You are on page 1of 10

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Cordillera Administrative Region


SCHOOLS DIVISION OF ABRA
ABRA HIGH SCHOOL
Bangued, Abra

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Teacher I Position: Head Teacher III
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Bureau of Secondary Education/ Abra High School/SDO-ABRA Date of Review:
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DUTING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators RATING


MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight
per Score
Actual Results
KRA
Very
QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactor Unsatisfactory Poor Q E Ave
(2)
T
(5) (4) y (1)
(3)
Basic 1 Content 1 Applied June Showed Showed Showed Showed No
Education
Services knowledge knowledge of 2018 – 7.5% Quality knowledge of knowledge knowledge knowledge acceptable
and content April content and of content of content of content evidence
Pedagogy within and 2019 its integration and its and its and its was
across within and integration integration integration shown
curriculum across within and within and within and
teaching subject areas across across across
areas as shown in subject subject subject areas
MOV 1 with areas as areas as as shown in
a rating of 7 shown in shown in MOV 1 with
MOV 1 MOV 1 a rating of 4
with a rating with a rating
of 6 of 5
Submitted at Submitted Submitted Submitted at No
Efficiency least 4 at least 3 at least 2 least 1 acceptable
lessons using lessons lessons lessons using evidence
MOV 1 of using MOV using MOV MOV 1 of was
the other 1 of the 1 of the the other shown
given MOV other given other given given MOV
MOV MOV
Timeliness

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Performance Indicators RATING


per Actual Results
KRA Score
QET Very
Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Q T E Av
(4) (2)
(5) (3) (1) e
Basic 2. Used a range Quality Facilitated Facilitated Facilitating Facilitated No
Education of teaching using different using using using different acceptable
Services strategies that teaching different different teaching evidence
enhance learner
strategies that teaching teaching strategies that was shown
achievement in
literacy and
promote strategies that strategies that promote
numeracy skills. reading, promote promote reading,
writing and/or reading, reading, writing and/or
numeracy writing writing numeracy
skills as shown and/or and/or skills as shown
in MOV 1 numeracy numeracy in MOV 1
with a rating 7 skills as skills as with a rating
shown in shown in of 4
MOV 1 with MOV 1 with
a rating of 6 a rating of 5
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
least 4 learner- learner- learner- learner- acceptable
centered centered centered centered evidence
lessons as lessons as lessons as lesson as was shown
evidently evidently evidently evidently
shown in shown in shown on shown in any
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and of the given
supported by supported by supported by MOV
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
other MOV other MOV other MOV
given given given
Timeliness
Basic 3. Applied a Quality Used different Used Used Used different No
Educatio range of teaching different different teaching acceptable
n teaching strategies that teaching teaching strategies that evidence
Services strategies to develop strategies that strategies that develop was shown
critical and develop develop critical and
develop
creative critical and critical and creative
critical and thinking creative creative thinking
creative and/or other thinking thinking and/or other
thinking as HOTS as and/or other and/or other HOTS as
well as other shown in HOTS as HOTS as shown in
higher-order MOV 1 with a shown in shown in MOV 1 with a
thinking rating of 7 MOV 1 with MOV 1 with rating of 4
a rating of 6 a rating of 5
skills

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Performance Indicators RATING


per Actual Results
KRA Score
QET Very
Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Q T E Av
(4) (2)
(5) (3) (1) e
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
least 4 lessons lessons as lessons as lessons as acceptable
as evidenced evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidence
by MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and was shown
supported by supported by supported by supported by
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by supported by supported by supported by
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
other given other given other given other given
MOV MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
2 Learning 4. Managed Quality Used Used Used Used No
Environme classroom classroom classroom classroom classroom acceptable
structure to management management management management evidence
nt and engage learners,
Diversity strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that was shown
individually or
engage engage engage engage
of in groups, in
meaningful learners in learners in learners in learners in
Learners activities/tasks activities/task activities/task activities/tasks
exploration,
discovery and as shown in s as shown in s as shown in as shown in
hands-on MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with MOV 1 with MOV 1 with a
activities within rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 rating of 4
a range of Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
physical least 4 lessons lessons lessons lessons acceptable
learning
environments.
supported by supported by supported by supported by evidence
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and was shown
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
other other other other
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
5. Managed Quality Applied Applied Applied Applied No
learner teacher teacher teacher teacher acceptable
behaviour management management management management evidence
constructively strategies of strategies of strategies of strategies of was shown
by applying
positive and
learner learner learner learner
non-violent behaviour that behaviour behaviour behaviour that
discipline to promote that promote that promote promote
ensure learning- positive and positive and positive and positive and
focused non-violent non-violent non-violent non-violent
environments. discipline discipline discipline discipline
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Performance Indicators RATING
per Actual Results
KRA Score
QET Very
Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Q T E Av
(4) (2)
(5) (3) (1) e
as shown on as shown on as shown on as shown on
MOV MOV MOV MOV
submitted with submitted submitted submitted with
a rating of 7 with a rating with a rating a rating of 4
of 6 of 5
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No
least 4 of the least 4 of the least 4 of the least 4 of the acceptable
given given given given evidence
strategies as strategies as strategies as strategies as was shown
observed in observed in observed in observed in 1
at least 4 3 lessons 2 lessons lessons
lessons
Timeliness
6. Used Quality Applied Applied Applied Applied No
differentiated, differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated acceptable
developmental teaching teaching teaching teaching evidence
ly appropriate strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to was shown
learning address learner address address address learner
experiences to diversity as learner learner diversity as
address shown in diversity as diversity as shown in
learners’ MOV 1 with a shown in shown in MOV 1 with a
gender, needs, rating of 7 MOV 1 with MOV 1 with rating of 4
strengths, a rating of 6 a rating of 5
interests and Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted No
experiences. least 4 differentiate differentiate any 1 acceptable
differentiated d teaching d teaching differentiated evidence
teaching strategies in strategies in teaching was shown
strategies in at least 2 2 lessons as strategy in
at least 2 lessons as evidenced only 1 lesson
lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 as evidently
evidenced by by MOV 1 and shown in any
MOV 1 and and supported 1 of the
supported by supported by any 1 of acceptable
any 1 of by any 1 of other MOV
other other acceptable
acceptable acceptable MOV
MOV MOV
Timeliness

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Performance Indicators RATING


per Actual Results
KRA Score
QET Very
Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Q T E Av
(4) (2)
(5) (3) (1) e
3. 7. Planned, Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No
Curriculum managed and implemented implemented implemented implemented acceptable
and implemented developmental developmenta developmenta developmental evidence
Planning develop- ly sequenced lly sequenced lly sequenced ly sequenced was shown
teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
mentally
learning learning learning learning
sequenced process as process as process as process as
teaching and shown in shown in shown in shown in
learning MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with MOV 1 with MOV 1 with a
processes to rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 rating of 4
meet Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
curriculum least 4 develop- develop- developmental acceptable
requirements developmental mentally mentally ly sequenced evidence
and varied ly sequenced sequenced sequenced teaching and was shown
teaching teaching and teaching and teaching and learning
contexts. learning learning learning process as
process as process as process as evidently
evidently evidently evidently shown in
shown in shown in shown in MOV 1 and
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and supported by
supported by supported by supported by any 1 of the
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the other given
other given other given other given MOV
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
8. Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No
Participated participated in participated participated participated in acceptable
LACs/FGDs/ in in LACs/FGDs/ evidence
in collegial meetings to LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ meetings to was shown
discussions discuss meetings to meetings to discuss
that use teacher/learner discuss discuss teacher/learner
teacher and feedback to teacher/learne teacher/learne feedback to
enrich r feedback to r feedback to enrich
learner
instruction as enrich enrich instruction as
feedback to shown in the instruction as instruction as shown in the
enrich MOV shown in the shown in the MOV
teaching submitted MOV MOV submitted
practice. submitted submitted
Efficiency Participated in Participated Participated Participated in No
at least 4 in 3 in 2 LACs/ 1 LACs/ acceptable
LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs FGDs FGDs/ evidence
meeting as meetings as meeting as meeting as was shown
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Performance Indicators RATING
per Actual Results
KRA Score
QET Very
Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Q T E Av
(4) (2)
(5) (3) (1) e
evidently evidently evidently evidently
shown in any 1 shown in any shown in any shown in any 1
of the given 1 of the given 1 of the given of the given
MOV MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
9. Selected, Quality Developed and Developed Developed Developed and No
developed, used varied and used and used used varied acceptable
organized teaching and varied varied teaching and evidence
and used learning teaching and teaching and learning was shown
resources, learning learning resources,
appropriate
including ICT, resources, resources, including ICT,
teaching and to address including including to address
learning learning goals ICT, to ICT, to learning goals
resources, as shown in address address as shown in
including MOV 1 with a learning goals learning goals MOV 1 with a
ICT, to rating of 7 as shown in as shown in rating of 4
address MOV 1 with MOV 1 with
learning a rating of 6 a rating of 5
goals Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any No
least 4 varied varied varied teaching and acceptable
teaching and teaching and teaching and learning evidence
learning learning learning resources, was shown
resources, resources, resources, including ICT,
including ICT, including including as evidently
as evidently ICT, as ICT, as shown in
shown in evidently evidently MOV 1 and
MOV 1 and shown in shown in supported by
supported by MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1 of the
any 1 of the supported by supported by acceptable
acceptable any 1 of the any 1 of the MOV
MOV acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV
Timeliness
4. 10. Designed Quality Designed, Designed, Designed, Designed, No
Assessme selected, selected, selected, selected, selected, acceptable
nt and organized organized and organized and organized and organized and evidence
Reporting and used used used used used was shown
diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic,
diagnostic,
formative and formative and formative and formative and
formative summative summative summative summative
and assessment assessment assessment assessment
summative as
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Performance Indicators RATING
per Actual Results
KRA Score
QET Very
Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Q T E Av
(4) (2)
(5) (3) (1) e
Assessment strategies strategies strategies strategies
strategies consistent with consistent consistent consistent with
consistent curriculum with with curriculum
with requirements curriculum curriculum requirements
as shown in requirements requirements as shown in
curriculum
MOV 1 with a as shown in as shown in MOV 1 with a
requirements. rating of 7 MOV 1 with MOV 1 with rating of 4
a rating of 6 a rating of 5
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
least 4 varied varied varied assessment acceptable
assessment assessment assessment tool as evidence
tools as tools as tools as evidently was shown
evidently evidently evidently shown in any 1
shown in any 1 shown in any shown in any of the
of the 1 of the 1 of the acceptable
acceptable acceptable acceptable MOV
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
11. Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No
Monitored monitored and monitored monitored monitored and acceptable
and evaluated evaluated and evaluated and evaluated evaluated evidence
learner learner learner learner was shown
learner progress and progress and progress and progress and
progress and achievement achievement achievement achievement
achievement using learner using learner using learner using learner
using learner attainment attainment attainment attainment
data as shown data as shown data as shown data as shown
attainment
in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV
data. submitted submitted submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No
combination of combination combination acceptable acceptable
at least 4 of the of 3 of the of 2 of the MOV evidence
acceptable acceptable acceptable was shown
MOV MOV MOV
Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted No
MOV were MOV were MOV were MOV was acceptable
Timeliness distributed distributed distributed completed in evidence
across 4 across 3 across 2 only 1 quarter was shown
quarters quarters quarters

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Performance Indicators RATING


per Actual Results
KRA Score
QET Very
Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Q T E Av
(4) (2)
(5) (3) (1) e
12. Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely showed No
Communicat showed showed showed prompt and acceptable
ed promptly prompt and prompt and prompt and clear evidence
and clearly clear clear clear communicatio was shown
communicatio communicati communicati n of the
the learners’
n of the on of the on of the learners’
needs, learners’ learners’ learners’ needs,
progress and needs, needs, needs, progress and
achievements progress and progress and progress and achievement to
, including achievement to achievement achievement key
parents/ key to key to key stakeholders,
guardians. stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, including
including including including parents/
parents/ parents/ parents/ guardians as
guardians as guardians as guardians as shown in the
shown in the shown in the shown in the MOV
MOV MOV MOV submitted
submitted submitted submitted a
rating of 5
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any No
combination of combination combination 1 of the given acceptable
at least 4 of the of 3 of the of 2 of the MOV evidence
acceptable acceptable acceptable was shown
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted No
MOV were MOV were MOV were MOV was acceptable
distributed distributed distributed completed in evidence
across 4 across 3 across 2 only 1 quarter was shown
quarters quarters quarters
5. Plus 13. Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No
Factor Performed performed performed performed performed acceptable
various various related various various various related evidence
related work/ related work/ related work/ work/ was shown
activities that activities that activities that activities that
works/
contribute to contribute to contribute to contribute to
activities that the teaching the teaching the teaching the teaching
contribute to learning learning learning learning
the process as process as process as process as
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Performance Indicators RATING
per Actual Results
KRA Score
QET Very
Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Q T E Av
(4) (2)
(5) (3) (1) e
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV MOV MOV MOV
submitted submitted submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any No
least 4 different different 1 of acceptable acceptable
different kinds kinds of kinds of MOV evidence
of acceptable acceptable acceptable was shown
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVERALL
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES


RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500 – 5.000 Outstanding
3.500 – 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500 – 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 – 2.499 Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499 Poor

____________________________ ______________________________ ________________________________


Ratee Rater Approving Authority

You might also like