Professional Documents
Culture Documents
POLICY
Review of Literature
Shannon Kornegay
Abstract
Women abroad are being robbed of their fundamental rights. This is due to a U.S Policy that is
called the Global Gag Rule (GGR). Women are being objectified by this policy and now by the
topic of abortion. 881,000 abortions were done in the U.S just in the year 2017. (Abort73) There
are hundreds of thousands of abortions happening yearly in the U.S. So, you must be asking why
is it any different for countries abroad? Well, countries abroad that receive any category of U.S
foreign assistance are not allowed to perform or even speak about abortions. Even if they use
their non-U. S funds to perform an abortion. Due to the fact that clinics are forbidden to talk
about abortion many have closed down and lost funding for not only abortion but many other
important healthcare including HIV and malaria protection and medication. The Global Gag
Rule Policy has been enacted and rescinded depending on what party is in office. Since we have
a republican party in office right now the policy is enacted. How is it fair that in the U.S abortion
is legal but in clinics abroad using U.S funding abortion is not legal. To make matters worse
Trump has set back so much development with his version of the GGR more than 40 countries
have liberalized their abortion laws and have invested into the well-being of women and
girls.(CHANGE2018) Due to the fact that this policy forbids abortion in U.S funded clinics
which is the majority of clinics available, women are forced to take matters into their own hands.
The rate of unsafe abortions has increased, and many women are dying because of unsafe
abortions.
WOMEN’S RIGHTS REGARDING GLOBAL GAG RULE 3
POLICY
Review of literature
The rights of women have been debatable regarding abortion. Many people have no knowledge
of the Global Gag Rule Policy and what it entails. Healthcare should be provided and be
accessible to women everywhere without a biased policy preventing from getting the healthcare
that they deserve. Many people are not aware that this policy even exists and is doing more
damage than ever. Women everywhere should have access to proper healthcare without a gag
being enforced that holds them back from getting the healthcare they deserve. Because of the
injustices that this policy has caused restricting women from getting the full healthcare that they
deserve, we must put an end to this harmful policy. This literature review analyzes the research
2. What are the negative effects of restricting reproductive care for women?
The question as to who this policy is affected seems pretty obvious. Women mostly but, there are
so many other people being affected by this policy. This policy has affected many people who
are receiving HIV care. This is because HIV prevention efforts are heavily supported by the U.S
government and they have been heavily impacted by Trump’s version of this policy. Even
though the policy is thought to only affect safe abortions, it affects HIV treatment and prevention
programs. Non- governmental organizations (NGO’S) are also being affected by this because of
the fact that even before Trump’s version was enacted they were already struggling from funding
shortages because they decided to continue to provide abortions and abortion care. Now that
Trump’s version of the GGR is enacted the struggle for funding has gotten even harder for these
NGO’S. Because of the fact that these NGO’S are having shortages in funding some are forced
to close their doors and shut down. This means that there is one less clinic providing healthcare
for women, men, and children. Also, there will be no more access to HIV treatment or
contraception which has made a big problem even worse and it is affecting everyone. Adolescent
girls and young women (AGYW) account for 74 percent of new HIV infections among
adolescents in sub-Saharan Africa (Gender Health 2018). In conclusion, on the outside it may
seem that women are the only ones being affected by this policy. That is not true at all. Women
are the ones getting the worst part of it but this policy affects so many other people with different
health concerns. This policy has setback years of HIV and contraception efforts for women and
men.
What are the negative effects of restricting reproductive care for women?
WOMEN’S RIGHTS REGARDING GLOBAL GAG RULE 5
POLICY
The negative effects that come from restricting reproductive care for women go on and on. To
Prevented women and girls from accessing contraception and safe abortions consistent
Removed funding from humanitarian settings, which could have negatively affected the
(CHANGE2018)
The list of how this policy affects women really shows just how many negative affects come
with this policy. These women are living with the effects of this policy and are doing whatever it
takes to get the healthcare they need regardless if it is safe or if they come out alive. This policy
leaves these women with no other option than to perform an unsafe abortion not knowing the
outcome. In Figure.1 It is shown here in this survey that the entire comment section agrees that
this policy has a negative effect on women. Because the GGR is restricting reproductive care for
million women of reproductive age in developing regions have an unmet need for contraception,
accounting for 84% of all unintended pregnancies in developing regions. If these women had
due to unsafe abortion, which range in the tens of thousands per year, mostly in countries with
restrictive access. This is especially critical for adolescents who are at greater risk of pregnancy-
Figure. 1
WOMEN’S RIGHTS REGARDING GLOBAL GAG RULE 7
POLICY
What other aspects of healthcare are being affected by this policy?
Many aspects of healthcare are being affected by this policy. Starting with HIV and AIDS
treatment and prevention. Since clinics are now closing their doors and shutting down the access
to contraception and treatment are not available in rural communities. “IPPF” estimated it would
lose $100 million in U.S. funding during the Trump administration, a loss that would hamper
IPPF’s ability to prevent 20,000 maternal deaths, 4.8 million unintended pregnancies, and 1.7
70 million condoms
(Gender health 2018). As shown in the statistics above HIV is a major health problem in
countries receiving U.S funds. The GGR also prevents access to contraception.
According to “The Open Society Foundation” the U.S is a provider of nearly 50 percent
of the world’s HIV and AIDS funding (Public Health Program 2018). When the GGR is
countries rely heavily on the U.S to fund their clinics and provide them with the funds for
HIV treatment and prevention. Without these funds these clinics will be of no use to
HER Act would end the GGR policy. The Global HER Act is important because it would
require that any U.S foreign aid promotes healthcare that is free of discrimination and
prioritizes women’s health. The Global HER Act would require that U.S foreign aid is
consistent with the principals of the U.S meaning freedom of speech. Thus, removing the
gag on these people. The ACT would uphold and make sure that the patient has an
informed right to their own choice. The HER Act would benefit healthcare abroad for
women, men, and children. In Figure.2 it is shows that 100 percent of the survey takers
would get rid of this policy. Now all that we have to do is take action. According to
“genderhealth.org” what you can do to put an end to the GGR and support the Global
HER Act is call your member of congress and ask them to cosponsor the Global HER
Act. Also, as a member of congress, co- sponsor S.210 or H.R.671 and encourage your
Figure.2
WOMEN’S RIGHTS REGARDING GLOBAL GAG RULE 9
POLICY
Conclusion
In conclusion, this policy has little to no benefits for these people receiving funding abroad. It
has been proven by the facts that this policy causes more harm than it does good. It is proven that
this policy only sets back years of work on HIV prevention and progress that has been made
regarding healthcare. There are many websites, forums, blogs, and many more places that you
can find information about this topic. I learned when reviewing the results from my survey that 3
out of 4 people had no idea what the Global Gag Rule was or what it meant as a policy. As
shown in Figure.3. We as a country need to educate our people on our policy’s and us as
Americans need to be more involved with this policy and the subject of women’s rights. Being a
country that has freedom of speech and freedom for women to choose if they want an abortion or
abortion care or not we should provide that abroad. Everyone else who is getting funds from the
WOMEN’S RIGHTS REGARDING GLOBAL GAG RULE 10
POLICY
U.S should get the same freedom that we do in our country. A policy like this would never be
Figure.3
References
P. (n.d.). How the Global Gag Rule Undermines U.S. Foreign Policy and harms Women's
Health[PDF]. PAI.
http://pai.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/PAI-Gag-PIB.pdf
WOMEN’S RIGHTS REGARDING GLOBAL GAG RULE 11
POLICY
Global Gag Rule: How U.S. Aid is Threatening Health and Speech Worldwide. (n.d.). Retrieved
February 22, 2019, from https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/explainers/what-global-gag-
rule
https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/explainers/what-global-gag-rule
Fact Sheet: The Global Gag Rule and Human Rights[PDF]. (2018, January). Center for
Reproductive Rights.
https://www.reproductiverights.org/sites/crr.civicactions.net/files/documents/GLP-GGR-FS-
0118-Web.pdf
Prescribing Chaos in Global Health[PDF]. (2018, June). Change center for health and gender
equality.
http://www.genderhealth.org/files/uploads/change/publications/Prescribing_Chaos_in_Global_H
ealth_full_report.pdf
Global Health, Empowerment and Rights[PDF]. (2018, July). Change center for health and
gender equality.
http://www.genderhealth.org/files/uploads/change/publications/CHANGE_GGR_fact_sheet.pdf
Trump marks first week in office by betraying women[PDF]. (2017, January). Change center for
health and gender equality.
http://www.genderhealth.org/files/uploads/Trumps_Global_Gag.pdf