Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 13
Lecture-13
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 5115 Advance Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures 1
Topics Addressed
y Introduction
y Examples
1
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Topics Addressed
y Moment Distribution Method
y Moment Redistribution
y Summary
2
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
z The width of the frame is same as mentioned in DDM. The length of the
frame extends up to full length of 3D system and the frame extends the full
height of the building.
3
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
4
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
z Kec represents the modified column stiffness. The modification depends on lateral
members (slab, beams etc) and presence of column in the storey above.
Ksb Ksb Ksb Ksb Ksb
5
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
z Once a 2D frame is obtained, the analysis can be done by any method of 2D frame analysis.
Ksb Ksb Ksb Ksb Ksb
6
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
z For a span, the k factor is a direct function of ratios c1/l1 and c2/l2
c1
l2 c2
l1
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 13
z Determination of k
7
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
z Isb determination
8
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
z Mathematically,
nKc × mKt
1/Kec = 1/nKc + 1/mKt OR Kec =
nKc + mKt
Where,
n = 2 for interior storey (for flat plates only)
= 1 for top storey (for flat plates only)
m = 1 for exterior frames (half frame)
= 2 for interior frames (full frame)
Note: n will be replaced by ∑ for columns having different stiffness
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 17
z Design aids are available from which value of k can be readily obtained for
different values of (ta/tb) and (lu/lc).
9
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
z Determination of k
10
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
11
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
12
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Ecs = modulus of elasticity of slab concrete; Isb = I of slab with beam; Is = I of slab without beam
13
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
14
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
20′
20′
10′
10′
25′
25′
10′
25′
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 25′ 30
15
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
20′
25′
25′
10′
25′
25′
16
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Table: Kt calculation.
Column
l2 c2 C = ∑ (1 – 0.63x/y)x
0 63x/y)x3y/3 (i
(in4) Kt = ∑ 9EcsC/ {l2(1 – c2/l2)3}
location
A2 20′ 14" {1 – 0.63 × 10/ 14} × 103 × 14/3 = 2567 2 × [9Ecs×2567/ {20×12 (1–14/ (20×12))3}]=231Ecs
Note 01: Kt term is multiplied with 2 because two similar torsional members meet at column A2.
Note 02: Kt values for all other columns will be same as A2 because of similar column
dimensions.
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 34
17
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
lu
z Solution:
B
z Step 03b: Equivalent column stiffness calculation
Note: For flat plates, ∑Kc term is multiplied with 2 for interior storey with similar columns
above and below. For top storey, the ∑Kc term will be a single value (multiplied by 1)
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 35
18
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
z Because the slab and the columns have the same strength
concrete, Ecc = Ecs = Ec.
19
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Keclec = 124.91×10×12=14989E
10′
20
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
21
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
22
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
20′
23
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
20′
10′
10′
25′
25′
10′
25′
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 25′ 47
20′
25′
25′
10′
25′
25′
24
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Table: Kt calculation.
Column
l2 c2 C = ∑ (1 – 0.63x/y)x
0 63x/y)x3y/3 (i
(in4) Kt = ∑ 9EcsC/ {l2(1 – c2/l2)3}
location
A2 20′ 14" 11208 3792.63Ecs
25
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
lu
z Solution:
B
z Step 03b: Equivalent column stiffness calculation
lu
z Solution:
B
z Step 03b: Equivalent column stiffness calculation
26
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
z Because the slab and the columns have the same strength
concrete, Ecc = Ecs = Ec.
z Because the slab and the columns have the same strength
concrete, Ecc = Ecs = Ec.
27
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Keclec = 315×10×12=37800E
Keclec = 318×10×12=38160E
28
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
29
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
30
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
z Once stiffnesses are obtained from EFM, the distribution factors are
conveniently calculated.
31
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Ksb1
DF (span 2-1) =
Ksb1 + Ksb2 + Kec
Ksb2
DF (span 2-3) =
Ksb1 + Ksb2 + Kec
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali 64
32
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Kec
DF =
Ksb1 + Ksb2 + Kec
z The comparison with SAP 3D model result for beam moments is also
done
done.
33
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Slab Column Slab Slab Column Slab Slab Column Slab Slab Column Slab Slab Column Slab
FEM 0.000 0.000 399.103 ‐399.103 0.000 399.103 ‐399.103 0.000 399.103 ‐399.103 0.000 399.103 ‐399.103 0.000 0.000
Bal 0.000 ‐119.955
119.955 ‐279.148
279.148 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 279.148 119.955 0.000
Carry over 0.000 ‐140.529 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 140.529 0.000
Bal 0.000 0.000 0.000 57.838 24.854 57.838 0.000 0.000 0.000 ‐57.838 ‐24.854 ‐57.838 0.000 0.000 0.000
Carry over 29.117 0.000 0.000 29.117 ‐29.117 0.000 0.000 ‐29.117
Bal 0.000 ‐8.751 ‐20.365 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 20.365 8.751 0.000
Carry over 0.000 ‐10.252 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 10.252 0.000
Bal 0.000 0.000 0.000 4.220 1.813 4.220 0.000 0.000 0.000 ‐4.220 ‐1.813 ‐4.220 0.000 0.000 0.000
Total 0.000‐129.395 129.395 ‐488.302 26.810 461.492‐367.695 0.000 367.695‐461.492‐26.810488.302‐129.395129.395 0.000
34
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Joint A B C D E
CarryOver 0.5034 0.5034 0.5034 0.5034
DF 0.000 0.474 0.526 0.344 0.313 0.344 0.344 0.313 0.344 0.344 0.313 0.344 0.526 0.474 0.000
Slab Column Slab Slab Column Slab Slab Column Slab Slab Column Slab Slab Column Slab
FEM 0.000 0.000 351.891 ‐351.891 0.000 351.891‐351.891 0.000 351.891‐351.891 0.000 351.891‐351.891 0.000 0.000
Bal 0.00 ‐166.90 ‐185.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 185.00 166.90 0.00
Carry over 0.00 ‐93.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 93.13 0.00
Bal 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.99 29.15 31.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 ‐31.99 ‐29.15 ‐31.99 0.00 0.00 0.00
Carry over 16.11 0.00 0.00 16.11 ‐16.11 0.00 0.00 ‐16.11
Bal 0.00 ‐7.64 ‐8.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.47 7.64 0.00
Carry over 0.00 ‐4.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.26 0.00
Bal 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.46 1.33 1.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 ‐1.46 ‐1.33 ‐1.46 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0. ‐174.900 174.900 ‐415.961 30.544 385.417‐335.012 0.000 335.012‐385.417‐30.544415.961‐174.900174.900 0.000
35
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
z When LL ≤ 0.75DL
z Maximum factored moment when Full factored LL on all spans
z Other cases
z Pattern live loading using 0.75(Factored LL) to determine maximum
factored moment
36
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
z Interior supports
z Critical section at face of rectilinear support but ≤ 0.175l1 from center of
the support
z Exterior supports
z At exterior supports
pp with brackets or capitals,
p , the critical section < ½ the
projection of bracket or capital beyond face of supporting element.
37
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
Mu2
Mu1
Mo
Mu3
ln
c1/2 c1/2
l1
38
Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar
z Analyze the obtained 2D frame using any method of analysis to get longitudinal moments
based on center to center span.
The End
39