Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Huppmann
brewhouse at Oettinger
Brau in Germany has
been installed within a
no frills industrial
building. Oettinger is a
leading supplier to the
supermarket trade.
A brewer’s view on a
“The decision by
SAB-Miller to retain
the triple decoction
process, a copper
RIGHT: Figure 3:
Equipment schematic
for “wet” and “dry”
milling operation –
diagram from
Huppmann
from haze stability. Hops whether order to get the 30% fine flour be achieved. This would be “Continuous steep
from pellets or leaf are known to required, power consumption is up important to any brewery whose milling is
improve the quality of beer foam to three times that required by wet mash cycle is the rate determining recommended by
compared with beers brewed using milling systems. Noise and step in their brewhouse. For a Steinecker
extract. explosion risks also need to be taken temperature programmed mash (Variomill) and
The correct choice of plant will into consideration. starting at 45°C and rising to 75°C, Huppmann (Millstar)
influence the overall project cost, Continuous steep milling is an overall time saving of 30–50 and can be used in
beer quality and how much it will recommended by Steinecker minutes is very significant. Note
conjunction with any
cost to brew for the next 20 years or (Variomill) and Huppmann that any operation using mash
lauter tun.
more. With energy and waste costs (Millstar) and can be used in boiling or decoction will include
Conditioning of the
rising, these will have an increasing conjunction with any lauter tun. more complex plant as well as
influence on running costs. The Conditioning of the whole malt increased energy costs. whole malt grain in a
latest techniques involving reduced grain in a continuous warm water continuous warm
wort oxidation and ‘thermal stress’ steep increases the water content of Wort separation water steep
are also leading to improvements in the husk to approx 15 % before The big debate continues on the use increases the water
flavour, flavour stability and head milling. Advantages over dry of lauter tuns and mash filters. content of the husk
retention. milling are said to be better and Historically mash filters had a brief to approx 15 %
Thermal stress is brought about faster wort separation with rise in the late 1970s, but before milling.
by any process involving excess opportunities for increased lauter improvements in lauter tun design Advantages over dry
heat at high temperatures in any tun loading, less equipment and less reasserted their ascendancy until the milling are said to be
brewhouse process (eg excessive explosion risk (no dry ground grist), introduction of the Meura 2001 better and faster
wort boiling) Over enthusiastic less oxygen uptake due to mashing membrane mash filter (Fig 6). wort separation with
mixing in other brewhouse vessels taking place at the same time as Ziemann continue to offer modern opportunities for
such as conversion vessels also has milling (Fig.3). mash filters and lauter tuns. The increased lauter tun
a negative effect on flavour stability. Ziemann have recently developed Ziemann TCM (Thin layer Chamber loading, less
The leading brewhouse their innovative “Dispax” dispersion Mash filter) produces up to 16 equipment and less
manufacturers all offer their own mashing/milling system which is a brews per day, the largest version explosion risk (no
interpretation and development on compact ‘wet’ option mainly for use taking a 21 tonne grist. At present dry ground grist),
the latest available brewing with mash filters (Fig.4) there is no clear winner, except that less oxygen uptake
knowledge and science. each brewer must make the decision
due to mashing
Mash Conversion based on its own requirements.
taking place at the
Milling The key here is the choice of Breweries using unmalted adjucts
same time as
There are three main options for infusion/temperature programmed and high gravity brewing often opt
milling. Dry milling normally uses mashes and whether mash boiling for mash filters, as do breweries milling.”
six roller mills and is still popular and cereal cooking are part of the with a low number of wort streams
with breweries using lauter tuns. desired brew recipe. All requiring fast throughput and high
The milling is independent from the manufacturers feature on low extract yields. Lauter tun
mashing process and therefore a oxygen pick up, efficient mixing, manufacturers, Briggs, Ziemann,
lower rated mill can be used so that heat transfer with latest design Steinecker (with Pegasus) and
the milling operation can utilise the mixers and temperature control. Huppmann (with Lauterstar) have
conversion vessel cycle-time, Ziemann and Steinecker continued to develop their
whereas ‘continuous steep’ milling (ShakesBeer) have introduced equipment to increase loading (up
requires milling to take place in 20 dimpled heat surfaces inside the from a “norm” of 160kg/m2 to over
minutes of the mashing process. It is vessel (Fig.5) which gives improved 200kg/m2) while reducing cycle
also reckoned that mill adjustments heat transfer and hence faster times and increasing extract. An
available on the three sets of rollers temperature rises for programmed emphasis has been put on
give a better opportunity for mashes. Along with hot water decreasing down time (like spent
optimisation of extract and run off. injection, heat rises of over 2°C/min grain removal) with improvements
Hammer milling is only used in as against 0.5– 0.9°C/min for a in rake design, automated raking
conjunction with the mash filter in conventional conversion vessel can and run off control improving the
technology twelve brews per day on the wort also predicts an increase in
a bed loading of 200 kg/m2 can be flavour stability, although results
achieved with a lauter tun. Whatever supplied by manufacturers are
mash separation device is used, the difficult to assess and compare
malt quality is vital to good because they are often from different
performance, especially levels of tests and analyses. With flavour
beta glucans, with β-glucanase stability and beer freshness
addition to the mash often used to attracting more focus, relying more
maintain consistent run off on tasting beer and using better
performance on mash filters. understood analysis would be
A recovery of 100–101% of helpful. Reduced evaporation from
laboratory extract from a mash filter less and lower heat input also results
compared with say 98.5% on an in improved beer foam. Less fouling
optimised lauter tun can mean a of the heating surface also has the
saving in malt of around £150,000 benefit that cleaning frequencies can
per year at a brewery producing one be reduced. The introduction of a
Figure 7: The underside wort flow itself. A significant step million hectolitres of wort. There is, natural thermosyphon during
of a modern lauter tun – forward has been to increase the however, a debate about how much boiling is becoming a feature in all
take note of the number number and positioning of run off the extra 3–4% extract is of positive modern wort boilers.
of wort run off pipes – ports incorporating a conical design value from a beer flavour and There is a choice between internal
photo supplied by (Fig.7). This has resulted in faster quality perspective. and external wort boiling. The latter
Huppmann run off with an even extract Capital costs of lauter tun systems is a development of Briggs external
recovery across the whole bed and are claimed to be about 70% of an wort boiling system and is called
less vacuum produced. equivalent mash filter. The ‘Symphony’ (Fig.8) This involves
Without getting into detail, the maximum size for a single mash increasing the specific heating
main differences between a lauter filter has been around 11 tonnes of surface of the boiler to 0.43m2/hl
tun and mash filter include the grist (approx 600 hl of high gravity which is five times more than for a
following. The lauter tun is more wort) compared with up to 25 typical internal heater, and twice as
flexible for loading – charges of + tonnes for a single lauter tun, high as a standard external wort
50% to -30% are claimed with the although the 21 tonne Ziemann boiler. By using this increased area,
mash filter only able to handle mash filter is catching up fast. the steam temperature and pressure
+10% to -20% of optimum loading. Operating costs for mash filters can be reduced and a two phase,
Smaller breweries with a large are also higher. This is mainly due liquid/vapour driven thermo-syphon
number of beer brands are more to higher maintenance costs, is produced. The wort, which is
likely to favour lauter tuns because cleaning costs (cleaning required circulated eight to ten times during
of this. every 50–60 brews), replacement of the boil, is returned to the copper in
Figure 8: The Symphony The cycle time of the mash filter filter sheets (every 2,000–3,000 a tangential manner to reduce
external wort boiling of 90–120 minutes has been brews) and membranes (every 5,000 foaming and minimise trub break
system – supplied by consistently better than the lauter brews). Unlike the Meura 2001, the up. This arrangement of external
Briggs of Burton. tun, although using the latest run off Ziemann TCM has no membranes to wort boiler and tangential inlet to
maintain or replace. the copper is easily arranged into a
combination copper/whirlpool.
Wort Boiling Other suppliers have developed
As energy costs rise, wort boiling efficient internal copper heaters. A
will continue to be an area of ‘dynamic’ or ‘low pressure’ boiling
increased attention. Modern technique has been introduced by
understanding of wort boiling has Huppmann (Fig.9) which involves
enabled manufacturers to look at heating wort under pressure of 150
wort volatile reduction and protein mbar, equivalent to a boiling
denaturisation/ coagulation as temperature of 103°C. When this
separate processes. The idea of pressure is reached, it is rapidly
applying a minimum temperature reduced to 50mbar and the
difference between the heating temperature drops back to 101°C.
medium and the wort by effectively This takes place at least six times
increasing heating area and during each boil and the effect
inducing two phase liquid/vapour produces a flash evaporation with
bubbles in the wort means that wort the formation of foam and bubbles
evaporation can be reduced from within the wort kettle which strips
over 8% to 4 –5%. Different unwanted volatiles and aids
approaches have been made by coagulation of hot break particles.
manufacturers, with some opting for In order to accommodate the flash
a separate volatile reducing step evaporation, the copper volume
after wort boiling. needs to be 30% greater than for a
Beers produced have similar standard system and the wort is
fermentation characteristics and circulated 20–30 times per hour.
volatiles as well as reduced DMS Ziemann offers a similar
levels. Reduced thermal stress on technology. The internal wort heater
Figure15: A Ziemann
vacuum wort
“stripping” system
positioned after the
whirlpool but before
wort cooling – photo
supplied by Ziemann.
Trub separation Figure 16: Schematic of a brewhouse ‘energy store system’, with heat
The whirlpool remains the most recovered by a vapour condenser used to preheat wort on its way to the copper
popular and simplest method for – diagram supplied by Huppmann.
separation of hot trub from boiled
wort. The workings of whirlpools of a copper whirlpool is that a vessel ● The author would like to acknowledge
have been studied extensively with to vessel transfer is eliminated, there the help of the following for supplying
information, diagrams and
many theories and calculations is less trub particle size reduction,
“It is easy to get photographs for this article.
showing the best design. A vessel and it allows a faster start up of Briggs of Burton (Paul
carried away with
height to diameter ratio of around wort transfer to fermenter. The Dowd), Krones/Steinecker (Peter
new plant, but a Gattermayer), Huppmann (Thomas
0.5, copper casting time of ten copper/whirlpool is a natural
dedicated project minutes, tangential inlet velocity of Bühler) and Ziemann Group (Volker
development from the Briggs Mewes).
team and detailed 3–4 metre/sec and stand time of 20 Symphony system involving a
planning needs to minutes normally works effectively. tangential inlet to the copper and is
be in place from the An often overlooked branded as ‘Symphony Plus’
beginning. Bringing consideration is solids loading. In
the new plant on order to get good trub separation, it A final word
stream is not always is said that hop pellet loading should It is easy to get carried away with
as straight forward not exceed 2.0kg/m2. Hop pellets new plant, but a dedicated project
as first thought and also retain extract, so increasing or team and detailed planning needs to
a logical step-wise decreasing hop pellets and hop be in place from the beginning.
programme of trials extract ratios can make a difference Bringing the new plant on stream is
to ensure beer in yield. There are many designs for not always as straight forward as
flavour and quality the run off system, floor shape, and first thought and a logical step-wise
match the trub removal, all of which are programme of trials to ensure beer
specifications is important to consider as long as the flavour and quality match the
fundamental.” basic design gives a good result. specifications is fundamental.
Converting hop backs in traditional There should also be a
breweries to effective whirlpools is comprehensive blending operation
● The author
often easily achieved with minimal in place until all ‘stakeholders’ are
expenditure. After a long career with Whitbread and
satisfied with the result. It is
Interbrew, including time as Head Brewer
Combined copper-whirlpools important that the Marketing and of Boddingtons and Stella Artois
have been successfully installed in Sales functions are included in this Brewmaster, Paul Buttrick has started
recent years, these tend to be a process and the success criteria for his own independent consultancy Beer
compromise in optimum design, a successful flavour match is agreed Dimensions. Paul has an MSc in Brewing
Science from Birmingham University and
Vessel configuration and the hop beforehand, so there is no dispute is one of only a handful of British brewers
grist must be fully considered along when the time for the final sign off to have studied at Weihenstephan (T.U.
with all other criteria. An advantage comes. ■ Munich).