Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Imaging Spectroscopy: - Hyperspectral Data!
Imaging Spectroscopy: - Hyperspectral Data!
• Hyperspectral Data!
Imaging Spectroscopy
• Hyperspectral Imagery (HSI)
• It’s just like other optical RS data only with WAAAAY
more bands
• Usually 100 – 200 bands in 5 – 20 nm bandwidths
Lots of testing has been done over the past ~10 years
focused on ‘if we had a hyperspectral satellite’…
Imaging Spectroscopy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKGeufqQqyc
NASA Studies Volcanos and Coral Reefs from 65,000 feet (HyspIRI)
Imaging Spectroscopy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHc0-LZBf1w
NASA Studies Volcanos and Coral Reefs from 65,000 feet (HyspIRI)
Imaging Spectroscopy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ts71279n8FE
NASA Studies Volcanos and Coral Reefs from 65,000 feet (HyspIRI)
Imaging Spectroscopy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kljFd9Aai7c
NASA Studies Volcanos and Coral Reefs from 65,000 feet (HyspIRI)
Imaging Spectroscopy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdjsfKky4Dw
NASA Studies Volcanos and Coral Reefs from 65,000 feet (HyspIRI)
Imaging Spectroscopy
• Hyperspectral Imagery (HSi)
• What’s a band ratio, again?
Landsat 8
red = 640-670 nm
NIR = 850-880 nm
Landsat 7
red = 630-690 nm
NIR = 770-900 nm
Imaging Spectroscopy
• Normalized Difference Nitrogen Index (Serrano et al 2002)
1 1
log 𝑅 − log(𝑅 )
1510 1680
𝑁𝐷𝑁𝐼 =
1 1
log 𝑅 + log(𝑅 )
1510 1680
Imaging Spectroscopy
• Normalized Difference Lignin Index (Serrano et al 2002)
1 1
log 𝑅 − log(𝑅 )
1754 1680
𝑁𝐷𝐿𝐼 =
1 1
log 𝑅 + log(𝑅 )
1754 1680
Imaging Spectroscopy
• Spectral Unmixing
• Each pixel in your image is either a ‘pure’ pixel (one land
cover type, e.g. forest, grassland, roof, rock, etc)
• Or it’s a mixture!
Imaging Spectroscopy
• Spectral Unmixing
• Each pixel in your image is either a ‘pure’ pixel (one land
cover type, e.g. forest, grassland, roof, rock, etc)
• Or it’s a mixture!
Peterson et al 2015
Imaging Spectroscopy
Deepwater Horizon disaster (20 April 2010)
Imaging Spectroscopy
Peterson et al 2015
Imaging Spectroscopy
Peterson et al 2015
Imaging Spectroscopy
Peterson et al 2015
Imaging Spectroscopy
Peterson et al 2015
Imaging Spectroscopy
https://aviris.jpl.nasa.gov/alt_locator/
Imaging Spectroscopy
https://aviris.jpl.nasa.gov/alt_locator/
Imaging Spectroscopy
https://aviris.jpl.nasa.gov/alt_locator/
Imaging Spectroscopy
• Full Spectrum Chemical Analysis
• The analysis of hyperspectral imagery is often called
‘Imaging Spectroscopy’ to highlight the connection with
chemistry and chemical spectroscopy.
www2.chemistry.msu.edu
Imaging Spectroscopy
• Full Spectrum Chemical Analysis
• The analysis of hyperspectral imagery is often called
‘Imaging Spectroscopy’ to highlight the connection with
chemistry and chemical spectroscopy.
Imaging Spectroscopy
• Full Spectrum Chemical Analysis
• General Workflow
1. Collect leaf samples (or rock or soil samples?)
2. Measure their reflectance (like we did with the ASD in Lab 3)
or extract from imagery
3. Measure their chemical content
4. Add noise to your ASD measurements (!)
5. Use ‘partial least squares regression’ to statistically link
chemical samples to your spectra
6. Iterate (as always!)
[note: in theory you could get steps 1-4 from a spectral library]
Imaging Spectroscopy
• Full Spectrum Chemical Analysis
• In practice this works surprisingly well.
Dahlin et al 2013
Imaging Spectroscopy
• Full Spectrum Chemical Analysis
• In practice this works surprisingly well.
Dahlin et al 2013