Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
Very Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Satisfactory Score
QET Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
KRA (4) (3) Q E T Ave
(5) (2) (1)
Basic 1. Content 1.Applied June 22.5% Showed Showed Showed Showed No
Educatio Knowledg knowledge of 2018 knowledge knowledg knowledg knowledge of acceptable
n e and content within March 7.5% of e of e of content and evidence
Services Pedagogy and across 2019 content content content its was shown
curriculum and its and its and its integration
teaching integration integratio integratio within and
areas. within and n n across
across within and within and subject
Quality
subject across across areas as
areas as subject subject shown
shown in areas as areas as in MOV 1
MOV 1 shown shown in with a
with a in MOV 1 MOV 1 rating of 4
rating of 7 with a with a
rating of 6 rating of 5
Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
Very Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Satisfactory Score
QET Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
KRA (4) (3) Q E T Ave
(5) (2) (1)
Submitte Submitt Submitt Submitted No
d at ed 3 ed 2 any 1 acceptab
least 4 lessons lessons of the le
lessons using using given evidence
using MOV 1 MOV 1 MOV was
MOV 1 and and shown
Efficienc and support support
y supporte ed by ed by
d any 1 of any 1 of
by any 1 the the
of the other other
other given given
given MOV MOV
MOV
Timeline
ss
Basic 2. Used a June 7.5% Facilitated Facilitated Facilitated Facilitated No
Educatio range of 2018 using using using using acceptable
n teaching March different different different different evidence
Services strategies 2019 Teaching teaching teaching teaching was shown
that enhance strategies strategies strategies strategies
learner that that that that
achievement promote promote promote promote
in reading, reading, reading, reading,
literacy and Quality writing writing writing writing
numeracy and/or and/or and/or and/or
skills. numeracy numeracy numeracy numeracy
skills skills skills skills
as shown as shown as shown as shown in
in in in MOV 1 with a
MOV 1 MOV 1 MOV 1 rating of 4
with a with a with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5
Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
Very Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Satisfactory Score
QET Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
KRA (4) (3) Q E T Ave
(5) (2) (1)
Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted 1 No
at 3 2 Learner acceptable
least 4 Learner Learner centered evidence
learner centered centered Lesson as was shown
centered lessons as lessons as evidently
lessons as evidently evidently shown in any
evidently shown shown of
Efficienc shown in MOV 1 in MOV 1 the given
y in MOV 1 and and MOV
and supported supported
supported by by
by any 1 of any 1 of
any 1 of the the
the other other
other MOV MOV MOV
given given given
Timeline
ss
Basic 3. Applied a June 7.5% Quality Used Used Used Used No
Educatio range of 2018 different different different different acceptable
n teaching March teaching teaching Teaching Teaching evidence
Services strategies to 2019 strategies strategies strategies strategies was shown
develop that that that that
critical and develop develop Develop develop
creative critical critical critical critical and
thinking, as and and and creative
creative
well as other creative creative thinking
thinking
higher order thinking Thinking and/or
and/or
thinking skills. and/or and/or other HOTS
other HOTS
as other other as
shown in HOTS as HOTS as shown in
MOV shown in shown in MOV
1 with a MOV 1 MOV 1 1 with a
rating with a with a rating
of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 of 4
Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
Very Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Satisfactory Score
QET Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
KRA (4) (3) Q E T Ave
(5) (2) (1)
Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted 1 No
at 3 2 lesson as acceptable
least 4 lessons as lessons as evidenced by evidence
lessons evidenced evidenced any 1 of the was shown
as by by given MOV
evidenced MOV 1 MOV 1
Efficienc by MOV 1 and and
y and supported supported
supported by by
by any 1 of any 1 of
any 1 of the the
the other other
other given given given
MOV MOV MOV
Timeline
ss
Basic 2. 4. Managed June 22.5% Quality Used Used Used Used No
Educatio Learning classroom 2018 classroom classroom classroom classroom acceptable
n Environm structure to March 7.5% manageme managem managem management evidence
Services ent and engage 2019 nt ent ent strategies was shown
Diversity learners, strategies strategies strategies that
of individually or that that that engage
Learners in engage engage engage learners
groups, in learners in learners learners in activities/
meaningful activities/t in in tasks
exploration, asks activities/ activities/ as shown in
discovery and as shown tasks as tasks as MOV 1 with a
hands-on in shown in shown in rating of 4
activities MOV 1 MOV 1 MOV 1
within a range with a with a with a
of physical rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5
learning
environments.
Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
Very Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Satisfactory Score
QET Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
KRA (4) (3) Q E T Ave
(5) (2) (1)
Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted 1 No
at 3 2 lesson acceptable
least 4 lessons lessons supported by evidence
lessons supported supported any of the was shown
supported by by acceptable
Efficienc by MOV 1 MOV 1 MOV
y MOV 1 and and any 1 and any 1
any of the of the
1 of the other other
other acceptabl acceptabl
acceptable e e
MOV MOV MOV
Timeline
ss
Basic 5. Managed June 7.5% Quality Applied Applied Applied Applied No
Educatio learner 2018 teacher teacher teacher teacher acceptable
n Behaviour March manageme managem managem management evidence
Services constructively 2019 nt ent ent strategies of was shown
by strategies strategies strategies learner
applying of of of behavior
positive and learner learner learner that promote
non-violent behavior behavior behavior positive and
discipline that that that non-violent
to ensure promote promote promote discipline as
learning positive positive positive shown in
focused and and and MOV
environments. non-violent non- non- submitted
discipline violent violent with a
as discipline discipline rating of 4
shown in as as
MOV shown in shown in
submitted MOV MOV
with a submitted submitted
rating of 7 with a with a
rating of 6 rating of 5
Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
Very Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Satisfactory Score
QET Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
KRA (4) (3) Q E T Ave
(5) (2) (1)
Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted No
at at at any 1 acceptable
least 4 of least 4 of least 4 of of the given evidence
the the the strategies as was shown
Efficienc given given given observed in
y strategies strategies strategies only
as as as 1 lesson
observed in observed observed
at least 4 in in
lessons 3 lessons 2 lessons
Timeline
ss
Basic 6. Used June 7.5% Applied Applied Applied Applied No
Educatio differentiated, 2018 differentiat differentia differentia differentiated acceptable
n developmenta March ed ted ted teaching evidence
Services lly 2019 teaching teaching teaching strategies to shown
appropriate strategies strategies strategies address
learning to to to learner
experiences to address address address diversity as
address Quality learner learner learner shown in
learners’ diversity as diversity diversity MOV
gender, needs, shown in as as 1 with a
strengths, MOV shown in shown in rating
interests 1 with a MOV 1 MOV 1 of 4
and rating with a with a
experiences. of 7 rating rating
of 6 of 5
Efficienc Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted No
y at 3 2 any 1 acceptable
least 4 differentiat differentiat differentiated evidence
differentiat ed ed teaching shown
ed teaching teaching strategy in No
teaching strategies strategies only acceptable
strategies in in at least in 2 1 lesson as evidence
at 2 lessons lessons as was shown
Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
Very Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Satisfactory Score
QET Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
KRA (4) (3) Q E T Ave
(5) (2) (1)
least 2 as evidenced evidently
lessons evidenced by shown
as by MOV 1 MOV 1 in any 1 of
evidenced and and the
by MOV 1 supported supported acceptable
and by any 1 by MOV
supported of the any 1 of
by other the
any 1 of acceptabl other
the e acceptabl
other MOV e
acceptable MOV
MOV
Timeline
ss
Basic 3.Curricul 7. Planned, June 22.5% Planned Planned Planned Planned and No
Educatio um managed and 2018 and and and implemented acceptable
n and implemented March 7.5% implement implemen implemen development evidence
Services Planning developmenta 2019 ed ted ted ally was shown
lly developme developm developm sequenced
sequenced ntally entally entally teaching and
teaching sequenced sequence sequence learning
and learning teaching d d process as
Quality
processes to and teaching teaching shown in
meet learning and and MOV 1 with a
curriculum process as learning learning rating of 4
requirements shown in process as process as
and MOV shown in shown in
varied 1 with a MOV 1 MOV 1
teaching rating with a with a
contexts. of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5
Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
Very Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Satisfactory Score
QET Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
KRA (4) (3) Q E T Ave
(5) (2) (1)
Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted 1 No
at 3 2 development acceptable
least 4 Developm Developm ally evidence
developme entally entally sequenced was shown
ntally sequence sequence teaching and
sequenced d d learning
teaching teaching teaching process as
and and and evidently
learning learning learning shown
process as process as process as in any 1 of
Efficienc
evidently evidently evidently the
y
shown in shown in shown in given MOV
MOV 1 and MOV 1 MOV 1
supported and and
by supported supported
any 1 of by by
the any 1 of any 1 of
other given the the
MOV other other
given given
MOV MOV
Timeline
ss
8. Participated June 7.5% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasional Rarely No
in 2018 participated participate ly participated acceptable
collegial March in d in participate in evidence
discussions 2019 LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs d in LAC/FGD/ was shown
that use meetings to / LACs/FGDs meeting to
teacher and discuss meetings / discuss
learner teacher/lea to meetings teacher/learn
feedback to rner discuss to er
feedback teacher/le discuss feedback to
enrich
arner teacher/le enrich
teaching
feedback arner instruction as
practice.
feedback shown in the
Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
Very Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Satisfactory Score
QET Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
KRA (4) (3) Q E T Ave
(5) (2) (1)
to to to MOV
enrich enrich enrich submitted
instruction instructio instructio
as n as n as
shown in shown in shown in
the the the
MOV MOVsubm MOV
submitted itted submitted
Participate Participat Participat Participated No
d in ed in 3 ed in 2 in 1 acceptable
at least 4 LACs/FGD LACs/FGD LAC/FGD/ evidence
LACs/FGDs s/ s/ meeting as was shown
/ meetings meetings meetings evidently
Efficienc as as as shown in any
y evidently evidently evidently 1 of the
shown shown in shown in given MOV
in any 1 of any 1 of any 1 of
the the the
given MOV given given
MOV MOV
Timeline
ss
Basic 9. Selected, June 7.5% Developed Develope Develope Developed No
Educatio developed, 2018 and d and d and and acceptable
n organized March used varied used used used varied evidence
Services and used 2019 teaching varied varied teaching and was shown
appropriate and teaching teaching learning
teaching and learning and and resources,
Quality
learning resources, learning learning including ICT,
resources, including resources, resources, to
ICT, to including including address
address ICT, ICT, to
address
Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
Very Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Satisfactory Score
QET Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
KRA (4) (3) Q E T Ave
(5) (2) (1)
including learning to address learning learning
ICT, to address goals learning goals goals
learning goals as shown goals as shown as shown in
in as shown in MOV 1 with a
MOV 1 in MOV 1 rating of 4
with a MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 with a rating of 5
rating of 6
Timeline
ss
Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
Very Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Satisfactory Score
QET Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
KRA (4) (3) Q E T Ave
(5) (2) (1)
Basic 4.Assessm 10. Designed, June 22.5% Quality Designed, Designed, Designed, Designed, No
Educatio ent and selected, 2018 selected, selected, selected, selected, acceptable
n Reporting organized March 7.5% organized organized organized organized evidence
Services and used 2019 and and and and was shown
diagnostic, used used used used
formative and diagnostic, diagnostic diagnostic diagnostic,
summative formative , , formative
assessment and formative formative and
strategies summative and and summative
consistent assessment summativ summativ assessment
with strategies e e strategies
curriculum consistent assessme assessme consistent
requirements. with nt nt with
curriculum strategies strategies curriculum
requireme consistent consistent requirements
nts as with with as
shown in curriculu curriculu shown in
MOV m m MOV
1 with a requireme requireme 1 with a
rating nts as nts as rating
of 7 shown in shown in of 4
MOV 1 MOV 1
with a with a
rating of 6 rating of 5
Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted 1 No
at 3 2 assessment acceptable
least 4 varied varied tool evidence
varied assessmen assessmen as evidently was shown
assessment t t shown in any
Efficienc tools as tools as tools as of
y evidently evidently evidently the
shown shown shown acceptable
in any 1 of in any 1 of in any 1 of MOV
the the the
acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV
Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
Very Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Satisfactory Score
QET Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
KRA (4) (3) Q E T Ave
(5) (2) (1)
Timeline
ss
Basic 11. Monitored June 7.5% Consistentl Frequentl Occasiona Rarely No
Educatio and 2018 y y lly monitored acceptable
n evaluated March monitored monitored monitored and evidence
Services learner 2019 and and and evaluated was shown
progress and evaluated evaluated evaluated learner
achievement Quality learner learner learner progress
using progress progress progress and
learner and and and achievement
attainment achievem
data. ent
Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
Very Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Satisfactory Score
QET Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
KRA (4) (3) Q E T Ave
(5) (2) (1)
across 4 distributed distributed in only 1
quarters across 3 across 2 quarter
quarters quarters