Ipcrf Teachers Final Template

BACOLOD CITY NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Bacolod City
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR TEACHER
Name of Teacher: JOEY IAN C. SINGSON Name of Rater: SHEILA V. QUIRINO/EDNA ROSE P. GUECO
Position: TEACHER III Position: MT II / Head Teacher VI
Review Period: APRIL 2018 - MARCH 2019 Date of Review: April 5, 2019
Division: BACOLOD CITY
Equivalent (Refer Score (Equiv x Total Score

Key Performance Indicator Actual Result Performance Indicator to the Performance Weight
Weight)
Indicator)
Academic Performance for 5 - 90 - 100%

STE:
4 - 85 - 89%
Percentage of students with 100% 3 - 80 - 84% 5 25% 1.25
80% Final Grade in the
2 - 75 - 79%
specialized Learning Area
taught 1- below 75%
5 - 0 Dropout
Number of Drop Outs in the 4 - 1- 10 DO

5
Sections Handled 0 3 - 11 - 20 DO 5 50% 2.5
2 - 21 - 30 DO
1 - 31 and above
5 - 0 Failed Learners
4 - 1- 2 Failed Learners
Number of Failures in the
specialized subject taught 0 3 - 3- 4 Failed Learners 5 25% 1.25
2 - 5-6 Failed Learners
1 - More than 6 FL
KRAs Objectives Weight per KRA PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Rating
1. TEACHING-LEARNING PROCESS 40%

5 - Submitted 100% completed Lesson
Plans/ Daily Lesson Log (DLL) on time
4 - Submitted 91% to 99% completed
Lesson Plans/ Daily Lesson Log (DLL) on
Prepared daily lesson plan/log of time
activities compliant to the agreed 3 - Submitted 80% to 90% completed
format and content and is aligned with Lesson Plans/ Daily Lesson Log (DLL) on
1.1 Lesson Plans/Logs 100 % Lesson logs/DLL the standard learning competencies 5% time 5
with innovative or ICT based teaching Lesson Plans/ Daily Lesson Log (DLL) on
strategies with appropriate time
instructional materials.
time
5 - Developed more than 4 innovative &

appropriate instructional Materials
4 - Developed 4 innovative & appropriate

Developed Appropriate & Innovative instructional Materials
1.2. Innovative & Appropriate
Developed 10 Instructional Materials Instructional Materials in Subject Area 5% 3 - Developed 3 innovative & appropriate 5
Instructional Materials
Taught) instructional Materials
instructional materials
instructional material
5 - One collaborative action plan approved
by SH with 100% activities implemented and
5% increase in focus KPI within the grading
period.
3% to 4% increase in focus KPI within the
Approved & implemented 1 Conducted problem-based action grading
1.3. Approved & Implmented Action
collaborative Action plan & 1 action planning to improve students' 5% 3 - One period.
collaborative action plan approved 5
Plan by SH with 100% activities implemented and
plan (solo) performance.
grading period.
2 - Drafted one collaborative action plan but
not implemented.
1 - Zero Action Plan
5 - 190 - 195 days without absences

4 - 185 to 190 days present.
1.4 Summary of Absences 190 days present 9% 3 - 175 to 184 days . 5
2 - 165 to 174 days
1 - 164 days and below
5 - Zero-5 tardiness & undertime
4 - 6-10 times occurrence in a month for at
least 1 month in a semester or at least (2)
Time on Task: Delivered actual consecutive months in a year
teaching according to allotted time. 3 - 11-15 times occurrence in a month for
at least 1 month in a semester or at least (2)
1.5 Summary of Tardiness & consecutive months in a year
10 times tardy 6% 2 - 15-20 times occurrence in a 4
Undertime
month for at least 1 month in a semester or
at least (2) consecutive months in a year
1 - more than 20 times
occurrence in a month for at least 1 month
in a semester or at least (2) consecutive
months in a year
5 - Accomplished and submitted 100%
accurate School Forms and other
documents on time every quarter
4 - Accomplished and submitted
100% accurate School Forms and other
documents Three (3) days after the
deadline. 3 - Accomplished and
1.6 Duly accomplished School Forms Accomplished and submitted 100% Monitored students'learning progress submitted 100% accurate School Forms
including Grade Sheets, anecdotal accurate School Forms and other on key performance areas by 5% and other documents Five (5) days after the 5
records, etc documents on time every quarter maintaining school forms and records. deadline 2 - Accomplished
and submitted 100% accurate School
Forms and other documents Seven (7) days
after the deadline 1-
Accomplished and submitted 100%
documents more than Seven (7) days after
the deadline.
5 -- No cases recorded or addressed and
resolved 100% reported bullying incidence
with duly accomplished CPP Monitoring and
1.7 Duly accomplished CPP
feedback tool
monitoring tool
4 - Addressed and resolved 90% to 99%
reported bullying incidence with duly
accomplished CPP Monitoring and feedback
tool
Promoted a learner - friendly learning reported bullying incidence with duly
No cases recorded of child abuse with accomplished CPP Monitoring and feedback
environment to improve students 5% 5
certification tool
performance.
tool
1 - Addressed and resolved69% & below
tool
certification tool
performance.
1.8 Duly accomplished feed back form accomplished CPP Monitoring and feedback
tool
tool
Sub-Total
2. STUDENTS' OUTCOMES 30%
5 - 15% of Test takers achieved 75% in

wirtten examinations/ perforrmance (based
on rubrics provided) in the specialized
subject taught
4 - 11-14% of Test takers achieved
75% in wirtten examinations/ perforrmance
(based on rubrics provided) in the
specialized subject taught
3 - 9-11% of Test takers
achieved 75% in wirtten examinations/
90% of test takers achieved 75%
10% perforrmance (based on rubrics provided) in 5
average
the specialized subject taught
2 - 6-8% of Test
takers achieved 75% in wirtten
Achieved 75% average MPS in the examinations/ perforrmance (based on
2.1 TOS, Examination booklets/ rubrics provided) in the specialized subject
1st to 3rd periodical examinations
questionnaires, Class Record, Grade taught
(written or performance based) in the
Sheets 1- 5% and below of Test takers achieved
5 - Submitted average MPS summary on or

before the deadline
4 - Submitted average MPS summary 1-2
days after the deadline.
3 - Submitted average MPS summary
Submitted average MPS summary 1-2
5% 3 days after the deadline 4
days after the deadline
2 - Submitted average MPS
summary 4 days after the deadline
1 - Submitted average
MPS summary 5 days and beyond the
deadline
5- Completed 100% PAPs within the
applicable period
4 - Completed 90% to 99% PAPs within
the applicable period
Completed 100% PAPs within the 3 - Completed 80% to 89% PAPs
5% 5
applicable perios within the applicable period
2 - Completed 70% to 79% PAPs
within the applicable period
1 - Completed below 70% PAPs
2.2 Complete documentation of within the applicable period
Implemented data driven intervention
intervention PAPs ( Program,
PAPs to improve student
Activities, Projects with 3rd Quarter as 5 - At least 75% of SARFs/SARDOs passed
performance.
baseline data of list of SARDO/SARF) the subject
4 - At least 65-74% of SARFs/SARDOs
passed the subject
3 - At least 55-64% of
100% of SARFs passed the subject 5% SARFs/SARDOs passed the subject 4
5 - Prepared & used more than 5 written or
SARFs/SARDOs passed the subject
perfomance based assessment or a
1 - below 45% of
combination of both in the specialized
SARFs/SARDOs passed the subject taught
subject taught
4 - Prepared & used 5 written or
Prepared & used more than five (5) combination of both in the specialized
written (i.e. summative tests, subject taught. 3 - Prepared
2.3. Written test results; pefromance
Prepared & used 15 written test & activities, etc.), and/or perfomance & used 4 written or perfomance based
assessment criteria/ ratings, Teachers' 5% 5
assessment activities based assessment or a combination assessment or a combination of both in the
Quiz notebook, etc
of both in the specialized subject specialized subject taught
taught 2 - Prepared & used 3 written or
subject taught 1 - Prepared
& used 1-2 written or perfomance based
assessment or a combination of both in the
Sub-Total
3. PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT 15%
5 - Attended more than 5 seminars,
Attended 13 Seminars/Fora trainings, conferences, fora, INSET, LAC
(SEAMEO QITEP International sessions
Training - Indonesia, Writeshop in 4 - Attended 4-5 seminars, trainings,
Science, YES-O National Congress - conferences, fora, INSET, LAC sessions
3.1 Certificate of Appearance/ Attended trainings
Baguio City, Science Utilization of 3 - Attended 3 seminars, trainings,
Participation/Attendance or Approved /seminars/conferences/ fora/ INSET/ 9% 5
Developed LRs, PPST FGD - Pasig, conferences, fora, INSET, LAC sessions
Authority to Travel/ Output LAC Sessions
NTPDP Training, Regional & Division 2 - Attended 2 seminars, trainings,
Research Conference, Summer & conferences, fora, INSET, LAC sessions
October INSET, GAD, 2 STE LAC 1 - Attended 1 seminar, trainings,
Sessions) conferences, fora, INSET, LAC sessions
5 - 100% attendance in Department
Meetings, Grade Level Meetings, Faculty
Meetings
4 - 80-99% attendance in Department
Meetings
3.2 Attended Dept. Meetings, Grade Attended 100% Science Department Attendance in Dept. Meetings, Grade Meetings, Grade Level Meetings, Faculty
6% Meetings 5
Level sessions, Faculty Meetings Meetings Level sessions, Faculty Meetings
Meetings
1 - below 50% attendance in Department
Meetings
Sub-Total
PLUS FACTOR (15%)

Put a check on the box provided
Assignments eligible for Plus Factor if Indicator is present Description
Community Linkages (Conducted PTA Conference, Participated in community - based

activities for the school year (i.e, Brigada Eskwela, Independence day, World Teachers Conducted 2 PTA Conferences, Participated in BE, World Teacher's Day, MOU with Brgy.
Day, Masskara, Alay Lakad, etc.), Established partnership with CSOs/ NGOs/ private and ✓
public educational stakeholders (with MOA, MOU, DOD/DOA, Pictures of Projects)
Taculing during BE
Regular member of a School-Level or higher Committee such as the Grievance,

Discipline, SIP Planning/Project Team, SDRRM Team, SBM Team, Brigada Eskwela Core School & District V DRRM Coordinator, Member of School Planning Team, Member -
Group, SGC, Child Protection, Screening/Hiring, Inspection, Investigation, GAD, INSET, ✓
Masskara, School Class Schedule, Intramurals, Recognition/Moving Up, Soiree.
Committee on Awards
Act as TIC/OIC, Chairman/Co-Chairman or Adviser of a Grade-

Level/Club President/Chairman/Co-Chairman in Learning Area/Club ✓ Co-Chairman/Coordinator - Division YES-O & Scilympics
Related Commitees
Winner Coach/Trainer in a student competition/contest at least Coach - Champion, Mega Quiz Team, Division Scilympics; Coach - Regional Finalist
School Level ✓
YWOFS Fishery Quiz Bowl
Resource Speaker/Demonstration Teacher to a School-Level or higher

conferences, seminars, workshops, and the like; writer of Trainer - NTPDP, Science Utilization of LRs Seminar; Demonstrator - Science Utilization
✓
Instructional Materials of LRs Seminar, Trainer - Health Non-Major in MAPEH Training
Action research/Innovations whose findings and recommendations have been Regional BERF Action Research - Effectiveness of RISE AP Intervention in the Academic
adopted by the Dept./School/District/Division ✓
Performance of STE SARFs; Division Action Research - MENU Model
Remediation/Intervention ✓ RISE AP Intervention on Identified SARFs in Grade 10 Beta & Gamma
Home Visitation/Parent Conference ✓ 2 Parent Conferences in Grade 9 STE Pythagoras
TOTAL 8
SUMMARY OF RATING
KRAs Weight Score
1. TEACHING-LEARNING PROCESS 40% 1.940
2. STUDENTS’ OUTCOMES 30% 1.400
3. PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT 15% 0.750
4. PLUS FACTOR 15% 0.750
Sub-Total 4.840 Adjectival Rating
GRAND TOTAL 4.840 OUTSTANDING
I hereby certify that I fully understand what is required of We hereby certify that the Overall Rating of the Ratee reflected
me as a Teacher and willingly commit to implement what have herein is product of a careful appraisal of the evidences to support each
been stipulated and agreed upon in this document to the best of rating and a thorough deliberation between the Ratee and the Rater.
my ability.
Ratee: Rater:
JOEY IAN C. SINGSON JOEY IAN C. SINGSON

Teacher Teacher SHEILA V. QUIRINO
Master Teacher II
EDNA ROSE P. GUECO

Head Teacher VI
Approving Authority:
Witness:
EDNA ROSE P. GUECO WARLITO D. ROSAREAL

Head Teacher VI Principal IV
Date: _________________ Date: __________________
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING Concurred:

4.500-5.000 OUTSTANDING
3.500- 4.499 VERY SATISFACTORY CYNTHIA G. DEMAVIVAS, CESO V
2.500-3.499 SATISFACTORY Schools Division Superintendent
1.500-2.499 UNSATISFACTORY Date: __________________
1.400 and below POOR
OD CITY NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Bacolod City
MMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR TEACHER
Highest score that can

be claimed in each
Performance Indicator
under KRA (Refer to the
attached RUBRIC)
5
Score
(Equivalent x Weight)
0.250
0.250
0.250
0.450
0.240
0.250
0.250
0.250
1.940
0.500
0.200
0.250
0.200
0.250
1.400
0.450
0.300
0.750
PLUS FACTOR (15%)
5.000
WEIGHT SCORE PLUS FACTOR INDICATORS
5 7-8 Indicators are present.
3 4 Indicators are present.
15% 0.750
2 3 indicators are present.

Bacolod City
Equivalent (Refer
Key Performance Indicator Actual Result Performance Indicator to the Performance Weight Score (Equiv x AVE OF STE
Weight) & STAR
Indicator)

STE:
4 - 85 - 89%
2 - 75 - 79%
taught 1- below 75%
1.25
STAR:
4 - 75 - 79%
2 - 65 - 69%
taught 1- below 65%
5 - 0 Dropout

2 - 21 - 30 DO
1 - 31 and above
specialized subject taught 0 5 25% 1.25
1 - More than 6 FL

time


period.
grading period.
not implemented.

2 - 165 to 174 days
Undertime
months in a year
the deadline.
feedback tool
monitoring tool
tool
certification tool
performance.
tool
tool
Sub-Total

subject taught
average
2 - 6-8% of Test

before the deadline
deadline

applicable period
5% 5
Activities, Projects with 3rd Quarter as
performance.
baseline data of list of SARDO/SARF)
2.2 Complete documentation of
performance.
passed the subject
1 - below 45% of
subject taught
Quiz notebook, etc
Sub-Total
Meetings
Meetings
6% Meetings 5
Meetings
Meetings
Sub-Total
PLUS FACTOR (15%)


Taculing during BE

Committee on Awards

Related Commitees
School Level ✓

✓
TOTAL 8
SUMMARY OF RATING
KRAs Weight Score
my ability.
Ratee: Rater:

Master Teacher II
EDNA ROSE P. GUECO

Head Teacher VI
Witness:

Date: _________________ Date: __________________

(IPCRF) FOR TEACHER
Highest score that can be

claimed in each
Total Score Performance Indicator
attached RUBRIC)
5 5
5 5
Score
0.250
0.250
0.250
0.450
0.240
0.250
0.250
1.940
0.500
0.200
0.250
0.200
0.250
1.400
0.450
0.300
0.750
%)
5.000 15% 0.75


5.000 15% 0.75
Bacolod City
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
Name of Teacher: JOEY IAN C. SINGSON

Position: TEACHER III
Review Period: APRIL 2018 - MARCH 2019
Key Performance Indicator Actual Result Performance Indicator

BEC:
4 - 70 - 74%
Percentage of students with 100% 3 - 65 - 69%
2 - 60 - 64%
taught 1- below 60%
5 - 0 Dropout

Sections Handled 0 3 - 11 - 20 DO
2 - 21 - 30 DO
1 - 31 and above
specialized subject taught 0 3 - 3- 4 Failed Learners
1 - More than 6 FL
KRAs Objectives
1. TEACHING-LEARNING PROCESS
Prepared daily lesson plan/log of

activities compliant to the agreed
format and content and is aligned with
1.1 Lesson Plans/Logs 100 % Lesson logs/DLL the standard learning competencies
with innovative or ICT based teaching
strategies with appropriate
Developed Appropriate & Innovative

Developed 10 Instructional Materials Instructional Materials in Subject Area
Taught)
Approved & implemented 1 Conducted problem-based action

collaborative Action plan & 1 action planning to improve students'
Plan
1.4 Summary of Absences 190 days present
Time on Task: Delivered actual

teaching according to allotted time.
1.5 Summary of Tardiness &

10 times tardy
Undertime
1.6 Duly accomplished School Forms Accomplished and submitted 100% Monitored students'learning progress
including Grade Sheets, anecdotal accurate School Forms and other on key performance areas by
records, etc documents on time every quarter maintaining school forms and records.

monitoring tool
Promoted a learner - friendly learning

No cases recorded of child abuse with
environment to improve students
certification
performance.
1.8 Duly accomplished feed back form
2. STUDENTS' OUTCOMES
average
Achieved 75% average MPS in the

2.1 TOS, Examination booklets/
questionnaires, Class Record, Grade
Sheets

Completed 100% PAPs within the

applicable perios

performance.
100% of SARFs passed the subject

Prepared & used more than five (5)
written (i.e. summative tests,
Prepared & used 15 written test & activities, etc.), and/or perfomance
assessment criteria/ ratings, Teachers'
assessment activities based assessment or a combination
Quiz notebook, etc
of both in the specialized subject
taught
3. PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT
Attended 13 Seminars/Fora
(SEAMEO QITEP International
Training - Indonesia, Writeshop in
Science, YES-O National Congress -
Baguio City, Science Utilization of
Participation/Attendance or Approved /seminars/conferences/ fora/ INSET/
Developed LRs, PPST FGD - Pasig,
NTPDP Training, Regional & Division
Research Conference, Summer &
October INSET, GAD, 2 STE LAC
Sessions)
3.2 Attended Dept. Meetings, Grade Attended 100% Science Department Attendance in Dept. Meetings, Grade
PLUS FACTOR (15%)

Assignments eligible for Plus Factor if Indicator is present

activities for the school year (i.e, Brigada Eskwela, Independence day, World Teachers

Discipline, SIP Planning/Project Team, SDRRM Team, SBM Team, Brigada Eskwela Core

Level/Club President/Chairman/Co-Chairman in Learning Area/Club ✓
Related Commitees
Winner Coach/Trainer in a student competition/contest at least

School Level ✓

conferences, seminars, workshops, and the like; writer of ✓
Action research/Innovations whose findings and recommendations have been

Remediation/Intervention ✓
Home Visitation/Parent Conference ✓
TOTAL 8
SUMMARY OF RATING
KRAs
2. STUDENTS’ OUTCOMES
4. PLUS FACTOR
GRAND TOTAL
I hereby certify that I fully understand what is required of

me as a Teacher and willingly commit to implement what have
been stipulated and agreed upon in this document to the best of
my ability.
JOEY IAN C. SINGSON

Teacher
Witness:
EDNA ROSE P. GUECO

Head Teacher VI
Date: _________________
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING

3.500- 4.499 VERY SATISFACTORY
2.500-3.499 SATISFACTORY
1.500-2.499 UNSATISFACTORY
Bacolod City
Name of Rater: SHEILA V. QUIRINO/EDNA ROSE P. GUECO

Position: MT II / Head Teacher VI
Date of Review: April 5, 2019

Equivalent (Refer be claimed in each
Score (Equiv x Total Score Performance
to the Performance Weight Indicator
Weight)
Indicator) under KRA (Refer to the
attached RUBRIC)
5 25% 1.25
5 5
5 50% 2.5
5 25% 1.25
Score
Weight per KRA PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Rating
40%
5% 5 0.250
time
5% time 5 0.250
time

time


instructional Materials
5% 3 - Developed 3 innovative & appropriate 5 0.250
period.
grading
3 - One period.
collaborative action plan approved
5% 5 0.250
grading period.
not implemented.

9% 3 - 175 to 184 days . 5 0.450
2 - 165 to 174 days
consecutive months in a year
3 - 11-15 times occurrence in a month for
6% 2 - 15-20 times occurrence in a 4 0.240
months in a year
submitted 100% accurate School Forms
5% and other documents Five (5) days after the 5 0.250
deadline 2 - Accomplished
the deadline.
feedback tool
tool
5% accomplished CPP Monitoring and feedback 5 0.250
tool
tool
tool
Sub-Total 1.940
30%
subject taught
10% perforrmance (based on rubrics provided) in 5 0.500
2 - 6-8% of Test
examinations/ perforrmance (based on
rubrics provided) in the specialized subject
taught
1- 5% and below of Test takers achieved

before the deadline
5% 3 days after the deadline 4 0.200
deadline

applicable period
5% 5 0.250
5 - At least 75% of SARFs/SARDOs passed

the subject
passed the subject
5% SARFs/SARDOs passed the subject 4 0.200
1 - below 45% of
subject taught
subject taught. 3 - Prepared
5% & used 4 written or perfomance based 5 0.250
Sub-Total 1.400
15%
trainings, conferences, fora, INSET, LAC
sessions
4 - Attended 4-5 seminars, trainings,
conferences, fora, INSET, LAC sessions
9% 3 - Attended 3 seminars, trainings, 5 0.450
2 - Attended 2 seminars, trainings,
1 - Attended 1 seminar, trainings,
Meetings
Meetings
6% Meetings 5 0.300
Meetings
Meetings
Sub-Total 0.750
PLUS FACTOR (15%)

Description WEIGHT
Conducted 2 PTA Conferences, Participated in BE, World Teacher's Day, MOU with Brgy.
Taculing during BE
School & District V DRRM Coordinator, Member of School Planning Team, Member -
Committee on Awards
Co-Chairman/Coordinator - Division YES-O & Scilympics
Coach - Champion, Mega Quiz Team, Division Scilympics; Coach - Regional Finalist 5.000 15%
Trainer - NTPDP, Science Utilization of LRs Seminar; Demonstrator - Science Utilization

of LRs Seminar, Trainer - Health Non-Major in MAPEH Training
Regional BERF Action Research - Effectiveness of RISE AP Intervention in the Academic

RISE AP Intervention on Identified SARFs in Grade 10 Beta & Gamma
2 Parent Conferences in Grade 9 STE Pythagoras
OF RATING
Weight Score
40% 1.940
30% 1.400
15% 0.750
15% 0.750
RAND TOTAL 4.840 OUTSTANDING
We hereby certify that the Overall Rating of the Ratee reflected

herein is product of a careful appraisal of the evidences to support each
rating and a thorough deliberation between the Ratee and the Rater.
Ratee: Rater:
JOEY IAN C. SINGSON

Teacher SHEILA V. QUIRINO
Master Teacher II
EDNA ROSE P. GUECO
Head Teacher VI
WARLITO D. ROSAREAL
Principal IV
Date: __________________
Concurred:
CYNTHIA G. DEMAVIVAS, CESO V

Schools Division Superintendent
Date: __________________
SCORE PLUS FACTOR INDICATORS
0.750

Bacolod City
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
Name of Teacher: JOEY IAN C. SINGSON

Review Period: APRIL 2018 - MARCH 2019
Key Performance Indicator Actual Result Performance Indicator

BEC:
4 - 70 - 74%
2 - 60 - 64%
taught 1- below 60%
OHSP:
4 - 55 - 59%
2 - 40 - 44%
taught 1- below 40%
5 - 0 Dropout

Sections Handled 0 3 - 11 - 20 DO
2 - 21 - 30 DO
1 - 31 and above
specialized subject taught 0 3 - 3- 4 Failed Learners
1 - More than 6 FL
KRAs Objectives

strategies with appropriate
Developed Appropriate & Innovative

Developed 10 Instructional Materials Instructional Materials in Subject Area
Taught)
Approved & implemented 1 Conducted problem-based action

collaborative Action plan & 1 action planning to improve students'
Plan
1.4 Summary of Absences 190 days present

1.5 Summary of Tardiness &

10 times tardy
Undertime
1.6 Duly accomplished School Forms Accomplished and submitted 100% Monitored students'learning progress
including Grade Sheets, anecdotal accurate School Forms and other on key performance areas by
records, etc documents on time every quarter maintaining school forms and records.

monitoring tool
Promoted a learner - friendly learning

No cases recorded of child abuse with
environment to improve students
certification
performance.
1.8 Duly accomplished feed back form
2. STUDENTS' OUTCOMES
average
Achieved 75% average MPS in the

2.1 TOS, Examination booklets/
questionnaires, Class Record, Grade
Sheets

Completed 100% PAPs within the

applicable perios

performance.
100% of SARFs passed the subject

Prepared & used more than five (5)
written (i.e. summative tests,
Prepared & used 15 written test & activities, etc.), and/or perfomance
assessment criteria/ ratings, Teachers'
assessment activities based assessment or a combination
Quiz notebook, etc
of both in the specialized subject
taught
Attended 13 Seminars/Fora
(SEAMEO QITEP International
Training - Indonesia, Writeshop in
Science, YES-O National Congress -
Baguio City, Science Utilization of
Participation/Attendance or Approved /seminars/conferences/ fora/ INSET/
Developed LRs, PPST FGD - Pasig,
NTPDP Training, Regional & Division
Research Conference, Summer &
October INSET, GAD, 2 STE LAC
Sessions)
3.2 Attended Dept. Meetings, Grade Attended 100% Science Department Attendance in Dept. Meetings, Grade
PLUS FACTOR (15%

Assignments eligible for Plus Factor if Indicator is present

activities for the school year (i.e, Brigada Eskwela, Independence day, World Teachers

Discipline, SIP Planning/Project Team, SDRRM Team, SBM Team, Brigada Eskwela Core

Level/Club President/Chairman/Co-Chairman in Learning Area/Club ✓
Related Commitees
Winner Coach/Trainer in a student competition/contest at least

School Level ✓

conferences, seminars, workshops, and the like; writer of ✓
Action research/Innovations whose findings and recommendations have been

Remediation/Intervention ✓
Home Visitation/Parent Conference ✓
TOTAL 8
SUMMARY OF RATING
KRAs
2. STUDENTS’ OUTCOMES
4. PLUS FACTOR
GRAND TOTAL
I hereby certify that I fully understand what is required of

me as a Teacher and willingly commit to implement what have
been stipulated and agreed upon in this document to the best of
my ability.
JOEY IAN C. SINGSON

Teacher
Witness:
EDNA ROSE P. GUECO

Head Teacher VI
Date: _________________

Bacolod City
Name of Rater: SHEILA V. QUIRINO/EDNA ROSE P. GUECO

Position: MT II / Head Teacher VI
Date of Review: April 5, 2019
Equivalent (Refer Score (Equiv x AVE OF STE

to the Performance Weight Total Score
Weight) & STAR
Indicator)
5 25% 1.25
1.25
5 25% 1.25
5 50% 2.5
5 25% 1.25
Score
Weight per KRA PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Rating
40%
time
5% time 5 0.250
time

time


5% 3 - Developed 3 innovative & appropriate 5 0.250
period.
5% 3grading
- One period.
collaborative action plan approved 5 0.250
grading period.
not implemented.

9% 3 - 175 to 184 days . 5 0.450
2 - 165 to 174 days
3 - 11-15 times occurrence in a month for
6% 2 - 15-20 times occurrence in a 4 0.240
months in a year
submitted 100% accurate School Forms
5% and other documents Five (5) days after the 5 0.250
deadline 2 - Accomplished
the deadline.
feedback tool
tool
5% accomplished CPP Monitoring and feedback 5 0.250
tool
tool
tool
Sub-Total 1.940
30%
subject taught
10% perforrmance (based on rubrics provided) in 5 0.500
2 - 6-8% of Test
examinations/ perforrmance (based on
rubrics provided) in the specialized subject
taught
1- 5% and below of Test takers achieved

before the deadline
5% 3 days after the deadline 4 0.200
deadline

applicable period
5% 5 0.250
5 - At least 75% of SARFs/SARDOs passed

the subject
passed the subject
5% SARFs/SARDOs passed the subject 4 0.200
1 - below 45% of
subject taught
subject taught. 3 - Prepared
5% & used 4 written or perfomance based 5 0.250
Sub-Total 1.400
15%
trainings, conferences, fora, INSET, LAC
sessions
4 - Attended 4-5 seminars, trainings,
9% 3 - Attended 3 seminars, trainings, 5 0.450
2 - Attended 2 seminars, trainings,
1 - Attended 1 seminar, trainings,
Meetings
Meetings
6% Meetings 5 0.300
Meetings
Meetings
Sub-Total 0.750
PLUS FACTOR (15%)

Description
Conducted 2 PTA Conferences, Participated in BE, World Teacher's Day, MOU with Brgy.
Taculing during BE
School & District V DRRM Coordinator, Member of School Planning Team, Member -
Committee on Awards
Co-Chairman/Coordinator - Division YES-O & Scilympics
Coach - Champion, Mega Quiz Team, Division Scilympics; Coach - Regional Finalist 5.000
Trainer - NTPDP, Science Utilization of LRs Seminar; Demonstrator - Science Utilization

of LRs Seminar, Trainer - Health Non-Major in MAPEH Training
Regional BERF Action Research - Effectiveness of RISE AP Intervention in the Academic

RISE AP Intervention on Identified SARFs in Grade 10 Beta & Gamma
2 Parent Conferences in Grade 9 STE Pythagoras
OF RATING
Weight Score
40% 1.940
30% 1.400
15% 0.750
15% 0.750
RAND TOTAL 4.840 OUTSTANDING

Ratee: Rater:
JOEY IAN C. SINGSON

Teacher SHEILA V. QUIRINO
Master Teacher II
EDNA ROSE P. GUECO
Head Teacher VI
WARLITO D. ROSAREAL
Principal IV
Date: __________________
Concurred:

Date: __________________
claimed in each
Performance Indicator
attached RUBRIC)
5
15% 0.75

Bacolod City
Equivalent (Refer
Score (Equiv x AVE OF STE
Weight) & STAR
Indicator)

STE:
4 - 85 - 89%
2 - 75 - 79%
taught 1- below 75%
STAR:
4 - 75 - 79%
Percentage of students with 100% 3 - 70 - 74% 5 25% 1.25 1.25
2 - 65 - 69%
taught 1- below 65%
BEC:
4 - 70 - 74%
2 - 60 - 64%
taught 1- below 60%
5 - 0 Dropout

2 - 21 - 30 DO
1 - 31 and above
1 - More than 6 FL

time


period.
grading period.
not implemented.

2 - 165 to 174 days
Undertime
months in a year
the deadline.
feedback tool
monitoring tool
tool
certification tool
performance.
tool
tool
Sub-Total

subject taught
average
2 - 6-8% of Test
before the deadline
deadline

applicable period
5% 5
performance.
passed the subject
1 - below 45% of
subject taught
Quiz notebook, etc
Sub-Total
Meetings
Meetings
6% Meetings 5
Meetings
Meetings
Sub-Total
PLUS FACTOR (15%)


Taculing during BE

Committee on Awards

Related Commitees
School Level ✓

✓
TOTAL 8
SUMMARY OF RATING
KRAs Weight Score
my ability.
Ratee: Rater:

Master Teacher II
EDNA ROSE P. GUECO

Head Teacher VI
Witness:

Date: _________________ Date: __________________

claimed in each
attached RUBRIC)
5 5
Score
0.250
0.250
0.250
0.450
0.240
0.250
0.250
1.940
0.500
0.200
0.250
0.200
0.250
1.400
0.450
0.300
0.750
5.000 15% 0.75

5.000 15% 0.75

Bacolod City
Equivalent (Refer
Score (Equiv x AVE OF STE
Indicator) Weight) & STAR

BEC:
4 - 70 - 74%
2 - 60 - 64%
taught 1- below 60%
1.25
STAR:
4 - 75 - 79%
2 - 65 - 69%
taught 1- below 65%
5 - 0 Dropout

2 - 21 - 30 DO
1 - 31 and above
1 - More than 6 FL

time


period.
grading period.
not implemented.

2 - 165 to 174 days
Undertime
months in a year
the deadline.
feedback tool
monitoring tool
tool
certification tool
performance.
tool
tool
Sub-Total
subject taught
average
2 - 6-8% of Test

before the deadline
deadline

applicable period
5% 5
performance.
performance.
passed the subject
1 - below 45% of
subject taught
Quiz notebook, etc
Sub-Total
Meetings
Meetings
6% Meetings 5
Meetings
Meetings
Sub-Total
PLUS FACTOR (15%)


Taculing during BE
Committee on Awards

Related Commitees
School Level ✓

✓
TOTAL 8
SUMMARY OF RATING
KRAs Weight Score
my ability.
Ratee: Rater:

Master Teacher II
EDNA ROSE P. GUECO

Head Teacher VI
Witness:

Date: _________________ Date: __________________

claimed in each
attached RUBRIC)
5 5
Score
0.250
0.250
0.250
0.450
0.240
0.250
0.250
1.940
0.500
0.200
0.250
0.200
0.250
1.400
0.450
0.300
0.750
5.000 15% 0.75

5.000 15% 0.75


Bacolod City
Name of Teacher: RODNEY N. MARTIRES Name of Rater: VOLTAIRE V. DAYPAL/SUSIE ARANETA PhD.
TEACHER II Position: MT I / Asst. Principal II

Equivalent claimed in each
Performance (Refer to the Score (Equiv AVE OF STE &
Key Performance Indicator Actual Result Weight Total Score Performance Indicator
Indicator Performance x Weight) STAR under KRA (Refer to the
Indicator) attached RUBRIC)

STE:
4 - 85 - 89%
2 - 75 - 79%
taught 1- below 75%

STAR:
4 - 75 - 79%

80% Final Grade in the 2 - 65 - 69%
taught
1.25
STAR:
Percentage of students with 100% 5 25% 1.25

taught 1- below 65%
1.25
BEC:
4 - 70 - 74%
2 - 60 - 64%
specialized Learning Area 5 5
taught 1- below 60%
OHSP:
4 - 55 - 59%
2 - 40 - 44%
taught 1- below 40%
5 - 0 Dropout

2 - 21 - 30 DO
1 - 31 and above
1 - More than 6 FL
Score
KRAs Objectives Weight per KRA PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Rating (Equivalent x
Weight)
5 - Submitted 100% completed
Lesson Plans/ Daily Lesson Log
(DLL) on time
Prepared daily lesson
plan/log of activities
compliant to the agreed
format and content and is
aligned with the standard
4 - Submitted 91% to 99%
Prepared daily lesson completed Lesson Plans/ Daily
plan/log of activities Lesson Log (DLL) on time
compliant to the agreed 3 - Submitted 80% to 90%
format and content and is completed Lesson Plans/ Daily
aligned with the standard Lesson Log (DLL) on time
1.1 Lesson Plans/Logs 100 % Lesson logs/DLL 5% 5 0.250
learning competencies with 2 - Submitted 69% to 79%
innovative or ICT based completed Lesson Plans/ Daily
teaching strategies with Lesson Log (DLL) on time
appropriate instructional
materials. 1 - Submitted 60% to 68%
completed Lesson Plans/ Daily
Lesson Log (DLL) on time
5 - Developed more than 4

innovative & appropriate
4 - Developed 4 innovative &
Developed Appropriate & appropriate instructional Materials
1.2. Innovative & Appropriate Developed 10 Instructional Innovative Instructional
5% 3 - Developed 3 innovative & 5 0.250
Instructional Materials Materials Materials in Subject Area
Taught)
appropriate instructional materials
5appropriate instructional
- One collaborative material
action plan
approved by SH with 100%
activities implemented and 5%
increase in focus KPI within
4 - One collaborative action the
plan
grading period.
approved by SH with 100%
activities implemented and 3% to
Approved & implemented 1 Conducted problem-based 34%- One
increase in focus KPI
collaborative within
action plan
collaborative Action plan & 1 action planning to improve 5% the gradingbyperiod.
approved SH with 100% 5 0.250
Plan
action plan (solo) students' performance. activities implemented and 2% to
3% increase in focus KPI within
the gradingone
2 - Drafted period.
collaborative
action plan but not implemented.
5 - 190 - 195 days without
absences 4 - 185 to 190
days present. 3-
1.4 Summary of Absences 190 days present 9% 175 to 184 days . 5 0.450
2 - 165 to 174 days
1 - 164 days
and below
4 - 6-10 times
occurrence in a month for at least
Time on Task: Delivered
1 month in a semester or at least
actual teaching according to
(2) consecutive months in a year
allotted time.
3 - 11-15 times
1.5 Summary of Tardiness & occurrence in a month for at least
10 times tardy 6% 1 month in a semester or at least 4 0.240
Undertime
(2) consecutive months in a year
2 - 15-20
times occurrence in a month for at
least 1 month in a semester or at
least (2) consecutive months in a
year 1-
more than 20 times occurrence in
a month for at least 1 month in a
100% accurate School Forms and
semester or at least (2)
other documents on time every
quarter 4-
Accomplished and submitted
Monitored students'learning other documents Three (3) days
1.6 Duly accomplished School Forms progress on key after the deadline. 3-
100% accurate School Forms
including Grade Sheets, anecdotal performance areas by 5% Accomplished and submitted 5 0.250
and other documents on time
records, etc maintaining school forms 100% accurate School Forms and
every quarter
and records. other documents Five (5) days
after the deadline 2
- Accomplished and submitted
other documents Seven (7) days
other documents more than Seven
(7) days after the deadline.
5 -- No cases recorded or
addressed and resolved 100%
reported bullying incidence with
duly accomplished CPP
monitoring tool
Monitoring and feedback tool
4-
Addressed and resolved 90% to
99% reported bullying incidence
with duly accomplished CPP
Promoted a learner - friendly Monitoring and feedback tool
No cases recorded of child learning environment to
5% 5 0.250
abuse with certification improve students 3 - Addressed and resolved 80%
performance. to 89% reported bullying
incidence with duly accomplished
1.8 Duly accomplished feed back form CPP Monitoring and feedback tool
2 - Addressed and resolved

70% to 79% reported bullying
incidence with duly accomplished
CPP Monitoring and feedback tool
1 - Addressed and
resolved69% & below reportedSub-Total 1.940
bullying incidence with duly
2. STUDENTS' OUTCOMES 30% accomplished CPP Monitoring and
feedback tool
5 - 15% of Test takers achieved
75% in wirtten examinations/
perforrmance (based on rubrics
provided) in the specialized
subject taught
4 - 11-14% of Test
examinations/ perforrmance
3 - 9-
11% of Test takers achieved 75%
in wirtten examinations/
10% perforrmance (based on rubrics 5 0.500
average
provided) in the specialized
subject taught
2 - 6-8% of Test
Achieved 75% average MPS takers achieved 75% in wirtten
2.1 TOS, Examination booklets/ in the 1st to 3rd periodical examinations/ perforrmance
questionnaires, Class Record, Grade examinations (written or (based on rubrics provided) in the
Sheets performance based) in the specialized subject taught
specialized subject taught 1-
5% and below of Test takers
achieved 75% in wirtten
examinations/ perforrmance
summary on or before the
deadline 4
- Submitted average MPS
summary 1-2 days after the
deadline.
Submitted average MPS
summary 1-2 days after the 5% 4 0.200
deadline
2-
Submitted average MPS summary
4 days after the deadline
1 - Submitted
average MPS summary 5 days
and beyond the deadline
5- Completed 100% PAPs within
4 - Completed 90%
to 99% PAPs within the
applicable period
3 - Completed 80% to
Completed 100% PAPs within
5% 89% PAPs within the applicable 5 0.250
the applicable perios
period
2.2 Complete documentation of 1-
Implemented data driven Completed below 70% PAPs
intervention PAPs to improve within the applicable period
Activities, Projects with 3rd Quarter as 5 - At least 75% of
student performance.
baseline data of list of SARDO/SARF) SARFs/SARDOs passed the
subject
SARFs/SARDOs passed the
100% of SARFs passed the
5% subject 4 0.200
subject 3 - At least 55-64% of
SARFs/SARDOs passed the
subject
5 - Prepared & used more than 5

written or perfomance based
assessment or a combination of
both in the specialized subject
2 - At least 45-54%
taught
of SARFs/SARDOs passed the
Prepared & used more than 4 - Prepared & used 5
subject
five (5) written (i.e. written or perfomance based
1 - below 45% of
2.3. Written test results; pefromance summative tests, activities, assessment or a combination of
Prepared & used 15 written test SARFs/SARDOs passed the
assessment criteria/ ratings, Teachers' etc.), and/or perfomance 5% both in the specialized subject 5 0.250
& assessment activities subject taught
Quiz notebook, etc based assessment or a taught. 3-
combination of both in the Prepared & used 4 written or
specialized subject taught perfomance based assessment or
a combination of both in the
2 - Prepared & used 3
written or perfomance based
assessment or a combination of
both in the specialized subject
taught 1- Sub-Total 1.400
Prepared & used 1-2 written or
perfomance based assessment or
a combination of both in the
Attended 13 Seminars/Fora 5 - Attended more than 5
(SEAMEO QITEP International seminars, trainings, conferences,
Training - Indonesia, Writeshop fora, INSET, LAC sessions
in Science, YES-O National 4 - Attended 4-5 seminars,
3.1 Certificate of Appearance/ Congress - Baguio City, Science Attended trainings trainings, conferences, fora,
Participation/Attendance or Approved Utilization of Developed LRs, /seminars/conferences/ fora/ 9% INSET, LAC sessions 3- 5 0.450
Authority to Travel/ Output PPST FGD - Pasig, NTPDP INSET/ LAC Sessions Attended 3 seminars, trainings,
Training, Regional & Division conferences, fora, INSET, LAC
Research Conference, Summer sessions 2 - Attended 2
& October INSET, GAD, 2 STE seminars, trainings, conferences,
LAC Sessions) fora, INSET, LAC sessions
1 - Attended 1 seminar,
5 - 100% attendance in
trainings, conferences, fora,
Department Meetings, Grade
INSET, LAC sessions
Level Meetings, Faculty Meetings
4 - 80-99% attendance in
Attendance in Dept.
3.2 Attended Dept. Meetings, Grade Attended 100% Science
Meetings, Grade Level 6% 3 - 60-79% attendance in 5 0.300
Level sessions, Faculty Meetings Department Meetings
sessions, Faculty Meetings Department Meetings, Grade
2 - 50-59% attendance in
1 - below 50% attendance in

Department Meetings, Grade Sub-Total 0.750
PLUS FACTOR (15%)

Put a check on the box
Assignments eligible for Plus Factor provided if Indicator is Description WEIGHT
present
Community Linkages (Conducted PTA Conference, Participated in community -
based activities for the school year (i.e, Brigada Eskwela, Independence day, Conducted 2 PTA Conferences, Participated in school Level World Teacher's
World Teachers Day, Masskara, Alay Lakad, etc.), Established partnership with ✓ Day, MOU with Brgy. Captain Leny Grace of Brgy Taculing &Councilor
CSOs/ NGOs/ private and public educational stakeholders (with MOA, MOU,
DOD/DOA, Pictures of Projects) Villafuerte running for councilor

Discipline, SIP Planning/Project Team, SDRRM Team, SBM Team, Brigada Eskwela School & District V DRRM Coordinator, Member of School Planning Team,
Core Group, SGC, Child Protection, Screening/Hiring, Inspection, Investigation, ✓
GAD, INSET, Masskara, School Class Schedule, Intramurals, Recognition/Moving Member - Committee on Awards
Up, Soiree.

Level/Club President/Chairman/Co-Chairman in Learning Co-Chairman/Coordinator for Stage Decoration & committee for cleanliness
✓
Area/Club Related Commitees co-chairman in school canteen Operation
Winner Coach/Trainer in a student competition/contest at least 5.000 15%

School Level ✓ Coach in- Technolympics EIM
Resource Speaker/Demonstration Teacher to a School-Level or

higher conferences, seminars, workshops, and the like; writer of Trainer LRs Seminar; Demonstrator Utilization of LRs Seminar, Trainer - Health
✓
Instructional Materials Non-Major in TESDA Training
Action research/Innovations whose findings and recommendations have

been adopted by the Dept./School/District/Division ✓ Recommendation for Proposal of School Canteen
Remediation/Intervention ✓ Intervention on Identified SARFs in Grade 11 CCS-C
Home Visitation/Parent Conference ✓ 4 Parent Conferences in Grade 11 CCS-C
TOTAL 8
SUMMARY OF RATING
KRAs Weight Score

GRAND TOTAL 4.348 VERY SATISFACTORY
I hereby certify that I fully understand what is We hereby certify that the Overall Rating of the Ratee
required of me as a Teacher and willingly commit to reflected herein is product of a careful appraisal of the evidences
implement what have been stipulated and agreed to support each rating and a thorough deliberation between the
upon in this document to the best of my ability. Ratee and the Rater.
Ratee: Rater:
RODNEY N. MARTIRES RODNEY N. MARTIRES

Teacher Teacher VOLTAIRE V. DAYPAL
Master Teacher I
SUSIE A. ARANETA PhD.

ASST. PRINCIPAL II
Witness:
SUSIE A. ARANETA PhD. WARLITO D. ROSAREAL

ASST. PRINCIPAL IV Principal IV
Date: _________________ Date: __________________

SCORE PLUS FACTOR INDICATORS
0.75

Bacolod City
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR HEAD TEACHER
Name of Teacher: Name of Rater: JOSE G. DAYOT III

Position: HEAD TEACHER VI Position: PRINCIPAL IV
Review Period: APRIL 2017 - MARCH 2018 Date of Review: OCTOBER 26, 2017
Key Performance Equivalent (Refer Score (Equiv x

Actual Result Indicator Weight
Indicator to the Indicator) Weight)
Academic Performance 5 - 75% Grand Ave Grade and above

4 - 70% - 74%
*Achieved at least 75%
Ave. Grade (1st-3rd 3 - 65% – 69% 50% 0
Grading) in the Learning 2 - 60% - 64%
Area.
1 - Below 60%
5 - 0 Dropout
Drop Out (for teachers w/ 4 - 1-10 DO
advisory class)
3 - 11- 20 DO
*Achieved zero (0) 25% 0
drop out in all advisory 2 - 21 - 30 DO
classes under the Dept.
31 DO and above
5 - 0 Failure
Failure (for teachers w/
4 - 1-10 Failures
Advisory Class)
*Achieved zero 3 - 11- 20 Failures 25% 0
(0) failed learners in the
Learning Area. 2 - 21 - 30 Failures
31 Failures and above
KRAs Outputs Objectives Weight per KRA PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Extent of participation in the preparation of

the SIP, AIP, and APP:
5 - Chairman
Approved SIP, AIP, and APP Assisted the School Head in the formulation of 4 - Co-
10%
documents SIP, AIP, and APP Chairman
3 - Member
2 - Contributor
1 - No Participation
Extent of implementation of programs and

Assisted in the implemention of programs and
Write-ups of programs or projects projects identified in the AIP in the
1. School Leadership, projects identified in the AIP in the respective 10%
implemented using other sources of fund respective learning area (e.g. actual
Management and Operations learning area
accomplishment over planned)
(30%)
Monitoring reports Conducted monitoring and prepared reports on
Monitor the implementation of programs and
the extent on the implementation of the 5%
projects identified in the AIP.
Accomplishment reports programs and projects in the AIP.
Full documentation of accomplishment Frequency of communicating the

Communicated the accomplishments in terms of
reports including invitation letter to various accomplishments in terms of implementation
implementation of programs and projects 5%
stakeholders, Program of activities, of programs and projects identified in the
identified in the AIP to various stakeholders.
attendance, pictorials, etc. AIP.
Sub-Total
Instructional Supervision Plan Supervised and provided technical assistance Number of teachers observed and provision
to teachers to improve the delivery of 20% of quality technical assistance to improve
Insttructional Supervision Report instruction. the delivery of instruction
Supervisory Report
Checklist made Frequency of monitoring teacher's lesson
Monitored teachers' leson plans and recordings 10%
for checking teachers' lesson plans and plans and recordings
recordings (Grade Sheets, SFs, etc)
2. Instructional Superrvision
(40%) Copy of interventionprograms or
innovations implemented including Extent of utilization of the results of
beneficiaries, methodologies, resources, Assessed learning outcomes 5% assessment of learning outcomes such as
effectiveness (as shown in the difference reading inventory, spot test, etc.
between relevant baseline data, etc.)
Documented intervention programs Number of intervention programs or
Implemented intervention programs or
implemented based on the analysis of the 5% innovations for learners development
innovations for learners' development
result of assessment of learning outcomes implemented
Sub-Total
Percentage of attendance of teachers (e.g.
Logbook or other means by which
Monitored teachers attendance and punctuality 5% Actual attendance over number of school
attendance of teachers can be verified
days)
Approved program design supported by

3. Human Resource attendance sheets, pictorials, etc. In case
Management and of School-based INSET; copies of Provided professional developmentt Number of Professional development
Development (15%) 5%
certificates of participation for trainings opportunities for teachers opportunities provided to teachers.
attended by school personnel outside the
school
Number of performance rating of

Approved performance ratings of teachers Managed the performance teachers 5%
outstanding
Sub-Total
Full documentation of programs, projects,

interventions, and activities that support
the child-friendly school system and the
Number of programs, projects,
child protection policy to include the
4. Learning Environment Established a child-riendly, gender sensitive, interventuions, and activities that support
description of the program, project, 10%
(10%) safe and motivating learning environment the child-friendly school system and the
intervention or activity, beneficiaries,
child protection policy
methodologies, resources needed,
accomplishments, partners in
implementation, pictorials, etc.
Sub-Total
MOA, MOU, DOD/DOA and other

documentary evidences of resources Forged partnership with stakeholders in support Number of partners supporting the
5. Community Partnership
generated in support of the implementation of the implementtation of the school's 5% implementation of the school's programs
(5%)
of the school's programs and projects and programss and projects and projects
formalizing the partnership
Sub-Total
TOTAL
PLUS FACTOR (Not to exceed 1 point)
Assignments eligible for Plus Factor Point Description
Regular membership to a School-Level or higher Committee such as

Grievance, SIP Planning/Project Team, SDRRM Team, Brigada Eskwela
0.2
Core Group, SGC, Child Protection, Screening/Hiring, Inspection,
Investigation, and other School related committees
Chosen to pilot/lead a special program or project as mandated by high

0.2
office within the rating period
Chairmanship of a Division-level task-based committee 0.2
Resource Speaker to a School-Level or higher conferences, seminars,

0.2
workshops, and the like.
Action research/Innovations whose findings and recommendations have

0.2
been adopted by the Dept./School/District/Division
TOTAL
SUMMARY OF RATING
KRAs Weight Score
1. School Leadership, Management and Operations (30%) 30% 0.00
2. Instructional Superrvision (40%) 40% 0.00
3. Human Resource Management and Development (15%) 15% 0.00
4. Learning Environment (10%) 10% 0.00
5. Community Partnership (5%) 5% 0.00
Sub-Total 0.00
Adjectival Rating
PLUS FACTOR 0.00
OVERALL RATING 0.00 OUTSTANDING
I hereby certify that I fully understand what is required of me as a We hereby certify that the Overall Rating of the Ratee reflected
Teacher and willingly commit to implement what have been stipulated and herein is product of a careful appraisal of the evidences to support ea
agreed upon in this document to the best of my ability. rating and a thorough deliberation between the Ratee and the Rater.
Ratee:
EDNA ROSE P. GUECO EDNA ROSE P. GUECO

Head Teacher VI Head Teacher VI
Witness:
JOSE G. DAYOT III JOSE G. DAYOT III

Principal IV Principal IV
Date: _________________ Date: __________________
Concurred:

Date: __________________
TY NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Bacolod City
NT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR HEAD TEACHER

be claimed in each
under KRA (Refer to
the attached RUBRIC)
0.00 0.00
Score
Rating (Equivalent x
Weight)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Sub-Total 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Sub-Total 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Sub-Total 0.00
0.00
Sub-Total 0.00
0.00
Sub-Total 0.00
TOTAL 0.00
TOR (Not to exceed 1 point)
Description Score
TOTAL 0.00
Adjectival Rating
OUTSTANDING
JOSE G. DAYOT III

Principal IV
Concurred:


Ipcrf Teachers Final Template

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ipcrf Teachers Final Template

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

BACOLOD CITY NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR TEACHER

Equivalent (Refer Score (Equiv x Total Score

Academic Performance for 5 - 90 - 100%

Number of Drop Outs in the 4 - 1- 10 DO

1. TEACHING-LEARNING PROCESS 40%

5 - Developed more than 4 innovative &

4 - Developed 4 innovative & appropriate

5 - 190 - 195 days without absences

5 - 15% of Test takers achieved 75% in

5 - Submitted average MPS summary on or

PLUS FACTOR (15%)

Community Linkages (Conducted PTA Conference, Participated in community - based

Regular member of a School-Level or higher Committee such as the Grievance,

Act as TIC/OIC, Chairman/Co-Chairman or Adviser of a Grade-

Resource Speaker/Demonstration Teacher to a School-Level or higher

JOEY IAN C. SINGSON JOEY IAN C. SINGSON

EDNA ROSE P. GUECO

EDNA ROSE P. GUECO WARLITO D. ROSAREAL

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING Concurred:

MMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR TEACHER

Highest score that can

PLUS FACTOR (15%)

5 7-8 Indicators are present.

4 5-6 Indicators are present.

3 4 Indicators are present.

1 1-2 Indicators are present.

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR TEACHER

Academic Performance for 5 - 90 - 100%

Number of Drop Outs in the 4 - 1- 10 DO

1. TEACHING-LEARNING PROCESS 40%

5 - Developed more than 4 innovative &

4 - Developed 4 innovative & appropriate

5 - 190 - 195 days without absences

5 - 15% of Test takers achieved 75% in

5 - Submitted average MPS summary on or

5- Completed 100% PAPs within the

PLUS FACTOR (15%)

Community Linkages (Conducted PTA Conference, Participated in community - based

Regular member of a School-Level or higher Committee such as the Grievance,

Act as TIC/OIC, Chairman/Co-Chairman or Adviser of a Grade-

Resource Speaker/Demonstration Teacher to a School-Level or higher

JOEY IAN C. SINGSON JOEY IAN C. SINGSON

EDNA ROSE P. GUECO

EDNA ROSE P. GUECO WARLITO D. ROSAREAL

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING Concurred:

Highest score that can be

5 7-8 Indicators are present.

4 5-6 Indicators are present.

3 4 Indicators are present.

5.000 15% 0.75

1 1-2 Indicators are present.

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Teacher: JOEY IAN C. SINGSON

Key Performance Indicator Actual Result Performance Indicator

Academic Performance for 5 - 75 - 100%

Number of Drop Outs in the 4 - 1- 10 DO

Prepared daily lesson plan/log of

Developed Appropriate & Innovative

Approved & implemented 1 Conducted problem-based action

1.4 Summary of Absences 190 days present

Time on Task: Delivered actual

1.5 Summary of Tardiness &