Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Repot Lab Asb 1
Repot Lab Asb 1
Objective:
1. To analysis the hardness number of the material
2. To test the resistance of the material towards an impact load
Apparatus:
I. Vickers Hardness Test instrument, a rod of mild steel and a rod of carbonate steel.
II. Rockwell Hardness Test instrument, a rod of round shaped ASSAB steel with a center
hole and a rod of carbonate steel without a center hole.
III. Brinell Hardness Test instrument, a rod of mild steel and a rod of carbonate steel.
IV. Charpy Test instrument, a rod of mild steel and a rod of carbonate steel.
Introduction:
The Hardness Test is a measurement of the resistance of the material to indentation,
which indicates its strength. The indenter can be either rounded or pointed and is made of
a material much harder than the test piece, for example hardened steel and diamond.
There are 3 methods to test the hardness of the materials:
PART A
PART B
Charpy Test
Figure 1
· One of the impact energy tests used to determine the resistance towards load
impulse, which directly changes the plastic shape that is known to be brittle.
· The elasticity state refers to the difficulty of the impact to change the plastic shape
of the materials.
· Brittle fracture leads to a clear, shinny and surfaces results while elastically
fracture results with a typical cleavage texture.
· Charpy test is a test to measure the resistance of the material towards the load
impulse.
· The impacted specimen with small fracture or no even change in the plastic shape
of the material is known as brittle.
· Fracture of plastic deformation mechanisms involved, is said to be in elasticity.
The elasticity fracture results with the typical cleavage texture while the brittle
fracture leads to a clear, shinny and surfaces.
Method:
PART A
a) Vickers Hardness Test (BS 427:1961)
1) The specimen (carbonate steel) is correctly place on anvil of the Vickers
Hardness instrument.
2) The specimen is being focused and changed it below the indenter exactly.
3) The ‘START’ button is pressed and the machine will shine with the sound
showed that the machine is readily operated.
4) When the ‘START’ light goes off, the indenter is assured that it doesn’t
touches the specimen’s surface.
5) Change the indenter with the lens.
6) The width of the corner is measured and noted.
7) Step 1-6 is repeated for the other area of the steel and for the mild steel.
PART B
Charpy Test
1) The indenter specimen is positioned at the maximum heights and at the
stress-concentrating notch.
2) The pendulum is swing from the initial height to the final heights towards
the piece.
3) The necessary to fracture the test piece is directly calculated from
difference heights.
RESULTS :
PART A :
a) Vickers Hardness Test (BS 427:1961)
CARBON STEEL
Readings D1 (mm) D2 (mm) VHN
1 334.6 342.6 162.0
2 303.3 304.3 201.0
3 267.8 260.0 266.0
4 317.9 317.9 183.0
5 277.2 268.4 249.0
MILD STEEL
Readings D1 (mm) D2 (mm) VHN
1 408.3 414.0 110
2 413.9 419.7 107
ASSAB STEEL
Readings Rockwell Hardness Number
1 57.4
2 57.1
3 57.4
Average 57.3
MILD STEEL
Readings Center line for the notch Brinnel Hardness Test
part d (mm) number (BHN)
1 3.8 84.9
2 3.9 80.4
3 3.7 89.7
Average 3.8 85.5
CARBON STEEL
Readings Center line for the notch Brinnel Hardness Test
part d (mm) number (BHN)
1 2.8 159
2 2.9 148
3 3.0 138
Average 2.9 148.3
PART B :
Charpy Test
Carbon Steel 26 J
Mild Steel 299 J
CALCULATIONS:
DISCUSSION:
PART A
1) Knowing that the Vickers Hardness test and the Brinell Hardness test were using
both mild steel and carbonate steel while the Rockwell Hardness test used both
ASSAB steel and high quality of carbonate steel.
2) The values of the BHN and VHN are much higher for carbonate steel compared to
the values of mild steel.
3) The value of Rockwell Hardness Number is higher for the ASSAB steel than the
value of the high quality of carbonate steel.
4) However, the value of the center line of the indenter for mild steel are much
higher compared to the carbonate steel in the Vickers and Brinell hardness test.
PART B
1) From the results, based on the shape of the test piece after the pendulum swing was;
a) The mild steel was not fully break that is the end of the specimen is still
connected with each other.
b) The carbonate steel is fully broken.
2) All this happened is because of (a) has higher plasticity properties compared to the
(b) The carbonate steel has high carbon that caused it more ductile.
3) The carbonate steel is much harder and brittle while the mild steel is ductile and
elastic. This caused the carbonate steel cannot absorb the impact energy. Thus, it
made the test piece break into two. While, for the mild steel, which is softer and more
elastic can absorb the energy.
4) The high carbon carbonate steel reduced the ability to absorb the impact energy.
5) As the assumption, the carbonate steel can change the shape easily when there is
impacted energy put on it. The surface of this steel is shinny and smooth. While the
surface of the mild steel is results with typical cleavage on it.
6) There is 0.2% carbon in the mild steel. The carbonate steel has almost 85% carbon.
The amount of carbon affected the mechanical properties of the materials.
ERRATUM:
PART A
1) The imperfect surfaces of each steel such as rusty surface.
2) Steel’s surfaces have lots of small indentation that result in only small area left
for new indentation.
3) Position of the specimen not exactly localize as wanted.
CONCLUSION:
PART A
The ASSAB steel is the hardest steel, followed by carbonate steel and lastly the mild
steel.
PART B
From the aspect of strength ness of steels, the mild steel have the most strength
followed by the carbonate steel. Where as, the ASSAB steel is the hardest, followed
by carbonate steel and lastly the mild steel.
REFFENCES
1) Cliffe “Technical Metallurgy” page 150 – 154
2) Sergal “Material, Their Nature, Fabrication and Properties” page 143 – 145, 71 –
72
3) Rollesan “Metallurgy for Engineers” page 15