You are on page 1of 103

Improving Your Structural

Mechanics Simulations with


Release 14.0

1 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Structural Mechanics Themes

MAPDL/WB Integration
Physics coupling
Rotating machines
Listening to your
needs, we have
Composites & Fracture Mechanics
been able to identify
Application Customization
a number of themes
Thin structures modeling
which form the basis
Contact analysis
of our roadmap and
Performance guide our
Advanced Modeling developments
Geometry Handling

5 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
What will Release 14.0 bring you?

6 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Let’s now take a closer look at some topics

7 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
MAPDL/WB Integration

Finite Element Information Access within


ANSYS Mechanical

8 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Motivation

ANSYS Workbench is
originally a geometry
based tool. Many users
however also need to
control and access the
finite element
information.

9 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Reviewing Connections

Spot Welds

Connections created
internally at the
solution level are
available and can help
understand the results
Weak springs and MPC contacts
as generated by the solver
10 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,
2011
Selections of Nodes

Nodes can be grouped


into named selections
based on selection logic,
using locations or other
characteristics – or
manual selections
Box Selection Node Picking Lasso Selection

11 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Applying Loads and Orientations to Nodes

“Nodal orientation”
allows users to orient
nodes in an arbitrary
coordinate system.
Direct FE loads and
boundary conditions can
be applied to selections
of nodes.

Nodes are oriented in cylindrical system for loads and


boundary condition definitions
12 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,
2011
Results on Node Selections

Results are displayed on


elements for which all
Results with first layer of nodes are selected.
quads removed
Nodes named selections
allow to scope on specific
regions of the mesh or
remove undesired areas.

Results on quads layers only

13 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Restart and Direct FE Loads

Added after
initial solve
Analysis Settings tabular data:
No restart point is lost

Nodal Forces and Pressures objects can


be added to a restart analysis without
Second Load step causing the restart points to become
modified for restart
invalid.
Other loads can now be modified
without losing the restart points.
14 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,
2011
MAPDL/WB Integration

Linear Dynamics in ANSYS Mechanical

15 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Workbench and Mechanical enhancements

→MSUP Transient
Analysis supported
→Joint feature can now
be used in Harmonics,
Modal Superposition Transient
Random vibration
analysis
→Reaction Force &
Moment results is now
supported

Joints in Harmonic Reaction Forces in a


Analyses Harmonic Analyses

16 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Physics Coupling

Data Mapping

17 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Motivation

Exchange files are


frequently used to
transfer quantities from
one simulation to
another.

Efficient mapping of
point cloud data is
required to account for
misalignment, non
matching units or scaling
issues.

18 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Supported Data Types

New at R14.0

19 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Increased Accuracy

The smoothness of the


mapped data depends on
the density of the point
cloud.

Several weighting
Triangulation versus Kriging
options are available to
accommodate various
data quality.

20 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Validating the Mapped Data

Visual tools have


been implemented to
control how well the
data has been
mapped onto the
target structure
21 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,
2011
Importing Multiple Files

Multiple files can be


imported for
transient analyses or
to handle different
data to be mapped
on multiple bodies

22 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Rotating Machines

Studying Rotordynamics in ANSYS Mechanical

23 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Motivation

ANSYS Mechanical users


need to be able to quickly
create shaft geometries
as well as analyze
dynamic characteristics
of rotating systems

Industrial fan (Venti Oelde)

24 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Geometry Creation

Geometries can be
imported from a CAD
system or imported
from a simple text
file definition as used
in preliminary design

25 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Import/Export of Bearing Characteristics

ANSYS provides an
interface that allows
to import bearing
characteristics from
an external file

26 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Specific Solver Settings

Rotordynamics
analyses require a
number of advanced
controls:
→Damping
→Solver choice
→Coriolis effect

27 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Campbell Diagrams

Campbell diagrams
are used to identify
critical speeds of a
rotating shaft for a
given range of shaft
velocities

28 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Composites

Enhanced Analysis Workflow and Advanced


Failure Models for Composites

29 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Motivation

Efficient workflows
and in-depth analysis
tools are required to
model and
understand complex
composites structures

30 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Defining Material Properties

Composites material
require specific
definitions including
orthotropic
properties, as well as
some constants for
failure criteria (Tsai-
Wu, Puck, LaRc03/04,
Hashin)

31 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Manually Defining Layers on Simple Geometries

Users can define


simple layered
sections for a shell
body as well as define
thicknesses and
angles as parameters

32 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Defining Layers on Complex Geometries

For complex
geometries, the ANSYS
Courtesy of
TU Chemnitz Composite PrepPost
and GHOST
Bikes GmbH tool is used and layer
definitions are imported
in the assembly model
in ANSYS Mechanical.

33 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Investigating Composites Results

ANSYS Mechanical
supports layerwise
display of results.

ANSYS Composite
PrepPost offers
comprehensive
capabilities for global and
plywise failure analysis.
34 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,
2011
Advanced Failure Analysis

2D laminar Crack growth simulation


composite based on VCCT is
available to simulate
Initial crack
interfacial delamination.

Start of damage (layer 1)


Progressive damage is
suitable for determining
Progressed damage (layer 1)
the ultimate strength of
the composite (last-ply
failure analysis)
Progressed damage (layer 3)

35 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Customization

ANSYS Design Assessment

36 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Motivation

Many of you have


expressed the need for:
→Computing and
displaying specific
results
→Be able to achieve
more complex “User
defined results”

37 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
What is Design Assessment?

The Design Assessment


system enables the
selection and
combination of
upstream results and
the ability to optionally
further assess results
with customizable
scripts

38 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Expanded Result Access

DA + “Allow all
Available Results”
allows beam results
Modal=No Beam Results

Filtering of potentially invalid combinations can be suppressed to


enable greater user control. This allows the user to access results
not typically available in the base analysis.
39 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,
2011
Design Assessment for Advanced “User Defined
Results”

Design Assessment enable


users to extend user defined
results capabilities with:
→Expressions using
mathematical operators as
supported by Python
→Coordinate systems, Units
Systems
→Integration options
→Nodal, Element-Nodal &
Elemental result types
Script used to display scalar element data stored
in an external file →Import from external tables

40 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Thin Structures

Mesh Connections

41 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Motivation

In order to connect
meshes of different
surface parts so as to
merge nodes at
intersections, users do not
always want or cannot
merge the topologies at
the geometry level.
Mesh based connections
are required.

42 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Mesh Connections

Mesh connections work


at part level:
→As a post mesh
operation
→Base part mesh is
stored to allow for quick
changes in connections

43 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Modal Analyses Shows Proper
Connections of the Various Bodies

44 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Further Meshing Enhancements

45 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Virtual Topologies Interactive Editing

Virtual topologies are


handled more
Direct access to interactively through
operations from direct graphics
RMB menu
interaction rather than
tree objects.
User selects entities then
applies VT operations

46 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
VT Hard Vertex, Edge and Face Splits

Hard vertices can be


added at any location
on an edge or a face.

Hard vertices can then


be used to create face
splits from virtual
edges.

47 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Virtual Topologies Applications

Get swept mesh on


non-sweepable
bodies

Improve shell mesh quality


and orthogonality with VT
combinations
48 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,
2011
Contact Analysis

Rigid Body Dynamics

49 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Motivation

Many mechanisms and


assemblies have
components that
operate through
contact.

In order to maintain the


rapid turnaround for
RBD simulations, there
has been a subsequent
focus on improving
speed, accuracy and
reliability of the contact
capability.
50 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,
2011
Performance Improvements

The applicability,
Valve: 158 sec elapsed time robustness and
(2x speed up)
efficiency of the
contact has been
improved for speed
Piston: 9 sec elapsed
time (7.5x speed up)
and accuracy –
expect a typical 2-5x
speed-up
Transition and “jump”
prediction have been greatly
improved

51 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Contact Analysis

Flexible bodies

52 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Motivation

While already providing


leading edge
technology, ANSYS
continues to enhance
its ability to robustly
and efficiently solve
complex contact
problems

53 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Projected Contact

Regular contact Projection based

The Surface Projection


Based Contact provides
Smoother temperature results on a
more accurate results
multilayered structure (stresses, pressures,
temperatures) and is
now also available for
bonded MPC contacts

Improved pressure results with


surface projection
54 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,
2011
Contact accuracy and robustness

“Adjust to touch” causes


rigid body motion and
leaves a gap
Contact stabilization
technique dampens
relative motions
between the contact
and target surfaces
New contact for open contact
stabilization prevents
rigid motion

55 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Performance

Further benefits from GPU boards

56 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Motivation

Taking advantage of
the latest hardware
is mandatory to
solve your large
models.
A combination of
+ relatively new
technologies
provides a
breakthrough means
to reduce the time
to solution

57 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Distributed ANSYS Supports GPUs

2.1 MDOF,
Nonlinear
Structural
Analysis using
the Distributed
Sparse Solver

GPU Acceleration can now be used with Distributed ANSYS to


combine the speed of GPU technology and the power of
distributed ANSYS
58 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,
2011
Speed-up from GPU technology

Linux cluster : Each node


contains 12 Intel Xeon 5600-
series cores, 96 GB RAM,
NVIDIA Tesla M2070,
InfiniBand

Solder
balls
Results Courtesy of MicroConsult Engineering, GmbH

Mold
PCB
Solder Joint Benchmark - 4M
DOF, Creep Strain Analysis
59 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,
2011
Speed-up from multiple nodes with 1 GPU
board per node

8 nodes@
1 core,
2 nodes @ 8 GPU
1 node @
4 cores,
8 cores, 1 2 GPU
GPU
Solder
balls
Results Courtesy of MicroConsult Engineering, GmbH

Mold
PCB

60 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Advanced Modeling

Material Models

61 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Motivation

ANSYS provides a
comprehensive library
of advanced materials.

Some users however


need even more
advanced models to
include complex
nonlinear phenomena
in their simulations.

62 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Advanced Materials for Biomechanical
Applications
→Anisotropic Hyperelasticity plus
Viscoelasticity for strain rate effects

→Hyperelasticity coupled with Pore


Pressure element
‘Hydrocephalus’ analysis
Hyperelastic material with porous media
→Shape Memory Alloy enhanced with
superelasticity, Memory effect, New
Yield Function, Differentiated Moduli
(Austenite, Martensite)
→Holzapfel Model - Capture the
behavior of fiber-reinforced tissue
Stent modeling using shape memory alloys
63 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,
2011
Nonlinear materials support for coupled field elements

Coupled field-elements
for strongly coupled
thermo-mechanical
analysis now accounts
for plasticity induced
heat generation along
with friction effects

Friction Stir Welding including heat generation due to


friction and plastic deformation

64 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Advanced Modeling

Advanced Methods

66 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Motivation

The solver techniques


available from our
solutions allow to
model complex
phenomena.

In some cases, better or


different techniques are
required to improve the
accuracy or the
convergence of the
models.

67 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Advanced Nonlinear Methods

User can now perform:


→Buckling from a
Buckling of a pre-stressed
stiffened container
nonlinear prestressed
state with dead loads
(new subspace
eigensolver)

→3D rezoning for very


large deformations for a
Hot-Rolling Structural Steel wider range of materials
Analysis with 3-D Rezoning
and boundary
conditions.

68 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Analyzing Fasteners under Large Deformations

Bolt pretension does not


include large rotation
effects.
With release 14.0, you
can now use Joint Loads:
Pre-tension element - Significant →Lock joint at specific
bending stress with large rotation
load step
→Apply Pre-Tension or
Pre-Torque load
→use iterative PCG
solver for faster runtime
Joint Element - Stress appears
without significant bending
69 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,
2011
Coupled structures/acoustics simulations

Coupled problems are


modeled more
efficiently:
→Quadratic tetrahedral
acoustics elements
→New acoustics
sources
→Absorbing areas
→Enhanced PML
formulation
→ Near and far-field
parameters

70 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Moisture Diffusion

Moisture induces
hydroscopic stresses and
alters thermal stresses.
Coupled-field elements
allow to incorporate
moisture effects in
thermal, structural and
coupled simulations.

71 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Advanced Modeling

Explicit Analysis

72 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Motivation
Explicit formulations
extend the range of
problems a structural
engineer can solve.

Providing handling
capabilities similar to
implicit solutions
provides an easy
transition from implicit
to explicit.

73 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
A Common User Interface

Implicit and explicit


solutions share the
same user interface for
a shortened learning
Crimping curve and allow
straightforward data
exchange between
disciplines

74 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
New tetrahedral element

The new tetrahedral


element helps quickly
model complex
geometries for low
velocity applications
such as drop tests for
mobile phones or
Self Piercing Rivet nuclear equipments

75 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Fast Solutions Using 2-D Formulations

2D forming

Similarly to implicit
analyses, 2D plain
strain and
axisymmetric
Axisymmetric
bullet model
formulations provide
faster computation of
explicit solutions

76 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Geometry

Advances for Structural Engineers

77 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Motivation

With every release,


ANSYS improves the
quality of the geometry
tools available in
Workbench in order to
increase the quality of
the geometric data.

Ease of use is also


constantly improved to
provide more efficient
tools.

78 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Mid Surfacing Improvements

Selection tolerance is
available to handle face
pairs in case of
imperfect offsets.

Body thicknesses can be


displayed on the model.

79 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Usability Enhancements

Toolbars can be
customized for easy and
direct access to preferred
features and tools.

Hot keys are also


available for frequently
used operations.
80 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,
2011
SpaceClaim Direct Modeler

“Preview sharing” allow


to control topology
sharing before
transferring the model
into Workbench.

“Multi-face patch”
Regular patch option increases the
quality of repairs for
missing faces.

Multi-face patch

81 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Physics Coupling

System Optimization with Rigid Body Dynamics


and Simplorer co-simulation

82 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Motivation

Most mechanisms and


assemblies are managed
via control systems.
System simulation,
including the details of
the mechanism or
assembly, are needed in
order to improve
modeling accuracy,
fidelity and ultimately
system optimization.

83 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Linking Mechanical and Simplorer

Inputs and outputs are


defined as “pins” in the
Mechanical model and
connected to the
schematics of Simplorer

84 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Simulation Results

Force Applied on Pistons Rotational Displacement

Rotational Velocity

85 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Some Examples

Aircraft Landing
Gear

Robotic Arm Control

RBD model

Trace of arm
trajectory
Simplorer schematic of
hydraulic circuit and control
86 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,
2011
And there is much more…

87 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
…check the Release Notes!

88 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Think also of the “Technology Demonstration
Guide”

89 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Questions?

90 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Appendix

91 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Customization

Application Customization Toolkit

92 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Motivation

As a Mechanical User,
you may want to:
→ Customize menus
→Create new loads and
boundary conditions
→Create new types of
plots
→Reuse APDL scripts
without command
snippets

93 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
What is the Application Customization Toolkit?

The Application
CustomizationToolkit is
a tool that
facilitates customization
of ANSYS Mechanical.

It provides a way to
extend the features
offered by ANSYS
products.

94 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Toolbar Customization through XML Files

XML definition:
<load internalName="Convection on Blade" caption="Convection on Blade" icon="Convection"
issupport="false" isload="true">
<version>1</version>

<callbacks>
<onsolve>Convection_Blade_Computation</onsolve>
</callbacks>

<details>
<property internalName="Geometry" dataType="string" control="scoping"></property>
<property internalName="Thickness" caption="Thickness" dataType="string"
control="text"></property>
<property internalName="Film Coefficient" caption="Film Coefficient" dataType="string"
control="text"></property>
<property internalName="Ambient Temperature" caption="Ambient Temperature"
dataType="string" control="text"></property>

</details>
</load>

95 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Python Driven Loads and Boundary Conditions
Python script:
# Get the scoped geometry:
propGeo = result.GetDPropertyFromName("Geometry")
refIds = propGeo.Value

# Get the related mesh and create the component:


for refId in refIds:
meshRegion = mesh.MeshRegion(refId)
elementIds = meshRegion.Elements
eid = aap.mesh.element[elementIds[0]].Id
f.write("*get,ntyp,ELEM,"+eid.ToString()+",ATTR,TYPE\n")
f.write("esel,s,type,,ntyp \n cm,component,ELEM")

# Get properties from the details view:


propThick = load.GetDPropertyFromName("Thickness")
thickness = propThick.Value
propCoef = load.GetDPropertyFromName("Film Coefficient")
film_coefficient = propCoef.Value
propTemp = load.GetDPropertyFromName("Ambient Temperature")
temperature = propTemp.Value

# Insert the parameters for the APDL commands:


f.write("thickness="+thickness.ToString()+"\n")
f.write("film_coefficient="+film_coefficient.ToString()+"\n")
f.write("temperature="+temperature.ToString()+"\n")

# Reuse the legacy APDL macros:


f.write("/input,APDL_script_for_convection.inp\n")
96 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,
2011
Writing APDL Commands From the New Definition

! APDL_script_for_convection.inp

! Input parameters:
esel,s,type,,10
cm,component,ELEM
thickness = 1.1
film_coefficient = 120.
temperature = 22.

! Treatment:
/prep7
et,100,152
keyop,100,8,2.
et,1001,131
keyo,1001,3,2
sectype,1001,shell
secdata,thickness,10
secoff,mid
cmsel,s,component
emodif,all,type,1001
emodif,all,secnum,1001
type,100
esurf
fini
alls APDL
/solu
esel,s,type,,100
nsle
sf,all,conv,film_coefficient,temperature
alls
97 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,
WB Mechanical
2011
An Example: ACT driven Submodeling

Users simply select the


coarse model’s results file,
all APDL commands are
automatically created – no
more need for command
blocks!

98 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Advanced Modeling

Offshore Structures

99 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Global Offshore Structures
Global hydrodynamics and
Over the period of the design of an offshore structure – structural analyses
from Concept through FEED and Detailed Structural and
Equipment Design – there are needs for many different
analyses related to global structural design and integrity
and detailed component level analysis. To ensure delivery
timeliness, and reliability where costs of failure are so high,
there is considerable value in compatibility between the
respective tools. This is delivered by the ongoing
integration of ANSYS AQWA in Workbench and delivery of
enhanced capabilities in Mechanical/MAPDL for offshore
structures analysis.
Importantly, ANSYS Structural Mechanics products now
deliver the ability to conduct both global and detailed
analysis of offshore structures subjected to various wave
and environmental loadings.

Local joint flexibility analysis

100 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Further AQWA Integration in Workbench
for Multi-Body Wave Hydrodynamics
• Hydrodynamic Time Response system
enhancements include
– Fenders (similar to contact)
• Allows connections between 2 structures
or between a structure and a fixed point
– Articulations (similar to joints)

Offloading arm
represented with series
of typical articulations
101 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,
2011
Enhanced Environmental Conditions and
Cable Behavior in AQWA

• Introduction of multi-directional wave spectra


allows more realistic modelling of real wave
conditions, and is important for the accurate
simulation of moored vessels and offshore
platforms
– Almost any combination of wave spectra to
be modelled in the solver modules LIBRIUM,
DRIFT and the Hydrodynamic Time Response
system in Workbench
• To meet API standard (RP2SK), non-linear axial
stiffness can be used to define a mooring line
• Gaussian formulated wave spectrum now
available in the core solver and the
Hydrodynamic Time Response system

102 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Extended Wave Loading in Mechanical
and links to Regulatory Code Checks
Vessel Loading Transfer from

• Diffracted wave loading AQWA to Mechanical


Courtesy of Vuyk Engineering Rotterdam

– Provides simplified pressure loading from


Hydrodynamics Diffraction systems (AQWA)
onto MAPDL system
• Harmonic Wave Loading
– Regular wave loading now available for harmonic
response analyses
– ANSYS FATJACK (for beam joint fatigue of framed
structures) automatically reads the RST file data
for harmonic load cases
• ANSYS BEAMCHECK (for member checks on framed
structures) and ANSYS FATJACK now delivered with
Mechanical installation
– See Design Assessment for further information

103 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Coupling Mechanical with 3rd Party
Aeroelastic Tools for Offshore Wind
Turbine Modeling

• Aeroelastic coupling (for wind turbine support


structures)
– Sequential
• Allowing structural (ANSYS) and aeroelastic (3rd
party) analyses to be run independently
• Just use a provided MAPDL macro to write out
input data for the aeroelastic analysis
– Fully coupled
• Co-simulation of structural and aeroelastic tools
• Custom build of MAPDL required, with a macro to
manage the data availability from and to MAPDL
Images Courtesy of REpower Systems AG
104 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,
2011
Advanced Modeling

Brake Squeal

105 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
Motivation

Brake Squeal is a consistent


customer complaints and is
associated with high warranty
costs.

ANSYS provides the best


solution for such analyses,
including complex Eigen-
Methods to predict onset of
squeal, new state-of-the-art
linear methods and
parametric studies.

106 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,


2011
ANSYS Solution for Brake Squeal
• Provides for sliding • Complex Eigen solve
contact with friction • Animate: Complex
• No match mesh needed Mode Shape
• Supports higher order • Contact Status at Pads
• Automated Meshing elements

Mesh & Setup & Post


CAD
Connection solver Processing

Bi-Directional CAD • Automated Contact • Flexibility to use Linear • Root locus plots
Connectivity Detection & Non-linear solver • Correlation of modes
capabilities • List Strain energy per
Friction sensitivity study component per mode
• Physical prototyping time consuming and expensive
• Can
• Provide more Include
analysis Squeal
early and cycle
in the design
Contact damping
• Parametric Study by changing friction coefficient
• - Sliding velocity
• Run set of DOE’s
dependent Friction
• Reuse symmetric modes and just run un-
symmetric part
• Significant time reduction
107 © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. November 22,
2011

You might also like