Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region IX, Zamboanga Peninsula
Pagadian City Division
Pagadian City West District
DAMPALAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Pagadian City

Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III
Name of Employee: RENE L. DELOVIO Name of Rater: LALAINE R. BONILLA
Position: Teacher I Position: PRINCIPAL- I
Rating Period: June 2018-April 2019 Date of Review: April 29,2019
Division: Pagadian City

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED UP DUR

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA QET RESULTS
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
1. Applied June 2018 7.5% Quality Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge of Showed No Showed knowledge
1. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy

knowledge of to April of content and its ofcontent and its content and its knowledge of acceptable ofcontent and its
content within 2019 integration within and integration within and integration within and content and its evidence integration within
across subject areas across subject areas across subject areas integration was shown and across subject
Basic Education Services

and across as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 within and areas as shown in
curriculum with a with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 across subject MOV 1 with a
teaching areas. rating of 7 areas as shown rating of 6
in MOV 1 with a
rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted any 1 of No Submitted 3
lessons using MOV 1 using MOV 1 and using MOV 1 and the given MOV acceptable lessons using
and supported by supported by any 1 supported by any 1 of evidence MOV 1 and
any 1 of the other of the other given the other given MOV was shown supported by any
given MOV MOV
1 of the other
given MOV

Timeliness
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA RESULTS
 Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA QET RESULTS
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
2. Used a range June 2018 7.5% Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No Facilitated using
of teaching to April different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching acceptable different teaching
strategies that 2019 strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence was strategies that
promote reading, promote reading, promotereading, promote reading, shown promote reading,
enhance learner writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
achievement in numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
literacy and shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
numeracy skills. a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 with a rating of 6

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 learner Submitted 2 Submitted 1 learner- No Submitted 2

learnercentered centered lessons as learnercentered centered lesson as acceptable learnercentered
lessons as evidently evidently shown in lessons as evidently evidently shown in evidence was
1. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy

lessons as
shown in MOV 1 and MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and any of the given shown evidently shown
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 of MOV
in MOV 1 and
Basic Education Services

of the other MOV of the other MOV the other MOV given
given given
supported by any
1 of the other
MOV given
Timeliness

3. Applied a June 2018 7.5% Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No Used different
range of teaching to April teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies acceptable teaching strategies
strategies 2019 that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical evidence was that develop critical
and creative thinking and creative thinking and creative thinking and creative thinking shown and creative
todevelop critical and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS as and/or other HOTS thinking and/or
and creative as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 with asshown in MOV 1 other HOTS as
thinking, as well with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 shown in MOV 1
as other higher with a rating of 6
order thinking
skills.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No Submitted 2
lessons as evidenced as evidenced by lessons as lesson as acceptable lessons as
by MOV 1 and MOV 1 and evidenced by evidenced by evidence evidenced by
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 MOV 1 and any 1 of the was shown MOV 1 and
of the other given of the other given supported by given MOV
supported by
MOV MOV any 1 of the
other given
any 1 of the
MOV other given
MOV
 other given
MOV

Timeliness
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA QET RESULTS
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
4. Managed June 2018 7.5% Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No Used classroom
classroom to April management management management management acceptable management
structure to 2019 strategies that strategies that strategies that engage strategies that evidence was strategies that
engage learners in engage learners in learners in activities/ engage learners in shown engage learners in
engage learners, activities/ tasks as activities/ tasks as tasks as shown in activities/ tasks as activities/ tasks as
individually or in shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with MOV 1 with a rating of shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
groups, in a rating of 7 a rating of 6 5 with a rating of 4 with a rating of 6
meaningful
2. Learning Environment and Diversity of Learners

exploration,
discovery and Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson No Submitted 2
hands-on lessons supported by supported by MOV 1 supported by MOV 1 supported by any of acceptable lessons
MOV 1 and any 1 of and any 1 of the and any 1 of the other the acceptable MOV evidence was supported by
activities within a the other acceptable other acceptable acceptable MOV shown
range of physical MOV 1 and any 1
MOV MOV
learning of the other
Basic Education Services

environments. acceptable MOV

Timeliness

5. Managed June 2018 7.5% Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No Applied teacher
learner behavior to April management management management management acceptable management
constructively by 2019 strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of evidence strategies of
applying positive behavior that behavior that behavior that learner behavior was shown learner behavior
promote positive promote positive promote positive and that promote that promote
and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent non-violent discipline positive and non- positive and non-
discipline to discipline as shown discipline as shown as shown in MOV violent discipline as violent discipline
ensure learning in MOV submitted in MOV submitted submitted with a shown in MOV as shown in MOV
focused with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 rating of 5 submitted with a submitted with a
environments. rating of 4 rating of 5

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 of Submitted any 1 of No Submitted at least
of the given of the given the given strategies as the given strategies acceptable 4 of the given
strategies as strategies as observed in 2 lessons as observed in only evidence strategies as
observed in at least 4 observed in 3 1 lesson was shown observed in 3
lessons lessons
lessons
 observed in 3
lessons

Timeliness

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight
Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA QET RESULTS
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
6. Used June 2018 7.5% Quality Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied No Applied
differentiated, to April teaching strategies to teaching strategies teaching strategies to differentiated acceptable differentiated
2. Learning Environment and Diversity of

developmentally 2019 address learner to address learner address learner teaching strategies evidence was teaching strategies
diversity as shown in diversity as shown in diversity as shown in to address learner shown to address learner
appropriate MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating of diversity as shown in diversity as shown
learning of 7 of 6 5 MOV 1 with a rating in MOV 1 with a
experiences to of 4 rating of 5
address learners’
gender, needs,
strengths, Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No Submitted 2
Learners

interests and differentiated differentiated differentiated teaching differentiated acceptable differentiated

experiences. teaching strategies in teaching strategies in strategies in 2 lessons teaching strategy in evidence teaching
at least 2 lessons as at least 2 lessons as as evidenced by MOV only strategies as was shown strategies in 2
evidenced by MOV 1 evidenced by MOV 1 1 and supported by observed in only 1
lessons as
and supported by and supported by any 1 of the other lesson
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other acceptableMOV
evidenced by
MOV 1 and
Basic Education Services

acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

supported by any
1 of the other
acceptableMOV
Timeliness

7. Planned, June 2018 7.5% Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No Planned and
managed and to April implemented implemented implemented implemented acceptable implemented
implemented 2019 developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was developmentally
sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching shown sequenced
developmentally and learning process and learning process and learning process and learning teaching and
. Curriculum and Planning

sequenced as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 process as shown in learning process as
teaching and with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a rating shown in MOV 1
learning of 4 with a rating of 6
processes to meet
curriculum
requirements and
varied teaching
contexts.
 teaching and

3. Curriculum and Plan

learning
processes to meet
curriculum Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No Submitted 3
requirements and developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally acceptable developmentally
sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching evidence sequenced
varied teaching and learning process and learning process and learning process and learning was shown
contexts. teaching and
as evidently shown in as evidently shown as evidently shown in process as evidently
learning process
MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and MOV 1 and supported shown in any 1 of
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 by any 1 of the other the given MOV
as evidently
of the other given of the other given given MOV shown in MOV 1
MOV MOV and supported by
any 1 of the other
given MOV
Timeliness
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA QET RESULTS
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
8. Participated in June 2018 7.5% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated No Occasionally
2. Learning Environment and Diversity

collegial to April participated in participated in participated in in LAC/FGD/ acceptable participated in

discussions that 2019 LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ meetings meeting to discuss evidence LACs/FGDs/
meetings to discuss meetings to discuss to discuss teacher/learner was shown meetings to
use teacher and teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner feedback to enrich discuss
learner feedback feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich instruction as shown teacher/learner
to enrich teaching instruction as instruction as shown instruction as shown in the MOV feedback to enrich
practice. shown in the in the MOV in the MOV submitted submitted instruction as
of Learners

MOV submitted submitted shown in the MOV

submitted

Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No Participated in 3

least 4 LACs/ FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ meetings LAC/FGD/ meeting acceptable LACs/FGDs/
meetings as meetings as as evidently shown in as evidently shown evidence was meetings as
evidently shown in evidently shown in any 1 of the given in any 1 of the given shown evidently shown
any 1 of the given any 1 of the given MOV MOV
in any 1 of the
MOV MOV
given MOV
Basic Education Services

Timeliness
Basic Education Services
9. Selected, June 2018 7.5% Quality Developed and used Developed and used Developed and used Developed and used No Developed and
developed, to April varied teaching and varied teaching and varied teaching and varied teaching and acceptable used varied
organized and 2019 learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, evidence teaching and
including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to was shown learning resources,
used appropriate address learning address learning address learning address learning including ICT, to
teaching and goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in address learning
learning MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating of MOV 1 with a rating goals as shown in
3. Curriculum and Planning

resources, of 7 of 6 5 of 4 MOV 1 with a

including ICT, to rating of 5
address learning
goals.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No Submitted 3
varied teaching and teaching and teaching and learning teaching and acceptable varied teaching
learning resources, learning resources, resources, including learning resource, evidence was and learning
including ICT, as including ICT, as ICT, as evidently including ICT, as shown resources,
evidently shown in evidently shown in shown in MOV 1 and evidentl shown in
including ICT, as
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of any of the
supported by any 1 supported the acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
evidently shown
of the acceptable by any 1 of the in MOV 1 and
MOV acceptable supported
MOV by any 1 of the
acceptable
MOV
Timeliness

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA QET RESULTS
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
 10. Designed, June 2018 7.5% Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, Designed, No Designed,
selected, to April organized and used organized and used selected, selected, acceptable selected,
organized and 2019 diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative organized and organized and evidence organized and
and summative and summative used diagnostic, used diagnostic, was shown used diagnostic,
used diagnostic, assessment assessment formative and formative and formative and
formative and strategies consistent strategies consistent summative summative summative
summative with curriculum with curriculum assessment assessment assessment
assessment Quality requirements as requirements as strategies strategies strategies
strategies shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV consistent with consistent with consistent with
consistent with with a rating of 7 1 with a rating curriculum curriculum curriculum
of 6 requirements as requirements as requirements as
curriculum shown in MOV shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV
requirements. 1 with a rating with a rating of 4 1 with a rating
of 5 of 5
4. Assessment and Reporting

Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No Submitted 3

Basic Education Services

least 4 varied varied varied

assessment assessment assessment assessment tool acceptable varied
tools as tools as tools as as evidently evidence assessment
Efficiency evidently shown
in any 1 of the
evidently shown
in any 1 of the
evidently shown
in any 1 of the shown in any of was shown tools as
acceptable acceptable acceptable the acceptable evidently shown
MOV MOV MOV
MOV in any 1 of the
acceptable
MOV
Timeliness

11. Monitored June 2018 7.5% Consistently monitored and

evaluated learner progress
Frequently monitored and
evaluated learner progress
Occasionally monitored and
evaluated learner progress and
Rarely monitored and
evaluated learner progress
No
acceptable
Frequently monitored and
evaluated learner progress
and evaluated to April and achievement using learner and achievement using achievement using learner and achievement using evidence and achievement using
attainment data as shown in learner attainment data as attainment data as shown in the learner attainment data as was shown learner attainment data as
learner progress 2019 the MOV submitted shown in the MOV submitted MOV submitted shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV
Quality
and achievement submitted

using learner
attainment data.
Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No Submitted a
combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of acceptable acceptable combination of 3 of
Efficiency least 4 of the the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV MOV evidence was the acceptable
acceptable MOV shown MOV

Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No Submitted MOV
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed acceptable were distributed
across 4 across 3 across 2 in only 1 quarter evidence across 3
Timeliness
quarters quarters quarters was shown quarters
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA QET RESULTS
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
12. June 2018 7.5% Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely showed No Frequently
Communicated to April showed prompt showed prompt showed prompt prompt and clear acceptable showed prompt
promptly and 2019 and clear and clear and clear communication evidence and clear
clearly the communication of communication of communication of of the learners’ was shown communication
learners’ needs, the learners’ the learners’ the learners’ needs, progress of the learners’
progress and needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress and achievement needs, progress
achievement to and achievement and achievement and achievement to key and
key stakeholders, to key to key to key stakeholders, achievement to
including parents/ Quality stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, including key
guardians. including parents/ including parents/ including parents/ parents/ stakeholders,
guardians as guardians as guardians as guardians as including
4. Assessment and Reporting

shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the parents/

Basic Education Services

MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted guardians as

shown in the
MOV submitted

Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 No Submitted a

combination of at combination of 3 combination of 2 of the given acceptable combination of
least 4 of the of the acceptable of the acceptable MOV evidence 3 of the
acceptable MOV MOV MOV was shown acceptable
Efficiency
MOV
 4
Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No Submitted MOV
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed acceptable were distributed
across 4 across 3 across 2 in only 1 quarter evidence across 3
quarters quarters quarters was shown quarters
Timeliness

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA
QET
RESULTS
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
13. Performed June 2018 10% Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No Frequently
various related to April performed various performed various performed various various related acceptable performed various
works/activities 2019 related work/activities related related work/activities work/activities that evidence related
that contribute to the work/activities that that contribute to the contribute to the was shown work/activities that
that contribute to teaching learning contribute to the teaching learning teaching learning contribute to the
the teaching- Quality process as shown in teaching learning process as shown in process as shown in teaching learning
5. Plus Factor

learning the MOV submitted process as shown in the MOV submitted the MOV submitted process as shown
process. the MOV submitted in the MOV
submitted

Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No Submitted 3

least 4 different different kinds different kinds of the acceptable different kinds
Efficiency kinds of of acceptable of acceptable acceptable evidence of acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV was shown MOV
MOV

Timeliness

OVERALL RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENT

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES
Range Adjectival Rating
4.500 - 5.0 Outstanding
3.500 - 4.4 Very Satisfactory
2.500 - 3.4 Satisfactory
1.500 - 2.4 Unsatisfactory
below 1.49 Poor

Rater: Ratee: Approving Authority:

LALAINE R. BONILLA RENE L. DELOVIO LALAINE R. BONILLA

Principal-I Teacher I Principal-I
ublic of the Philippines
artment of Education
IX, Zamboanga Peninsula
gadian City Division
dian City West District
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Pagadian City

ent and Review Form (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

Rating
Score

Q E T Ave.
4 4 4.00 0.30

Rating
Score
 Rating
Score

Q E T Ave.
4 3 3.50 0.26

4 4 4.00 0.30
 Rating
Score

Q E T Ave.
4 3 3.50 0.26

3 4 3.50 0.26
 Rating
Score

Q E T Ave.
3 3 3.00 0.23

4 4 4.00 0.30
 Rating
Score

Q E T Ave.
3 4 3.50 0.26
3 4 3.50 0.26

Rating
Score

Q E T Ave.
3 4 3.50 0.26

4 4 4 4.00 0.30
 Rating
Score

Q E T Ave.
4 4 4 4.00 0.30
 Rating
Score

Q E T Ave.
4 4 4.00 0.40

48.00 3.70
 Approving Authority:

LALAINE R. BONILLA
Principal-I
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region IX, Zamboanga Peninsula
Pagadian City Division
Pagadian City West District
DAMPALAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Pagadian City

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF)

Name of Employee: RIEZL MAE GLADYS B. MANCERAS Name of Rater: LALAINE R. BONILLA
Position: Teacher I Position: PRINCIPAL -I
Rating Period: June 2018-April 2019 Date of Review:
Division: Pagadian City

Mid-year Review Rating

Weight PERFORMANCE Ratee Rater
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA MOV TARGET
Mid-Year Review Result
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
1. Applied June 2018 7.5% Quality
knowledge of to April
content within 2019
and across
1. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy

curriculum
teaching areas.
Basic Education Services

Efficiency
 1. Conte
Ba
Timeliness

Mid-year Review Rating

Weight PERFORMANCE Ratee Rater
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA MOV TARGET
Mid-Year Review Result
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
2. Used a range June 2018 7.5% Quality Quality
of teaching to April
strategies that 2019
enhance learner
achievement in
literacy and
numeracy
skills.
Efficiency Efficiency
1. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
Basic Education Services

Timeliness
3. Applied a June 2018 7.5% Quality Quality
range of to April
teaching 2019
strategies
todevelop
critical and
creative
thinking, as
well as other
higher order
thinking skills.
 critical and

1. Cont
B
creative
thinking, as
well as other
higher order Efficiency Efficiency
thinking skills.

Timeliness

Mid-year Review Rating

Weight PERFORMANCE Ratee Rater
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA MOV TARGET
Mid-Year Review Result
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
June 2018 7.5% Quality Quality
to April
4. Managed 2019
classroom
structure to
engage learners,
individually or
in groups, in
earning Environment and Diversity of Learners

meaningful
exploration, Efficiency Efficiency
discovery and
hands-on
activities within
Basic Education Services

a range of
physical
learning
environments.
Timeliness
Basic Education Se

2. Learning Environment and Di

June 2018 7.5% Quality Quality
to April
2019
5. Managed
learner behavior
constructively
by applying
positive and
non-violent
discipline to Efficiency Efficiency
ensure learning
focusedenviron
ments.

Timeliness

Mid-year Review Rating

Weight PERFORMANCE
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA MOV TARGET
Ratee Rater Mid-Year Review Result
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
6. Used June 2018 7.5% Quality Quality
2. Learning Environment and Diversity of

differentiated, to April
developmentall 2019
y appropriate
learning
experiences to
address
learners’ Efficiency Efficiency
Learners

gender, needs,
strengths,
interests and
experiences.
cation Services

Timeliness
Basic Education Servi
7. Planned, June 2018 7.5% Quality Quality
managed and to April
implemented 2019
developmentall

3. Curriculum and Planning

y sequenced
teaching and
learning
processes to
meet Efficiency Efficiency
curriculum
requirements
and varied
teaching
contexts.

Timeliness
Mid-year Review Rating
Weight PERFORMANCE Ratee Rater
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA MOV TARGET
Mid-Year Review Result
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
8. Participated June 2018 7.5% Quality Quality
2. Learning Environment and Diversity

in collegial to April
discussions that 2019
use teacher and
learner
feedback to
of Learners

enrich teaching
practice.

Efficiency Efficiency
ion Services

Timeliness
Basic Education Services
9. Selected, June 2018 7.5% Quality Quality
developed, to April
organized and 2019
used
appropriate

3. Curriculum and Planning

teaching and
learning
resources,
including ICT,
to address Efficiency Efficiency
learning goals.

Timeliness
Mid-year Review Rating
Weight PERFORMANCE Ratee Rater
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA MOV TARGET
Mid-Year Review Result
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
10. Designed, June 2018 7.5% Quality Quality
selected, to April
organized and 2019
used diagnostic,
formative and
summative
assessment
strategies Efficiency Efficiency
consistent with
curriculum
requirements.
Reporting
Services
 4. Assessment and Reporting
Basic Education Services
Timeliness

11. Monitored June 2018 7.5% Quality Quality

and evaluated to April
learner progress 2019
and
achievement
using learner
attainment data.

Efficiency Efficiency

Timeliness Timeliness

Mid-year Review Rating

Weight PERFORMANCE Ratee Rater
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA MOV TARGET
Mid-Year Review Result
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
 12. June 2018 7.5% Quality Quality
Communicated to April
promptly and 2019
clearly the
learners’ needs,
progress and
achievement to
key
stakeholders,
including
parents/
guardians.
4. Assessment and Reporting
Basic Education Services

Efficiency Efficiency

Timeliness Timeliness

Mid-year Review Rating

Weight PERFORMANCE
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA MOV TARGET
Mid-Year Review Result
 Weight PERFORMANCE
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA MOV TARGET Ratee Rater Mid-Year Review Result

Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

13. Performed June 2018 10% Quality Quality
various related to April
works/activities 2019
that contribute
5. Plus Factor to the teaching-
learning
process.

Efficiency Efficiency

Timeliness

Rater: Ratee: Approving Authority:

LALAINE R. BONILLA RIEZL MAE GLADYS B. MANCERAS

PRINCIPAL - I Teacher I
 PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Final Performance Results Rating Adjectival Rating

Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives 3.70 VERY SATISFACTORY

RATEE -RATER AGREEMENT

The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed to the contents of this appraisal and the
performance rating with the consent of approving DepEd Officials

Name of
Name of Name of Approving
Employee: RENE L. DELOVIO Superior: LALAINE R. BONILLA Authority: LALAINE R. BONILLA
Signature: Signature: Signature:
Date: 29-Apr-19 Date: 29-Apr-19 Date: 29-Apr-19
MMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

LALAINE R. BONILLA

29-Apr-19
 PART II: COMPETENCIES
CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES
Self-Management
1. Sets personal goals and directions, needs and development.
2. Understands personal actions and behavior that are clear and purposive and takes into
account personal goals and values congruent to that of the organization.
3. Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by higher goals.
4. Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through Gantt chants, checklists, etc.) to achieve
goals.
5. Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others.
Professionalism and Ethics
1. Demonstrate the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms and Conduct and Ethical
Standards for Public Officials and Employees (RA 6713).
2. Practice ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the impact of
his/her actions and decisions.
3. Maintains a professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of attendance and
punctuality, good grooming and communication.
4. Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization’s needs.
5. Act with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the organization’s needs, improve
system and help others improve their effectiveness.
Results Focus
1. Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time.
2. Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work methods by placing
organizational needs before personal needs.
3. Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard operating
procedures correctly and consistently. Able to produce very satisfactory quality work in
terms of usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no supervision required.
4. Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or inefficiency.
May focus on new or more precise ways of meeting goals set.
5. Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve performance.
Examples may include doing something better, faster, at a lower cost, more efficiently, or
improving quality, customer satisfaction, morale, without setting any specific goal.
Teamwork
1. Willingly does his/her share of responsibility.
2. Promotes collaboration and removes barrier to teamwork and goal accomplishment across
the organization.
3. Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements.
4. Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions.
5. Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across organizations to
accomplish organization goals and objectives.
Service Orientation
1. Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems.
2. Takes personal responsibility for dealing with and/or correcting customer service issues
and concerns.
3. Initiates activities that promote advocacy for men and women empowerment.
4. Participates in updating office vision, mission, mandates and strategies based on DepEd
strategies and directions.
5. Develops and adopts service improvement program through simplified procedures that will
further enhance service delivery.
Innovation
1. Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions. Foster new ideas,
processes and suggests better ways to do things (cost and/or operational efficiency).
2. Demonstrates an ability to think “beyond the box”. Continuously focuses on improving
personal productivity to create higher value and results.
3. Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop original ideas or solutions.
4. Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work unit
and organization.
5. Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilities. Demonstrates resourcefulness and
the ability to succeed with minimal resources.
OVERALL COMPETENCY RATING
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region IX, Zamboanga Peninsula
Pagadian City Division
Pagadian City West District
DAMPALAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Pagadian City

PART IV : DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs Timeline Resources Needed
(Recommended Developmental Intervention)
A. Functional Competencies

B. Core Behavioral Competencies

Ratee Rater: Approving Authority:

RIEZL MAE GLADYS B. MANCERAS LALAINE R. BONILLA
Teacher I PRINCIPAL-I
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region IX, Zamboanga Peninsula
Pagadian City Division
Pagadian City West District
DAMPALAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Pagadian City

PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND COACHING FORM

CRITICAL INCIDENCE IMPACT ON JOB/
DATE OUTPUT
DESCRIPTION ACTION PLAN
ORM
SIGNATURE
(Rater / Ratee)
ANNOTATION TEMPLATE
Name of Employee: EVA GRACE A. ESCIO Name of Rater: MERCEDITA A.ORDENIZA
Position: Teacher I Position: HEAD TEACHER -I
Rating Period: June 2018-April 2019 Date of Review:
Division: Pagadian City

Objectives Means of Verification Description of the MOV Presented Annotations

 PORTFOLIO RATING
Name of Employee: NATHAN BLAKE C. ROSALES Name of Rater: JULIETA H. TANO
Position: Teacher III Position: Master Teacher II
Rating Period: June 2018-April 2019 Date of Review:
Division: Pagadian City

Numerical Ratings
KRA Weight per KRA Weight per Score
Objectives Objective Q E T Ave.

Objective 1 7.50% 4 5 4.500 0.338

1 22.50%
Objective 2 7.50% 4 4 4.000 0.300

Objective 3 7.50% 4 5 4.500 0.338

Objective 4 7.50% 3 4 3.500 0.263

2 22.50%
Objective 5 7.50% 4 5 4.500 0.338

Objective 6 7.50% 5 5 5.000 0.375

Objective 7 7.50% 5 4 4.500 0.338

3 22.50%
Objective 8 7.50% 4 4 4.000 0.300

Objective 9 7.50% 4 4 4.000 0.300

Objective 10 7.50% 5 5 5.000 0.375

4 22.50%
Objective 11 7.50% 4 5 5 4.667 0.350

Objective 12 7.50% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300

5 10.00%
Objective 13 10.00% 5 5 5.000 0.500

Final Rating 4.413

Adjectival Rating Very Satifactory