Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Telecommunications Final PDF
Telecommunications Final PDF
• for compensation and bonus plans, impact on the This may significantly change the profile of revenue
timing of targets being achieved and the likelihood of recognition for some entities and, due to the sheer
targets being met; and volume of customers with different tariffs and service
plans, entities may have to overcome significant
• potential non-compliance with loan covenants. practical challenges to ensure systems are in place to
deal with the new requirements.
Current accounting systems and processes may
require significant changes to cope with the new What is the impact if a contract is modified?
Standard It is very common in the telecommunications industry
Within the telecommunications industry, it is common to allow customers to modify their contracts to,
for revenue recognition to be driven off an entity’s for example, increase or decrease minutes or add
billing systems. As explained below, IFRS 15 introduces or remove services. In the past, IFRSs included only
new requirements to move to a more conceptual limited guidance on such modifications. IFRS 15
approach. The complexity of applying this approach includes detailed guidance on whether a contract
and of producing the detailed disclosures required modification should be accounted for prospectively (as
by the new Standard in an industry typified by vast an adjustment to future revenues) or retrospectively
numbers of contracts and a multitude of product (via an adjustment when the modification occurs). This
offerings may be so great as to compel entities to may result in a change of practice for some entities
develop new systems solutions. The availability of a and, again, may pose a logistical challenge for the
‘portfolio approach’ in some circumstances may reduce industry as a result of the vast number of different
this additional complexity, but it will not be eliminated. permutations of goods and services within contracts.
It will be important to assess whether it is practicable
In determining the extent to which systems to deal with such adjustments by working with current
modifications will be required, entities will wish to accounting systems, or whether changes may be
consider the need for sufficient flexibility to cope with required to those systems.
future changes in pricing and in the variety of product
offerings made to customers. The 1 January 2017 Should contract costs be capitalised (e.g. sales
effective date may set a challenging timeframe for commissions and success fees)?
developing new systems. In addition to more prescriptive guidance on revenue
recognition, the new Standard introduces specific
What are the most significant changes? criteria for determining whether to capitalise certain
costs, distinguishing between those costs associated
How should revenue be allocated to different goods with obtaining a contract (e.g. sales commissions) and
and services identified (e.g. mobile phone handsets)? those costs associated with fulfilling a contract. In the
Previously, given the lack of specific guidance in telecommunications industry, this becomes an issue
IFRSs, there was greater room for judgement when because significant costs are incurred that are directly
identifying the goods and services within a contract attributable to obtaining contracts with customers,
and then allocating the revenue to those goods and for example through ‘success fees’ (i.e. commissions
services. Entities may have to amend their current that are only payable if a contract is obtained). At
accounting policies as a result of the more detailed present, different entities might treat these costs
guidance in IFRS 15. The new Standard requires the differently, although most have previously been
revenue from a contract to be allocated to each distinct expensing them. The new Standard will require entities
good or service provided on a relative standalone to capitalise success fees, which will have an impact
selling price basis, though a ‘residual’ approach is on operating profits. In addition, the new Standard
permitted in limited circumstances. requires capitalised contract costs to be amortised on
a systematic basis that is consistent with the pattern of
transfer of the goods or services. Entities will need to
exercise judgement to determine the appropriate basis
and time period for this amortisation.
Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee (“DTTL”), its
network of member firms, and their related entities. DTTL and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent
entities. DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) does not provide services to clients. Please see www.deloitte.com/about
for a more detailed description of DTTL and its member firms.
Deloitte provides audit, tax, consulting, and financial advisory services to public and private clients spanning multiple industries.
With a globally connected network of member firms in more than 150 countries and territories, Deloitte brings world-class
capabilities and high-quality service to clients, delivering the insights they need to address their most complex business
challenges. Deloitte’s more than 200,000 professionals are committed to becoming the standard of excellence.
This communication contains general information only, and none of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, its member firms,
or their related entities (collectively, the “Deloitte Network”) is, by means of this communication, rendering professional advice
or services. No entity in the Deloitte Network shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any person who relies
on this communication.
Deloitte LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number OC303675 and its registered
office at 2 New Street Square, London EC4A 3BZ, United Kingdom. Tel: +44 (0) 20 7936 3000 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7583 1198.