Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Determine which values of principal stresses and principal directions of the given stress matrix are
correct
5 3 −3
σ = | 3 0 2 | (MPa)
−3 2 0
1 0 1 1
a) λ = 3; ∅ = [−√10] b) λ = 2; ∅ = [1] c) λ = −4; ∅ = [0] d) λ = 7; ∅ = [−1]
1 1 1 1
Solution: b)
5−λ 3 −3
| 3 −λ 2| = 0
−3 2 0−λ
λ3 − 5λ2 − 22λ + 56 = 0
λ1 = −4 ; λ2 = 2 ; λ3 = 7
2
Principal direction associated with the first eigenvalue λ1 = −4 → ∅ = [−3]
1
3
0
Principal directions for λ2 = 2 → ∅ = [1]
2
1
3
Principal directions for λ3 = 7 → ∅ =[ 1 ]
3
−1
2. The “standard body” of the figure has the following properties.
E2
E1 E1 = 200 MN/m2
s s E2 = 100 MN/m2
h η = 500 MN · s/m2
A constant stress σ = 1 MN/m2 is applied for 25 s long and then suddenly released.
Which of the plots below reflects the body’s total strain, ε = ε1 + ε2 , as a function of time?
a) b)
c) d)
Solution: c)
σ E 1 t
− 2t
ε2 = (1 − e η ) = (1 − e− 5 )
E2 100
For t = 25 s
1
ε2 (25) = (1 − e−5 ) = 9.93 · 10−3
100
So that the total strain is
If the applied stress is released the spring E1 recovers instantaneously the ε0 strain, and we can se the
jump to the value
ε(50) = 0
Solution b) is incorrect because it doesn’t meet this condition
3. A constant load F = 150 kN is applied in the structure center node of the figure with the followings
bar properties.
Bar I: Elastic
EI = 200 MN/m2
AI = 0.04 m2
LI = 1 m
Determine bar I force increment between t = 0+ (once the load is applied) and t = ∞.
a) 40 kN b) 50 kN c) 60 kN d) 90 kN
Solution: a)
For t = 0+
The dashpot in the standard solid blocks the movement and the behavior becomes as a spring EII1
The load is distributed between the two bars and the stiffness are:
EI A I EII1 AII
KI = y K II = = 2 · KI
LI LII
The compatibility condition relates the node displacement with the bar strains or elongations:
F
F = K I ∆LI + K II ∆LII = (K I + K II ) u = 3 · K I · u → u=
3 · KI
1 2
NI = F; NII = − F
3 3
For t = ∞
The dashpot in the standard solid doesn’t work because stress rate is zero and the behavior becomes as
a spring in series EII1 and EII2 .
EI A I EII AII 2
KI = y K II = = KI
LI LII 3
5 3F
F = K I ∆LI + K II ∆LII = (K I + K II ) u = K I · u → u=
3 5 KI
3 2
NI = F; NII = − F
5 5
3 1 4
∆NI = F − F = F = 40 kN
5 3 15
4. The hinged structure (truss) from the figure is incrementally loaded with two antisymmetric point
loads P. Once the first group of bars yields, the load increases until a second group of bars reaches
the elastic limit (yield stress). At that moment the structure is unloaded.
Assuming all bars are the same (same cross-section and same plastic material with yield stress sy ,
kinematic linear hardening and tangent modulus Et = E/4).
P 2 P
6 5
1 3
L
4 7
Determine the residual strain in the first group of yielded bars generated by the previous loading
case.
σy √2 σy √2 σy σy
a) 3(√2 − 1) E
b) c) (1 − )E d) 4 √2 E
2 E 2
Solution: a)
Using the antisymmetric conditions with the equilibrium equations the problem is statically determinate
and the internal forces are evaluated:
P N2 = 0 P
N
=
6
-
P
2
2
P
=
5
N
N1 = P N3 = - P
P
N
2
=
=
-
4
N
2
P
P P
2P 2P
Depending on the member forces, we can classify the bars into three groups:
Group I: bars 4, 5, 6 and 7 with a force √2 P. Tension in bars 4 and 5 and compression in bars 6
and 7.
Group II: bars 1 and 3 with a force P in tension and compression, respectively
Group III: bar 2 unloaded
2 σ
N1I = σ y A = 2 P1 P1 = σ y A ε1I = y
2 E
2 2 σy
N1II = P1 = σ y A ε1II =
2 2 E
2
N 2II = σ y A = P 2 ΔP 2 = 1- σ y A
2
2 σy
N 2I = 2 ΔP 2 = 2 1-
σ y A= 2-1 σ y A Δε I 4
2
E
2-1
2
2 2 σy
N 2II = ΔP 2 = 1- σ y A Δε II 1-
2
2 2 E
ΔP3 = - P 2 - σ y A
σy
N 3I = 2 ΔP3 = - 2 σ y A Δε 3I - 2
E
σy
N 2II = ΔP3 = - σ y A Δε 2II -
E
σy σy
ε 3I = ε1I + Δε I2 + Δε 3I = 1+4 2-4- 2 E =3 E
2-1
2 2 σy
ε 3II = ε1II + Δε II2 + Δε 3II = +1- -1 =0
2 2 E
The following plot shows the group I behavior when the member works in tension (like bars 4 and 5).
sI
2
2 σy
1
sy E/4
E E
3
σy eI
ε1I =
E
σy
ε 3I = 3 2-1 E
σy
ε 2I 4 2-3 E
5. The behavior of a concrete specimen under compression can be modelled using the constitutive law
coupling elastic behavior with the damage rule.
Normalized
s
stress Ee R
1
tic
e las
ar
su Lin
e
Ee R
0
1 e Normalized
eR strain
where E = 30 GPa
σ ε ε s+1 S=2
= [1 − ( ) ]
E εR εR εR εR = 0.35%
The specimen is subjected to a strain-controlled test with two steps (see figure):
e / eR
In the first one ε/εR reaches the value 0.65, practically that 0.65
of the maximum stress σu
In the second, the strain is reduced until the value
0.20
ε/εR = 0.2
1 2
D D
2 1
2 1
a) b)
D D
2 1
2 0.65 1 e/e 0.20 0.65 1 e/e
0.20 R R
c) d)
Solution: b)
Equation of damage is
ε s+1
D=( )
εR
Solution c) is not valid because the unloading branch is elastic and, although interrupted at ε/εR = 0.2,
damage is constant in unloading.
Finally, d) is plotted under assuming that Damage only starts from σu on what is false because damage
starts from the very beginning.