Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mr. Acre
GAT 9C
29 February 2016
Gi - Rehman 1
The Cuboctahedron
As mathematician Paul Richard Halmos once uttered, “The only way to learn
whoever tackles the mentioned project to apply the skills they already know into something that
utilizes those abilities in order to single-handedly learn something more from it. It lets their mind
work on old gears to create something that extends from what is already known, which is needed
in a lot of areas. Not only that, with puzzles alike to the cuboctahedron, it enhances the brain’s
ability to recognize problems and fix them quicker. In this, many formulas and different
equations along with the use of basic constructions were used in order for the lengths and sides
of the cuboctahedron to be found. Jobs, such as the job of an architect or even a mathematician,
works the brain or uses techniques like so every single day in their work environment.
Completing everything that is required in this project can carve a simpler path for many to strive
Now, for the beginning of this project, the measure of one side of the overall cube was
given. Being assigned differently, the length for this essay soon became 19.2 units, with the units
free to determine. In the end, a one to one ratio was decided upon and the units used to measure
the entire project became centimeters. A cuboctahedron has a total of fourteen faces, eight
triangular ones and six square. It also has twenty-four edges and twelve vertices. Its volume can
be found in three different ways because of its unique structure. The intricate design of the
cuboctahedron assists in the understanding of various ways to calculate volume, along with
surface area, making it easier by applying skills that have already been installed into the brain.
Gi - Rehman 2
Figure 1 shows one face of the overall cube that can contain the cuboctahedron.
Because a cuboctahedron is technically a cube with its corners cut off, Figure 1
showcases it perfectly. The triangles in each corner represent the space that had been taken away
from the large cube in order to form the top face of a cuboctahedron. With one edge of the cube
being 19.2 cm, as decided, the legs of the triangle in Figure 1 easily becomes half of that, which
is 9.6 cm. Because that triangle is a right triangle and both legs are of the same length, it is a 45°
- 45° - 90° triangle. Doing the math of multiplying √2 to one of the legs helps in finding the
missing hypotenuse. This ends with the hypotenuse being 9.6√2 cm, and with that, all edges of
the cuboctahedron becomes 9.6√2 cm as all square and triangle faces of the cuboctahedron share
edges.
Gi - Rehman 3
In Figure 2, it reveals the side lengths, and the height, of one triangular face on the
cuboctahedron.
From Figure 1, each edge of the cuboctahedron face was revealed to be 9.6√2 cm.
Inserting that into Figure 2, the edges of the triangle is simply 9.6√2 cm. Now, to find the height
of one triangular face, split the equilateral triangle in half as done above. This creates the 30° -
60° - 90° triangle. Taking one side length and dividing it by two gives the bottom leg of the right
triangle; which is now 4.8√2 cm. Using the 30° - 60° - 90° method, multiply the bottom leg, or in
this case 4.8√2 cm, with √3, making it 4.8√6 cm. The height of one triangular face is 4.8√6 cm.
Gi - Rehman 4
Area (A) = ½ · base (b) · height (h) Formula for Area of a Triangle
Using the formula to finding the area of a triangle, substitute in the numbers for the base
and height of the triangle to end up with its area. The base of the face is 9.6√2 cm while the
height is 4.8√6 cm as found. Multiplying it out and simplifying as shown above, the area
From Figure 1, it showed how to find one edge of the cuboctahedron. No additional math was
needed as its height is the same as one of its edges because the face is a square.
To find the total surface area, the areas of the triangular and square faces must be added
together. Take the area of a triangular face and multiply it by how many triangular faces there are
while the area of the square face with how many square faces there are and then add up those
Taking the side of the square, which is 9.6√2 cm, and plugging it into the formula of the
area of a square gives 184.32 cm² as one square face’s area. Figure 5 shows how to do so.
In Figure 6, the steps used to find the total surface area are shown. The area of one
triangular face found from Figure 4 and the area of one square face found from Figure 5 must be
multiplied by the total amount of that type of face. In the case of the triangular faces, the area of
one face must be multiplied by eight as there are eight triangular faces. For the square faces, its
Gi - Rehman 6
area must be multiplied by six as there are six square faces in total. The areas then become
184.32√12 cm² and 1,105.92 cm² accordingly. The last step is adding those two measurements
together, producing the total surface area of the cuboctahedron. Because combining roots with
numbers that contain different roots or none at all is not possible, the total surface area stays as
Now as told in the introduction, the volume can be found differently. The first case is
with a large cube and cutting out the corners to form a cuboctahedron, the second case is the
combination of a rectangular prism with four rectangular pyramids on each long face, while the
third case is the combination of several tetrahedrons and square pyramids to form the end
cuboctahedron. With these three cases comes three separate methods to find the volume.
With case one, to find the volume of the cuboctahedron, the overall cube and chopped off
corners are used. In Figure 7, it demonstrates the measurements of the net of a corner that would
Gi - Rehman 7
be cut off from the cube. Folded together, the corner is obviously a triangular pyramid. When the
pyramid is placed upon the cuboctahedron, the lateral faces become the triangles that were cut
from the face of the cube and the base is the triangular face itself. That is why the base of the
pyramid is an equilateral triangle and the lateral faces are isosceles triangles.
Now, one of the congruent lengths becomes 9.6 cm for one of the lateral faces, which
was found when dividing one edge of the larger cube, 19.2 cm, in half. Considering that the
triangles on the cube were 45° - 45° - 90° triangles, the lateral faces are the same and the length
of the hypotenuse would have to be found by multiplying the leg to √2, which was done from
Figure 1. In the end, the length of 9.6√2 cm was found and that makes as the edges for the
Volume (V) = ⅓ · (A of b) · (h of
Formula for Volume of a Pyramid
Pyramid)
For the area of the pyramid’s base, instead of using the equilateral triangle, one of the
lateral faces was used instead. That makes the height of the pyramid 9.6 cm. Inserting it into the
area of a triangle formula, the area of the base becomes 46.08 cm². Using those numbers, with
the steps as shown in Figure 8, the volume of the pyramid ends up as 147.456 cm³.
Gi - Rehman 8
The cube’s base’s area is merely two of its lengths multiplied together, which is why, in
Figure 9, for the area of the base, it shows two numbers being multiplied instead. Multiplying it
In Figure 10, the steps taken to find the cuboctahedron’s volume are shown. In case one,
the volume of the cube is needed, along with eight times the volume of the pyramid. Once these
volumes are found, the pyramid volume multiplied by eight must be subtracted from the cube’s
volume. This was the final step needed to find the cubo’s volume.
To begin, finding the volume of the cuboctahedron using case one can be easily messed
up. There are many different steps that have to be completed. First, the volume of the pyramid
corners must be found, which is shown in Figure 8. Once the formula is completed, 147.456 cm³
Gi - Rehman 9
cm³ is the final volume. Next, the volume of the cube must be found. As shown in Figure 9, the
cube’s volume is 7,077.888 cm³. Then, the volume of the pyramid must be multiplied by 8,
which comes out to 1,179.648 cm³. Following Figure 10, the pyramid volume that was just found
should be subtracted from the cube’s volume. After this is complete, the volume of the
One measurement of the rectangular prism is 19.2 cm because that edge is the same
length as the cube overall. The other is 9.6√2 cm as that one is the same side as one of the
In Figure 13, as shown above, the math used to find the volume of the rectangular prism
is shown. The measurements from Figure 11 were plugged into the volume formula.
In Figure 12, the measurements for the rectangular pyramid are shown. The side
measures are 9.6√2 and 19.2. The height for the rectangular pyramid 4.8√2.
Gi - Rehman 11
Figure 14, above, shows the work needed to find the volume for the rectangular pyramid
in case two. The measurements from Figure 12 were placed into the volume formula in order to
Above, in Figure 15, the volume for the cuboctahedron is shown. The volume was found
Finding the volume of the cuboctahedron using the method of case two proved to be
fairly simple. First, the measurements of the sides of the rectangular pyramid and prism must be
found, as seen in Figures 11 and 12. The next step is to find the volume of the rectangular prism.
This is done by plugging in the measurements into the volume formula, as seen in Figure 13. The
end result is 3538.94 cm³. Now, the volume of the regular rectangular pyramid must be found.
Going along with Figure 14, the measurements found in Figure 12 are placed into the formula for
Gi - Rehman 12
the volume of a pyramid. This produces an answer of 589.824 cm³. The final step is to multiply
the rectangular pyramid volume by four and add it to the volume of the rectangular prism. This
can be found in Figure 15. Once all this is complete, the volume of the cubo is revealed to be
5898.24 cm³.
Above, in Figure 16, the measurements for the tetrahedron are shown. Because the
tetrahedron faces are congruent to the cuboctahedron triangular face, the side measurements are
the same. One edge was found to be 9.6√2 cm, as to which the height branched off to become
3.2√12 cm.
Gi - Rehman 13
Figure 8 showcases the volume of case three’s tetrahedron. Taking the area of the triangle
already found from Figure 2, plug that into the volume of a pyramid formula in Figure 8 along
with the height of the tetrahedron, which was 3.2√12 cm, as found from Figure 16. Multiplying it
all out and dividing by three ends up with 294.912 cm³ as the tetrahedron volume.
In Figure 17, the measurements of the pyramid were discovered. The height was found to
be 9.6 cm and the side measurement was 9.6√2 cm. As its base is the same as the square face of
the cuboctahedron, it was clear that all of case three’s pyramid edges were 9.6√2 cm. These
Gi - Rehman 14
measurements are useful to know as they will help in finding out the volume of the entire
Now, up above reveals how to find case three’s second pyramid, or otherwise known as a
square pyramid. The area of the base of the pyramid is the same as the square face from Figure 3
as they are practically the same thing. Plugging that, and the height of 9.6 cm that was found in
Figure 17, multiply it out and divide until the volume ends up becoming 589.824 cm³.
Case three’s method of finding volume shows to get the volume of both the tetrahedron
and the square pyramid. Now, because eight tetrahedrons and six square pyramids together
create the complete cuboctahedron once together, multiply the volume of the said shapes and
multiply by the mentioned number of how many times the shape is required to create the final
Gi - Rehman 15
structure. Once those are done, add the two end numbers, which ended as 5,898.24 cm³ in this
case, which is happily the same number as found from the other two cases.
Just like the other two cases, case three was just as simple. The only problem had been
that the amount of tetrahedrons and pyramids needed to form the cuboctahedron was unknown. It
was until it was figured out that the tetrahedrons are technically how many triangular faces there
are on the cuboctahedron and the pyramids are how many square faces there are. Once using the
newfound knowledge, the formula became easier to understand and simplify. Checking back on
all three, it is a relief that all three cases ended up with the same volume in the end.
Overall, the cuboctahedron was a long and tedious yet simple process. It was fairly easy
to understand, even though the way to creating it and completing it was a lengthy process.
Following formulas precisely was very important for this project to be successful. Also,
measurements needed to be close to perfect for the building of the cases. Many obstacles were
faced in both the math and the building of the cuboctahedron. Simple mathematical errors, like
multiplying or adding the wrong number, could mess up the entire answers. Another essential
part of the math process was the formulas. If a formula was not followed correctly, the answer
would not be correct. Challenges in the building process included measurements and lack of
paper. When measuring the paper, the ruler would move slightly. This caused some of the
measurements not to be exact. Another issue was the lack of paper. Since the given length was
scaled to a 1:1 ratio, some of the paper did not fit the entire length of a side. This issue required
compromises.
Even using three different methods, the overall volume always proved to be the same.
This was due to the fact that the same measurement given in the beginning of the project was
used throughout the entire project. Also, the three methods all produce a cuboctahedron. As long
Gi - Rehman 16
as the correct measurement and formulas were used, the volume of the cuboctahedron was the
same.
All in all, the cuboctahedron has been an insightful experience. This project has helped us
understand volume more. It used concepts we already knew and applied them in a more
challenging way, which enhances our abilities in finding out volume and surface area. This
project proved as helpful in expanding what we already know and teaching us something a little
bit different.