You are on page 1of 34

Projetos e Sistemas de

Gestão de Barragens de
Rejeitos: uma perspectiva
mundial.

Dr. Richard Dawson, P.Eng.


Executive Vice President

April 25, 2017

“the dam safety system


applied to the oil sands
industry is the best in the
world” (Morgenstern, 2011)
EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com
Outline

• Roles and
Responsibilities
• Design Standards
• Technology
Development
• Risk Management
• Dam Safety Reviews

EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com 2


MAC, 2011: Roles and Responsibilities

Accountable
Executive Officer Independent Tailings
Review Board
(ITRB)

TSF Qualified Engineer of Record


Person

EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com 3


Engineer of Record (EOR)

 “Is a qualified and competent engineer with


experience commensurate with the consequence
classification and complexity ”
 “Holds the professional responsibility for the facility
design and is responsible for evaluating the
adequacy of the as-built facility relative to the
design as well as applicable standards, criteria, and
guidelines”

EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com 4


Independent Tailings Review Board (ITRB)

 “Made up of independent subject


matters experts not currently
involved in or responsible for the
design, operation or construction
of the facility”
 “Provides non-binding advice and
guidance, but does not direct the
work or perform the role of the
Engineer of Record”

EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com 5


Design Standards – Factor of Safety Criteria Comparison

Brazil
Canada Australia
Phase Condition (ABNT)
(CDA) (ANCOLD)
2006
Potential Loss of
Short Containment
1.5
Term 1.5  1.3
No Potential Loss of
(EOC) Containment
1.3

Long Term (Steady State) 1.5 1.5


Rapid Drawdown 1.1 1.2 - 1.3
Critical Phreatic Level 1.3
Pseudo-Static ? 1.0
Seismic
Post Earthquake ? 1.2 1.0 – 1.2

EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com 6


Samarco Stability Design Criteria

Brazil
Phase Condition (ABNT) Comment
2006
Short Potential Loss of Containment
Term 1.5
(EOC) No Potential Loss of Containment
Existing Brazil
Long Term (Steady State) 1.5 regulatory
standard
Rapid Drawdown 1.1

Critical Phreatic Level 1.3

Pseudo-Static 1.0
Adopt CDA
Seismic
guideline
Post Earthquake/Post liquefaction* 1.2 *
* Include static liquefaction
EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com 7
Best Practices

• Best Applicable Technology Economically


Achievable – BATEA - combination of
technologies and techniques that most EXAMPLES:
effectively reduce the economic, physical,
geochemical, ecological and social risks  Filter Tailings
associated with tailings during all stages of
operation and closure.  Remote Monitoring
• Best Available/Applicable Practice – BAP -  Cone Penetration Testing
management systems and operational
procedures to ensure that tailings storage
facilities are designed, constructed, operated,
maintained, monitored and closed to support
sustainable mining practices.

EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com 8


BATEA – Filter Tailings
Lowest solids content
• Conventional Slurry Tailings

• Thickened Tailings Thickening


Continuum

• Paste Tailings

• Filtered Tailings / “Dry” Stack Highest solids content

Filter Press

EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com 9


BATEA – Tailings Technology Alternatives Evaluation

Trade off study to determine BATEA at a site in


British Columbia, Canada

EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com 10


Operational Filtered Tailings Stack
Eldorado Gold Efemcukuru Mine, Turkey

Controlled Material Placement


Transportation Spreading Compaction

EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com 11


Brasil Filter Tailings Pilot Plant and Test Plots

Thickened
slimes
Filtered
Sand
Tailings Mixture of filtered
Pile 2 slimes and sandy
tailings

Pile 1

Pile 3

EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com 12


Samarco Germano Pit Filter Tailings Design

EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com 13


BAP - Cone Penetration Test (CPT)
ADVANTAGES:
• Fast and continuous profiling
• Repeatable and reliable data
• Economical and productive
• Strong theoretical basis for interpretation
• Additional sensors

LIMITATIONS:
• High capital investment
• Skilled operators
• No soil sample
• Penetration restricted in gravels/cemented layers

EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com


CONVENTIONAL DRILLING DIRECT-PUSH
& SAMPLING TECHNOLOGY
Lab

Oscilloscope
UD Drop
tube Hammer

Cased SCPTù
Boreholes
qt
FIRM
CHT: fs
u2
Vs, Vp
SAND t50
Vs
SPT: N60
SOFT Fast 2cm/s
Continuous
VST: su, St CLAY Repeatable
Cost effective
PMT: E’
Packer: kEXPLORE
vh old After Mayne, 2010
the Depths of our Experience new
| www.norwestcorp.com
CPT Data Presentation

EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com


Standard CPTu Plot
CPTU for Liquefaction Evaluations

3.2H:1V

~El. 945m-952m

Key Plan

17
EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com 17
BAP - Automated Instrumentation Systems

Sensors
(Vibrating Wire Piezometer, Shape Accelerometer Array (SAA), In-Place
Inclinometer (IPI), Transducer, Tiltmeter, Strain Gauge, GPS, Radar, inSAR)

Datalogging and Telemetry


(Storage and transmission of data via networked radios, cellular or satellite
communication)

Communication
Acquisition andDevices
Analysis
(Web/Server based monitoring software, near real-time readings, alarm criteria
and alert systems, Factor of Safety (FOS) analysis)

Design and Operational Decisions


(Performance based decisions, construction sequencing)

EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com 18


Samarco Monitoring System

EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com


BAP- Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar
(InSAR)

EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com 20


Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR)

SAMARCO Sela/Tulipa Dams

EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com 21


BAP – Mobile Data Collection

Intelltech is a Brazilian technology company


EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com 22
FEMA (2015) Dam
Safety Risk
Management
Framework

EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com 23


Potential Failure Modes Analysis
Warning Time
Potential Failure Mode Controlling
Failure Category Positive Factors Adverse Factor (hours, days, Barriers/Controls Hazard Category Recommendations and Comments
Description Areas
weeks)
Large storm exasperated by a • Freeboard exceeds the incident PMP by a factor of 5. • Closed water management system. • Containment structure with generous • There are no recommendations or comments at
pumping failure leading to a freeboard. this time.
rising pond level and a • Recycle water barges are in place.
subsequent breach of the dyke. • Ultimate containment for all site water. • Specific procedures are in place to
All areas. • Very slow increase with sufficient time to implement Weeks manage a rising pond condition (OMS). IV
Unplanned operational rise in the mitigations.
pond water leading to a rising
pond level and a subsequent • Control of the fresh water intake.
breach of the dyke.
• TT containment is hundreds of meters away from the • TT dykes will be higher than the surrounding perimeter • Continuous monitoring. • Per the CP16 plan CST beach is built in advance of
perimeter dyke. structure for a period of time. the TSRU deposit, and therefore, this scenario is
unlikely given the current plan.
• The EETA is planned as a "dry" facility. • Characteristics are not well known.
Failure of the TT containment
Dyke Fails by • Evaluate critical failure mechanisms.
dykes leading to a wave or flow
Overtopping EETA • Deposit characteristics limit the mobility. • Tailings plans are subject to change. Hours IV
event which subsequently
(Reservoir Goes overtops the perimeter dyke.
Up) • Beaching from the perimeter dykes means that any TT
released from the TT containment dykes will have to
overcome a positive beach slope for some distance, as well as
the perimeter dyke freeboard.
• BBW has slumped without consequence. • Steep (30 degrees)TSRU BBW slopes. • Continuous monitoring. • Operational risks (non-breach) for TSRU BBW
need to be assessed.
• TSRU is strong (30 degrees) and compressible. • Removal of FFT supporting the TSRU BBW from the pond for
use in TT. • Although this failure mode could develop
Failure of the BBW leading to a
• Freeboard of 3 m. quickly, the potential risk for an overtopping event
wave or flow event which
WETA Hours IV is considered negligible.
subsequently overtops the
• TSRU feed goes in-pit when storage space is available.
perimeter dyke.
• Current beach above water widths are greater than the
minimum. 50 m of beach above water is added to the
structural zone by Operations as a form of contingency.
• CPT programs demonstrate BAW is dilative for the rate of • Liquefaction occurs very rapidly and cannot be managed • Beach surveillance program is in place • Liquefaction potential of the BAW relies on the
rise used to date. with the observational method. to measure and confirm the design rate of rise.
minimum BAW.
• Industry experience demonstrates that the BAW is typically • BBW liquefaction has been observed in oil sands tailings • Failure method occurs rapidly and observational
dilative. facilities. • Procedures in place to control the method cannot be relied upon.
Liquefaction of the beach leading
placement of the beach and promote
to flow slides and failure of the All areas. Hours II


• Beach construction follows a method specification. • Potential to deviate from past placement methods. drainage. • Verify that method specification is being
Identify “credible” failure modes
dyke.
• Tailings feed is variable.
followed.

• BBW is assigned an undrained shear strength.


• Potential for the method specification to be applied

 Provide complete descriptions of each failure mode including the initiating event and
• The design governs the rate of rise.
inconsistently.
• Limited mitigation options due to physical constraints
(space).
• Pore water pressure and inclinometer
monitoring system.
• Revise the monitoring thresholds.

sequence of steps leading to an uncontrolled release from the impoundment


• Shallow (8H:1V) slopes at design controlling sections.

• Performance has been within expectations.


• WETA - Up to 280 mm of displacement has been measured in
the shallow foundation (P7).
• Rate of rise is limited to 10 m per year
(OMS).
• Perform stress strain analysis.


• Foundation materials get stronger with time. • WETA - Hl and Pl clays have the potential to generate high • EETA - Potential for a toe berm.
Describe the magnitude of the breach • Construction pore water pressures dissipate rapidly.
excess pore pressures during undrained shear (i.e. contractive
behavior).

Undrained shear failure through West Dyke (P5 -


• Undrained strength is considered in design. • EETA - Up to 160 mm of displacement has been measured in
shallow weak layers in the P9), East Dyke Days II
the shallow foundation (P35) on the first lift of the starter
foundation (Hl/Pl clays). (P35 - P38)
• Foundation conditions are well characterized. dyke.

• An appropriate level of conservatism has been incorporated • EETA - Cell construction practices lead to elevated shear
into the design. WETA - Wick drains to relieve construction stress beneath the starter dyke.

EXPLORE
"Robust Parameters" were used in the design as mitigation
involves relocating infrastructure.
the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com
pore water pressure for West Starter Dyke construction. EETA -
24
Risk Analysis Techniques

Some examples:
• Failure Modes and Effects
Analysis (FMEA)
• Bow Tie Analysis
• Event Trees
• Fault Trees
• Reliability Analysis
• Consequential Risk
Analysis
• Subjective methods
• Vulnerability Index

EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com 25


Dam Safety Risk Controls

• Dam Safety Management System (MAC


Guidelines)
• Operating Plans and Procedures
• Maintenance and Testing of Critical
Equipment
• Surveillance Plans
• Performance Evaluation/Observational
Method
• Mitigation/Repair
• Emergency Management

EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com 26


Risk Informed vs Risk Based Dam Safety Decisions

FEMA, 2015:

 “Risk informed dam safety decision


making implies that decisions are
made considering risk estimates and
many other contributing factors that
might include confidence in the risk
estimates, risk uncertainty,
deterministic analyses, and the
overall dam safety case in addition to
other local or regional
considerations”

 “Risk based dam safety decision


making implies that a comparison of
a risk estimate to risk criteria is the
basis for decision making”

EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com 27


Dam Safety Reviews

“A dam safety review is part of the


dam safety management system that
has the overall goal to protect
people, property and the environment
from harmful effects of misoperation
or failure of dams and reservoirs.”

Companion CDA references:

 CDA (2007, 2013); Dam Safety


Guidelines
 CDA (2014) Technical Bulletin –
Guidelines to Mining Dams

EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com 28


Types of Dam Safety Reviews

 Audit type

 Comprehensive

 Detailed Design-based Multi-


disciplinary

 Comprehensive and Detailed


Design and Performance Review

EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com 29


Deficiencies and Non-conformances (CDA, 2016)

 A dam safety “deficiency” is an inadequacy or uncertainty in


the inadequacy of the dam system to meet its performance
goals in accordance with good dam safety practices
 A dam safety “non-conformance” is an inadequacy in the non-
physical controls (procedures, processes and management
systems) necessary to maintain the safety of the dam

EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com 30


APEGBC Dam Safety Assurance Statement – Mining Dams

EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com 31


Key Messages – Governance

 Well defined roles, responsibilities and


accountabilies for key positions (ex. Engineer of
Record)
 Formal independent review requirements with
Independent Tailings Review Boards (ITRB) reporting
to senior management.

EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com 32


Key Messages – Best Practices

BATEA
 Rapid development of tailings dewatering processes. Technology sharing
occurs at international conferences and workshop (ex. Paste conference,
Tailings and Mine Waste conference) and with expert review. Each site is
unique and alternative assessments are required.
BAP
 Performance management and the observational method
 CPTU is the “standard” for evaluating tailings deposits
 Remote monitoring technologies and systems
 Mining Association of Canada (MAC) tailings guides

EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com 33


Key Messages – Process

 Systems based approach ….. Mining Association of Canada (MAC)


Guidelines
 Dam Safety Reviews
 Risk Management:
o Failure Modes Identification and Risk Control are critical to the process. Need
to get it right….experience required
o Quantitative Risk Assessment is not exact…..serves to calibrate judgement
o Very High and Catastrophic failure modes dominated by the consequence of
failure …..unless the mechanism can be virtually eliminated as non-credible

EXPLORE the Depths of our Experience | www.norwestcorp.com 34

You might also like