Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Liquid Liquid Extraction Experiment
Liquid Liquid Extraction Experiment
Abstract/summary
1
2. Introduction
The basic principle behind extraction involves the contacting of a solution with another
solvent that is immiscible with the original. The solvent is also soluble with a specific solute
contained in the solution. Two phases are formed after the addition of the solvent, due to the
differences in densities. The solvent is chosen so that the solute in the solution has more affinity
toward the added solvent. Therefore mass transfer of the solute from the solution to the solvent
occurs. Further separation of the extracted solute and the solvent will be necessary. However,
these separation costs may be desirable in contrast to distillation and other separation processes
for situations where extraction is applicable.
A general extraction column has two input stream and two output streams. The input
streams consist of a solution feed at the top containing the solute to be extracted and a solvent
feed at the bottom which extracts the solute from the solution. The solvent containing the
extracted solute leaves the top of the column and is referred to as the extract stream. The solution
exits the bottom of the column containing only small amounts of solute and is known as the
raffinate. Further separation of the output streams may be required through other separation
processes
2
Flow sheet
3
3. Aims/Objectives
4
4. Theory
In liquid-liquid extraction, two phases must be brought into contact to permit transfer of
material and then be separated. Extraction equipment may be operated batch wise or continuous.
The extract is the layer of solvent plus extracted solute and the raffinate is the layer from which
solute has been removed. The extract may be lighter or heavier than the raffinate, and so the
extract may be shown coming from top of the equipment in some cases and from the bottom in
others. The operation may of course be repeated if more than one contact is required, but when
the quantities involved are large and several contacts are needed, continuous flow becomes
economical.
In dilute solutions at equilibrium, the concentration of the solute in the two phases is called
the distribution coefficient or distribution constant ‘K’.
K=Y/X
Where the Y and X are the concentrations of the solute in the extract and the raffinate phases
respectively. The distribution coefficient can also be given as the weight fraction of the solute in
the two phases in equilibrium contact:
K’=y*/x
Where y* is the weight fraction of the solute in the extract and x is the weight fraction of the
solute in the raffinate.
The rate at which a soluble component is transferred from one solvent to another will be
dependent, among other things, on the area of the interface between the two immiscible liquids.
Therefore it is very advantageous for this interface to be formed by droplets and films, the
situation being analogous to that existing in packed distillation columns.
5
The theory for the system Trichloroethylene-Propionic acid-Water is as follows:
Let Vw : Water flow rate, lt/s
Mass Balance:
Propionic acid extracted from the organic phase (raffinate).
= Vo (X1-X2) (8.1.1)
Therefore theoretically,
Vo (X1-X2) = Vw (Y1 -0) (8.1.3)
Where X1* is the concentration in the organic phase which would be in equilibrium with
concentration Y1 in the aqueous phase. The equilibrium values can be found using the
6
5. Apparatus
Apparatus:
Liquid-liquid extraction column
Water pump
Separator funnel
Burette
conical flask
volumetric flask
Reagents:
7
6. Procedure
Experiment A
Experiment B
1. Add 50mL of water, 50mL of organic solvent and 1mL of propanoic acid into a conical
flask and shake it well.
2. Repeat step 1 with 1.5 and 2 mL of propanoic acid.
3. It will form two layers and take 10mL from each upper and bottom layer.
4. Add 3 drops of phenophtalein into each sample.
5. Titrate each sample with 0.1 M and 0.025 M of naOH.
8
7. Result
EXPERIMENT A
EXPERIMENT B
Diameter = 50 mm
9
8. Calculations
Formula:
K = Y/X
1. M1V1 = M2V2
V1 – volume of NaOH
4. K = Y1/X*
10
6. Packing dimension: length = 1.2 m
Diameter = 50 mm
= 2.36×10-3 m3
= 2.36 L
11
Finding the distribution coefficient:
K = Y/X
= 1.28 M/0.17 M
= 7.53
2. 1.5 ml of propionic acid
Upper (Y): bottom (X)
M1V1 = M2V2 M1V1 = M2V2
(0.1) (0.027) = M2 (0.0015) (0.1) (0.0063) = M2 (0.0015)
M2 = 1.80 M M2 = 0.42 M
K = Y/X
= 1.80 M/0.42 M
= 4.29
3. 2.0 ml of propionic acid
Upper (Y): bottom (X)
M1V1 = M2V2 M1V1 = M2V2
(0.1) (0.0277) = M2 (0.002) (0.1) (0.0076) = M2 (0.002)
M2 = 1.385 M M2 = 0.38 M
K = Y/X
= 1.385 M/0.38 M
= 3.64
12
For 0.025 M of NaOH
K = Y/X
= 0.9475 M/0.215 M
= 4.41
2. 1.5 ml of propionic acid
Upper (Y): bottom (X)
M1V1 = M2V2 M1V1 = M2V2
(0.025) (0.0482) = M2 (0.0015) (0.1) (0.00265) = M2 (0.0015)
M2 = 0.803 M M2 = 0.44 M
K = Y/X
= 0.803 M/0.44 M
= 1.825
3. 2.0 ml of propionic acid
Upper (Y): bottom (X)
M1V1 = M2V2 M1V1 = M2V2
(0.025) (0.1378) = M2 (0.002) (0.1) (0.0293) = M2 (0.002)
M2 = 1.723 M M2 = 0.366 M
K = Y/X
= 1.723 M/0.366 M
= 4.71
13
Finding the mass transfer coefficient:
Raffinate:
M1V1 = M2V2
(0.1)(0.0013) = M2 (0.01)
Feed:
M1V1 = M2V2
(0.1)(0.0001) = M2 (0.01)
Extract:
M1V1 = M2V2
(0.1)(0.0001) = M2 (0.01)
= 0.0003 mol/min
X2 = 0.012 M
14
Log mean driving force= (ΔX1-ΔX2) / ln (ΔX1/ΔX2)
ΔX1 = (X2-0)
= 0.012 M
X* = Y1/K
= 0.001/7.53
= 0.000133 M
ΔX2= (X1-X*1)
= ( 0.013 M - 0.000133M)
= 0.0129
= 0.0124
= 0.0003 mol/min
2.36 L × 0.0124
= 0.0102 mol/L.min
= 0.0102M/min
= 0.0102 kg/min
15
For 0.025 M of NaOH
Raffinate:
M1V1 = M2V2
(0.025)(0.001) = M2 (0.01)
Feed:
M1V1 = M2V2
(0.025)(0.0006) = M2 (0.01)
Extract:
M1V1 = M2V2
(0.025)(0.0004) = M2 (0.01)
= 0.0003 mol/min
X2 = 0.0015 M
16
Log mean driving force= (ΔX1-ΔX2) / ln (ΔX1/ΔX2)
ΔX1 = (X2-0)
= 0.0015 M
X* = Y1/K
= 0.001/4.41
= 0.000227 M
ΔX2= (X1-X*1)
= (0.0025M - 0.000227M)
= 0.002273
= 0.00186
= 0.0003 mol/min
2.36 L × 0.00186
= 0.068 mol/L.min
= 0.068 M/min
= 0.068 kg/min
17
9. Discussions
In this experiment, we want to determine the distribution of coefficient and to determine the
mass transfer coefficient. This experiment is based on the solubility, the solvent is also soluble
with a specific solute contained in the solution, and this is the separation of a substance from a
mixture by preferentially dissolving the substance in a suitable solvent.
For the first experiment, which is to determine the distribution coefficient, we used
titration method from the upper (Y) and bottom (X) layer sample. By titration with 0.1M, the
values are 7.53 in 1.0 ml of propionic acid, 4.29 in 1.5 ml propionic acid and 3.64 in 2 ml
propionic acid. While the value for distribution coefficients by titration with 0.025M are 4.41 in
1.0 ml of propionic acid, 1.825 in 1.5 ml propionic acid and 4.71 in 2 ml propionic acid.
For the second experiment, which is to determine the mass transfer coefficient, we used
the liquid-liquid extraction column to get the feed, raffinate and extract solution. The samples
then were titrated with 0.1M NaOH and 0.025M NaOH. The mass transfer coefficient value
when titrated with 0.1M NaOH is 0.0102 kg/min while the mass transfer coefficient value when
titrated with 0.025M NaOH is 0.068 kg/min.
From the result in the first experiment, if titrated with 0.1M NaOH, it shows that the
value of distribution coefficient decrease as the volume of propionic acid increase. Meanwhile, if
titrated with 0.024M NaOH, the value of distribution coefficient firstly decrease then increase
back, this might be of the errors during titration. The value of distribution coefficient should
decrease as the volume of propionic acid increase.
Result for the second experiment shows the increase of mass transfer rate as the
concentration of NaOH decrease. So, here we say that the mass transfer rate will differ as the
concentration of NaOH increase.
The value from this experiment might be different with the actual. This maybe because of
several error occur during the experiment progress. The most common error is the position of the
eye during taking the volume value at the burette, the eye position should be straight to the scale
and must be perpendicular to the meniscus.
18
We choose pinkish-purple color for the color indicator during titration, but to get all the
same color might be hard enough to identify. As the color is not constant, the value of mass
transfer coefficient and distribution coefficient will be different from the actual. The color
indicates that the NaOH is at equilibrium with the sample solution.
The differences of the experiment result from the actual result might also caused by the
oil emission and impurities at the beaker, conical flask or burette. To avoid the error, the
equipment or apparatus we use must be in clean condition.
The concentration of propionic acid in raffinate is more than in extract. The concentration
of propionic acid should more in extract than in raffinate, this might be the extraction process
does not occur efficiently. More time needed to extract the solution.
Moreover, the experiment should be repeated at least 3 times to get the accurate values
and the mistake during the experiment progress can be identified.
19
10. Conclusion
As a conclusion:
The value for distribution coefficient can be determine by titration with 0.1M and the
values are, 7.53 in 1.0ml of propionic acid, 4.29 in 1.5ml propionic acid and 3.64 in 2ml
propionic acid. While the value for distribution coefficients by titration with 0.025M are
4.41 in 1.0 ml of propionic acid, 1.825 in 1.5 ml propionic acid and 4.71 in 2 ml
propionic acid.
The value of mass transfer coefficient from liquid-liquid extraction are; 0.0102 kg/min if
titrated with 0.1M NaOH and 0.068 kg/min if titrated with 0.025M NaOH.
20
11. Recommendations
Use clean apparatus, if not clean the apparatus using distilled water
The eye position should be perpendicular to the meniscus and the scale.
Repeat the experiment at least 3 times to get accurate values and to make comparisons.
Titration should be repeat several times to get the average values.
Used magnetic stirrer during titration.
Make sure the changes of color should be constant in every titration.
12. References
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid-liquid_extraction
http://rothfus.cheme.cmu.edu/uolab/lle/projects/t8_f00/t8_f00.pdf
http://www.scribd.com/doc/5552507/3-Liquid-Liquid-Extraction
http://www.scribd.com/doc/7009722/Liquid-Liquid-Extraction
Perry, R.H., and D. Green, Perry’s Chemical Engineering Handbook, 6th edition,
McGraw-Hill, 1984.
Bennett, C. O., and J. E. Myers, Momentum, Heat and Mass Transfer, 3rd edition,
McGraw-Hill, 1983.
Sinnott, R.K., J. M. Coulson, and J. F. Richardson, An Introduction to Chemical
Engineering Design, 1st edition, Pergamon Press, 1983.
21
13. Appendices
22