Eurocode 3 for Dummies

The Opportunities and

Traps
a brief guide on element design to
EC3
Tim McCarthy
Email tim.mccarthy@umist.ac.uk

Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering

Slides available on the web

http://www2.umist.ac.uk/construction/staff/
mccarthy/index.htm
Follow the link from my home page
From 21 March 2003

21/03/2003 2

2003 Tim McCarthy 1

 Overview
Eurocode 3
n Current status
n Coverage
Pitfalls
n Major and minor
differences with
BS5950
Element Design
n Beams, Struts
Capacity comparisons

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 3

EC3 Current Status

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 4

2003 Tim McCarthy 2

 E-SCI News March 2003

21/03/2003 5

Eurocode terminilogy
EN EuroNorm
n mandatory standard
ENV EuroNorm Voluntaire
n You can use it if you wish
DD Draft for development
DC Draft for public comment
prEN
n Pre-
Pre-EuroNorm between DD and EN
21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 6

2003 Tim McCarthy 3

 EC3 Current Published Status
DD ENV 1993-
1993-1-1:1992 Eurocode 3. Design of
steel structures. General rules and rules for
buildings (together with United Kingdom
National Application Document)
DD ENV 1993-
1993-1-2:2001 Eurocode 3. Design of
steel structures. General rules. Structural fire
design (together with United Kingdom National
Application Document)
DD ENV 1993-
1993-1-3:2001 Eurocode 3. Design of
steel structures. General rules. Supplementary
rules for cold formed thin gauge members and
sheeting

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 7

Other ECs Published Status

prEN 1994-
1994-1-1:2002 Design of composite steel
and concrete structures. Part 1.1 General rules
and rules for buildings. Stage 49 Examination
Document
DD ENV 1998-
1998-3:1997 Eurocode 8: Design
provisions for earthquake resistance of
structures. Towers, masts and chimneys

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 8

2003 Tim McCarthy 4

 Potential pitfalls
Terminology
n Restricted vocabulary
Change in symbols
n More logical symbol name
conventions
n Lots of subscripts
Changes in values
n Young
Youngs Modulus etc
Multiple documents
n Need to consult more than
one part

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 9

Terminology
BS5950 EC3
Force Action
Capacity Resistance
n Mc n Mc,Rd
Design strength Yield strength
n py n fy
Dead load Permanent load
Live load Variable load
Wind load Another variable load

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 10

2003 Tim McCarthy 5

 Terminalogy
BS5950 in wonderland EC3
Words evolved over Vocabulary consistent
time with meaning
Inconsistent at times Consistent across all
No link with concrete Eurocodes
structural codes Easy to translate

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 11

Symbols
BS5950 Eurocode
Elastic Modulus Z Wel
Plastic Modulus S Wpl
Radius of r i
Gyration
Torsion constant J It
Warping constant H Iw

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 12

2003 Tim McCarthy 6

 Changes in Values
Young
Youngs Modulus Changes in load
n BS - 205000 N/mm
N/mm factors
n EC - 210000 N/mm
N/mm n BS 1.4Gk + 1.6 Qk
Shear modulus n EC 1.35Gk + 1.5 Qk
n BS 79000 N/mm
N/mm
n EC - 81000N/mm
81000N/mm Many extra load
combinations in EC
n Main variable action
n Secondary variable
action

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 13

Axes redefined in Eurocodes

Major axis is y-y
Vertical axis is z-z
X direction is along
the member

This is consistent with

most FE and Frame
analysis software
EC3 Definitions

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 14

2003 Tim McCarthy 7

 BS Section classification

= (275/py)0.5

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 15

prEN1993 Classification
Different
outstand
Different
= (235/fy)0.5

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 16

2003 Tim McCarthy 8

 Multiple documents
The DD ENV 1993:1-
1993:1-1 contained all the
information in one 300 page document.
It also contained the National Application
Document
prEN1993-
prEN1993-1-1 Contains member and
frame design but omits fasteners
prEN1993 must be read in conjunction
with the UK National Annex

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 17

Element Design
Beams
n Moment capacity/resistance
n Shear
n Deflections
Compression members z x
Lateral Torsional Buckling u
y

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 18

2003 Tim McCarthy 9

 Moment Resistance
BS5950 EC3
Class 1 and 2 Class 1 and 2
n M = p S
c y n M
c,Rd = fy W pl /M1
n
M1 = 1.05 in UK
Class 3 semi-compact Class 3
c,Rd = fy W el,min /M1
n M = p Z or n M
c y
Mc = pySeff
Class 4 slender Class 4
n M = p Z
n M
c,Rd = fy W eff,min /M1
c y eff
Low shear Low shear
n F < 60 % P
n V
Ed < 50% VplRd
v v

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 19

Shear Resistance
BS5950 EC3
Pv = 0.6 py Av Vpl,Rd = Av (fy/ 3)/
3)/M1
Shear area Shear area
n Av = tD n Av = A 2btf +(tw+2r)tf
n Approx = 1.04tD
Shear buckling if Shear buckling if
n 70
d/t > 70 n 72
hw/tw > 72

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 20

2003 Tim McCarthy 10

 Deflections
BS5950 EC3 ? EN1990
Serviceability LS Serviceability LS
n Imposed load only n Permanent action, 1
n Span/360 - brittle n Variable action, 2
n Span/200 - generally n Pre-camber, 0
Pre-

n max < L/ 250

n 2 < L / 350 brittle
n 2 < L / 300 generally

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 21

Deflections
BS5950 EC3 ? EN1990
Serviceability LS Serviceability LS
n Imposed load only n Permanent action, 1
n Span/360 - brittle n Variable action, 2
n Span/200 - generally n Pre-camber, 0
Pre-

n max < L/ 250

n 2 < L / 350 brittle
max = 1 + 2 - 0 n 2 < L / 300 generally
1 0
2 max

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 22

2003 Tim McCarthy 11

 Compression Members
Pc = Ag pc from Nb,Rd= A fy/M1
Tables 23 and 24 is a reduction factor
pc is a function of depends on
BS5950 requires a n ? non-
non-dimensional
large number of slenderness
tables n Perry-
Perry-Robertson
approach

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 23

Compression members
N b , Rd = a A f y M 1
1
[ ]
? = but ? 1
2 0.5
f + f 2
?

[
f = 0,5 1 + a ? 0,2 + ? ( ) 2
]
[
= a A f y Ncr ]0.5
= 1 , 1 = E f y
21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 24

2003 Tim McCarthy 12

 Compression members
N b, Rd = a A f y M 1

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 25

Example
UC 203x203x60 of grade S275 is axially loaded and
pinned at each end of its 6m length.
A = 76.4 cm
cm, flange thickness, tf = 14.2mm, radius of
gyration about minor axis, izz = 5.2 cm, depth, h =
209.6mm, width b = 205.8 h/b= h/b= 1.01 => H section
Table 3.1:
3.1: tf = 14.2mm < 40mm therefore fy=275N/mm
fy=275N/mm
for S275 grade
E = 210000 N/mmN/mm
Slenderness - zz= zz= 600/5.2 = 115 <180 OK
a=1.0, implies 1=(E/fy)0.5 = 86.8
( zz/ 1) a0.5= 115/86.8 = 1.324
?
21/03/2003 26

2003 Tim McCarthy 13

 0.38

1.32

21/03/2003 27

Example
UC 203x203x60 of grade S275 is axially
loaded and pinned at each end of its 6m
length.
Figure 6.3 factor, = 0.38
NbRd = 0.38*1.0*76.4*10
0.38*1.0*76.4*10*275/1.05
= 760kN

BS5950 786kN

21/03/2003 28

2003 Tim McCarthy 14

 But
EC loads are typically 5% lower than BS
Scaling the capacity by this figure gives:
EC3 = 760/0.95 = 800 kN
EC3 stronger than BS at 786 kN

21/03/2003 29

LTB BS5950:2000
Mx Mb/mLT and Mx Mcx
Mb = pb modulus
pb from LT
LT = uv
uv W
Class 1 & 2: W = 1.0

Class 1 & 2: Mb = pbSx

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 30

2003 Tim McCarthy 15

 LTB BS5950:2000
Mx Mb/mLT and Mx Mcx
Mb = pb modulus
pb from LT
LT = uv
uv W
Mb = pbSx

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 31

BS 5959 Table 18 mLT

When = 0
mLT = 0.6

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 32

2003 Tim McCarthy 16

 BS5950 - mLT for UDL

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 33

pb from Table 16

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 34

2003 Tim McCarthy 17

 1.0 For UB, UC
EC3 LTB
Same approach as for Compression
M b .Rd = LT wW pl . y f y / M 1
1
=
1.05
? LT
[
LT + LT LT
2
]
2 0 ,5

2
LT = 0,51+ LT (LT 0.2) + LT

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 35

EC3 LTB
2
LT = 0,51+ LT ( LT 0.2) + LT

LT = 0,34 for rolled UCsections W ply.fy
LT = 0,49 for rolled UB sections

The non-dimensional slenderness LT = M pl .Rd / M cr

2 EI z I w L2GI t
M cr = C1 + Where C1 results from the
L2 I z 2 EI z bending moment diagram

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 36

2003 Tim McCarthy 18

 EC3 LTB
Moment factor, C1 loaded between
restraints

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 37

EC3 LTB
Moment factor, C1, due to end moments

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 38

2003 Tim McCarthy 19

 Same curves as before!
M b .Rd = LT wW pl . y f y / M 1

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 39

Example
Uniform moment unbraced length 3m
UB 610x229x140 S275
BS Mb = 1100 kNm
EC3 MbRd = 960kNm
For comparison scale by 1/0.95
n MbRd scaled = 1010 kNm < than BS

21/03/2003 40

2003 Tim McCarthy 20

 Summary of LTB
BS5950 splits calculations between
strength and equivalent moment
EC3 combines equivalent moment and
section properties to give a reduction
factor
EC3 uses EXACT same buckling curves
for LTB and Strut buckling
EC3 look awful but is easily programmed
in a spreadsheet

21/03/2003 Manchester Centre for Civil & Construction Engineering 41

Conclusions
Eurocodes are not that difficult
They are just a little different
Rationalises terminology across materials
and countries
The EFTA region is 10 times bigger than
UK
Eurocodes are not going to go away this
time
21/03/2003 42

2003 Tim McCarthy 21

 Questions??
1. How quickly will the take up be in the
UK?
Ans:
Ans: It should be quicker than the
switch from BS449 to 5950 was since
both EC3 and BS5950 are limit states
codes. EC3 will become mandatory.
2. What does EC3 say about effective
lengths?
Ans:
Ans: The EC3 guidance is not as
helpful as BS5950 Table 22. EC3
gives the general approach for effective
lengths in frames which results in the
same values as Table 22

21/03/2003 43

Questions??
1. How is Europe progressing with
using EC3?
Ans:
Ans: The German speaking countries
have already adopted the DDENV as a
DIN. Benelux countries are well
advanced. The rest are planning the
implementation.
2. What
Whats in EC3 about sway, lambda
crit etc?
Ans:
Ans: There is a lengthy section in the
prEN on frame stability. On initial
viewing, this looks very like the
BS5950:2000 approach. See Section 5
of the prEN for the full details

21/03/2003 44

2003 Tim McCarthy 22