Department of Education

Region X
Division of Bukidnon

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for TEACHER I-III
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position: Master Teacher I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: KALILANGAN CENTRAL SCHOOL Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2018 - 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight Actual Rating

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES Timeline QET Very Unsatisfactor Score
per KRA Outstanding Satisfactory Poor Results
Satisfactory y

(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave

Basic 1. Content 1. Applied knowledge on Showed Showed Showed Showed No acceptable
Education Knowledge and content within and across knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of evidence was
Services Pedagogy curriculum teaching areas. content and its content and its content and its content and its shown
integration integration integration integration
within and within and within and within and
Quality across subject across subject across subject across subject
areas shown in areas shown in areas shown in areas shown in
91-100% of the 81-90% of the 71-80% of the 70% of the
MOV MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
submitted.
Year - round 0 0

7.50%
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied knowledge on
Education Knowledge and content within and across
Services Pedagogy curriculum teaching areas.

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight Actual Rating

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES Timeline QET Very Unsatisfactor Score
per KRA Outstanding Satisfactory Poor Results
Satisfactory y

(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave

Year - round 0 0
Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable
least 4 lessons least 4 lessons least 4 lessons least 4 lessons evidence was
using MOV 1 using MOV 1 using MOV 1 using MOV 1 shown
and supported and supported and supported and supported
Efficiency by any 1 of the by any 1 of the by any 1 of the by any 1 of the
other given other given other given other given
MOV. MOV. MOV. MOV.

7.50% Timeliness
Basic 2. Used a range of Facilitated Facilitated Facilitated Facilitated No acceptable
Education teaching strategies that using different using different using different using different evidence was
Services enhance learner teaching teaching teaching teaching shown
achievement in literacy strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
and numeracy skills. promote promote promote promote
reading, writing reading, writing reading, writing reading, writing
and/or and/or and/or and/or
Quality numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills
as shown in 91 as shown in 81 as shown in 71 as shown in 91
– 100% of the – 90% of the – 80% of the – 70% of the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

3 3 3 0.225
Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable
least 4 learner- least 3 learner- least 2 learner- least 1 learner- evidence was
centered centered centered centered shown
lessons as lessons as lessons as lesson as
evidently evidently evidently evidently
shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
Efficiency 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and
supported by supported by supported by supported by
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
other MOV other MOV other MOV other MOV
given given given given

7.50% Timeliness
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight Actual Rating

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES Timeline QET Very Unsatisfactor Score
per KRA Outstanding Satisfactory Poor Results
Satisfactory y

(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave

Basic 3. Applied a range of Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable
Education teaching strategies to teaching teaching teaching teaching evidence was
Services develop critical and strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
creative thinking, as well develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical
as other higher – order and creative and creative and creative and creative
thinking skills. thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or
other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as
Quality shown in 91- shown in 81- shown in 71- shown in 91-
100% of the 90% of the 90% of the 70% of the
MOV MOV MOV MOV
submitted. submitted. submitted. submitted.

3 3 3 0.225

Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable

least 4 lessons least 3 lessons least 2 lessons least 1 lessons evidence was
as evidenced as evidenced as evidenced as evidenced shown
by MOV 1 and by MOV 1 and by MOV 1 and by MOV 1 and
Efficiency supported by supported by supported by supported by
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
other given other given other given other given
MOV. MOV. MOV. MOV.

7.50% Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed classroom Used Used Used Used No acceptable
Education Environment structure to engage classroom classroom classroom classroom evidence was
Services and Diversity of learners, individually or in management management management management shown
Learners groups, in meaningful strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
exploration, discovery and engage leaners engage leaners engage leaners engage leaners
hands – on activities within Quality in in in in
a range of physical activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks
learning environments. as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
90-100% of the 81-90% of the 71-80% of the 70% of the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
0 0

7.50%
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed classroom
Education Environment structure to engage
Services and Diversity of learners, individually or in
Learners groups, in meaningful
exploration, discovery and PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
hands – on activities within
a range of physical Rating
learning environments. Weight Very Unsatisfactor Actual
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES Timeline QET Outstanding Satisfactory Poor Score
per KRA Satisfactory y Results

(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave

0 0
Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at
least 4 lessons least 3 lessons least 2 lessons least 1 lesson
supported by supported by supported by supported by
No acceptable
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
Efficiency evidence was
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
shown
other other other other
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV. MOV MOV MOV

7.50% Timeliness
Basic 5. Manage learner Applied Applied Applied Applied No acceptable
Education behavior constructively by teacher teacher teacher teacher evidence was
Services applying positive and non- management management management management shown
violent discipline to ensure strategies of strategies of strategies of strategies of
learning – focused learner learner learner learner
environments. behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that
promote promote promote promote
positive and positive and positive and positive and
Quality non-violent non-violent non-violent non-violent
discipline with discipline with discipline with discipline with
91-100% 81-90% 71-80% 70% accuracy
accuracy and accuracy and accuracy and and
appropriatenes appropriatenes appropriatenes appropriatenes 0 0
s as shown in s as shown in s as shown in s as shown in
MOV MOV MOV MOV
submitted. submitted. submitted. submitted.
Submitted at Least 3 of the Least 2 of the Least 1 of the No acceptable
least 4 of the given given given evidence was
given strategies as strategies as strategies as shown
Efficiency strategies as observed in at observed in at observed in at
observed in at least 4 lessons. least 4 lessons. least 4 lessons.
least 4 lessons.

7.50% Timeliness
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight Actual Rating

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES Timeline QET Very Unsatisfactor Score
per KRA Outstanding Satisfactory Poor Results
Satisfactory y

(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave

Basic 6. Used differentiated, Applied Applied Applied Applied No acceptable
Education developmentally differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was
Services appropriate learning teaching teaching teaching teaching shown
experiences to address strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to
learners’ gender, needs, address address address address
strengths, interests and learner learner learner learner
experiences. Quality diversity with diversity with diversity with diversity with
91-100% 81-90% 71-80% 70% accuracy
accuracy and accuracy and accuracy and and
appropriatenes appropriatenes appropriatenes appropriatenes
s as shown in s as shown in s as shown in s as shown in
MOV MOV MOV MOV
submitted. submitted. submitted. submitted.
Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable
least 4 least 3 least 2 least 1 evidence was 0 0
differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated shown
teaching teaching teaching teaching
strategies in at strategies in at strategies in at strategy in at
least 2 lessons least 2 lessons least 2 lessons least 1 lesson
as evidenced as evidenced as evidenced as evidenced
Efficiency
by MOV 1 and by MOV 1 and by MOV 1 and by MOV 1 and
supported by supported by supported by supported by
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
other other other other
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV. MOV. MOV. MOV.

7.50% Timeliness
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, managed Planned Planned Planned Planned No acceptable
Education and Planning and implemented implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was
Services developmentally developmentall developmentall developmentall developmentall shown
sequenced teaching and y sequenced y sequenced y sequenced y sequenced
learning processes to teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
meet curriculum learning learning learning learning
requirements and varied process with process with process with process with
teaching contexts. Quality 91-100% 81-90% 71-80% 70% accuracy
accuracy and accuracy and accuracy and and
appropriatenes appropriatenes appropriatenes appropriatenes
s as shown in s as shown in s as shown in s as shown in
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

0 0
Education and Planning and implemented
Services developmentally
sequenced teaching and
learning processes to
meet curriculum
requirements and varied
teaching contexts.
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight Actual Rating

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES Timeline QET Very Unsatisfactor Score
per KRA Outstanding Satisfactory Poor Results
Satisfactory y

(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave

Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable
least 4 least 3 least 2 least 1 evidence was
developmentall developmentall developmentall developmentall shown
y sequenced y sequenced y sequenced y sequenced 0 0
teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning learning learning learning
process as process as process as process as
evidently evidently evidently evidently
shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
Efficiency 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and
supported by supported by supported by supported by
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
other given other given other given other given
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV.
supported by supported by supported by
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
other given other given other given
MOV. MOV. MOV.

7.50% Timeliness
Basic 8. Participated in Participated Participated Participated Participated No acceptable
Education collegial discussions that actively LACs/ actively LACs/ actively LACs/ actively LACs/ evidence was
Services use teacher and learner FGDs/ FGDs/ FGDs/ FGDs/ shown
feedback to enrich meetings to meetings to meetings to meetings to
teaching practice. discuss discuss discuss discuss
teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner
feedback to feedback to feedback to feedback to
Quality
enrich enrich enrich enrich
instruction with instruction with instruction with instruction with
91-100% 81-90% 71-80% 70%
participation participation participation participation
rate as shown rate as shown rate as shown rate as shown 0 0
in MOV in MOV in MOV in MOV
submitted. submitted. submitted. submitted.
In at least 4 In at least 3 In at least 2 In at least 1 No acceptable
LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ evidence was
meetings as meetings as meetings as meetings as shown
Efficiency evidently shown in any 1 shown in any 1 shown in any 1
shown in any 1 of the given of the given of the given
of the given MOV MOV MOV
MOV
7.50% Timeliness
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight Actual Rating

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES Timeline QET Very Unsatisfactor Score
per KRA Outstanding Satisfactory Poor Results
Satisfactory y

(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave

Basic 9. Selected, developed, Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable
Education organized and used used varied used varied used varied used varied evidence was
Services appropriate teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and shown
learning resources, learning learning learning learning
including ICT, to address resources, resources, resources, resources,
learning goals. including ICT, including ICT, including ICT, including ICT,
to address to address to address to address
learning goals learning goals learning goals learning goals
Quality with 91-100% with 81-90% with 71-80% with 70%
accuracy and accuracy and accuracy and accuracy and
appropriatenes appropriatenes appropriatenes appropriatenes
s as shown in s as shown in s as shown in s as shown in
the MOV the MOV the MOV the MOV
submitted. submitted submitted submitted

1 1 1 0.075
Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable
least 4 varied least 3 varied least 2 varied least 1 varied evidence was
teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and shown
learning learning learning learning
resources, resources, resources, resources,
including ICT, including ICT, including ICT, including ICT,
Efficiency as evidently as evidently as evidently as evidently
shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in any
1 and 1 and 1 and MOV.
supported by supported by supported by
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

7.50% Timeliness
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight Actual Rating

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES Timeline QET Very Unsatisfactor Score
per KRA Outstanding Satisfactory Poor Results
Satisfactory y

(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave

Basic 4. Assessment 10. Designed, selected, Designed, Designed, Designed, Designed, No acceptable
Education and Reporting organized and used selected, selected, selected, selected, evidence was
Services diagnostic, formative and organized and organized and organized and organized and shown
summative assessment used used used used
strategies consistent with diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic,
curriculum requirements. formative and formative and formative and formative and
summative summative summative summative
assessment assessment assessment assessment
strategies strategies strategies strategies
consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
Quality curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
requirements requirements requirements requirements
with 91-100% with 81-90% with 71-80% with 70%
accuracy and accuracy and accuracy and accuracy and
appropriatenes appropriatenes appropriatenes appropriatenes
s as shown in s as shown in s as shown in s as shown in 0 0
the MOV the MOV the MOV the MOV
submitted. submitted submitted submitted

Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable

least 4 varied least 3 varied least 2 varied least 1 varied evidence was
assessment assessment assessment assessment shown
tools as tools as tools as tools as
Efficiency evidently evidently evidently evidently
shown in any 1 shown in any 1 shown in any 1 shown in any
of the of the of the of the
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV. MOV. MOV. MOV.
7.50% Timeliness
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight Actual Rating

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES Timeline QET Very Unsatisfactor Score
per KRA Outstanding Satisfactory Poor Results
Satisfactory y

(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave

Basic 11. Monitored and Showed Showed Showed Showed No acceptable
Education evaluated learner progress monitoring and monitoring and monitoring and monitoring and evidence was
Services and achievement using evaluation of evaluation of evaluation of evaluation of shown
learner attainment data. learner learner learner learner
progress and progress and progress and progress and
achievement achievement achievement achievement
using learner using learner using learner using learner
Quality attainment data attainment data attainment data attainment data
as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
91-100%of the 81-90%of the 71-80%of the 70%of the
MOV MOV MOV MOV
submitted. submitted. submitted. submitted.
0 0

Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted No acceptable

combination of combination of combination of combination of evidence was
at least 4 of the at least 3 of the at least 2 of the at least 1 of the shown
Efficiency
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV MOV

Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted No acceptable

MOV were MOV were MOV were MOV were evidence was
Timeliness distributed distributed distributed distributed shown
across 4 across 3 across 2 across only 1
7.50% quarters. quarters. quarters. quarter.
Basic 12. Communicated Communicated Communicated Communicated Communicated No acceptable
Education promptly and clearly the promptly and promptly and promptly and promptly and evidence was
Services learners’ needs, progress clearly the clearly the clearly the clearly the shown
and achievement to key learners’ learners’ learners’ learners’
stakeholders, including needs, needs, needs, needs,
parents/guardians. progress and progress and progress and progress and
achievement to achievement to achievement to achievement to
key key key key
Quality stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders,
including including including including
parents/ parents/ parents/ parents/
guardians with guardians with guardians with guardians with
91-100% 81-90% 71-80% 70% success
success rate success rate success rate rate as shown
as shown in as shown in as shown in in the MOV 0 0
the MOV the MOV the MOV submitted.
submitted. submitted. submitted.
 stakeholders, including
parents/guardians.

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight Actual Rating

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES Timeline QET Very Unsatisfactor Score
per KRA Outstanding Satisfactory Poor Results 0 0
Satisfactory y

(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave

Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any No acceptable
combination of combination of combination of 1 of the given evidence was
at least 4 of the at least 3 of the at least 2 of the MOV. shown
Efficiency
acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

Submitted Submitted Submitted

Submitted
MOV were MOV were MOV were No acceptable
MOV was
Timeliness distributed distributed distributed evidence was
completed in
across 4 across 3 across 2 shown
only I quarter
7.50% quarters quarters quarters
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight Actual Rating

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES Timeline QET Very Unsatisfactor Score
per KRA Outstanding Satisfactory Poor Results
Satisfactory y

(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave

Basic 13. Performed various Performed Performed Performed Performed No acceptable
Education related works/activities various related various related various related various related evidence was
Services that contribute to the work/activities work/activities work/activities work/activities shown
teaching – learning that contribute that contribute that contribute that contribute
process. to the teaching to the teaching to the teaching to the teaching
learning learning learning learning
process with process with process with process with
Quality 91-100% 81-90% 71-80% 70%
performance performance performance performance
rating as rating as rating as rating as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
5. Plus Factor MOV MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted 0 0
submitted.

Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at

Submitted any
least 4 different least 3 different least 2 different No acceptable
1 of the
Efficiency kinds of kinds of kinds of evidence was
acceptable
acceptable acceptable acceptable shown
MOV.
MOV. MOV. MOV.

10% Timeliness

RATING FOR 0.525

OVERALL
ACCOMPLISHM
ENTS

Rater Ratee Approving Authority

Adjectival Rating Scale

Outstanding 4.500 - 5.000
Very Satisfactory 3.500 - 4.499
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight Actual Rating

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES Timeline QET Very Unsatisfactor Score
per KRA Outstanding Satisfactory Poor Results
Satisfactory y

(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave

Satisfactory 2.500 - 3.499
Unsatisfactory 1.500 - 2.499
Poor 1.000 - 1.499
 MOVs FOR TI-III IPCRF

KRAs OBJECTIVES

1. Content Knowledge 1.    Applied knowledge on

and Pedagogy content within and across
curriculum teaching areas.

2.    Used a range of teaching

strategies that enhance learner
achievement in literacy and
numeracy skills.

3.    Applied a range of teaching

strategies to develop critical and
creative thinking, as well as
other higher – order thinking
skills.
2. Learning Environment 4.    Managed classroom
and Diversity of structure to engage learners,
Learners individually or in groups, in
meaningful exploration,
discovery and hands – on
activities within a range of
physical learning environments.

5.    Manage learner behavior

constructively by applying
positive and non-violent
discipline to ensure learning –
focused environments.

6.    Used differentiated,
developmentally appropriate
learning experiences to address
learners’ gender, needs,
strengths, interests and
experiences.

3. Curriculum and 7.    Planned, managed and

Planning implemented developmentally
sequenced teaching and
learning processes to meet
curriculum requirements and
varied teaching contexts.
Planning implemented developmentally
sequenced teaching and
learning processes to meet
curriculum requirements and
varied teaching contexts.

8.    Participated in collegial
discussions that use teacher
and learner feedback to enrich
teaching practice.

9.    Selected, developed,
organized and used appropriate
teaching and learning
resources, including ICT, to
address learning goals.

4. Assessment and 10.  Designed, selected,

Reporting organized and used diagnostic,
formative and summative
assessment strategies
consistent with curriculum
requirements.
 11.  Monitored and evaluated
learner progress and
achievement using learner
attainment data.

12.  Communicated promptly
and clearly the learners’ needs,
progress and achievement to
key stakeholders, including
parents/guardians.

5. Plus Factor 13.  Performed various related

works/activities that
contribute to the teaching –
learning process.
Vs FOR TI-III IPCRF

Means of Verification (MOV)

With reference to MOVs
1.    Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet
and/or inter – observer agreement form about
knowledge of content within and across curriculum
teaching areas with a rating of at least level 6.
2.    Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed
highlighting integration of content knowledge within
and across subject areas.
3.    Instructional materials highlighting mastery of
content and its integration in other subject areas.
4.    Performance tasks/test materials highlighting
integration of content knowledge within and across
subject areas.
5.    Others (Please specify and provide
annotations).
1.    Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet
and/or inter-observer agreement form about
teaching strategies that enhance leaner
achievement in literacy and numeracy skills with a
rating of at least level 6.
2.    Lesson plans/modified DLL used in teaching
highlighting learner –
3.    Centered strategies that promote literacy and/or
numeracy skills.
4.    Instructional materials highlighting learner –
centered strategies that promote literacy and/or
numeracy skills.
5.    Performance tasks/test materials(s) used in
teaching.
6.    Results of assessment used in teaching.
7.    Others (please specify and provide
annotations).
1.    Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheets
and/or inter – observer agreement form about
teaching strategies to develop critical and creative
thinking, as well as other higher – order thinking
skills with a rating of at least level 6.
2.    Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in teaching
highlighting different teaching strategies that
develop critical and creative thinking
3.    And/or other HOTS.
4.    Performance tasks/test materials used in
demonstration teaching.
5.    Performance tasks/test materials used in
demonstration teaching.
6.    Results of assessment used in teaching.
7.    Others (Please specify and provide
annotations).
 1.    Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet
and/or inter – observer agreement form about
knowledge of managing classroom structure that
engages learners in various activities with a rating
of at least level 4.
2.    Lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting
various classroom management strategies that
engage learners in activities/tasks within available
physical learning environments.
3.    Others (Please specify and provide
annotations).
Classroom observation tool(COT) rating sheet and/or
inter-observer agreement form (with a rating of at least
level 6) about teacher management of learner behavior
using the following strategies:
1.    Provide motivation
2.    Praising the learners/ giving the positive
feedback
3.    Setting house rules/guidelines
4.    Ensuring learners’ active participation
5.    Allowing learners to express their
ideas/opinions
6.    Giving equal opportunities to learners
7.    Encouraging learners to ask questions
8.    Others (specify and provide annotation.
1.    Classroom observation tool (COT) rating
sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form
about using differentiated, developmentally
appropriate learning experiences with a rating of
at least level 6.

2.    Lesson plans/modified DLL developed

highlighting differentiation in content, product,
process, learning environment or others
according to learners’ gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences.

3.    Instructional materials developed highlighting

differentiation in content, product, process,
learning environment to others according to
learners’ gender, needs, strengths, interests and
experiences.

4.    Others (specify and provide annotation)

1.    Classroom observation tool (COT) rating
sheet and/or inter – observer agreement form
about using developmentally sequenced
teaching and learning process with a rating at
least level 6.
 2.    Lesson plans/modified DLL highlighting
developmentally sequenced instruction that
meet curriculum goals and varied teaching
contexts.

3.    Instructional materials used to implement

developmentally sequenced teaching and
learning process to meet curriculum
requirements and varied teaching contexts

4.    Others (specify and provide annotation)

1.    Personal notes of teachers on
LACs/FGD/Meetings with proof of attendance.
2.    Minutes of LAC/FGD sessions on use of
teacher and learner feedback to enrich teaching
practice with proof of attendance

3.    Others (specify and provide annotation)

1.    Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet

and/or inter-observer agreement form (with a rating of
at least level 6) about using appropriate teaching and
learning resources, including ICT with a rating of at
least level 6.

Examples:
·         Activity sheets/task sheets/ work sheets
·         Power point presentation
·         Video clips
·         Module
·         SIM – Strategic Intervention Materials
·         Others
2.    Lesson plans/modified DLLs with appropriate
instructional materials appended
3.    Others (specify and provide annotation).
1.    Prepared lesson plans/ modified DLLs
highlighting appropriate use of formative
assessment strategies.
2.    Developed diagnostic tests: (a) with TOS
reviewed by superior; (b) with sample
accomplished questionnaire/answer sheets

3.    Developed summative tests: (a) with TOS

reviewed by the superior; (b) with sample
accomplished questionnaire/ answer sheets.

4.    Developed performance tasks: (a) with

rubrics reviewed by superior; (b) with sample
accomplished rubrics.
5.    Others (specify and provide annotation).
1.    Compilation of learner’s written work with
summary of results and with signature of
parents.
2.    Formative/summative assessment tools with
TOS and frequency of errors with identified least
mastered skills.
3.    Class records/ grading sheets
4.    Lesson
5.    Plans/modified DLL showing index of
mastery.
6.    Others (specify and provide annotation).
1.    At least 3 samples of corrected test papers of
same 3 learners in the same learning area with
parents’ or guardian signature and date of
receipt.
2.    Minutes of PTA meetings or Parent – Teacher
conferences in all quarters with proof of
parent’s/guardian’s attendance
3.    Reports cards with parent’s or guardian’s
signature in all quarters supported by minutes of
meeting.
4.    Communication with parents/guardians using
various modalities.
5.    Anecdotal record showing entries per
quarter.
6.    Other documents showing leaners’ needs,
progress and
7.    Achievement submitted to other
stakeholders.
1.    Certificate of Recognition or Participation
2.    Certificate of Training
3.    Certificate of Speakership
4.    Committee involvement
5.    Advisor ship of Co-curricular activities.
6.    Book or Journal Authorship/ Co-authorship/
Contributor ship
7.    Coordinatorship/ Chairpersonship
8.    Coaching and mentoring learners in
competitions
9.    Mentoring pre-service/ in-service teachers
10.  Others (specify and provide annotation).