Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region III
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF AURORA
San Luis

UMIRAY NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

Umiray, Dingalan, 3207 Aurora

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee: ROGELIO V. JUNIO JR. Name of Rater: ROLANDO F. PAJARILLO
Position: Teacher I Position: HEAD TEACHER
Division: Aurora Date of Review:

KRAs OBJECTIVES Timeline Weight Performance Indicator Actual Rating Score

per Results
KRA
1. Prepared DLL and Year 10% (5) Have complete and exemplary DLLs with functional IMs.
Lesson Plans of round (4) Have DLL and IMs which are more than expected.
Activities including (3) Prepared prescribed number of DLLs and IMs which are
appropriate, adequate submitted and checked on time. 5 0.5
and updated (2) Have DLLs and IMs but some are not checked.
Instructional Materials. (1) DLLs and IMs not observed.
TEACHING
AND 2. Maintained classroom Year 10% (5) The classroom is conducive for learning and the decoration is
LEARNING Conducive for learning round more informative and also it is conducive for learning.
PROCESS by adding decorations (4) The classroom is conducive for learning.
maintaining its (3) The classroom is clean and decorated
cleanliness. (2) Maintained and decorated but not clean 5 0.5
(1) Did not maintain and decorates the classroom.
 3. Facilitated learning in
the school through
functional DLLs and
Innovative Teaching
strategies
1. Monitored, evaluated
and maintained
pupils/students progress
within the rating period
2. Conducted Quarterly
remediation/enrichment
program to improve the
Pupils/Student
performance of slow
outcomes
learners
3.Prepared question
bank, Periodic Test,
Unit test and Diagnostic
test
1. Visited parents of Quarterly
learners who need
COMMUNITY
academic monitoring/
INVOLVEMENT
follow up within the
rating period
Year 10% (5) The Teacher established challenging and measurable goal/s for
round student learning that is aligned the k-12 curriculum.
(4) the teacher explained the goal and its appropriateness to students
(3) the teacher clearly communicate a focus for students learning that
is appropriate for students 5 0.5
(2) the teacher did not have a clear focus for students learning
(1) the teacher did not have clear focus for student learning
objectives is to general to guide the DLLs
Year 10% (5) Completed, accurately prepared mechanism to improve students
round outcomes
(4) Assess students more than expected activities
(3) Maintained students records and progress 4 0.4
(2) Assessed students activities
(1) Did not maintained students records and progress
5% (5) With documentations, 100% of the slow learners have improved
performance after using the intervention materials
(4) Prepared ADM materials more than standards with
documentations 1 0.05
(3) Conducted intervention programs without documentations
(2) Prepared ADM but not conducted
(1) Did not prepared ADM
Year 5% (5) TOS is 80% and above prepared for test that require it with test 4 0.4
round analysis
(4) TOS is 75% prepared for test that require it with test analysis
(3) TOS is 70% prepared for test that require it with test analysis
(2) TOS is 50% prepared for test that require it without test analysis
(1) TOS is not prepared
10% (5) Exemplary guidance program activities with mechanism
(4) Conducted guidance program activities more than standard
(3) Conducted selected guidance program activities 5 0.5
(2) Conducted guidance but not documented
(1) Do not have a guidance program
 2. Organized PTA, Class Quarterly 5% (5) Put extraordinary projects with ingenuity, creativity and
and Clubs Organization initiative.
and Meeting (4) Community, Class, Clubs and PTA officials are performing more
than standard
4 0.2
(3) Organized PTA, Class and Clubs Meeting and other community
projects
(2) Class, Club and PTA officers did not perform their duties.
(1) Did not organized any organization
3.Conducted the social Year 5% (5) Put extraordinary projects with initiative, creative and iniquity
mobilization and round (4) Put projects beyond what is expected and standards
networking (3) Put project based on school needs 1 0.05
(2) Put a proposed project but not materialize
(1) Did not put a project
1. Participated and Year 8% (5) Participated or attended seminars for professional growth
attended different round (Regional Level)
seminars or trainings for (4) Participated or attended seminars for professional growth
PROFESSIONAL professional growth (Division Level)
GROWTH AND
DEVELOPMENT
(3) Participated or attended seminars for professional growth 5 0.4
(District Level)
(2) Participate or attended seminars for professional growth (School
Level)
(1) Did not participate or attend seminars for professional growth.
2. Innovated teaching Year 2% (5) Introduced an innovative idea in teaching, classroom
strategies, classroom Round management and assessment which was implemented in the District
management and level or in the higher level.
assessment to enhance (4) Introduced at least two innovative ideas in teaching, classroom
learning. management and assessment which were implemented in the school
level.
(3) Introduced an innovative idea in teaching, classroom 1 0.02
management and assessment which was implemented in the school
level.
(2) Introduced an innovative idea in teaching, classroom
management and assessment but was not implemented.
(1) Did not introduce any innovative idea in teaching, classroom
management and assessment.
 3. Earned relevant Year 10% (5) Earned at least 30 units in MA degree
professional trainings, Round (4) Earned at least 27 units in MA degree
earned units or (3) Earned at least 18 units in MA degree 5 0.5
graduated from a higher (2) Earned at least 9 units in MA degree
relevant degree (1) Earned at least 6 units in MA degree
PLUS 1.Served as School Year 5% (5) Administered NCAE with Honesty.
FACTOR Testing Coordinator Round (4) Conducted review for NAT
(3) conducted the orientation on NCAE and NAT. 5 0.25
(2) attended seminar on testing..
(1) did not attend the seminar about testing administration
2. Participated for the Year 5% (5) Won Champion for the search for best classroom District Level
search for the best child Round (4) Won 2nd place for the search for best classroom District Level
and Environment (3) Won 3rd Place for the search for best classroom District Level 5 0.25
st
Friendly classroom (2) Won 1 place for the search for best classroom School Level
(1) Won 2nd Place for the search for best classroom School Level
OVERALL PERFORMANCE 4.52

ROGELIO V. JUNIO JR ROLANDO F. PAJARILLO

Signature over Printed Name of Ratee Signature over Printed Name of Rater
 PART III SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Final Performance Results Rating Adjectival Rating

Accomplishments of KRAs and
4.52 OUTSTANDING
Objectives

Rater-Ratee Agreement

The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed on the content of this appraisal form and the performance rating.

Name of Employee Name of Superior

ROGELIO V. JUNIO JR. ROLANDO F. PAJARILLO
Signature Signature

Date Date
 PART IV DEVELOPMENTAL PLANS

Resources Needed
Action Plan
Strengths
Development Needs (Recommended Timeline SOURCE
Developmental Intervention) FUND HUMAN MATERIALS
OF FUND
Participated and Should implement Continue and finished master’s BoSY: 2015- 30,000.00 Personal School Head articles
attended various proposed action degree and submit articles to 2016 to MOOE Fellow
seminars in the research and submit publications EoSY: 2015- teachers
Division level and articles to publication 2016
pursuing a higher
degree
Organized PTA, Should conduct social Put-up projects based on school BoSY: 2015- 10,000.00 HRPTA School Head IGP proposal
Class organization mobilization and needs and implement 2016 to GPTA Fellow
and English Club networking with innovative income generating EoSY: 2015- NGO teachers
that put up NGOs project in cooperation with 2016
successful projects NGOs and stakeholders
or activities including parents
Monitored, Should promote the Write an action research and BoSY: 2015- 10,000.00 Personal School Head Auto Card
evaluated, and Auto Card to fellow conduct intervention programs 2016 to MOOE Fellow template,
maintained students teachers and teach for slow learners to improve EoSY: 2015- teachers action research
progress within them how to use it. their performance in 2016 proposal
rating period Mathematics

ROGELIO V. JUNIO JR. ROLANDO F. PAJARILLO

Signature over Printed Name of Ratee Signature over Printed Name of Rater