Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Harpsichord
5/15/19
Piece: The Art of Fugue; Contrapunctus VIII
By: JS Bach
Despite many visual similarities, the harpsichord and piano are very different instruments. This
leads to a variety of different ways in which one might preform a particular piece of music on either
instrument. First, there are the internal mechanisms that makes these keyboards differ in how sound is
created and projected. This leads to how one might interpret a piece of music given the unique
limitations of each instrument. Furthermore, the individuals for whom the harpsichord and piano are
tools of mastery, come into their own from different worlds and possess temperament tempered in part
The most obvious difference between the piano and harpsichord is that while the harpsichord is
a stringed instrument, the piano is a percussive one. That is to say, when you play a key on the
harpsichord, a mechanism plucks the string, allowing the string to vibrate before returning to it’s resting
position. The piano contains a different mechanism that hits the string with a hammer. This leads to a
very different sound coming from each instrument. The piano’s action is created such that only a
beautiful tone (ideally) is created when a note is struck. The harpsichord has a more mechanical sound
with the addition of the sound created when the jack returns to it’s resting position via its own weight.
It’s also important to note that the tuning may also differ. A harpsichord’s string is not pulled in as much
tension. In this particular set of recording, the piano is tuned an entire half step above the harpsichord.
With the unique set of limitations set by each instrument, soloists have developed performance
techniques that enhance a piece of music by playing into that instrument’s particular strengths. For the
piano, one is able to play in varying dynamics based on how one strikes the keys. A harpsichord lacks
Cory Wageman
Harpsichord
5/15/19
this ability, and so is more reliant on the use of articulations to shape a musical phrase. The piano also
contains a sustain pedal. This allows one to sustain all notes played under it.
For these particular recordings, Davitt Moroney takes a slightly slower tempo. This allows him
more control to highlight each voice with the use of separation. For instance, the first section of the
fugues ends in mm.39 on a two-note phrase. On the piano, the two-note phrase is traditionally played
by playing the first note louder than the second, which Sokolov does. On the harpsichord, Moroney
spaces the second note is such a way to give the illusion of ‘loud to soft’. It’s interesting to note that
while the piano has the ability to sustain notes with the use of pedal, Sokolov opts out of its use for a
more authentic interpretation. In fact, one could even go as far to say that Sokolov’s interpretation is
more a caricature of an ‘authentic’ interpretation. Sokolov uses subtle dynamics to highlight three
otherwise equal voices throughout the fugue. Moroney is actually more liberal in how he highlights
instrument’s capabilities, rather than what one might expect to hear. I would consider Sokolov’s
recording as more ‘authentic’ in terms of Baroque performance practice simply because the piano
allows for a greater range of sound. This, because the Art of Fugue wasn’t necessarily meant to be
played on a keyboard instrument, making it the perfect subject for this discussion.
Cory Wageman
Harpsichord
5/15/19
Bibliography
- J.s. Bach: The Art Of Fugue (bwv 1080), Contrapunctus Viii; Davitt Moroney, Harpsichord 4k Uhd
Voices Music - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjIv4Jx3BjQ