Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region XII
Division of South Cotabato
BUKAY PAIT NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Bukay Pait, Tantangan, South Cotabato

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: XXXXXX Name of Rater: XXXXXX

Position: TEACHER I Position: MASTER TEACHER I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: BUKAY PAIT NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL, DIVISION OF SOUTH COTABATO Date of Review: OCTOBER 2018
Rating Period: SY 2018 - 2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators Rating

Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA Results
Very Unsatisfactory Poor
QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied knowledge June 2018 7.50% Quality Showed Showed Showed Showed No acceptable
Education Knowledge and of content within and to March knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of evidence was
4 4 4
Services Pedagogy across curriculum 2019 content and its content and its content and its content and its shown
teaching areas. integration within integration within integration within integration within
and across and across and across and
subject areas as subject areas as subject areas as across subject
shown shown shown in MOV 1 areas as shown in
inMOV1witha inMOV1witha with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No

4 lessons using lessons using lessons using of the given MOV acceptable
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and evidence was
supported by any supported by any supported by any shown
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
 MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and evidence was
supported by any supported by any supported by any shown
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 2. Used a range of June 2018 7.50% Quality Showed Showed Showed Showed No acceptable
Education teaching strategies to March knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of evidence was
4 3 3.5
Services that enhance learner 2019 content and its content and its content and its content and its shown
achievement in integration within integration within integration within integration within
literacy and and across and across and across and
numeracy skills. subject areas as subject areas as subject areas as across subject
shown shown shown in MOV 1 areas as shown in
inMOV1witha inMOV1witha with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 4

Efficiency Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable
different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, promote
writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or reading, writing
numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills and/or numeracy
as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV skills as shown in
1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of MOV 1 with a
7 6 5 rating of 4

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)

Basic 3. Applied a range of June 2018 7.50% Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable
Education teaching strategies to to March teaching teaching teaching teaching evidence was
4 4 4
Services develop critical and 2019 strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
creative thinking, as develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical
well as other higher- and creative and creative and creative and creative
order thinking skills. thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or
other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 1 with a rating
of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

4 lessons as lessons as lessons as lesson as evidence was
evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by any shown
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and 1of the given
supported by supported by supported by any MOV
any1ofthe other any1 of the other 1of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed June 2018 7.50% Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No acceptable 4 4 4
Education Environment classroom structure to March management management management management evidence was
Services and Diversity to engage learners, 2019 strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
of Learners individually or in engage learners engage learners engage learners engage learners
groups, in in in in in
meaningful activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks activities/tasks
exploration, as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
discovery and MOV 1 with a MOV1witha MOV 1 with a MOV 1with a
hands-on activities rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
within a range of
physical learning
environments.
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
least 4 lessons lessons lessons as lesson evidence was
supported by supported by evidenced by supported by shown
MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any of the
1 of the other 1 of the other supported by acceptable
acceptable acceptable any 1of the MOV
MOV MOV other given
MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 5. Managed learner June 2018 7.50% Quality Applied teacher Used classroom Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable 4 4 4
Education behavior to March management management management management evidence was
Services constructively by 2019 strategies of strategies that strategies of strategies of shown
applying positive learner behavior engage learners learner behavior learner behavior
and non-violent that promote in that promote that promote
discipline to ensure positive and activities/tasks positive and positive and
learning- focused non-violent as shown in non-violent non-violent
environments. discipline as MOV1witha discipline as discipline as
shown in MOV rating of 6 shown in MOV shown in MOV
submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a
rating of 7 rating of 5 rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted any 1 No acceptable

least 4 of the least 4 of the least 4 of the of the given evidence was
given strategies given strategies given strategies strategies as shown
as observed in as observed in as observed in observed in only
at least 4 3 lessons 2 lessons 1 lesson
lessons

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 6. Used June 2018 7.50% Quality Applied Applied Applied Applied No acceptable 3 3 3
Education differentiated, to March differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was
Services developmentally 2019 teaching teaching teaching teaching shown
appropriate strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to
learning address learner address learner address learner address learner
experiences to diversity as diversity as diversity as diversity as
address learners’ shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
gender, needs, 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
strengths, interests of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
and experiences.
 gender, needs,
strengths, interests
and experiences.

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable

least 4 differentiated differentiated at least 4 evidence was
differentiated teaching teaching lessons as shown
teaching strategies in at strategies in 2 observed in 3
strategies in at least 2 lessons lessons as lessons as
least 2 lessons as evidenced by evidenced by observed in 2
as evidenced by MOV 1 and MOV 1 and lessons
MOV 1 and supported by supported by observed in only
supported by any1ofthe other any1ofthe other 1 lesson
any 1 of the acceptable acceptable differentiated
other MOV MOV teaching
acceptable strategy in only
MOV 1 lesson as
evidently shown
in any 1 of the
acceptable
MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating

Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, June 2018 7.50% Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable 4 4 4
Education and Planning managed and to March implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was
Services implemented 2019 developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
teaching and learning learning learning learning
learning processes process as process as process as process as
to meet curriculum shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
requirements and 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
varied teaching of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
contexts.

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

least 4 developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced shown
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and
teaching and learning learning learning
learning process as process as process as
process as evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown
evidently shown in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in any 1 of the
in MOV 1 and supported by supported by given MOV
supported by any 1 of the any 1 of the
any 1 of the other given other given
other given MOV MOV
MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating

Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA Results
 Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 8. Participated in June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable 3 3 3
Education collegial to March participated in participated in participated in participated in evidence was
Services discussions that 2019 LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/ shown
use teacher and meetings to meetings to meetings to meeting to
learner feedback to discuss discuss discuss discuss
enrich teaching teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner
practice. feedback to feedback to feedback to feedback to
enrich enrich enrich enrich
instruction as instruction as instruction as instruction as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Participated in Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable

at least 4 LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/ in evidence was
LACs/FGDs/ meetings as meetings as any 1 of the shown
meetings as evidently shown evidently shown given MOV
evidently shown in any 1 of the in any 1 of the
in any 1 of the given MOV given MOV
given MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 9. Selected, June 2018 7.50% Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable 4 4 4
Education developed, to March used varied used varied used varied used varied evidence was
Services organized and 2019 teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and shown
used appropriate learning learning learning learning
teaching and resources, resources, resources, resources,
learning resources, including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
including ICT, to address address address address
address learning learning goals learning goals learning goals learning goals
goals. as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
MOV1witha MOV1witha MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any No acceptable

least 4 varied varied teaching varied teaching teaching and evidence was
teaching and and learning and learning learning shown
learning resources, resources, resource,
resources, including ICT, including ICT, including ICT,
including ICT, as evidently as evidently as evidently
as evidently shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in any of
shown in MOV 1 and supported 1 and supported the acceptable
1 and supported by any 1 of the by any 1 of the MOV
by any 1 of the acceptable acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV
MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 4. 10. Designed, June 2018 7.50% Quality Designed, Designed, Designed, Designed, No acceptable 3 3 3
Education Assessment selected, organized to March selected, selected, selected, selected, evidence was
Services and Reporting and used 2019 organized and organized and organized and organized and shown
diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic,
formative and formative and formative and formative and formative and
summative summative summative summative summative
assessment assessment assessment assessment assessment
strategies strategies strategies strategies strategies
consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
requirements. requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
of 7 of 6 of 5 of

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

least 4 varied varied varied assessment tool evidence was
assessment assessment assessment as evidently shown
tools as tools as tools as shown in any of
evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown the acceptable
inany1ofthe inany1ofthe in any1ofthe MOV
acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 11. Monitored and June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable 4 4 4
Education evaluated learner to March monitored and monitored and monitored and monitored and evidence was
Services progress and 2019 evaluated evaluated evaluated evaluated shown
achievement using learner progress learner progress learner progress learner progress
learner attainment and and and and
data. achievement achievement achievement achievement
using learner using learner using learner using learner
attainment data attainment data attainment data attainment data
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No acceptable

combination of combination of combination of acceptable evidence was
at least 4 of the 3 of the 2 of the MOV shown
acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 12. Communicated June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely showed No acceptable 3 3 3
Education promptly and to March showed prompt showed prompt showed prompt prompt and evidence was
Services clearly the learners’ 2019 and clear and clear and clear clear shown
needs, progress communication communication communication communication
and achievement to of the learners’ of the learners’ of the learners’ of the learners’
key stakeholders, needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress
including and and and and
parents/guardians. achievement to achievement to achievement to achievement to
key key key key
stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders,
including including including including
parents/ parents/ parents/ parents/
guardians as guardians as guardians as guardians as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
 Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 No acceptable
combination of combination of combination of of the given evidence was
at least 4 of the 3 of the 2 of the MOV shown
acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating

Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Results Q E T Ave
Satisfactory (4) (2) (1)
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed June 2018 10.00% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable 3 3 3
Education various related to March performed performed performed performed evidence was
Services works/activities that 2019 various related various related various related various related shown
contribute to the work/activities work/activities work/activities work/activities
teaching-learning that contribute that contribute that contribute that contribute
process. to the teaching to the teaching to the teaching to the teaching
learning learning learning learning
process as process as process as process as
shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable

least 4 different different kinds different kinds of the evidence was
kinds of of acceptable of acceptable acceptable shown
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
MOV
 Timeliness
RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING VERY SATISFACTORY

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500 -5.000 Outstanding
3.500- 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499 Poor

MERIAN Q. CARIÑO EDEN Y. VALENCIA RENATO M. IGNACIO

Rater Ratee Approving Authority
G EVALUATION

Score

0.3
 Score

0.2625
Score

0.3
Score

0.3
Score

0.3
Score

0.225
Score
0.3

Score
Score

0.225
Score

0.3
Score

0.225
Score

0.3
Score

0.225
Score

0.3
 3.5625
SATISFACTORY