Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 2: Antinomianism
Chapter 2 begins Geisler's more detailed examination of the different views of ethics. He provides a
history of the antinomian view; he covers the time from the ancient beginnings to contemporary
influences. In the process he looks at twelve different ethical philosophies that fall under the broad
umbrella of antinomianism. He points out what they have in common and provides what he believes are
the good influences of antinomianism, including the fact that it stresses individual responsibility. He
then offers a critique of each individual system, then provides the issues with antinomianism in general -
- the major ones would be that it is self-defeating, and it is too subjective to be of value to the whole of
humanity.
Chapter 3: Situationism
Chapter 3 deals with Joseph Fletcher's Situationism. Geisler begins this examination by explaining that
the purpose of this ethical model was to avoid the pitfalls of legalism and antinomianism. He describes
the "single-norm" ethic that is put forth by Fletcher. Basically the ethical thing to do in any situation is
determined by the single absolute norm: love. Geisler states that Situationism does have its advantages
over legalism (it is sensitive to circumstances, it stresses love over other possible norms, and others) and
antinomianism (it does have an absolute and is a normative position). However, he does point out that
the "love" does not really have a foundation -- it is determined by the situation. The fact that the
"absolute" is actually relative makes it a form of the antinomian view. He also points out that the end
result of a decision is that the most love be accomplished -- a form of utilitarianism (the subject of
Chapter 4).
Chapter 4: Generalism
In Chapter 4 Geisler discusses what is more commonly called utilitarianism. The general idea of this
ethical model is that any behavior may be justified if it will achieve the most good for the most people.
Popularly, it is summed up as "the ends justify the means". Geisler points out that there are a few
different positions within this view that distinguishes what "good" means (if it is based on quality or
quantity) and how exceptions are handled. He mentions that in general utilitarianism does affirm the
need for a norm or standard and provides a way to deal with conflicting norms. However, he does state
that its weakness falls in the need for "good" to have an objective standard (a norm of its own) and the
fact that the "end" is ambiguous (due to lack of omniscience of humans). The responsibility to determine
both of these then falls back on the individual making the decision. The individual would then need to
appeal to another ethical system of his choice, which ultimately defeats the need for this one and leads
back to the first system described: antinomianism.
Part 2
Having established the system of ethics that he will be using, Geisler now moves on to Part 2, where he
looks at specific ethical challenges. The space provided to discuss the different ethical issues is limited,
so his treatment is not thorough or as technical as some may like. However, this section will introduce
the reader to the complexity of the issues, address the issues, and prepare the reader for more in-depth
material. In all the following chapters, Geisler distinguishes among specific positions and lays out the
debate clearly. The following chapter reviews will be shorter than in Part 1.
Chapter 8: Abortion
Geisler begins his investigation of abortion by pointing out that the whole debate centers on the
humanity of the fetus. From this he establishes that there are three different positions on abortion:
Abortion anytime, abortion sometimes, and no abortions at all. He lays out the biblical, scientific,
philosophical, and emotional arguments for each position, then offers critique for the first two options
and answers objections to the third (the one he holds).
Chapter 9: Euthanasia
Geisler's treatment of euthanasia follows the same pattern as his chapter on abortion. He points out
that euthanasia can fall into several categories: active or passive; voluntary or involuntary; and self-
causes or caused by someone else. He provides the arguments for each and critiques the views opposed
to his. He then gives a defense for his own view.
Conclusion
Christian Ethics was quite an interesting and enjoyable read. It helps the reader to think more clearly
about the different ethical systems proposed by Christians. He guides the Christian though a thoughtful
evaluation of several ethical debates and provides conclusions that are soundly based on scripture. This
book is recommended as an introductory book for Christian Ethics; so, those interested in particular
systems or specific debates should not rely solely on this resource. Geisler wrote this book with the
beginner in mind and takes care to clearly articulate difficult concepts. His inclusion of a glossary also
helps with those not as familiar with the more technical terms.