You are on page 1of 6

5/5/2018 part1_06

VI. The Disintegration of the Sultanate


*The First Afghan Kings* == *The Rise of Regional Kingdoms*

[[76]] IN THE century that intervened between the death of the last of the
Tughluq kings in 1413 and the emergence of a new Turkish power, the Mughals, in
the early years of the sixteenth century, two main processes can be seen at work in
Muslim India. One is the disintegration of the power of the Delhi Sultanate; the
other, and complementary to it, is the rise of independent regional Muslim
kingdoms. The centralizing authority of the Delhi sultan that had been asserted with
varying success since the time of Muhammad Ghuri (d.1206) ceased to be a
paramount factor in Indian political life, and its place was taken by kingdoms, many
of which were centers of great artistic achievement, and some of which were better
organized and more powerful than Delhi.

This did not mean, however, that the Delhi Sultanate passed away; on the
contrary, as a symbol of prestige and a source of wealth it remained the great prize
for which factions struggled and fought. The group that succeeded to the sultanate
on the death of Mahmud Tughluq are known as the Sayyids, although there is little
evidence that, as their name would suggest, they were descendants of the Prophet.
The first of them, Khizr Khan, considered himself to be the viceroy of Timur's son,
which in itself was an indication of the change that had come over the sultanate.
Three more members of the family continued to maintain some show of authority
until the last of the line, Alam Shah, retired from the turmoil of Delhi to the relative
peace of the provincial city of Badaun in 1448. It was against this background of
confusion that the wazir and nobles turned to Buhlul Lodi, the able governor of
Sirhind, and invited him to come to Delhi. Buhlul responded with alacrity and in
1451, without any opposition from Alam Shah, he occupied the throne, becoming
the first Afghan ruler in India.

The First Afghan Kings


[[77]] Buhlul Lodi was a member of an Afghan family that had been rewarded
by the Sayyid sultans with control of the Sirhind district in the Punjab in return for
service as defenders of the northwestern frontier. From this base Buhlul Lodi had
gained control over eastern and central Punjab, and by the time the invitation came
from Delhi he was virtually independent of the sultanate. After he had succeeded to
the throne he sought to strengthen his position by bringing in Afghans from the
northwestern highlands, attracting them by grants of lands and estates. Energetic and
ambitious, he overlooked no opportunity of extending his dominion, and throughout
the nearly forty years of his reign he concentrated his power on attempts to
overcome the chiefs, both Hindu and Muslim, who had established independent
kingdoms during the previous reigns and now opposed the new centralizing force
emanating from Delhi. That part of this resistance met by the Lodi kings was related
to groups with attachments to the displaced Sayyid sultans is suggested by the
attitude of the ruler of Jaunpur, an important kingdom in the central Gangetic plain.
http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00islamlinks/ikram/part1_06.html 1/6
5/5/2018 part1_06

The ruler, Husain Sharqi, had married Jalila, a daughter of the last Sayyid sultan of
Delhi, and she persuaded her husband to invade Delhi. This led to the defeat of the
Jaunpur ruler and the annexation of his territory.

Buhlul's policy was continued by his son Sikandar (r.1489–1517), and while he
did not succeed in regaining the full territory that the Delhi sultans had once
controlled, at least he made the chiefs within the narrower boundaries recognize his
power. He spent four years (1499–1503) in thoroughly organizing the administration
of the trans-Gangetic province of Sambhal, and soon after he transferred his capital
from Delhi to Sikandara, a suburb of Agra, to be nearer the areas which required his
attention. This was, incidentally, the beginning of the future importance of Agra,
which hitherto had been a dependency of the more important fortress of Biana.

A patron of learning who himself wrote poetry, Sikandar attracted many


scholars to his court, including the well-known poet and mystic [[78]] Jamali
(d.1535). One of the most interesting works of the period, which was sponsored by
his wazir, Miyan Bhuva, was a voluminous book on medicine entitled Ma'dan-ul-
Shifa or Tibb-i-Sikanadari, in which theories and prescriptions of Indian medicine
were consolidated. A work on music, Lahjat-i-Sikandar Shahi, of which the only
existing copy is in the Tagore Library of the University of Lucknow, was another
important contribution./1/

Muslim historians, including Nizam-ud-din Bakshi, the author of Tabaqat-i-


Akbari, have accused Sikandar of religious bigotry, but it was during his reign that
Hindus began to adjust to the new conditions, and a great many of them started to
learn Persian. Muslim interest in Indian medicine and music in the highest circles
has already been mentioned. In spite of Sikandar's reputation for bigotry it seems
fair to surmise that in the cultural sphere his period was one of active mutual interest
"among Hindus and Muslims for each other's learning, thus conducing to a
reapproachment." Sikandar died in 1517 and was succeeded by his son, Ibrahim
Lodi. Soon disputes between the sultan and his Afghan nobles, which simmered
throughout the Lodi period, became acute; and Daulat Khan Lodi, the governor of
the Punjab and the king's uncle, invited Babur, the ruler of Kabul, to invade India.
After early incursions confined to the northwest and the Punjab, Babur met Ibrahim
in the first battle of Panipat on April 21, 1526, and, by defeating him and capturing
Delhi and Agra, laid the foundation for the Mughal rule.

The Rise of Regional Kingdoms


One aspect of the history of Islamic civilization in India in the fifteenth century,
the collapse of the Delhi Sultanate, led to anarchy and turmoil, but the second
important feature, the rise of independent kingdoms, prevented the disintegration of
central authority from becoming an unqualified disaster. It can be argued, indeed,
that splitting the realm into regional kingdoms resulted in Muslim penetration of
areas hitherto unconquered, such as Kathiawar and eastern Bengal.

[[79]] The administration of smaller and more compact territories was certainly
more effective, and it is doubtful if the loosely controlled and vaguely demarcated
iqtas of the sultanate could have developed into the well-organized subasof the
Mughal period without the rise and consolidation of regional kingdoms. Because of
these kingdoms, closer administrative control over areas where old Hindu chiefs had
exercised a great degree of autonomy became a reality for the first time.

http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00islamlinks/ikram/part1_06.html 2/6
5/5/2018 part1_06

The rise of the regional kingdoms also helped the spread of Islam and Muslim
culture. During the days of the sultanate, Delhi was the one major center of Islamic
culture and religion; now Ahmadabad, Jaunpur, Gulbarga, Sonargaon, Gaur, Pandua,
and other provincial capitals became active centers of Muslim religious and cultural
activity. Delhi had a large number of influential immigrants, and the cultural
traditions of the capital reflected mainly the Central Asian pattern. At the capitals of
the regional kingdoms, Muslims and immigrants were not in a majority, and the
cultural activity in these areas mirrored the indigenous tradition to a much greater
extent. It was in these regional kingdoms, therefore, that Muslim impact led to the
rise of vernaculars and paved the way for the religious synthesis advocated by some
leaders of the bhakti movement. Music was more actively patronized in such
regional centers as Kashmir, Jaunpur, Malwa, and Gujarat than at the capital of the
sultanate. Another important difference between the capital and the regional
kingdoms which affected culture was the fact that the rulers of the regional
kingdoms were not preoccupied with the threat of Mongol invasions and other
similar problems of the central government. They were able to devote greater
attention to cultural pursuits at their courts than was possible in Delhi. The elaborate
literary and cultural activity which was carried on in Kashmir under Zain-ul-
Abidin's direct patronage, for example, finds no parallel in the annals of the
sultanate.

These cultural activities of the regional kingdoms paved the way, moreover, for
the broader basis of Mughal culture. The Mughal cultural pattern was derived
primarily from Herat, Samarqand, Tabriz, and Isfahan; yet it included many features
which were absent during the sultanate. A possible explanation is that these had
gained prominence in the regional kingdoms. Examples of this process are the
attention [[80]] paid to the development of vernacular [literature], the official
patronage of music, and the greater scope offered to Hindu thought and art forms.
The extraordinarily rapid rise of Urdu during the eighteenth century was made
possible by the slow maturing of the Deccani in the courts of Bijapur and Golkunda,
and many other features of the regional cultural traditions were absorbed in the
pattern of the Mughal culture.

Among the areas which became independent during the weakness of the
sultanate, Bengal was probably the most important. Although Muhammad bin
Bakhtiyar Khalji had made the first Muslim conquest about 1202, his hold extended
over only a small portion of northern Bengal. After conquering Nadiya, the old
Hindu capital, he withdrew northward and confined himself to the areas near Bihar.
His successors gradually extended the Muslim dominion in the east, but their efforts
were fitful and often accompanied by defiance of Delhi's authority. We hear about
Sonargaon (near modern Dacca) for the first time in 1280, when Balban, in pursuit
of Tughril, the rebellious deputy in Bengal, compelled the Hindu raja of Sonargaon
to undertake a search for the rebel. Tughril's revolt forced Balban to face the
problem of chronic rebellion in Bengal, and he tackled it with his usual
thoroughness. After dealing with the rebels he stayed on to reorganize the
administration, appointed his son Bughra Khan as the viceroy of the territory, and
left a team of carefully selected officers to assist the prince.

The measures taken by Balban in Bengal proved fruitful. The consequences of


posting a team of highly educated and cultured officials from Delhi were soon
evident, and the Islamization of the territory was begun. Although Bughra Khan lost
his chance of succeeding Balban at Delhi because of his preference for Bengal, this
enabled Balban's family to continue their sway in the eastern territory long after its
rule had ended at Delhi. The reigns of Bughra Khan's successors from 1286 to 1328

http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00islamlinks/ikram/part1_06.html 3/6
5/5/2018 part1_06

constituted a period of active expansion. Southern and eastern Bengal came under
their control, and important centers were established at Satgaon (Hugli district) and
Sonargaon. One of these rulers, Shams-ud-din Firuz (r.1301–1322) extended Muslim
dominion across the Brahmaputra into the Sylhet district of [[81]]

*REGIONAL KINGDOMS AT THE END OF THE FIFTEENTH


CENTURY*
[[82]] Assam. These efforts were facilitated by the arrival of a large number of
Turkish officers and soldiers who had been displaced by the Khaljis at Delhi. In
addition, the volunteers for jihad, or holy war, locally known as ghazis, and other
spirited volunteers actively assisted in Muslim expansion. The conquest of Sylhet in
1303, for example, is attributed by both Muslim and Hindu accounts to the support
which the Muslim troops received from a contemporary soldier-saint, Shah Jalal,
who lies buried at Sylhet. Many other warrior-saints, such as Zafar Khan Ghazi of
Tribheni near Hugli and Shah Ismail Ghazi in Rangpur district, are mentioned in
contemporary accounts.

Although Ghiyas-ud-din Tughluq reasserted the authority of Delhi over Bengal


in 1234, the troubles which broke out in the reign of his son Muhammad Tughluq
resulted in the independence of the area once more. The two expeditions of the next
ruler, Firuz Tughluq, could not reverse this process, and Bengal remained
independent until its conquest by Akbar in 1576.

Independent Bengal was ruled by a succession of dynasties, of which two are


noteworthy. The rulers of the Ilyas Shahi dynasty, who were on the throne of Bengal
from 1338 to 1415, and again from 1437 to 1487, secured the independence of the
province, dealt with the two expeditions of Firuz Tughluq, revived Bengal's contacts
with the outside world, and won notable victories against neighboring non-Muslim
rulers of Tirhut, Nepal, and Orissa. Among them, Ghiyas-ud-din Azam Shah
(r.1393–1410) tried to attract the great Persian poet Hafiz to his court, sent large
sums of money to holy places in Hijaz, and exchanged envoys with the
contemporary Chinese emperor. His small, beautiful tomb at Sonargaon is the oldest
Muslim monument in East Pakistan. Soon after his death, Ganesh, a Hindu zamindar
of Dinajpur, seized power, and the local Muslims sought aid from the Muslim ruler
of the neighboring kingdom of Jaunpur. When the Sharqui king threatened to
intervene, Ganesh vacated the throne in favor of his son, who accepted Islam. He
ruled from 1415 to 1431. Six years later his successor was assassinated, possibly as
a result of rivalry between the Hindu and Muslim nobles, and the Ilyas Shahi
dynasty was restored to power.

[[83]] Much briefer, but somewhat better documented, was the tenure of the
Hussain Shahi dynasty (1493–1539). It produced two able rulers—Ala-ud-din
Husain Shah (r.1493–1519) and his son Nusrat Shah (r.1519–1532). They were
competent rulers, liberal in outlook, and great patrons of cultural activities. They
recovered lost territories, and left magnificent buildings at Gaur and Pandua. Their
patronage of letters was not confined to Persian, the court language; they gave
encouragement to the rising Bengali literature, and many Sanskrit works were
translated into Bengali at their court. The confusion following the assassination of
Nusrat Shah in 1532 enabled the Afghan, Sher Khan Suri, to intervene, and he
conquered the province in 1539. It remained in Afghan hands until 1576, when
Akbar annexed it to the Mughal empire.

http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00islamlinks/ikram/part1_06.html 4/6
5/5/2018 part1_06

Another important independent kingdom was the Bahmani sultanate in the


Deccan which lasted from 1347 to 1527. For a little less than a century and a half
(1347–1482) it prospered until it extended from the western to the eastern coasts of
South India. Ultimately it broke into five principalities—the Adil Shahis of Bijapur
(1490–1686), the Nizam Shahis of Ahmadnagar (1480–1633), the Imad Shahis of
Berar (1490–1568), the Barid Shahis of Bidar (1480–1609), and the Qutb Shahis of
Golkunda (1512–1687).

The rulers of these Deccan kingdoms attracted scholars, poets, and statesmen
from Persia and Iraq, but local talent was employed to a much larger extent than was
the case at Delhi. At one time the principal ministers at Bijapur were Hindu, and the
Maratha chief, Shahji of Ahmadnagar, the father of Shivaji, occupied a distinguished
position in the army. In linguistic matters also there was closer collaboration
between the Hindus and the Muslims. Marathi was the language used for village
records, and the rulers helped the development of the Deccani variety of Hindustani.
They themselves composed verses in that language and encouraged others, and it
was no accident that although Hindustani appeared in northern India in the very
beginning of the Muslim rule, it was the Deccani idiom that first attained literary
status.

Other important regional kingdoms which rose were Gujarat (1403–1572),


[[84]] Jaunpur (1393–1479), Malwa (1400–1561), Khandesh (1382–1601), and
Multan (1444–1524). Sind was also independent at this time, as indeed it had been
for centuries. During the two centuries of their independent rule, the kings of
Gujarat built many magnificent buildings and founded new cities, including
Ahmadabad. Their encouragement of arts and crafts laid the foundation of many of
the industries for which Gujarat became famous during the Mughal period. Jaunpur,
in the central Gangetic plain, became a great cultural center after Timur's destruction
of Delhi. The rulers provided asylum for the leading scholars from the capital, and
by bestowing rich endowments on scholarly families laid the foundation for that
intellectual preeminence of the region which has been maintained until recent times.
The last king of Jaunpur, Sultan Husain Sharqi, was an ineffective ruler, but, because
of his patronage, he occupies an important place in the history of Indian music.

Kashmir was also an independent Muslim kingdom, having remained outside


the kingdom of Delhi until its conquest by Akbar in 1586. Muslim rule had been
established there in the first half of the fourteenth century. Its most noteworthy ruler
was Zain-ul-Abidin, who ruled from 1420 to 1470. He abolished jizya and freely
patronized Hindu learning. At his court several works were translated from Sanskrit
into Persian and Persian and Arabic works were translated into Kashmiri.

The breakup of the Delhi Sultanate led not only to the establishment of a
number of Muslim kingdoms, but in certain areas the Hindu chiefs also reasserted
themselves. In addition to the minor chieftains who became independent, a powerful
state was established at Mewar in Rajputana. Rana Sanga, who came to the throne in
1509, was successful in battle against the Muslim kings of Gujarat and Malwa as
well as the Lodi ruler of Delhi. By 1526 he had become the most powerful ruler of
northern India, and when Babur was establishing Mughal rule, his most important
victory was not that against the Lodi ruler at Panipat but against Rana Sanga and his
Afghan confederates at Kanwah in 1527. Sanga was poisoned shortly after his
defeat, and Mewar's importance declined.

In the south an even more important Hindu kingdom was established [[85]] in
1336 at Vijayanagar. This lasted until 1564, when the Muslim rulers of the Deccan
united and administered a complete defeat to the Vijayanagar army at Talikota.
http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00islamlinks/ikram/part1_06.html 5/6
5/5/2018 part1_06

Mention must be made also of another power that made its appearance at this
time. On May 27, 1498, the Portuguese admiral Vasco da Gama, guided by the Arab
pilot Ahmad ibn Majid whom he had pressed into service on reaching the East
African coast, appeared before Calicut. A new chapter had opened not only in the
history of India but of the entire East. Soon the Portuguese established themselves as
the masters of the Indian Ocean. They did not establish a regional kingdom, but
instead occupied and fortified the key points of Daman, Diu, and Goa. They
controlled Indian coastal waters until their mastery was challenged first by the
Dutch, and then by the British.

NOTES
/1/ R. C. Majumdar, ed., The Delhi Sultanate, Vol. V of Culture and History of the
Indian People (Bombay, 1960), p. 146.

~~ next chapter ~~ Ikram index ~~ Glossary ~~ fwp's main page ~~

http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00islamlinks/ikram/part1_06.html 6/6

You might also like