to the students; simultaneously, the film
remains ambiguous on how to tackle societal questions of identity and identity politics, which
slightly weakens its case for the ethnic studies program.
Essay Outline
Summary
1. Rhetorical situation & reviews
a. Documentary about Tucson ethnic studies program
b. Urban Reviews Jose Garcia & UC Berkeleys Connie Wun
2. How main points/purposes conveyed
a. Use of interviews w/ students/participants, statistics, juxtaposition of both sides,
& live footage of ensuing events (press conferences, protests)
3. Perspectives of reviews
a. Garcia: pro ETHS & completely agree w/ film
b. Wun: more ambivalent; film does not take critical race & feminist analysis +
reifies state/institutions legitimacy while antagonizing it
4. Thesis & lens of reviews
a. (see above)
5. How do reviews back/help develop thesis
a. Both make observations necessary to assessing the film: pros v. cons
6. In 1997, community activism led the Tucson city council to set up a study committee to
look at ways of boosting Latino student achievement and reducing dropout rates. Based
on its findings, the school board unanimously voted to create what was then called the
Hispanic Studies Department (9:48 - 9:50)
Arg 2: Programs significance to students that move them to take action which shows programs
value
1. the relational ethic of In Lakech, you are my other me, along with history lessons
that connect the students to their indigenous past, the MAS program developed a sense of
belonging in the students. (Garcia 2)
2. The MAS teachers and directors strive to incorporate the community to the school by
inviting the students and their families to break bread in the school. This develops a sense
of belonging in the students through the programs practice of an ethic of authentic care
(Valenzuela, 1999). (Garcia 2)
3. The students, upon finding out that Horne was holding a press conference, marched to
the state building to protest these attacks. The students, teachers, and community
members risked arrest chanting, Whose classes? Our classes! inside the state building.
At the end of the school year, the students and teachers are seen reflecting on their
experience in MAS. Through the lingering sage smoke, Crystal reminds her peers that
despite MAS being outlawed, the struggle has not ended and that their generation needs
to continue la lucha. (Garcia 3)
4. They emphasize the importance of cultura, politics, and commitment to community and
social activismfactors that contributed to the transformation of students lives. (Wun
2)
5. In light of the ongoing attacks against ETHS and students of color at large, Crystals
assertion encourages ethnic studies programs and their supporters to re-center a political
and pedagogical project that challenges the racism of the US state, its institutions and
ideologies (Wun 3)
6. In the previous 11 years of my sons education, never did he come and come home and
talk to me about what he was learning in school. I cant get him to shut up about these
stuffs (22:05 - 22:15)
Arg 3: Fails to address how to resolve problem w/ identity; frames it as students v. state
1. Hornes oppositional stance towards MAS, as portrayed throughout the documentary, is
founded on a discourse of defending American values, morality, and civilization. Horne,
along with White allies, lobbied to shut down the program. (Garcia 2)
2. The films emphasis on the academic merits of MAS classes as evidence of the
programs legitimacy, overshadowed some of the more compelling scenes that included
students actively challenging the state. In those key moments, students are shown
becoming more disenchanted with public institutions, as they participate in a sit-in at City
Hall with police surrounding them, denounce the campaigns against ETHS as racist, and
express their demand to claim rights to their education. (Wun 3)
3. According to ethnic studies scholar Dylan Rodrguez (2012), the US state and its
institutions are predicated upon and reproduce the logic of white supremacy, settler
colonialism, chattel slavery, and ongoing forms of racial and gendered violence. The
films emphasis on the importance of institutional (e.g. school and legislative systems)
recognition unwittingly reifies the logic of the state and the dominant ideologies
embedded within it. Given Rodrguezs analysis of the state, the films narrative provides
a limited critique of the discourses surrounding the campaign to end ethnic studies
program. (Wun 3)
4. Instead of seeking to integrate or demonstrate that ETHS/MAS and its students are a
part of the fabric of America, supporters of ETHS may better serve the needs of students
of color by facilitating an abolitionist pedagogyone that does not try to ground its
claims for recognition in the U.S. state, but instead intends to disrupt the state and its
institutions, because they are purveyors of violence. (Wun 3)
5. Radio: The schools are turning these kids into angry young radicals, schools are
supposed to be the kids to think for themselves, not to indoctrinate them into left leaning
views of teachers, and Im speaking out because I think if the people get the facts I think
they will be outraged by this (35:53 - 36:06)
6. Curtis Agosto: They talked about my classroom in the National Review, which is a
conservative, very reputable conservative magazine, it was an online edition. So Im sure
theres people that dont like us, dont support, critical of us, all over the country. Theres
plenty of things said about me. Plenty of hurtful things (45:07 - 45:23)