GAS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

FOR THE UNITIZATION OF

THE JAMBARAN-TIUNG BIRU FIELD

FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS REPORT FOR PIPING

SYSTEM FROM SO2 STRIPPER TRAIN A (322-
T1007) TO SO2 STRIPPER REBOILER TRAIN A
(322-E1013)

DOCUMENT NUMBER: JTB-RJJ000-L0-CAL-322-00007

CONTRACTOR COMPANY
REV. DESCRIPTION DATE
PREPARED CHECK APPROVED CHECK APPROVED

ISSUED FOR INTERNAL

A 26/06/19 RSA MHM/YNA STN/TM
REVIEW

Contract Number :4650000076 Contractor Doc. No.: C-J130-1362-R2207 PAGE 1 OF 23

PERTAMINA EP CEPU
 REVISION HISTORICAL SHEET

Rev. Date Section Description

A 26-06-2019 ALL Issued for Internal Review

Document No. : JTB-RJJ000-L0-CAL-322-00007

Revision :A
Contractor Doc. No.: C-J130-1362-R2207 Page 2 of 23
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................................5
1.1 Scope ......................................................................................................................................5
1.2 Purpose ..................................................................................................................................5
2. DEFINITION and ABBREVIATION ..................................................................................................5
2.1 Definition .................................................................................................................................5
2.2 Abbreviation ............................................................................................................................5
3. REFERENCE ....................................................................................................................................6
3.1 Code and Standard ................................................................................................................6
3.2 Project Document ...................................................................................................................6
4. CALCULATION CONDITION ...........................................................................................................7
4.1 Process Data ..........................................................................................................................7
4.2 Piping Mechanical Data ..........................................................................................................8
4.3 Soil Data .................................................................................................................................8
5. MODELLING METHOD AND DESIGN CRITERIA ..........................................................................8
5.1 Temperature ...........................................................................................................................8
5.2 Friction Effect ..........................................................................................................................8
5.3 Seismic Load ..........................................................................................................................8
5.4 Natural Frequency BDV Reaction Force, & PSV Reaction Force/& Slug Force ....................9
5.5 Flange Leakage Check ...........................................................................................................9
5.6 Piping System Coordinate ......................................................................................................9
6. LOAD CASES ................................................................................................................................ 10

7. PIPE SUPPORT ............................................................................................................................. 11

8. RESULT ......................................................................................................................................... 12
8.1 Stress Output ....................................................................................................................... 12
8.2 The Maximum Displacement ............................................................................................... 12
8.3 Restraint Summary .............................................................................................................. 12
8.4 Nozzle Load Check ............................................................................................................. 13
8.5 Flange Leakage Assessment .............................................................................................. 13
8.6 Dynamic Analysis Piping Natural Frequency for Piping System .................................. 14
9. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................... 14

ATTACHMENT 1 MARK UP P&ID................................................................................................... 15

ATTACHMENT 2 CAESAR MODEL ................................................................................................ 16

ATTACHMENT 3 STRESS ISOMETRIC SKETCH .......................................................................... 17

ATTACHMENT 4 INPUT LISTING ................................................................................................... 18

ATTACHMENT 5 OUTPUT REPORT (DISPLACEMENT, RESTRAINT SUMMARY EXTENDED,

CODE STRESS SUMMARY) ........................................................................................................ 19

ATTACHMENT 6 NOZZLE EVALUATION SHEET ......................................................................... 20

ATTACHMENT 7 ASSUMPTION DATA .......................................................................................... 21

Document No. : JTB-RJJ000-L0-CAL-322-00007

Revision :A
Contractor Doc. No.: C-J130-1362-R2207 Page 3 of 23
 ATTACHMENT 8 PIPE NATURAL FREQUENCY ........................................................................... 22

ATTACHMENT 9 MISCELLANEOUS DATA................................................................................... 23

Document No. : JTB-RJJ000-L0-CAL-322-00007

Revision :A
Contractor Doc. No.: C-J130-1362-R2207 Page 4 of 23
1. INTRODUCTION
Gas Development Project for the Unitization of the Jambaran – Tiung Biru Field (herein
after called JTB Project) is located onshore in the Java Island, between the cities of
Cepu and Bojonegoro. The Processing Facility is needed to gather gas from various
wells, remove or reduce undesirable H2S and CO2 components to acceptable limits,
conform to sales gas specifications and safety, transporting the gas at the required
pressure, temperature, quantity and quality to the sales point.

1.1 Scope
This document is covered flexibility analysis for Piping System from SO2 Stripper Train A
(322-T1007) To SO2 Stripper Reboiler Train A (322-E1013) in 322 Unit for JTB Project.

1.2 Purpose

The propose of this calculation is design adequacy check of the piping system by the
following:
 To analyze and check the stress compliance of the selected piping system with code
of ASME B31.3 due to hydrotest, sustained, expansion, and occasional load.
 To obtain load on supports which are modelled with node number for each support
location and types.
 To verify loads on nozzle of equipments those are connected to the piping system
selected.
 To check vibration piping system.

2. DEFINITION and ABBREVIATION

2.1 Definition
COMPANY PT. PERTAMINA EP CEPU (PEPC)
PROJECT Gas Development Project for the Unitization of the Jambaran –
Tiung Biru Field
CONTRACTOR Consortium of PT Rekayasa Industri – JGC Corporation, PT JGC
Indonesia

2.2 Abbreviation
API American Petroleum Institute
ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers
SMYS Specified Minimum Yield Strength
SMTS Specified Minimum Tensile Strength
W Weight
WW Weight Filled Water
WNC Weight no Content
HP Hydro Test Pressure
P1 Design Pressure
P2 Maximum Operating Pressure
Document No. : JTB-RJJ000-L0-CAL-322-00007
Revision :A
Contractor Doc. No.: C-J130-1362-R2207 Page 5 of 23
 P3 Normal Operating Pressure
T1 Design Temperature
T2 Maximum Operating Temperature
T3 Normal Operating Temperature
U1 Seismic Acceleration Along X Axis
U2 Seismic Acceleration Along Y Axis
U3 Seismic Acceleration Along Z Axis
Win1 Wind in + X direction
Win2 Wind in - X direction
Win3 Wind in + Z direction
Win4 Wind in - Z direction
L Load Case
HYD Hydrostatic test load case
SUS Sustained load case
OPE Operating load case
EXP Thermal load case
OCC Occasional load case
MAX Maximum Values
ABS Sum of Absolute Values
SRSS Resultant of Seismic Acceleration

3. REFERENCE

3.1 Code and Standard

ASME B 31.3: 2016 Process Piping
API STD 662 Part 1 Plate-and-Frame Heat Exchanger for General Services
WRC 107 Welding research council bulletin 107

3.2 Project Document

JTB-SF-L-SPE-900-00009
JTB-SF-L-SPE-900-00010
JTB-RJJ000-L0-SPE-900-10001
JTB-SF-P-DBS-900-00002
JTB-SF-C-DBS-900-00004
JTB-SF-C-DBS-900-00006
JTB-SF-M-STD-900-00001
JTB-RJJ000-P0-LST-322-00201
JTB-RJJ000-L0-LST-900-00113
JTB-RJJ000-M0-DTS-322-03302
JTB-RJJ000-M0-DTS-322-01203
Bid Bulletin B-052
Specification for Flexibility Analysis
Specification for Hot Insulation
Specification for Piping Material Class
Process Design Basis
Calculation Procedure for Earthquake
Civil and Structure Design Criteria
Equipment Standard Drawings
Line List for Unit 322
Critical Line List for Unit 322
Datasheet for SO2 Stripper Reboiler (322-
E1013/2013)
Datasheet for SO2 Stripper (322-T1007/2007)
Allowable Nozzle Load in SHELL Standard Drawing

Document No. : JTB-RJJ000-L0-CAL-322-00007

Revision :A
Contractor Doc. No.: C-J130-1362-R2207 Page 6 of 23
4. CALCULATION CONDITION

4.1 Process Data

Service pressure and temperature of piping systems are presented in the table below:

Design Data Table (as per line list)

Pressure (Psig) Temperature (0F)

Fluid
P2 P3 T2 T3 HP
Line ID From To P1 T1 Density
(Ope. (Ope. (Ope. (Ope. (Psig)
(Des.) (Des.) (lb.ft-3)
Max) Normal) Max) Normal)
322-CNL- SO2 Stripper SO2 Stripper
1025-28"- Reboiler Train A Train A 60 11.4 11.4 300 246 246 90 67.9
01G0-H30 (322-E1013) (322-T1007)

SO2 Stripper
322-CNL- SO2 Stripper
Reboiler Train
1024-12"- Train A
A
60 11.4 11.4 300 245 245 90 66.4
01G0-H30 (322-T1007)
(322-E1013)
410-SL-1006-
322-SL-1001-
16"-01A1- LP Steam Header
16"-01A1-H
75 50 50 400 299 299 112.5 0.2
H51
SO2 Stripper
322-SL-1001-
410-SL-1006-16"- Reboiler Train
16"-01A1-
01A1-H A
75 50 50 400 299 299 112.5 0.2
H30
(322-E1013)
322-SCL- SO2 Stripper Steam
1001-8"- Reboiler Train A Condensate 75 50 50 300 230 230 112.5 57.4
01A1-H30 (322-E1013) Return Header

Design Data Table (as per SI unit)

Pressure (KPa) Temperature (0C)
Fluid
P2 T2 HP
Line ID From To P1 P3 (Ope T1 T3 (Ope Density
(Ope (Ope (KPa)
(Design) Normal) (Design) Normal) (kg.m-3)
Max) Max)
322-CNL- SO2 Stripper SO2 Stripper
1025-28"- Reboiler Train A Train A 414 79 79 149 119 119 621 1087.6
01G0-H30 (322-E1013) (322-T1007)

SO2 Stripper
322-CNL- SO2 Stripper
Reboiler Train
1024-12"- Train A
A
414 79 79 149 119 119 621 1063.6
01G0-H30 (322-T1007)
(322-E1013)
410-SL-1006-
322-SL-1001-
16"-01A1- LP Steam Header
16"-01A1-H
518 345 345 205 149 149 776 3.2
H51
SO2 Stripper
322-SL-1001-
410-SL-1006-16"- Reboiler Train
16"-01A1-
01A1-H A
518 345 345 205 149 149 776 3.2
H30
(322-E1013)
322-SCL- SO2 Stripper Steam
1001-8"- Reboiler Train A Condensate 518 345 345 149 110 110 776 919.5
01A1-H30 (322-E1013) Return Header

Document No. : JTB-RJJ000-L0-CAL-322-00007

Revision :A
Contractor Doc. No.: C-J130-1362-R2207 Page 7 of 23
4.2 Piping Mechanical Data
The material parameter such as piping class, material, NPS, corrosion allowance &
rating for piping are describe below:
Piping Mechanical Data Table
Corrosion Flange
Piping Material NPS Sch/W.t
Allowance rating
Class Designation (Inch) (mm)
(mm) (#)
01G0 A358-TP316 28 10 0 150
01G0 A358-TP316 24 10S 0 150
01G0 A312-TP316 12 10S 0 150
01A1 A106 GR. B 16 20 1.6 150
01A1 A106 GR. B 12 20 1.6 150
01A1 A106 GR. B 8 40 1.6 150

4.3 Soil Data

No underground model in this calculation.

5. MODELLING METHOD AND DESIGN CRITERIA

5.1 Temperature

Standard installation temperature to be used for thermal stress analysis shall be 21.7°C.

5.2 Friction Effect

The following static friction coefficients shall be used:

5.3 Seismic Load

Horizontal Seismic Acceleration is 0.25G and vertical seismic acceleration is 0.113G
based on ASCE 7-10 and civil data reference is as follow:
1. Site Class: D
2. Design Spectral Response Acceleration Parameters:
For 0.2 second period: Ss = 0.668

Document No. : JTB-RJJ000-L0-CAL-322-00007

Revision :A
Contractor Doc. No.: C-J130-1362-R2207 Page 8 of 23
5.4 Natural Frequency BDV Reaction Force, & PSV Reaction Force/& Slug Force
Natural frequency of the piping system o f piping downstream of the control valves
shall be verified with criteria greater than 4Hz. The piping system shall be provided
with adequate rigid supports and restraints such as Anchor type, Line Stop, Guide, etc.
So that the first mode natural frequency shifts to a value greater than 4Hz.

5.5 Flange Leakage Check

No flange leakage check in this calculation.

5.6 Piping System Coordinate

Piping system global coordinate using Caesar II 2018 for analysis of Jambaran Tiung
Biru Gas Processing Facility is as follow:

Document No. : JTB-RJJ000-L0-CAL-322-00007

Revision :A
Contractor Doc. No.: C-J130-1362-R2207 Page 9 of 23
6. LOAD CASES
Load Cases Table
Case Comb.
Load Case Load Combination Remarks
Type Method
L1 W HGR
L2 W+P3+T3 HGR
L3 WW+HP+H HYD - Hydrotest
L4 W+P1+D1+T1+H OPE - Operating T1
L5 W+P2+D2+T2+H OPE - Operating T2
L6 W+P3+D3+T3+H OPE - Operating T3
L7 W+P1+H SUS - Sustained 1
L8 W+P2+H SUS - Sustained 2
L9 W+P3+H SUS - Sustained 3
L10 W+P1+D1+T1+H+U1 OPE - Design Temperature + U1
L11 W+P1+D1+T1+H+U2 OPE - Design Temperature + U2
L12 W+P1+D1+T1+H+U3 OPE - Design Temperature + U3
L13 W+P1+D1+T1+H+WIN1 OPE - Design Temperature + Win1
L14 W+P1+D1+T1+H+WIN2 OPE - Design Temperature + Win2
L15 W+P1+D1+T1+H+WIN3 OPE - Design Temperature + Win3
L16 W+P1+D1+T1+H+WIN4 OPE - Design Temperature + Win4
L17 W+P1+D1+T1+H+F1 OPE - Design Temperature + PSV Thrust Load,
L18 L10-L4 OCC Algebraic BDV Load
Seismic acceleration Along X Axis (U1)
L19 L11- L4 OCC Algebraic Seismic acceleration Along Y Axis (U2)
L20 L12-L4 OCC Algebraic Seismic acceleration Along Z Axis (U3)
L21 L13-L4 OCC Algebraic Wind Load 1 (+X)
L22 L14-L4 OCC Algebraic Wind Load 2 (-X)
L23 L15-L4 OCC Algebraic Wind Load 3 (+Z)
L24 L16-L4 OCC Algebraic Wind Load 4 (-Z)
L25 L17-L4 OCC Algebraic PSV Thrust Load , BDV Load
L26 L18+L19+L20 OCC SRSS Resultant of Seismic acceleration
L27 L21,L22 OCC MAX Maximum Wind Along X axis
L28 L23,L24 OCC MAX Maximum Wind Along Z axis
L29 L7+L25 OCC Scalar Sus1 + PSV Thrust Load, BDV Load
L30 L7+L26 OCC Scalar Sus1 + Resultant of Seismic acceleration
L31 L7+L27 OCC Scalar Sus1 + Max. Wind Along X axis
L32 L7+L28 OCC Scalar Sus1 + Max. Wind Along Z axis
L33 L4-L7 EXP Algebraic Expansion Stress (T1)
L34 L5-L8 EXP Algebraic Expansion Stress (T2)
L35 L6-L9 EXP Algebraic Expansion Stress (T3)

Document No. : JTB-RJJ000-L0-CAL-322-00007

Revision :A
Contractor Doc. No.: C-J130-1362-R2207 Page 10 of 23
7. PIPE SUPPORT
Typical restraint symbols used in stress isometrics:

Document No. : JTB-RJJ000-L0-CAL-322-00007

Revision :A
Contractor Doc. No.: C-J130-1362-R2207 Page 11 of 23
8. RESULT

8.1 Stress Output

Actual stress of piping components due to weight load, internal pressure load,
occasional load and thermal load are tabulated below:
Maximum Stress and Ratio Table

Stress Summary
Highest Allowable
Ratio
Load Case Node Stress Stress
(%)
(KPa) (KPa)
Comply with Code
(HYD) WW+HP+H 520 43642.6 206838.0 21.1
(SUS) W+P1+H 10200 45469.5 137890.8 33.0 Not Comply
(OCC) L7+L25 10200 45469.5 183394.8 24.8
(OCC) L7+L26 520 66223.3 183385.1 36.1 Piping Code:
(OCC) L7+L27 10200 45504.6 183394.8 24.8 ASME B31.3
(OCC) L7+L28 10200 45518.8 183394.8 24.8
(EXP) L4-L7 10560 105860.7 334788.7 31.6
(EXP) L5-L8 10560 71251.5 335655.7 21.2
(EXP) L6-L9 10400 84341.9 333957.7 25.3
The results are furnished in attachment 5 Code Stress Summary Report.

8.2 The Maximum Displacement

Displacement for HYD, OPE, SUS & EXP cases of all node will be shown on attachment
5. Maximum nodal displacement for HYD, OPE, SUS, & EXP:

Maximum Displacement Table

Maximum Displacement
Load Case
Node Dx (mm) Node Dy (mm) Node Dz (mm)
HYD 189 0.9 189 -2.3 1335 -0.7
OPE 1239 28.0 1820 43.7
SUS1 189 0.9 189 -2.3 1335 -0.7
EXP1 1239 28.1 1820 43.8
Note: Direction based on global coordinate.

8.3 Restraint Summary

Restraint forces and moments for HYD, OPE, SUS & EXP cases of all support loads and
maximum piping equipment nozzle loads data will be shown on Restraint summary on
attachment 5. The maximum reaction loads are shown in table below:

Table Maximum Reaction Load

PIPE SUPPORT MAXIMUM REACTION LOAD
NO. NODE SUPPORT TYPE REMARKS
NUMBER FX (kg) FY (kg) FZ (kg)
1 915 - Resting+Stopper -3829 -935 -534 Expansion T1
2 232 - Resting+Vertical Guide -74 -3462 408 Hydrotest
3 232 - Resting+Vertical Guide 1268 158 -1029 Expansion T1

Document No. : JTB-RJJ000-L0-CAL-322-00007

Revision :A
Contractor Doc. No.: C-J130-1362-R2207 Page 12 of 23
8.4 Nozzle Load Check
Nozzles load Plate Heat Exchanger 322-E1013 for design condition (T2) shall conform
with API 662 Table 2 and Vessel Column 322-T1007 for design condition (T1) shall
conform with ES-22701 allowable for pressure vessel from document Bid Bulletin B-052.
The result of nozzle loads check are as tabulated below:
 Nozzle load check for 322-E1013 SO2 Stripper Reboiler

Nozzle
Force (kg) Moment (kg m)
Equipment Size Node Condition
Class FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
322-E1013 28" MAX (T2, T3) 1922 2355 -638 1218.2 -318.1 -692.1
(Outlet) 150# Allowable
8020 2514 2514 2514 5689 5689 5689
Nozzle
Result PASSED PASSED
322-E1013 12" MAX (T2, T3) -636 -351 -274 102.2 -783.0 37.8
(Inlet) 150# Allowable
8090 909 909 909 1259.7 1259.7 1259.7
Nozzle
Result PASSED PASSED
322-E1013 16" MAX (T2, T3) -120 489 -505 493.3 66.6 413.6
(Inlet) 150# Allowable
8140 1284 1284 1284 2070.1 2070.1 2070.1
Nozzle
Result PASSED PASSED
322-E1013 8" MAX (T2, T3) -152 297 16 -128.3 -124.9 13.8
(Outlet) 150# Allowable
8170 559 559 559 629.9 629.9 629.9
Nozzle
Result PASSED PASSED

 Nozzle load check for 322-T1007 SO2 Stripper

Nozzle
Force (kg) Moment (kg m)
Equipment Size Node Condition
Class FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
322-T1007 24" MAX (T1, T2, T3) -339 -1229 97 533.5 1179.0 -741.9
(N2Inlet) 150# Allowable
8050 2937 - - - 3524 4581
Nozzle
Result PASSED PASSED
322-T1007 12" MAX (T1, T2, T3) 49 1195 565 667.1 -286.8 -86.3
(N3 Outlet) 150# Allowable
8060 - - 1468 1145.3 881 -
Nozzle
Result PASSED PASSED

8.5 Flange Leakage Assessment

No flange leakage assessment have been calculated for this calculation.

Document No. : JTB-RJJ000-L0-CAL-322-00007

Revision :A
Contractor Doc. No.: C-J130-1362-R2207 Page 13 of 23
8.6 Dynamic Analysis Piping Natural Frequency for Piping System
Piping Natural Frequencies for piping system are as follow:

Five Lowest Natural Frequency Allowable Natural

of Piping System Frquency Check
Mode 1st = 4.617 Hz Accepted
Mode 2nd = 4.885 Hz Accepted
Mode 3rd = 5.101 Hz Accepted
Mode 4th = 5.433 Hz Accepted
Mode 5th = 5.485 Hz Accepted

For detail result of piping natural frequency are presented in the Attachment 10.

9. CONCLUSION
The conclusions of analysis are summarized as follows:
 Maximum stresses induced in the piping system for SO2 Stripper Train A (322-
T1007) to SO2 Stripper Reboiler Train A (322-E1013) in 322 Unit for Jambaran-Tiung
Biru Field Project compiled in para 7.1 are within allowable stress limit for sustain,
expansion, occasional and hydrostatic test conditions, and have complied with ASME
B31.3 Standard Code.
 Recommended pipe support type and location shall be applied into piping layout
drawing.
 Pipe natural frequency of this piping system has been verified with the requirement
greater than 4Hz.
 The piping system is considered “ACCEPTABLE” (OK).

Document No. : JTB-RJJ000-L0-CAL-322-00007

Revision :A
Contractor Doc. No.: C-J130-1362-R2207 Page 14 of 23