1) Open the Clustering WB tool and set the weight for WP Sales R to 100% on the Review/Set Weights tab.
2) Select the single attribute "Clima" and set the number of performance groups to 4.
3) Check the measure "WP Use Bang" and sort the results on the PoC Analysis tab, which shows the highest stores in the "A" group for WP Sales R but incorrectly places the highest stores in the "D" group for the "WP Perf Group (Bang!)" measure.
1) Open the Clustering WB tool and set the weight for WP Sales R to 100% on the Review/Set Weights tab.
2) Select the single attribute "Clima" and set the number of performance groups to 4.
3) Check the measure "WP Use Bang" and sort the results on the PoC Analysis tab, which shows the highest stores in the "A" group for WP Sales R but incorrectly places the highest stores in the "D" group for the "WP Perf Group (Bang!)" measure.
1) Open the Clustering WB tool and set the weight for WP Sales R to 100% on the Review/Set Weights tab.
2) Select the single attribute "Clima" and set the number of performance groups to 4.
3) Check the measure "WP Use Bang" and sort the results on the PoC Analysis tab, which shows the highest stores in the "A" group for WP Sales R but incorrectly places the highest stores in the "D" group for the "WP Perf Group (Bang!)" measure.
1) Open Clustering WB, and use 100% for WP Weight Sales R on Review/Set Weights tab:
2) Use just one atribute: “Clima”, on 2. Select Cluster Attributes:
3) Check the measure “WP Use Bang”, and set 4 as number of Perf Groups:
4) Go to PoC Analysis Tab and sort descending the column WP Sales R.
The column WP Perf Group (Breakpoint) seems to be OK, as the highest stores are on the “A” group. The problem is with the “WP Perf Group (Bang!)”, as it is considering the highest stores as “D”, that should be the lowest selling stores.
5) As we are using “Bang!”, the resulting clusters (last column) uses the Bang ranking and seems to be wrong: