VARIATION

CRITIQUES
AUTHORS YEAR TITLE AIMS OF SAMPLE CONCLUSION
INSTRUMENT
TITLE NO. 1: "The Effects of Technological Devices to the Academic Performances of Students"
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
Observe whether the
Provide useful
learning environment There is a
information
The Effect of the digital created by digital Experimental meaningful
about the digital
Mehmet Arif 2016 Classroom on Academic classroom Design with a pre 58 differences in
classroom’s
Success technologies has any - test/post - test. terms of academic
being used at
effects on the success of students,
school.
academic success.
Students who used
laptops in class Level the laptop
spent considerable use. Banning the
time multi-tasking laptop from their
Aims to know if
Carrie B. In-Class Laptop aid as a and that the laptop classroom when
2008 laptops are hinder in Survey method 100
Fried hinder used as a it is not used
classroom learning,
significant since it gives
distraction to both distraction to the
users and fellow students.
students.
Advantages and There are big
Dis – advantages factors that might
of mobile learning affect the
The Effects of Find out the effects of in different levels students learning
Qualitative
Yao – Ting integrating mobile integrating mobile of moderator in integrating
2016 analyses and 110
Sung devices on students’ devices in students variable were mobile devices in
synthesis
learning performance. learning. synthesized based learning. There
on content analyses will be
of individual distractions
students. during class
 hours.
These findings
Determine whether
One to One Technology 4TH Technology could are important due
one to one technology
and Its Effect on Grade be factor in to technological
Jennifer Haris 2015 effects the academic Quantitative
Students Academic Participa students’ academic shift that schools
achievement of
Achievement nts achievement. are currently
students.
facing.
TITLE NO. 2 " Learning Styles and its Effect to the Academic Performance of Senior High School Students "
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

Learni
ng
Styles
and Results indicated Learning styles
Acade significant can be
mic Investigate the relationships considered as a
Perfor relationship between between different good predictor of
mance learning styles and the learning styles and any second
Random Sapling
of academic performance the performance in language and
Mark Llin 2016 Technique and 488
Stude of students who attend an English test, and academic
Survey method
nts in English class to learn the performance performance and
Englis English as a Second resulted differently it should be taken
h as a language in Iran in four groups with into account to
Secon different preferred enhance
d learning styles. performances.
Langu
age
Class
in Iran
The relationship Identify the learning Teacher use It is not clear
between learning styles of Turkish Descriptive different ways to why the
Ali Ghainbari 2013 100
styles and academic physiotherapy students method learn new things in performance of
performance in and investigate the their daily lesson. some students of
 TURKISH relationship between physiotherapy in
physiotherapy students academic performance class perform
and determine whether well – maybe
the learning styles of teaching styles
physiotherapy students was much with
could influence this styles of
academic performance. learning
accidentally.
Results of these
finding, further
research is
recommended in
this area.
. It seems
therefore
from this
study that
although the
Evaluate the learning The significant learning
Does learning styles faculty students between the scores styles of
style influence and to determine the of post – test and students
Ivana academic effect of their success the student’s vary, they
2018 Survey method 140
Cimermanova performance in and relationship success revealed have little
different forms of between their learning that they levelled effect on
assessment? styles and academic how they study academic
success. effectively. performance,
including in
specific
forms of
assessment.
 The study objectives There
were to: (a) identify the is no There is strong
learning style significant positive and
preference among difference in statistically
A Correlation study secondary school learning style significant
between Learning students; (b) determine preference relationship
Styles and the academic among male between learning
Academic
Mar Nzecei 2015 achievement levels of Purposive 100 and female styles and
Achievement the students; and (c) students and academic
among Secondary determine the among high achievement for
School Students in relationship between and low the trimodal
Kenya learning style and academic learners, and
academic achievement achievement among male and
of the students by groups. female students.
gender.
TITLE NO: 3 " Cyber bullying and its effects to the academic performance and behavior to students of senior high school students"
REVIEW OR RELATED LITERATURE
Sensitivity
analysis indicat
ed potential Results suggest
problems of
The Seeks to that bullying has
Distinguish bullying omitted
Impact of Cyber measure the Survey a negative impact
from other kinds of variables. The
bullying and effect of method on performance
aggression: imbalance results indicate
Gunstein Cyber bullying in math in mathematics
2001 of power, repetition or that anti-
Egeberg Harassment on scores of Propensity and that social
duration of negative bullying
Academic students in the Score emotional skills
actions and a deliberate programs
Achievement 6th grade of Matching can help students
will to hurt.
public school. should take into deal with
account social bullying.
emotional
skills.
 Results further
The results of the designate that of
study indicated that the respondents
a significant specified that
Investigates the number of the they had bullied
emotional and respondents had someone inside
Triangulat
physiological effects of suffered the university at
ion
cyber bullying on the emotionally due to least 2 or 3 times
method
university students. The cyber bullying. a month while 4 of
(quantitati
primary objective of Furthermore, of the the participants
ve,
this investigation is to respondents said that they had
Cyber bullying and qualitative
Felipe R. identify the victims of indicated that in bullied someone
2017 Academic 365 and
Olivera cyber bullying and their views cyber outside the
Achievement descriptive
critically analyze their bullying causes university at least
) is
emotional state and emotional and 2 or 3 times a
employed
frame of mind in order psychological month. It is
in the
to provide them with a stress. Further, interesting to
investigati
workable and feasible majority of the note that majority
on
intervention in fighting respondents agreed of the students
cyber bullying. that cyber bullying signify that they
adversely affects have heard
students’ academic bullying taking
performance place inside the
university.
Reveals how Cyber There are few The most
bullying takes place research studies statistically
through the information directly examining significant factor
Cyber Bullying and technology that students the relationship in predicting a
Rahamani Survey method
2012 Academic access every day: cell 250 between academic relationship to
Jahambaksh Questionnaire
performance phones, text messages, achievement and involvement with
email, Internet cyberbullying; this cyberbullying
messaging, social dissertation was a history of
networks, pictures, and examined that involvement with
 video clips. With the relationship. Data traditional
world paying more collected from a bullying. Either
attention to this new questionnaire as a target or a
form of bullying. provided to 847 bully, having a
middle school history of this
students in a form of bullying
Northeastern city meant a student
revealed that was more likely
higher-achieving to be both a
students were no cyberbully and a
more likely to cyberbullying
understand the target.
risks involved with
using the Internet
than students who
earned lower
grades.
Significant
relationships
Findings
between cyber
Investigate the revealed that the
Cyber bullying and its bullying , mainly
influence of cyber students had
influence in student’s through instant
Carrie B. bullying on the Correlative experienced at
2008 academic , social, and 368 messaging can
Fried academic , social, and method least 1 or two
emotional influence student’s
emotional development bullies through
development academic
of students the types of
performance, social
social media.
and emotional
development.
 The Quantum Academy, Inc.
NLSA Rd. Brgy. San Isidro, General Santos City
Thesis Matris

Alberto G. Pacquiao Jr.

February28, 2018