You are on page 1of 7

BODY WAVES 29

Cross-references usually looks just like it did before the wave, and, is in
Electrical Properties of Rocks the same location as before the wave. When stress builds
Electrical Resistivity Surveys and Data Interpretation up in the Earth to such a level that rapid slip occurs on
Geomagnetic Field, Measurement Techniques a fracture (i.e., an earthquake takes place) or when an
Geomagnetic Field, Theory explosion or mechanical device is used to initiate
Geophysical Well Logging a seismic disturbance artificially, a complex field of seis-
Magnetic Anomalies, Interpretation
Magnetic Methods, Principles mic waves is generated. This wave field propagates much
Propagation of Elastic Waves: Fundamentals like the waves that travel away from the point at which
Remanent Magnetism a stone is thrown into a pond. Waves that travel through
Seismic Properties of Rocks the interior of the Earth are called body waves. Body waves
Seismic, Viscoelastic Attenuation travel through the interior of the Earth. They follow ray
paths bent by the varying density and modulus (stiffness)
of the Earth’s interior. The density and modulus, in turn,
vary according to temperature, composition, and phase.
BODY WAVES These waves are usually observed at higher frequency.

Mahmoud Mohamed Selim Saleh


Department of Nature and Applied Sciences, Al-Aflaj Types of body waves
Community College, AL-Kharj University, Al-Aflaj, There are two main kinds of body waves: P-waves and
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia S-waves, so-named because they are the primary and sec-
ondary waves detected by a seismograph (Figure 1). The
Synonyms P-wave is always the first wave to arrive at a seismometer,
Energy waves generated by an earthquake or an artificial closely followed by its reflection from the surface and
explosion S-waves arrive next. P-waves, or compressional waves,
are longitudinal waves (wave motion in the direction the
wave is traveling). S-waves are transverse waves or shear
Definition waves, involving a back-and-forth shearing motion at
Waves consist of a disturbance in materials (media) that right angles to the direction the wave is traveling
carries energy and propagates. However, the material that (Figure 2). Body waves are reflected and transmitted at
the wave propagates in generally does not move with the interfaces where the seismic velocity and/or density
wave. The movement of the material is generally confined changes, obeying Snell’s Law. At such an interface, or dis-
to small motions, called particle motion, of the material as continuity, some of the energy of an incident body wave
the wave passes. After the wave has passed, the material is reflected as a P-wave, some as an S-wave, some is

0.2 Horizontal
(East/West)

−0.2
S-wave Horizontal
Velocity (mm/s)

0.2
(North/South)

−0.2

P-wave
0.2 Vertical

−0.2 10 s

Body Waves, Figure 1 P- and S-wave recorded in a three-component seismograph. P- and S-waves are shown.
30 BODY WAVES

P-wave
Compressions
Undisturbed medium

Dilatations

S-wave

Double ampllitude
Wavelength

Body Waves, Figure 2 P- and S-waves motion. The arrow shows the direction that the wave is moving.

transmitted as a P-wave and some as an S-wave. The nota- PKIKP


tion for the various seismic ray paths within the Earth are
as follows: PKiKP PKP
When an earthquake occurs, seismic waves are emitted
from the focus (hypocenter); there are several paths that it PcP
can take through the Earth before emerging again at the
surface. These paths (refer to Figure 3) are symbolized
by the letters: p = P-wave arrival from a path that traveled
upward from the focus (hypocenter); pP = P-wave arrival
from a path that traveled upward from the focus, reflected Focus
off the surface of the Earth, then arrived back at the sur-
face; P = P-wave arrival from a path that traveled down-
PPP
ward from the focus (hypocenter); PP = P-wave reflected
off the surface once; PPP = P-wave reflected off the sur-
face twice; c = a reflection off the outside of the outer sur-
pP
face of the outer core – note that this is the principle cause
of multiple arrivals of P- and S-waves right at the epicen-
PKKP
ter; K = a travel path (refraction) through the outer core; P
KK = one reflection on the inside outer surface of the outer PP
core; KKK = two reflections off the inside outer surface of
the outer core; i = a reflection off the outside of the outer Body Waves, Figure 3 P- and S-wave paths in the Earth‘s
surface of the inner core; I = a travel path (refraction) interior.
through the inner core. These letters can be used to indi-
cate the path of a seismic wave through the Earth
(Figure 3). For example PKiKP indicates that the wave mantle to arrive at the surface. SKiKS is the same path, but
traveled downward from the focus, refracted through the an S-wave. Because liquids have no resistance to shear
outer core, reflected off the surface of the inner core, trav- and cannot sustain a shear wave, S-waves cannot travel
eled through the outer core, and then traveled through the through liquid material. The Earth’s outer core is believed
BODY WAVES 31

to be liquid because S-waves disappear at the mantle–core that some of the wave energy is reflected at the interface.
boundary, while P-waves do not. When a longitudinal wave moves from a slower to
a faster material, there is an incident angle that makes
Wave propagation the angle of refraction for the wave 90" . This is known
Seismic body waves propagate through the Earth’s inte- as the first critical angle. The change in direction depends
rior. Because of the elastic properties of the Earth’s mate- on the ratio of the wave velocities of the two different
rials (rocks) and the presence of the Earth’s surface, four rocks. When waves reach a boundary between different
main types of seismic waves propagate within the Earth. rock types, part of the energy is transmitted across the
Compressional (P) and Shear (S) waves propagate through boundary. The actual interaction between a seismic wave
the Earth’s interior. and a contrast in rock properties is more complicated
because an incident P-wave generates transmitted and
Waves on a seismogram reflected P- and S-waves and also an incident S-wave gen-
If we look at a seismogram, we expect to see the first wave erates transmitted and reflected P- and S-waves, so five
to arrive to be a P-wave (the fastest), then the S-wave, and waves are involved. The transmitted wave travels in
finally, the Love and Rayleigh (the slowest) waves. As a different direction, which depends on the ratio of veloc-
you might expect, the difference in wave speed has ities of the two rock types (Figures 5 and 6). Part of the
a profound influence on the nature of seismograms. Since energy is also reflected backwards into the region with
the travel time of a wave is equal to the distance the wave rock type 1, but we have not shown that on these figures.
has traveled divided by the average speed the wave moved Refraction has an important effect on waves that travel
during the transit, we expect that the fastest waves arrive at through Earth. In general, the seismic velocity in Earth
a seismometer first. The fact that the waves travel at increases with depth (there are some important exceptions
speeds that depend on the material properties (elastic mod- to this trend) and refraction of waves causes the path
uli and density) allows us to use seismic-wave observa- followed by body waves to curve upward (Figure 7).
tions to investigate the interior structure of the planet.
We can look at the travel times, or the travel times and
the amplitudes of waves to infer the existence of features
within the planet, and this is an active area of seismologi- VL1 VL1′
cal research. To understand how we “see” into Earth using
vibrations, we must study how waves interact with the
rocks that make up Earth. Several types of interaction θ1
θ1
between waves and the subsurface geology (i.e., the rocks)
are commonly observable on seismograms. We will exam-
ine the two simplest types of interaction refraction and
reflection.
θ2 VL2
Refraction
As a wave travels through Earth, the path it takes depends
on the velocity. Perhaps you recall from high school
a principle called Snell’s law, which is the mathematical
expression that allows us to determine the path a wave Body Waves, Figure 4 Reflected (VL10 ) and refracted (VL2 )
takes as it is transmitted from one rock layer into another. longitudinal waves.
Snell’s law describes the relationship between the angles
and the velocities of the waves. Snell’s law equates the
ratio of material velocities V1 and V2 to the ratio of the
sines of incident (y1) and refracted (y2) angles, as shown
in the following equation:
sin y1 sin y2
¼ (1) Rock
VL1 VL2 Type 1
where VL1 is the longitudinal wave velocity in material 1
and VL2 is the longitudinal wave velocity in material 2.
Note that in Figure 4, there is a reflected longitudinal Rock
wave (VL10 ) shown. This wave is reflected at the same Type 2
angle as the incident wave because the two waves are trav-
eling in the same material, and hence have the same veloc-
ities. This reflected wave is unimportant in our Body Waves, Figure 5 Velocity in rock type 2 is greater than
explanation of Snell’s law, but it should be remembered velocity in rock type 1.
32 BODY WAVES

Reflected
Rock Rock wave
Type 1 Type 1

Rock Rock
Type 2 Type 2

Body Waves, Figure 6 Velocity in rock type 2 is less than Body Waves, Figure 8 When a wave encounters a change in
velocity in rock type 1. material properties (seismic velocities and or density), its energy
is split into reflected and refracted waves.

Seismometer Seismometer
on t
efr
av cula
r
W endi t3
Perp
e
angl
Earthquake Earthquake t2
Ray
Constant-Velocity Earth path t1
Sphere
t0
Compressional
Body Waves, Figure 7 The overall increase in seismic-wave Source (P) motion
speed with depth into Earth produces an upward curvature to
rays that pass through the mantle. A notable exception is
caused by the decrease in velocity from the mantle to the core.
This speed decrease bends waves backwards and creates
a “P-wave shadow zone” between about 100" and 140" distance
(1" = 111.19 km).
Shear (S)
motion
Reflection
The second wave interaction with variations in rock type
Body Waves, Figure 9 Wave fronts and ray paths in seismic-
is reflection. I am sure you are familiar with reflected wave propagation.
sound waves: we call them echoes. And your reflection
in a mirror or pool of water is composed of reflected light
waves. In seismology, reflections are used to prospect for P-wave generates transmitted and reflected P- and
petroleum and investigate Earth’s internal structure. In S-waves and so five waves are involved. Likewise, when
some instances, reflections from the boundary between an S-wave interacts with a boundary in rock properties,
the mantle and crust may induce strong shaking that it too generates reflected and refracted P- and S-waves.
causes damage about 100 km from an earthquake (we call Because major boundaries between different rock types
that boundary the “Moho” in honor of Mohorovicic, the within the Earth are normally approximately parallel to
scientist who discovered it). A seismic reflection occurs the Earth’s surface, S-wave particle motion is commonly
when a wave impinges on a change in rock type (which in the SV (perpendicular to the ray path and vertical) and
usually is accompanied by a change in seismic-wave SH (perpendicular to the ray path and horizontal) direc-
speed). A part of the energy carried by the incident wave tions. P-waves travel faster than S-waves, so there will
is transmitted through the material (that is the refracted be separate wave front representations for the P- and
wave described above), and a part is reflected back into S-waves (Figure 9). If the physical properties of the mate-
the medium that contained the incident wave (Figure 8). rial through which the waves are propagating are constant,
The amplitude of the reflection depends strongly on the the wave fronts will be circular (or spherical in three
angle that the incident wave makes with the boundary dimensions). If the physical properties vary in the model,
and the contrast in material properties across the boundary. the wave fronts will be more complex shapes. In the trans-
For some angles, all the energy can be returned into verse or shear wave, the particles oscillate at a right angle
the medium containing the incident wave. An incident or transverse to the direction of propagation. Shear waves
BODY WAVES 33

require an acoustically solid material for effective propa- density, then the P-wave velocity, which we represent by
gation, and therefore, are not effectively propagated in CP, is defined by:
materials such as liquids or gases. Shear waves are rela- sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
tively weak when compared to longitudinal waves. In fact, l þ 2m
shear waves are usually generated in materials using some CP ¼ (3)
r
of the energy from longitudinal waves.
A modulus is a measure of how easy or difficult it is to
Velocity deform a material. For example, the bulk modulus is
Among the properties of waves propagating in isotropic a measure of how a material changes volume when pres-
solid materials are wavelength, frequency, and velocity. sure is applied and is a characteristic of a material. For
The wavelength (l) is directly proportional to the velocity example, foam rubber has a lower bulk modulus than
of the wave (C) and inversely proportional to the fre- steel. P-waves are sound waves, it is just that in seismol-
quency ( f ) of the wave. The phase velocity of a seismic ogy we are interested in frequencies that are lower than
wave can be written as: humans’ range of hearing (the speed of sound in air is
about 0.3 km/s). The vibration caused by P-waves is
C ¼ o=k; (2) a volume change, alternating from compression to expan-
where o ¼ 2pf is the angular frequency and k ¼ l=2p is sion in the direction that the wave is traveling. P-waves
wave number. travel through all types of media – solid, liquid, or gas.
S-waves
Velocity of P- and S-waves Secondary, or S-waves, travel slower than P-waves
Seismic waves travel fast, of the order of kilometers per and are also called “shear” waves because they do not
second (km/s). The precise speed that a seismic wave change the volume of the material through which they
travels depends on several factors, the most important of propagate – they shear it. S-waves are transverse waves
which is the composition of the rock. We are fortunate that because they vibrate the ground in a direction “trans-
the speed depends on the rock type because it allows us to verse,” or perpendicular, to the direction that the wave is
use observations recorded on seismograms to infer the traveling.
composition or a range of compositions of the planet. The S-wave speed, call it CS, depends on the shear
But the process is not always simple, because sometimes modulus and the density
different rock types have the same seismic-wave velocity, rffiffiffi
and other factors also affect the speed, particularly m
temperature and pressure. Temperature tends to lower CS ¼ (4)
r
the speed of seismic waves and pressure tends to
increase the speed. Pressure increases with depth in Earth Even though they are slower than P-waves, the S-waves
because the weight of the rocks above increases with move quickly. Typical S-wave propagation speeds are of
increasing depth. Usually, the effect of pressure is larger the order of 1–8 km/s. The lower value corresponds to
and in regions of uniform composition, the velocity gener- the wave speed in loose, unconsolidated sediment, the
ally increases with depth, despite the fact that the increase higher value is near the base of Earth’s mantle. An impor-
of temperature with depth works to lower the wave veloc- tant distinguishing characteristic of an S-wave is its inabil-
ity. When the different seismic-wave types are described ity to propagate through a fluid or a gas because fluids and
below, I will quote ranges of speed to indicate the range gases cannot transmit a shear stress and S-waves are
of values we observe in common terrestrial rocks. But waves that shear the material. The velocity of seismic
you should keep in mind that the specific speed through- waves depends on the elastic properties and density of
out Earth will depend on composition, temperature, and a material in which the wave is traveling. P-waves are
pressure. sound waves, it is just that in seismology we are interested
in frequencies that are lower than humans’ range of hear-
P-waves ing (the speed of sound in air is about 0.3 km/s). The vibra-
P-waves are the first waves to arrive on a complete record tion caused by P-waves is a volume change, alternating
of ground shaking because they travel the fastest (their from compression to expansion in the direction that the
name derives from this fact –P is an abbreviation for pri- wave is traveling. In general, earthquakes generate larger
mary, first wave to arrive). They typically travel at speeds shear waves than compressional waves and much of the
between #1 and #14 km/s. The slower values corre- damage close to an earthquake is the result of strong shak-
sponds to a P-wave traveling in water, the higher number ing caused by shear waves.
represents the P-wave speed near the base of Earth’s man-
tle. The velocity of a wave depends on the elastic proper- Attenuation
ties and density of a material. If we let k represent the bulk Near the source of a strong disturbance, such as a large
modulus of a material, m the shear modulus, and r the explosion or earthquake, the wave-generated deformation
34 BODY WAVES

can be large enough to cause permanent deformation, seismic body waves has been discussed in a number
which will be visible as cracks, fault offsets, and displace- of books and in numerous papers (e.g., Bromwich,
ments of the ground after the disturbance has passed. 1898; Sezawa, 1927; Haskell, 1953; Ewing et al., 1957;
A source of energy creates the initial disturbance and the Brekhovskikh, 1960; Bullen, 1963; Bath, 1968;
resulting waves propagate (travel) out from the distur- Achenbach, 1975 and others). Attenuations of seismic
bance. Because there is finite energy in a confined or waves have been investigated by many authors (e.g.,
short-duration disturbance, the waves generated by such McDonald et al., 1958; Knopoff and Macdonald, 1958;
a source will spread out during propagation and become Kolsky, 1963; White, 1965; Kuster and Toksoz, 1974;
smaller (attenuate) with distance away from the source Shoenberger and Levin, 1974; Kennett, 1983; Hong and
or with time after the initial source, and thus, will eventu- Kennett, 2003 and others). The asymptotic theory of
ally die out (Figure 10). Knowledge of attenuation can be body-wave propagation in anisotropic media is also
very useful in seismic data processing, as its removal well developed (e.g., Crampin, 1984; Thomsen, 1986;
increases resolution. Tsvankin, 1997; Cerveny, 2001; Chapman, 2004).
Attenuation often serves as a measurement tool that The effect of initial stresses present in the medium is not
leads to the formation of theories to explain physical or considered in the above studies. Recently, Dey and Dutta
chemical phenomenon that decreases the body wave’s (1998) have been studying the problem of propagation
intensity. The amplitude change of a decaying plane wave and attenuation of seismic waves, taking the effect of ini-
can be expressed as: tial stresses present in the medium into account. Biot incre-
mental deformation theory has been used (Biot, 1965) in
A ¼ A0 e%az (5) their study. Selim and Ahmed (2006) have studied the
In this expression A0 is the unattenuated amplitude of velocities of propagation, damping, and attenuations of
the propagating wave at some location. The amplitude A seismic body waves in compressible and dissipative
is the reduced amplitude after the wave has traveled medium under the effect of both initial and couple stresses.
a distance z from the source. The quantity a is the attenu-
ation coefficient of the wave traveling in the z-direction. Body-wave modeling
The more common unit of the attenuation value is Deci-
bels. Attenuation is generally proportional to the square Seismological methods for determining Earth structure are
of the frequency. Quoted values of attenuation are often often classified as being either active or passive in nature.
given for a single frequency, or an attenuation value aver- Passive methods involve waiting for an earthquake to
aged over many frequencies may be given. The quoted occur and provide the seismic source for recording. In
values of attenuation only give a rough indication of the contrast, controlled-source seismology refers to active
attenuation and should not be automatically trusted. Gen- methods where the experimenter provides the source by
erally, a reliable value of attenuation can only be obtained an explosion or a mechanical device such as a hammer,
by determining the attenuation experimentally for the par- a weight that is dropped, or a vibrator. Active methods
ticular material being used. can, in turn, be divided into two basic classifications.
The first is seismic reflection profiling, which is a clearly
defined approach in which the goal is to produce an image
Summary: results of regional and global studies of the subsurface in which structures can be seen directly,
The study of seismic body waves permits us to derive in the way that an X-ray image reveals features inside an
important knowledge about the internal constitution of object. Other active seismic methods infer seismic veloci-
the Earth. The problems related to propagation of elastic ties and the presence of discontinuities in velocity and
structure (such as faults) using a variety of approaches that
Attenuation of frequencies
analyze the arrival times and sometimes the shape of seis-
mic waves traveling along different paths through the
Earth. As a consequence of advances in seismic instru-
1
mentation and national programs increasing the number
0.8 of instruments available, there have been many recent
Amplitude

developments in these techniques that do not directly


0.6 image the Earth. A convenient aspect of the theoretical
0.4
basis for virtually all active-source techniques is that they
are largely independent of scale. Thus, detailed studies to
0.2 address environmental problems and regional studies to
determine deep Earth structure employ the same basic
0 techniques of analysis (Hancock and Skinner, 2000).
0 50 100 150 200
Frequency Recently, several efforts have been made to complete our
knowledge of the structure of the Earth’s upper mantle
Body Waves, Figure 10 Amplitude spectrum in red is for signal by detailed observation of seismic body waves, especially
after attenuation. by their amplitude–distance curves.
BODY WAVES 35

Bibliography McDonald, F. J., Angona, F. A., Mills, R. L., Sengbush, R. L., Van
Nostrand, R. G., and White, J. E., 1958. Attenuation of shear and
Achenbach, J. D., 1975. Wave Propagation in Elastic Solids.
compressional waves in Pierre shale. Geophysics, 23(3),
Amsterdam: North-Holland, p. 425.
421–439.
Bath, M. A., 1968. Mathematical Aspects of Seismology.
Selim, M. M., and Ahmed, M. K., 2006. Propagation and attenua-
Amsterdam: Elsevier, p. 414.
tion of seismic body waves in dissipative medium under initial
Biot, M. A., 1965. Mechanics of Incremental Deformation.
and couple stresses. Applied Mathematics and Computation,
New York: Wiley, p. 181.
182, 1064–1074.
Brekhovskikh, L. M., 1960. Waves in Layered Media. New York:
Sezawa, K., 1927. Dispersion of elastic waves propagated on the
Academic.
surface of stratified bodies and on curves surfaces. Bulletin of
Bromwich, T. J. L. A., 1898. On the influence of gravity on the elas-
the Earthquake Research Institute (Tokyo), 3, 1–18.
tic waves and in particular on the vibration of an elastic globe.
Shoenberger, M., and Levin, F. K., 1974. Apparent attenuation due
Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 30, 98–120.
to intrabed multiples. Geophysics, 39(3), 278–291.
Bullen, K. E., 1963. An Introduction to the Theory of Seismology.
Thomsen, L., 1986. Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophysics, 51,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1954–1966.
Cerveny, V., 2001. Seismic Ray Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge
Tsvankin, I., 1997. Anisotropic parameters and p-wave velocity for
University Press.
othorhombic media. Geophysics, 62, 1292–1309.
Chapman, C., 2004. Fundamentals of Seismic Wave Propagation.
White, J. E., 1965. Seismic Waves, Radiation, Transformation and
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Attenuation. New York: McGraw-Hill, p. 302.
Crampin, S., 1984. An introduction to wave propagation in aniso-
tropic media. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical
Society, 76, 17–28. Cross-references
Dey, S., and Dutta, D., 1998. Propagation and attenuation of seismic Deep Seismic Reflection and Refraction Profiling
body waves in initially stressed dissipative medium. Acta Earth’s Structure, Global
Geophysica Polonica, XLVI(3), 351–365. Earthquakes and Crustal Deformation
Ewing, W. M., Jardetzky, W. S., and Press, F., 1957. Elastic Waves Earthquakes, Energy
in Layered Media. New York: McGraw-Hill, p. 380. Earthquakes, Source Theory
Hancock, P., and Skinner, B. J., 2000. Controlled-source seismol- Propagation of Elastic Waves: Fundamentals
ogy. The Oxford Companion to the Earth. Encyclopedia.com. Seismic Phase Names: IASPEI Standard
Haskell, N. A., 1953. The dispersion of surface waves in multilay- Seismic Signals in Well Observations: Pre, Co, Post
ered media. Bulletin. Seismological Society of America, 43, Seismic Tomography
17–34. Seismic Velocity-Density Relationships
Hong, T. K., and Kennett, B. L. N., 2003. Scattering attenuation of Seismic Wave Propagation in Real Media: Numerical Modeling
2D elastic waves: theory and numerical modeling using Approaches
a wavelet-based method. Bulletin of the Seismological Society Seismic Waves, Scattering
of America, 93(2), 922–938. Seismic, Ray Theory
Kennett, B. L. N., 1983. Seismic Wave Propagation in Stratified Seismic, Viscoelastic Attenuation
Media. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 342 pp. Seismic, Waveform Modeling and Tomography
Knopoff, L., and Macdonald, J. F., 1958. Attenuation of small Seismology, Global Earthquake Model
amplitude stress waves in solid. Reviews of Modern Physics, Traveltime Tomography Using Controlled-Source Seismic Data
30, 1178.
Kolsky, H., 1963. Stress Waves in Solid. New York: Dover.
Kuster, G. T., and Toksoz, M. N., 1974. Velocity and attenuation of
seismic waves in two-phase media, Part I: theoretical formula-
tions. Geophysics, 39(5), 587–618.

You might also like