Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Submitted by
Certificate
This is to certify that the report titled “ULTRA STEP-UP
DC-DC CONVERTER WITH REDUCED SWITCH
STRESS” is a bonafide record of the Mini Project done by
AKSHAY VISHNU (19152003) under our guidance towards
the partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of B.Tech.
Degree in Electrical & Electronics Engineering of the Cochin
University of Science & Technology.
Certificate
This is to certify that the report titled “ULTRA STEP-UP
DC-DC CONVERTER WITH REDUCED SWITCH
STRESS” is a bonafide record of the Mini Project done by
NIVED SOMAN (19152028) under our guidance towards the
partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of B.Tech.
Degree in Electrical & Electronics Engineering of the Cochin
University of Science & Technology.
Certificate
This is to certify that the report titled “ULTRA STEP-UP
DC-DC CONVERTER WITH REDUCED SWITCH
STRESS” is a bonafide record of the Mini Project done by
ATHIRA D.S (19152046) under our guidance towards the
partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of B.Tech.
Degree in Electrical & Electronics Engineering of the Cochin
University of Science & Technology.
Certificate
This is to certify that the report titled “ULTRA STEP-UP
DC-DC CONVERTER WITH REDUCED SWITCH
STRESS” is a bonafide record of the Mini Project done by
DRISHYA DINESH (19152048) under our guidance towards
the partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of B.Tech.
Degree in Electrical & Electronics Engineering of the Cochin
University of Science & Technology.
Certificate
This is to certify that the report titled “ULTRA STEP-UP
DC-DC CONVERTER WITH REDUCED SWITCH
STRESS” is a bonafide record of the Mini Project done by
SAPTHA BALAN K V (19152059) under our guidance
towards the partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of
B.Tech. Degree in Electrical & Electronics Engineering of the
Cochin University of Science & Technology.
Here we would also like to extend my sincere thanks to other staff of the
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, College of Engineering,
Thalassery and all our friends who have patiently extended all sorts of help for
accomplishing this undertaking.
ABSTRACT
High gain dc-dc converters are gaining importance due to the latest trends in
extracting power from renewable energies. The most commonly available renewable
energy resources are wind and solar. The voltage developed while tapping energy from
these sources are very low. Often the load requires larger than the voltage developed by
the renewable sources which necessitates a high gain DC-DC converter with moderate
duty ratio. Conventional boost converter cannot achieve ultra high voltage gain at
moderate duty ratio. The aim of designing engineers is to obtain converters with high gain
with moderate duty ratio, reduced switch stress, and cost. Here a single switch non
isolated dc-dc converter with capacitor-diode voltage multiplier topology is presented. A
30W prototype of the converter is designed.
CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF TABLES
CHAPTER NO. CONTENTS PAGE NO.
1 INTRODUCTION 01
2 PROPOSED CONVERTER 04
3 SIMULATION RESULTS 13
REQUIREMENTS 16
5 EXPRERIMENTAL SETUP 25
6 CONCLUSION 26
REFERENCES 27
APPENDIX 28
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE NO. FIGURE NAME PAGE NO.
CONVERTER IN CCM 7
CONVERTER 13
LOAD RESISTOR 14
MOSFET SWITCH 15
4.3 INDUCTOR 21
4.4 CAPACITOR 21
4.5 RESISTOR 22
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
By reducing the switch stress it is possible to use MOSFET switch with low drain
to source resistance. MOSFET with low RDS-ON can reduces the power dissipation and
correspondingly reduces the size of heat sink hence converter cost and size can be
reduced. Inductors are main energy storing and transferring component in a boost
converter. So the switching frequency must be a key factor for a converter. As the
switching frequency increases the size of the inductor is reduced and the converter
bulkiness can be reduced. But at higher switching frequency the switching loss will be
high. So a compromise has to be made between switching losses and inductor size.
Switching converters with transformer isolation can generate higher voltage from low-
level input voltage but the efficiency is reduced due to transformer leakage inductance,
and the size and cost proportionally increases. Converters with coupled inductor can also
increase the boost level and reduces the switch stress, and size but the coupling
coefficient cannot be ideal.
frequencies. Small off times cause a severe diode reverse-recovery current which will
increase the electromagnetic interference (EMI) levels [1].Lower switching frequency
causes higher ripple current and increases magnetic components. Moreover, an extreme
duty cycle is not desirable since no room is left for control to compensate changes in a
load or a line. Furthermore, a conventional high step-up boost converter requires a high-
current and voltage-rated MOSFET; hence, it will require a MOSFET with a higher
RDS−ON. The drawbacks of this are increased size, cost, and degradation of the overall
converter efficiency. In order to increase the conversion efficiency and voltage gain, a
number of high step-up converter topologies have been proposed. The cascade boost
converter in [1] can meet the requirements of supplying a high output voltage with a
relatively high efficiency. The major drawbacks of this solution are the complexity and
higher cost resulting from using two dc–dc converters. The two power switches in the
cascade converter must be synchronized to avoid the beat frequency, and the stability of
the converter is also a concern. Quadratic converters can provide large step-up voltage
conversion ratios; however, the switch voltage stress in quadratic converters is equal to
the output voltage. Thus, no advantage over the conventional boost converter is achieved.
Converters with coupled inductors can achieve a high step-up voltage gain , but their
efficiency is degraded due to the losses associated with leakage inductors. Moreover,
these converters require a high-voltage-rated switch and suffer from EMI problems.
Converters with an active-clamp circuit can effectively recycle the leakage energy and yet
reduce the main switch voltage stress. This can be achieved at the expense of circuit
complexity, as well as introducing extra losses related to the clamp circuit. The topologies
presented in [3] overcome the aforementioned drawbacks, but they present high
resonating currents through both the magnetizing inductance and the power switch. An
improved active clamp gives better performance than its active-clamp counterparts
presented in [3]. Topologies based on a capacitor–diode voltage multiplier can eliminate
the aforementioned drawbacks, reduce the size and cost, and increase the efficiency and
reliability . However, these topologies cannot provide ultrahigh voltage gains at moderate
duty cycles. Utilizing multiplier cells and inductor coupling can also result in high step-up
gain .However, cascading several voltage multiplier cells can significantly increase the
voltage gain without a high-duty cycle operation but at the expense of increased system
size and cost. The aforementioned and related drawbacks associated with existing high
step-up boost converters encourage a search for a high step-up converter topology which
enables the use ofa lower voltage rated and lower RDS−ON MOSFET inorder to provide
better efficiency by reducing both conduction and switching losses. One possible solution
for this problem is to use the voltage lift. These converters have higher voltage gains with
smaller ripples than the exiting conventional dc–dc step-up converters. Other advantages
include high power density, high efficiency, and cheap topology in a simple structure. In
this paper, a new single-switch non isolated dc–dc converter with high voltage transfer
gain and reduced semiconductor voltage stress is proposed. The proposed topology
utilizes a hybrid switched-capacitor technique for providing a high voltage gain.
CHAPTER 2
PROPOSED CONVERTER
2.1 CIRCUIT DIAGRAM
The converter proposed in [1] is shown in fig: 2.1 which can be viewed as a single
switch topology with capacitor diode voltage multiplier .The converter consists of one
active switch(S) which is a power MOSFET. At the input section there are two identical
inductors La ,Lb and a capacitor Cin also there are two identical diodes Di1 and Di2.The
output section of the converter is a capacitor diode voltage multiplier which consists of
two identical capacitors Ca,Cb and two identical diodes Da,Db. Also there is diode Dc a
filter capacitor Cf and Load resistance Ro. The converter operation can be described as
follows.
During the switch on period of the power switch(S) La ,Lb and Cin are charged in
parallel combination by source Vin, at the same time Ca and Cb discharges through
source and load in series combination until Vin is greater than Vo. During switch off
period the stored energy in La, Lb and Cin discharges the stored energy equally between
Ca and Cb through Da and Db. The converter has a voltage gain of around 12 and the
switch voltage is only one half of the output voltage during off condition.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Converter is operating in steady state.
In one switching cycle, Input voltage is purely dc.
All components are ideal(100% efficiency).
Capacitors are having small voltage ripple at switching frequency.
STAGE 1:
[t0, t1] [Fig. 2.2]: When the power switch Q is turned on, diodes D1,D2 and D3
are turned on simultaneously, while diodesDo1 andDo2 are turned off by the negative
voltage (VC1 −Vo) across them. The voltages across L1, L2, and C are the same, and it is
equal to the input voltage Vg. On the other hand, the voltage (Vo−Vg) is divided equally
between the two capacitors C1 and C2. Thus, in this stage, both C1 and C2 are charging
the load, while the input voltage Vg is charging capacitor C. At the end of this interval,
the switch Q is turned off, initiating the next subinterval.
STAGE 2:
[t1, Ts] [Fig2.3]: At the instant t1, switch Q is turned off; both diodes Do1 and
Do2 are turned on simultaneously, providing a path for the inductor currents iL1 and iL2.
DiodeD3 is reversed biased by the negative voltage (VC1 −Vo) across it, while D1 and
D2 are reversed biased by the negative voltage (−VC1 −VC)/2 across them. In this stage,
the two capacitors C1 and C2 are effectively in parallel; hence, they are being charged
equally. Note that, in this stage, the voltages across inductors L1 and L2 are also the
1
same, and it is equal to (VC −VC1). Consequently, they can be magnetically coupled
2
into a single magnetic core. As a consequence, the size, the cost, and the power loss of the
magnetic devices are greatly reduced, allowing higher power density as compared to
using two separate inductors.
VC =Vg (2.1)
1
VC1 =VC2 = (Vo −Vg) (2.2)
2
From Fig. 2.4, the volt–second balance principle of inductor L1 (or L2) gives the
following relations:
1
Ton*(Vg) = -Toff (Vo-V1)
2
1
Ton*(Vg) = -(T-Ton) (Vo-V1)
2
1
DT*(Vg) = -(T-DT)(Vo-V1)
2
1
DT*(Vg) = -T(1-D)(Vo-V1)
2
1
DVg +D(VC −VC1) =0 (2.3)
2
Where D=1−D is the normalized switch-off time. From (1)–(3), the input-to-
output voltage transfer ratio of the proposed converter can be determined as
Fig. 2.5 (a) Equivalent circuit in DCCM; Inductor current iL1 waveform:
(b) at the boundary of CCM/DCCM (c) in DCCM
Also let
2 2.47 106
Ap 1.05 1011 m 4 10.5mm4
0.6 1.05 3 10 0.25
6
From datasheet, a material of area product greater than the measured value is taken.
ie, E 20/10/15 EE is selected.
L 207.6 106
No. of turns, N
7.37 108
N=53.07
Step 4: To find Wire guage
Irms 0.208
Area of cross section of wire, a= 6.93 108 m 2
J 3 10 6
a=0.0463 mm2
from the datasheet a guage with area greater than the measured value is taken.
ie, SWG=30 with a=0.07791 mm 2
CHAPTER 3
SIMULATION RESULTS
3.1 SIMULATION DIAGRAM:
We have assumed a conversion ratio of 12. And the obtained waveform shows
that the amplitude is approximately 128V. Ie, Vo = 144±12% V.
.
3.4 VOLTAGE ACROSS SWITCH
The voltage across the swcitch MOSFET is obtained as shown. The magnitude of the
voltage is almost half the output voltage. This shows a reduced switch stress from other
topologies.
CHAPTER 4
The primary advantages are switching speeds that approach zero time and very
low forward voltage drop. The reverse recovery time of Schottky diodes provides
extremely fast recovery characteristics. What little reverse recovery time they exhibit is
The most common values for maximum average rectified current are 1 A, 2 A, 3
A and 10 A. We also carry Schottky rectifiers with maximum average rectified current up
to 400 A. Maximum reverse voltage can have a range from 8 V to 1200 V, with the most
common values being 30 V, 40 V, 60 V and 100 V.
Features:
Mechanical Characteristics:
• All External Surfaces Corrosion Resistant and Terminal Leads are Readily
Solderable
• Lead and Mounting Surface Temperature for Soldering Purposes: 260°C Max.
for 10 Seconds
Schottky rectifiers are ideal for output stages of switching power supplies. The very fast
switching speed of Schottky rectifiers allows them to be used in very high frequency
applications such as very low power signals and switching diode requirements of less
than 100 picoseconds. Other applications include power management circuits and other
various rectifier circuits.
4.1.3 PIC16F877A:
Working of PIC
Reset pin is the first pin of this controller,and is used to restart the system without
power off. It is an active low pin and kept high using a resistor across a pin and VCC. Pin
11,32,12,31, are power pins and connected to 5 volt and ground respectively.
The initialization of different ports and pins of the microcontroller chip in our
circuit is described below.
Memory Organisation
The data memory is partitioned into multiple banks which contain the general
purpose registers and special function registers. All implemented banks contains special
function registers,some frequently used special function registers from one bank may be
mirrored in another bank for cod reduction and quicker access.
The data EEPROM and flash program memory are readable and writtable during
normal operation over the entire VDD range,these operations take place on a single byte
for data EEPROM memory and a single word for program memory.
I/O Ports
Some ports for these i/o ports are multiplexed with an alternate function for the
peripheral features on the device.
PORT A AND THE TRISA REGISTER- Port A is a 16 bit wide bidirectional port the
corresponding data direction register is a TRISA .
PORTB AND THE TRISB REGISTER- PORTB is an 8-bit wide, bidirectional port.
PORT C AND THE TRISC REGISTER- PORTC is an 8 bit wide, bidirectional port.
PORT D AND THE TRISD REGISTER- PORTD is an 8-bit port with Schmitt Trigger
input buffers.
4.1.4 INDUCTOR=207.6 H
A capacitor is a two terminal passive electronic component that stores electric energy in
an electric field. Effect of a capacitor is known as capacitance. The energy can be
completely recovered by discharging the device. If discharged through a resistive device
the power given off as heat will come from the stored charge in the capacitor.
PIN
PIN FUNCTION DESCRIPTION
NO
IC 7805 Rating
and to stabilize frequencies for radio transmitters and receivers. The most common type
of piezoelectric resonator used is the quartz crystal, so oscillator circuits incorporating
them became known as crystal oscillators, but other piezoelectric materials including
polycrystalline ceramics are used in similar circuits.
4.2.1 MP LAB
MATLAB SIMULINK is used for the checking the accuracy of the circuit and
approximate output. Open loop simulation was done.
CHAPTER 5
EXPERIMENTAL SETUP
A 40-W experimental prototype of the proposed converter in Fig. 2.1 has been
built to confirm the theory and to validate the simulations results. The converter is
designed for a nominal voltage conversion ratio M = Vo/Vg = 120 V/10 V = 12 and with
fs= 40 kHz. The converter is simulated in MATLAB/Simulink environment to get a
regulated output voltage even though there are variations in load conditions.
5.1 RESULTS
The software and hardware results justifies that converter selected is optimum for the
design we considered. From the simulation result it is clear that the converter has higher
voltage gain at moderate duty ratio. Also the stress across the switch is only half the
ouput voltage. The proposed converter is also well suitable for higher power applications
since it allows the use of low-voltage high-performance semiconductor devices.
CHAPTER 6
CONCLUSION
A high step-up single-switch converter with high voltage gain and reduced switch
voltage stress has been proposed. Features of the proposed converters and their operating
principles have been discussed Compared to the previous single-switch high step-up
topologies, the proposed converters have a higher voltage gain (for D ≤0.82), as well as a
lower blocking voltage across the controlled switch which allows the utilization of a
MOSFET switch with a lower drain-to-source resistance. Therefore, the proposed
converters are a competitive alternative for practical applications where a high voltage
transfer gain is demanded, such as renewable energy systems, with a simple structure
and a high efficiency. Finally, the simulation and experimental results prove their
functionality and confirm the theoretical analysis presented.
FUTURE SCOPE:
The gain of converters can also be used by adding additional multiplier cells or
additional inductor cells.
REFERENCES
[1] Abbas A. Fardoun,Esam H. Ismail,”Ultra Step-Up DCDC Converter With
Reduced Switch Stress”, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 46, no. 4, Sep./Oct. 2010
[2] Sreehari G Nair, Reshma M, Kshemada Devi .V, Sheeja G, “High gain DC-DC
converter with load regulation”.
[3] Q. Zhao, F. Tao, and F. C. Lee, “High-efficiency, high step-up dc–dc converters,”
IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 65–73, Jan. 2003.
[4] M. Prudente, L. L. Pfitscher, G. Emmenderfer, E. F. Romaneli, and R. Gules,”
Voltage multiplier cells applied to non-isolated DC- DC converters” ,IEEE Trans.
Power Electron., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 871 -887, Mar. 2008
APPENDIX
DELAY PROGRAM:
#include<pic.h>
int main(void){
int count=0;
TRISB=0X00;
PORTB=0X00;
TRISC=0X00;
PORTC=0X00;
TMR0IF=0;
GIE=1;
PEIE=1;
TMR0IE=1;
T0CS=0;
PSA=0;
PS2=1;
PS1=1;
PS0=1;
TMR0IF=0;
TMR0=254;
while(1);
TMR0IF=0;
count++;
if(count==1)
RB0=~RB0;
RC0=~RC0;
if(count==2)
RB1=~RB1;
RC1=~RC1;
else if(count==2)
RB2=~RB2;
RC2=~RC2;
else if(count==3)
RB3=~RB3;
RC3=~RC3;
else if(count==4)
RB4=~RB4;
RC4=~RC4;
else if(count==5)
RB5=~RB5;
RC5=~RC5;
count=0;
TMR0=254;