Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CUPRONICKELS - AN OVERVIEW
CONTENTS
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Physico-Chemical Properties of Copper-Nickel Alloys
3. Oxidation of Copper-Nickel Alloys
4. Electrochemical Behaviour of Copper-Nickel Alloys
5. Corrosion Resistance Behaviour of Copper Nickel Alloys
5.1. Atmospheric Corrosion
5.2. Corrosion Behaviour in Aqueous Solutions
5.2.1. In Chloride Solutions
5.2.2. In Acidic Solutions
5.2.3. In Alkaline Solutions
5.3. Corrosion in Marine Environment
5.3.1. Effect of Oxygen Content
5.3.2. Effect of Temperature
5.3.3. Effect of Velocity
5.3.4. Effect of Pollutants
5.3.4.1. Sulphide Pollution
5.3.4.2. Ammonia Pollution
5.4. Effect of Fouling and Microbial Corrosion
6. Preventive or Remedial Measures
7. Conclusions
Acknowledgement
References
ABSTRACT
1. INTRODUCTION
Copper and its alloys have been extensively used to fabricate structures
and components exposed to seawater and other marine environments because
of their low corrosion susceptibility III. Among those, copper-nickel alloys
are widely commercially used because they exhibit good corrosion and
biofouling resistance in marine environments. Cupronickels were introduced
for marine application mainly for condenser tubing, where good resistance to
localised (pitting) and erosion corrosion is important. Over the last few
decades the use of cupronickels has been extended to ship and boat hulls,
offshore structures 121, expanded mesh for fish cages and intake screens at
power stations /3/.
The corrosion rates of cupronickels decrease sharply with increasing
nickel content (up to ~ 40 wt.%) and thereafter remain approximately
constant /4/. The highest corrosion resistance was observed for nickel content
40-50% 151. The corrosion behaviour is strongly dependent on the nature and
characteristics of the passive film formed on the alloy /6-8/. However, these
alloys suffer greatly accelerated corrosion where exposed to seawater. The
main corrosion hazard for cupronickels in seawater can be related to the
presence of chloride. However, in polluted environment two other factors
must be taken into account; viz. the presence of sulphide anions and the
presence of organisms which are capable of fouling on the surface. Another
frequent cause of corrosion in marine environments has been attributed to
organic materials present in pollutes and stagnant seawater in harbour areas
191. Localised attack occurs due to the combined effects of corrosion and
erosion (impingement attack) as a consequence of the removal of passive film
by turbulent water flow /10/.
The extensive uses of cupronickels in marine and offshore application led
to considerable research on corrosion in seawater, at various conditions of
temperature, aeration, alloy containing varying amounts of nickel and other
alloying elements. Thus an overview of several works revealed complex
electrochemical behaviour in polluted saline media where the corrosion
behaviour of cupronickels can be altered by the simultaneous presence of
chlorides, sulphides and biofilm formation and its detachment. This paper
reviews various aspects of the corrosion behaviour of the cupronickels
covering several recent surveys and reports of documents.
2. PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
The strength and hardness of these alloys increase with nickel content,
approaching the strength of ferrous alloys. Their modulus of elasticity also
increases with nickel content. These alloys cannot be hardened by heat
treatment, but they exhibit considerable increase in hardness on cold
working.
The small additions (0.5 to 1%) of modifiers improve their corrosion
resistance in seawater. Thus alloys containing iron and manganese are called
admiralty cupronickels. The addition of iron to the alloy results in the
formation of a film that is very resistant to the impingement attack caused by
high-speed water. This film also provides good protection against attack by
polluted brackish water and water that may be stagnant for long periods of
time in the tubes. The beneficial effect of iron addition has been summarised
earlier by several authors /12-16/.
The most widely used alloys are the 70/30 and 90/10 varieties to which
additions such as Fe and Mn are made. Iron modified alloy has the greatest
tolerance for high velocity effects. Stewart and LaQue /17/ suggested that the
iron in cupronickels form hydrated iron oxides in the corrosion product
thereby improving its protective action. The addition of manganese helps to
control the rate of precipitation in aluminium hardened cupronickels.
Cupronickel 70/30 alloys with iron and manganese contents of at least 0.5%
have high abrasion resistance. Alloys without the addition of iron improve
the resistance to velocity effects. The division between alloys that foul and
those do not occur at 30 to 40% nickel. When iron is added to the extent of
about 0.3 to 0.5% in 70/30 alloy, resistance to fouling is greatly reduced. The
10% nickel alloy containing 1-2% iron can be expected to remain free from
fouling.
Beccaria and Crousier /18/ reported that the effect of iron addition on
70/30 alloy increased the average corrosion resistance of the alloy. This
beneficial effect is due to the formation of a layer containing large quantity of
nickel and iron oxides. A disadvantage of iron addition is the possibility of
Table-1
Physical and mechanical properties of cupronickels /19/
3. O X I D A T I O N OF C O P P E R - N I C K E L A L L O Y S
10
-C
\
10
ε iooo'C
Ε
0-1
0-01
0 20 AO SO 80 100
% NICKEL
The change in rate upon annealing was attributed to equilibrium in the oxide
by the reaction,
and a resultant change in diffusion of ions through the new oxide. The
extended scale present on a 7% nickel alloy oxidised at 300-700°C consists
entirely of copper oxides 1221. After removal of this outer scaling layer, a
brown layer lying under the surface was identified as NiO on the basis of
lattice constants determined by electron diffraction analysis.
The oxidation of cupronickel 60/40 alloy at temperatures up to 650°C
forms thick oxides, which contains invariably copper oxide /23/. Yet at room
temperature the oxide film is entirely nickel oxide. The overgrowth of the
initial nickel oxide by cuprous oxide takes place on 60/40-cupronickel alloy.
The physical and chemical displacement reaction is probably rate controlling
during oxidation of the alloy at temperatures up to 650°C. The oxidation of
cupronickel alloy at temperatures less than 160°C produces a duplex oxide
structure /24/. The isochronal curves are found to pass through a maximum at
74% copper which is explained by diffusion of copper through a porous
nickel oxide structure extending through the metal consumption zone.
4. ELECTROCHEMICAL BEHAVIOUR O F
COPPER-NICKEL ALLOYS
12
8 -
8
U
ÜJ Cu"
ο
ω
a ΰ 0 passivation -
>
Cu*
0 ω
LU
-u _ immunity
1 1 1 1 1 1 J 1 Γ"*
It
pH
12
ω Cu**
4 g
b LO 0 passivation (Λ
Cu*
ω
-U
mm unity
-8
-I 1 1 L J L—u
" " f 10 12
PH
percent nickel and above. Predicted minimum nickel content for passivity is
at 40 atomic percent or 38 wt.%.
5. C O R R O S I O N R E S I S T A N C E B E H A V I O U R O F
COPPER-NICKEL ALLOYS
73
Brought to you by | Purdue University Libraries
Authenticated
Download Date | 5/26/15 4:04 PM
Vol. 18, No. 1, 2000 Corrosion Resistance of Cupronickels-
An Overview
Table.2
Typical corrosion rate (in ipy) of cupronickel alloys /29/
74
Brought to you by | Purdue University Libraries
Authenticated
Download Date | 5/26/15 4:04 PM
J. Mathiyarasu et al. Corrosion Reviews
Table 3
Atmospheric corrosion of copper-nickel alloys /30/
75
Brought to you by | Purdue University Libraries
Authenticated
Download Date | 5/26/15 4:04 PM
Vol. 18, No. 1, 2000 Corrosion Resistance of Cupronickels-
An Overview
CU2(OH)3C1 on the surface. Kato et al. /44/ studied in aerated 3.4 wt.% NaCl
solution at room temperature and found that the corrosion product layers on
the alloy surface thickened during the first 103 h.
North and Pryor /45/ observed reduced anodic and cathodic reaction rates
and suggested that these reductions are due to the increased anodic and
cathodic resistance during the formation of the layer. The decreased corrosion
rate was correlated with the defect structure of the corrosion product layers
/46-47/. The film formation on 90/10 alloy was dependent on applied current
and the relative concentrations of the ionic species H+, OH" and CI" in
solution /48/. The influence of corrosion product film formation has been
studied /49-50/ to elucidate the reason for the protective nature of these films.
In copper-nickel corrosion, oxygen reduction occurs at the bottom of pores in
the outer corrosion product layers and the corrosion rate is determined by the
diffusion of oxygen through the electrolyte to these sites.
Copper-nickel was believed to get its corrosion resistance from the inner
cuprous oxide layer /45,47/. Cuprous oxide has a cubic, copper deficient
lattice, making it a p-type semiconductor with low ionic resistance due to
highly mobile vacancies and low electronic resistance. The holes have low
activation energy for movement /51/. Addition of nickel and iron were
thought to improve the corrosion performance by substitution for copper in
the lattice, but this idea is not readily accepted in the context of the theory of
doping on substitutional transport in ionic solids.
The greater corrosion resistance of the copper-nickel alloys in aerated salt
water was due to a slower cathodic reaction, presumably oxygen reduction
/52/. The poor catalytic nature and/or poor electronic conductance of the
outer porous layer force oxygen to diffuse within the pore electrolyte to sites
deep in the porous layer. These deep sites may be of a catalytic nature and are
where electrons are readily available for reduction of the oxygen. The oxygen
diffusion step in the pore electrolyte partially or completely limits the rates
for the overall corrosion reaction.
Although an increase in nickel content was expected to improve the
resistance of copper-nickel alloys to localised corrosion, however the
behaviour of the particular alloy is strongly influenced by the chloride ion
concentration. For lower chloride concentration, an increase in nickel content
worsens the resistance to passive film breakdown, whereas for higher
chloride concentration an increase in the nickel content is beneficial.
Mansfeld and Uhlig /53-54/ explained the behaviour of nickel-copper
alloys through the electronic configuration theory of passivity. If t h e ' d ' shell
76
Brought to you by | Purdue University Libraries
Authenticated
Download Date | 5/26/15 4:04 PM
J. Mathiyarasu et al. Corrosion Reviews
6.60 mg/L. The corrosion reaction was cathodically controlled at low oxygen
concentrations, but was anodically controlled at high concentrations. At
higher oxygen concentration ( [ 0 2 ] = 26.3 mg/L), no difference between the
high and low nickel alloys was apparent. It was explained that the loss in
corrosion resistance of the 70/30 cupronickel alloy was due to a shift in the
corrosion potential to a value that was more noble than the potential at which
large anodic currents were observed when the potential was swept in the
active to noble direction.
The principal corrosion product due to the oxygen attack was found to be
C u 2 0 . This may be formed by the direct complexing of copper by chloride
according to the following reaction /27/ and CuCl 2 ' is a dissolved species in
the presence of chloride,
0 3 + 2 H + + 2E -> 0 2 + H20
The hypothesized reaction can explain the shift in the corrosion potential
in the noble direction and supports the thinner, apparently more protective
corrosion product film formation.
components of the passive film formed on the metal surfaces were nickel
compounds after a short exposure time and copper compounds after a long
exposure time.
Another attempt /105/, was made to correlate the variations in
microstructure and iron content with the formation of protective corrosion
product layers at low temperature ranges (LTR) (20 to 40°C). Here LTR is
intended to cover the temperatures at which condensers and pipelines usually
operates. Temperature has a significant influence on the film formation
characteristics mainly for the homogenised and continuous precipitation
alloys. At 40°C, good protective corrosion product layers were formed
rapidly with in a short time of exposure. Such corrosion product layers
produced a characteristic maximum in the free corrosion potential versus
time of exposure curve. The corrosion product films were thin and adhered
well.
In contrast, at 20°C thicker more porous films were obtained, which did
not give adequate protection for exposure time up to 250 hours. The same
behaviour was observed for the discontinuous precipitate alloy, at both 20
and 40°C. The rapidly formed and protective corrosion product layers
obtained at 40°C exhibit 'p' type semiconducting properties. Another type of
attack coming from temperature is known as 'hot spot' corrosion /106/, due
to thermogalvanic effects. This localised attack occurs on the cooling side of
the tube opposite a local high temperature area on the steam side. 90/10
CuNiFe alloy is much less prone to this type of attack.
Table.4
Limiting design velocities (ft/sec.) /113/
Gudas and Hack /137/ monitored the corrosion rates of 90/10 cupronickel
and compared corrosion rates obtained in control tests in unpolluted seawater
with those in the polluted environments. The latter were much higher and in
most instances, remained high even long after sulphide additions had been
terminated. The effects of dissolved sulphide content /138-139/, seawater
velocity /112,140/ and the oxidation of the dissolved sulphide by oxygen
/140,141/ have been studied for both 90/10 and 70/30 cupronickel alloys in
natural seawater. Slight changes in the test conditions could have led to quite
different results.
In determining the effect of sulphide, Macdonald et al. /138,139/
monitored the corrosion rates of the cupronickel alloys in deaerated seawater
containing 0-55g/m 3 sulphide flowing at 1.62 m/sec. In unpolluted deaerated
seawater, the corrosion rates were extremely low because the cathodic
reaction was limited to the reduction of the trace amounts of dissolved
oxygen present. In sulphide polluted de-aerated seawater, corrosion rates
were much higher. This is because an active shift in the corrosion potential
occurred by hydrogen ion reduction. Thus the rate and nature of corrosion in
sulphide contaminated brine is strongly dependent upon the degree of
aeration in the seawater, and the aerated sulphide being very aggressive.
It would appear that an accelerated attack is not caused by the presence of
sulphide alone, even at high sulphide contents or under adverse flow
conditions. Laboratory experiments, performed under controlled conditions
have shown that dissolved oxygen plays a critical role in the accelerated,
sulphide-induced corrosion of cupronickel alloys /140-141/. It is possible that
the dissolved sulphide was homogeneously oxidised by the dissolved oxygen
to produce species that were particularly corrosive towards copper alloys.
The accelerated attack of copper-nickel alloys could then result from contact
with these sulphide oxidation products rather than with the sulphide or
oxygen from which they were derived.
In considering the synergism between dissolved oxygen and sulphide,
Syrett et al. /142/ performed experiments in seawater containing oxygen,
sulphide, sulphur and polysulphide either singly or in combination. These
experiments demonstrated that sulphur or polysulphides were just as effective
as sulphide in promoting corrosion in de-aerated seawater, but that compared
with oxygen, none of the sulphur-containing species caused a dramatic
increase in the corrosion rate. The presence of the sulphur species did have a
profound effect on the character of the surface film. The cuprous oxide Films
formed during the one-day exposure to unpolluted seawater were relatively
87
Brought to you by | Purdue University Libraries
Authenticated
Download Date | 5/26/15 4:04 PM
Vol. 18, No. 1, 2000 Corrosion Resistance of Cupronickels-
An Overview
89
Brought to you by | Purdue University Libraries
Authenticated
Download Date | 5/26/15 4:04 PM
Vol. 18, No. 1, 2000 Corrosion Resistance of Cupronickels-
An Overview
90
Brought to you by | Purdue University Libraries
Authenticated
Download Date | 5/26/15 4:04 PM
J. Mathiyarasu et al. Corrosion Reviews
91
Brought to you by | Purdue University Libraries
Authenticated
Download Date | 5/26/15 4:04 PM
Vol. 18, No. 1, 2000 Corrosion Resistance of Cupronickels-
An Overview
92
Brought to you by | Purdue University Libraries
Authenticated
Download Date | 5/26/15 4:04 PM
J. Mathiyarasu et al. Corrosion Reviews
93
Brought to you by | Purdue University Libraries
Authenticated
Download Date | 5/26/15 4:04 PM
Vol. 18, No. 1, 2000 Corrosion Resistance of Cupronickels-
An Overview
Cu 2 0 film formed initially on the tube surface. The electric field associated
with the Cu 2 0 film, which had a zeta potential, extended into the bulk of the
solution at the operating flow rates, attracting the lepidocrocite particles and
causing those that reach the surface to adhere to it. The existence of a
spontaneous cathode (positive zeta potential) associated with the Cu 2 0 film
further favoured the deposition of negative lepidocrocite particles.
It was reported /207/ that the corrosion of cupronickel alloys in sulphide
polluted environment may be avoided by using a stimulated iron anode.
Ferrous ion from a simulated iron anode system were also effective in
eliminating or reducing sulphide induced corrosion of the cupronickel alloys.
7. CONCLUSIONS
The copper nickel alloys exhibit good corrosion resistance to pitting and
erosion corrosion in seawater applications. With up to 40% nickel in the alloy
corrosion resistance increased and remained constant afterwards. Oxidation
of these alloys exhibits interesting features. At temperatures less than 160°C,
they produce duplex oxide structure. At 800°C they produce scales consisting
of a thick, inner Cu 2 0 and a thin outer CuO layer together with nickel
internal oxide. In non-oxidising environments they offer better corrosion
resistance than bronzes. In sulphide atmospheres, sulphidization occurs and
the surface layer composition varies with alloy composition. The general
order is alloy/nickel sulphide/CuS. In chloride solutions they undergo pitting.
Increase in nickel content in the alloy plays a crucial role towards pitting. For
lower chloride concentration, the high nickel alloy destroys passivation and
at higher chloride concentration the alloys are corrosion resistant. In alkaline
solutions, the passive layers formed on these alloys have an outer
CUO/CU(OH)2 layer overlaying a Cu 2 0 barrier layer with nickel cations
incorporated. In seawater the corrosion of these alloys is due to dissolved
oxygen and temperature plays a crucial role. Localised attack occurred in
spots where the liquid is motion. High flow velocities of seawater caused the
removal or prevented the formation of corrosion product film. Cupronickel
alloys undergo severe corrosion in seawater polluted by sulphide and
ammonia. The passive films formed on cupronickels are destroyed by the
presence of microorganisms present in seawater. Sulphides produced by the
bacteria accelerated the corrosion.
Corrosion control of these alloys was effectively carried out by the use of
inhibitors in the medium, applying cathodic protection and addition of a less
noble element in the cupronickel alloy.
Cupronickel alloys are still extensively used for marine applications and
seagoing vessels still employ these work horses in their heat exchangers.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
REFERENCES
95
Brought to you by | Purdue University Libraries
Authenticated
Download Date | 5/26/15 4:04 PM
Vol. 18, No. 1, 2000 Corrosion Resistance of Cupronickels-
An Overview
43. H.P. Dhar, R.E. White, R. Darby, L.R. Cornwell, R.B. Griffin and G.
Burnell, Corrosion, 41, 193, 1985.
44. C. Kato and H.W. Pickering, J. Electrochem. Soc., 131, 1219, 1984.
45. R.F. North and M.J. Pryor, Corros. Sei., 10, 297, 1970.
46. R.G. Blundy and M.J. Pryor, J. Electrochem. Soc., 12, 65, 1972.
47. J.M. Popplewell, R.F. Hart and J.A. Ford, J. Electrochem. Soc., 13,
295, 1973.
48. D.P. Harvey, T.S. Sudarshan and M.R. Louthan, Jr., Brit. Corros. J.,
2 3 , 6 1 , 1988.
49. H. Hack and H. Pickering, Electrochemical Impedance Analysis &
Interpretation (Proc. Conf.), San Diego, California, United States,
1991 Nov.
50. H. Hack and H. Pickering, ASTM Spec. Publ., 1993, 220-36.
51. O. Kubaschewski and B. Hopkins, "Oxidation of metals and alloys",
p.21, Buttersworth, London, 1967.
52. H.P. Hack and H.W. Pickering, J. Electrochem. Soc., 138, 690, 1991.
53. F. Mansfeld and H.H. Uhlig, Corros. Sei., 9, 377, 1969.
54. H.H. Uhlig, Eleclrochimica Acta., 16, 1939, 1971.
55. Zhu Xiaolohg, Lin Leyun and Yan Yumin, Cailiao Kexue jinzhan, 6,
218, 1992.
56. M. Abdallah, A.Y. Eletre and A.I. Mead, J. Electrochem. Soc. India.,
4 5 , 7 1 , 1996.
57. P.K. Chauhan and H.S. Gadiyar, Corros. Sei., 25, 55, 1985.
58. J.O'M. Bockris, B.T. Rubin, A. Despic and B. Loverecek,
Electrochim. Acta., 17, 973, 1972.
59. B. Cahan and R. Haynes, J. Electroanal. Chem., 22, 339, 1969.
60. M.E. Walton and P.A. Brook, Corros. Sei., 17, 317, 1977.
61. M.E. Walton and P.A. Brook, Corros. Sei., 17, 593, 1977.
62. H.P. Lee and Ken Nobe, J. Electrochem. Soc., 131, 1236, 1984.
63. H.P. Lee and Ken Nobe, J. Electrochem. Soc., 140, 2483, 1993.
64. Ken Nobe and G.L. Bauerle, Corrosion, 37, 426, 1981.
65. F.K. Crundwell, Electrochim. Acta, 36, 2135, 1991.
66. R.D.K. Misra and G.T. Burstein, Corros. Sei., 24, 305, 1984.
67. P. Druska, H.H. Strehblow and S. Golledge, Corros. Sei., 38, 1369,
1996.
68. I. Milosev and M. Metikos-Hukovic, J. Electrochem. Soc., 138, 61,
1991.
69. I. Milosev and M. Metikos-Hukovic, Corrosion, 48, 185, 1992.
101
Brought to you by | Purdue University Libraries
Authenticated
Download Date | 5/26/15 4:04 PM
Vol. 18, No. 1, 2000 Corrosion Resistance of Cupronickels-
An Overview
163. M.F.L. de Meie, G. Brankevich and H.A. Videla, Brit. Corros. J., 24,
211, 1989.
164. M.F.L. de Meie, G. Brankevich and H.A. Videla, Corros. Reviews, 9,
269, 1990.
165. M.F.L. de Meie, G. Brankevich and H.A. Videla, Proc. 7lh Int. Congr.
Mar. Corr. and Fouling, Valencia, Spain, 1988.
166. M. F.L. deMeie, An.-CIDEPINT, 1992, 259-78.
167. S.G. Gomez de Saravia, M.F.L. de Meie and H.A. Videla, Biofouling,
7, 141, 1993.
168. M.B. McNeil, J.M. Jones and B.J.Little, Corrosion, 47, 674, 1991.
169. A.H.L. Chamberlin, S.E. Simmonds and B.J.Gasner, Int. Biodeterior,
2 4 , 2 1 3 , 1988.
170. H.A. Videla, S.G. Gomez de Saravia and M.F.L. de Meie, Corrosion
89, NACE, N e w Orleans, Louisiana, Paper No. 185, 1989.
171. H. Cypionka, F. Widdel and N. Fenning, FEMS Microbiol Ecol., 31,
39, 1985.
172. J.W. Costerton, G.G. Geesey and P.A. Jones, Mater. Performance, 27,
49, 1988.
173. H.A. Videla, M.F.L. deMeie and G. Brankevich, Corrosion, 44, 423,
1988.
174. S.G. G o m e z de Saravia, M.F.L. deMeie and H.A. Videla, Corrosion,
46, 302, 1990.
175. F. Mansfeld and B. Little, Electrochim. Acta, 37, 2291, 1992.
176. B. Little, P. Wegner, J. Jacobus and L. James, Estuaries, 12, 138,
1989.
177. P.A. Wagner, A.V. Stiffey and B.J. Little, Gas, Oil, Coal, Environ.
Biotechnol., 3, 3rd, 1990, Pub. 1991, 521-33.
178. R.O. Lewis, Mater. Perform., 21, 31, (Sept.1982).
179. R.B. Srinivasan, S.N. Gaonkar and A.A. Karande, Proc. Indian Acad.
Sei. (Anim. Sei.), 99, 163, 1990.
180. Β. Little, R. Ray, P. Wagner, F. Mansfeld, R. Tsai and H. Shih, Proc.
Electrochem. Soc., 91, 7, 1997.
181. J. Mathiyarasu, C. Stella, S. Maruthamuthu, N. Palaniswamy, A.
Rajendran and N.S. Rengaswamy, Proc. National Symposium on
Electrochemistry in Nuclear Technology, 1998, p. 196.
182. J. Mathiyarasu, S. Maruthamuthu, N. Palaniswamy and P. Ganapathy,
Proc. Eigth National Congress on Corrosion Control, 1998, p. 4.3.1.
183. J.S. Maki, B.J. Little, P. Wagner and R. Mitchell, Biofouling, 2, 27,
1990.
184. F. Mansfeld, G. Liu, H. Xiao, C.H. Tsai and B.J. Little, Corros. Sei.,
36, 2063, 1994.
185. Tseng Ming Don and Shih Ham Chang, Corros. Prev. Control, 41, 19,
1994.
186. R.F. North and M.J. Pryor, Corros. Sei., 8, 149, 1968.
187. J.Ε. Castle, D.C. Epler and D.B. Peplow, Corros. Sei., 16, 145, 1970.
188. D.C. Epler and J.E. Castle, Corrosion, 35, 451, 1979.
189. D.C. Lenard, J. Moures and G.E. Morin, Brit. Corros. J., 24, 19, 1989.
190. R. Francis, Mater. Perform., 21, 44, (Aug-1982).
191. P.R. Shibad, J. Electrochem. Soc. India, 44, F60, 1995.
192. T.W. Bostwick, Corrosion, 17, 12, 1961.
193. J.C.J. Rowlands, Applied Chemistry, 15, 57, 1965.
194. D. Chadwick and T. Hashemi, Corros. Sei., 18, 39, 1978.
195. P.H.S har, W Li and K. Nobe, Proe. Electrochem. Soc., 93, 2, 1993.
196. T.S. Lee, Corrosion, 39, 371, 1983.
197. B.D. Oakes, Material Protection and Performance, 15, 44 (Jan-1976).
198. D. Van Loyen, Werkst. Korros., 40, 559, 1989.
199. P. Vander Pool Daniel and Y.Cha Charles, Eur. Pat. Appl. Ep., 397,
454, 1989, p.13.
200. P.Vander Pool Daniel and Y.Cha Charles, Eur. Pat. Appl. Ep., 478,
247, 1990.
201. A. Omberger John, A. Kelly John and B. Batton Carol., Can. C.A., 1,
2 9 3 , 6 1 3 , 1991.
202. Hollander Orin, Eur. Pat. Appl. Ep., 479, 572, 1992.
203. P. Vander Pool Daniel and P. Reysusan, Eur. Pat. Appl. Ep., 481, 667,
1990.
204. Jamal Ν. Al-Hajji and Mahmoud R. Reda, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 32,
960, 1993.
205. M.A. Elmorsi, M.M. Ghoneins and E.M. Mabronk, J. Electrochem.
Soc. India, 41, 97, 1992.
206. R. Gasparini, C. Delia Rocca and E. loannilli, Corros. Sei., 10, 157,
1970.
207. Η.P.Hack and J.P.Gudas, Materials Performance, 19, 49, 1980.