You are on page 1of 4

Chapter 4 – HUMAN GROUP Characteristics identified by Fichter (1977):

THE CONCEPT OF GROUP 1. must be identifiable as such, both by its members


and by outside observers
1. A group is composed of two or more persons 2. has a social structure in the sense that each member
interacting with each other, guided by a set of or person has a position related to other positions
norms. 3. there are individual roles
2. A group is a specified number of individuals where 4. reciprocal relations; there must be a contact and
each recognizes members as distinct from non- communication among the members
members; each has a sense of what others do and 5. has norms of behavior that influence the way in
think, as well as the purpose of the association or which the roles are enacted
grouping is. 6. have certain common interests and values among
3. The term “group” always implies three meanings: the members
a. to refer to a set of individuals with some similar 7. group activity, if not, the very existence of the group
characteristics; social category – emphasizes the itself must be directed toward social goal/s
sharing of traits 8. have relative permanence – a measurable duration
b. any number of individuals who meet occasionally over a period of time
or regularly and have a sense of who is present or
absent; stresses two conditions of group life –
common presence and a minimum awareness of COMMON BASES FOR GROUPS
others
c. to mean a specific number of individuals, where  Common ancestry
each recognizes members from non-members, - traditionally the strongest tie that binds beings in
each has a sense of what others do and think as their social relations
well as what the purpose of the association is; - blood groups
emphasizes three elements – common  groups based upon common ancestry
association, awareness of others, and socially  members are related by birth, marriage, or
shared goals adoption
 Territorial proximity
Social aggregates - territorial groups
- people who happen to be in the same place but share  the sociological neighborhood, not merely an
little else aggregate, and the true community
- do not interact with one another, nor consider their  identified with the name of the place where
temporary association to have any meaning they are
- do not share a purpose  Similar bodily characteristics
- In the primitive societies, similarity of biological
Statistical group characteristics is closely allied to the facts of
- people classified together because they share certain common ancestry and territory
characteristics - In the complex, modern societies, common racial
features are still the basis of imposed social
groupings
CHARACTERISTICS OF GROUPS  Common interests
- interest group
o Permanence beyond meetings and members, that is,  sociologically more significant than the other
even when members are dispersed groups
o Means for identifying members
o Mechanisms for recruiting new members
o Goals or purposes BASIC CLASSIFICATIONS OF SOCIAL GROUPS
o Social statuses and roles
o Means for controlling members’ behavior  Primary groups
- characterized by intimate face-to-face relationship
and close association and cooperation

Property of JENNY R. ABARQUEZ | SOCSCI011-K1 1


- is a we; involves the sort of empathy and mutual - IN-GROUP
identification for which we is the natural  a group that members use a point of reference
expression  there is a we-feeling generated among
- relationships are spontaneous, personal, and members, who are immediately aware of those
intimate who do not belong – the they-group
- Three Basic Primary Groups (Cooley, 1963) - OUT-GROUP
o family  do not belong to the in-group which exists in
o children’s play groups the perceptions of the in-group members
o neighborhood or community groups  people who do not have the same standing as
the in-group from the perspective of the in
 Secondary groups group
- relationships are impersonal and widely separated
- much less intimacy among the members and  Informal and formal groups
usually have specific goals that are formally - INFORMAL GROUP
organized and impersonal  arises spontaneously out of the interactions of
two or more persons
Primary Group Secondary Group  unplanned, have no explicit rules for members
1. Physical Conditions and recruitment, and do not have specific
 Small number  Big number objectives to be attained
 Long duration  Short duration  members are bound by emotions and
2. Social Characteristics sentiments
 Intrinsic valuation of  Extrinsic valuation of - FORMAL GROUP
the relation the relationship  the purpose and objectives are explicitly
 Intrinsic valuation of  Extrinsic valuation of labeled; roles and statuses of the members are
other persons other persons specifically defined
 Inclusive knowledge  Specialized and  have names and are often governed by
of other persons limited knowledge of constitutions and by-laws
 Feeling of freedom other persons
and spontaneity  Feeling of external  Gemeinschaft and gesellschaft
- espoused by Ferdinand Tönnies
 Operation of constraints
- GEMEINSCHAFT
informal controls  Operation of formal
 members do not live together but also develop
controls
strong, shared memories and experiences
3. Sample Relationships
 Mechanical Solidarity – a social unity based on
 friend – friend  clerk – customer
similarity of objectives, traits, and experiences
 husband – wife  announcer – listener
of members (Durkheim)
 parent – child  performer – - GESELLSCHAFT
 teacher - pupil spectator  social relationships tend to be impersonal and
 officer - subordinate segmented
4. Sample Groups  social ties become associational, springing from
 play group  nation an elaborate division of labor
 family  church hierarchy  work environment is governed by contract and
 village or  professional highly specialized roles
neighborhood association - VERBINDUNGSNETZCHAFT
 work team  corporation  added by Canadian sociologist, Richmond
 social and communication networks
 In-groups and out-groups  a characteristic of post-industrial societies
- distinctions may be based on unique racial, ethnic,  interactions are not depended on the face-to-
religious, or social class characteristics or on face model that is bounded by territorial
special interests, residential location, or unique community
common experiences  do not even involve participation in formal
organizations

Property of JENNY R. ABARQUEZ | SOCSCI011-K1 2


GROUP’S INFLUENCE ON AN INDIVIDUAL o Network analysis may be used to understand
which people have power in a community and how
Social Facilitation corporations are interlocked through the members
- a situation in which an individual is stimulated by the of their board of directors.
presence of others o Social networks can provide data about social
structure.
Social Inhibition o Social networks provide data on people’s
- a situation in which the presence of others blocks or interrelationships. They provide social and
retards one’s performance emotional support to people in a complex society.
o Sociologists and anthropologists may utilize
Group pressure knowledge of social networks in order to
- exerts a powerful influence on the member’s opinions categorize the societies in which they are found.

Group discussion
- important in shaping one’s attitude and behavior DIMENSIONS OF GROUPS (Champion, 1984)
- Mao Tse-tung recognized its importance in using
public confession as a way to punish acts of deviance  Size
and in publicly reorganizing the inviolate nature of the - affects the quality of interaction in any group
group norms - greater interaction is expected in a group with fewer
members as compared to a larger group of people
Reasons for not violating the norms:  Structure
o Norms develop and conformity occurs because - refers to the patterning of actual behavior
individual seek others with similar characteristics - BUREAUCRACY
o Based on Aristotle’s notion of distributive justice, it  a formal organizational structure of large
can be said that rewards in society are passed out organizations in contemporary society
according to what one does  Nature of goals
o Conformity is seen to be rewarding because it - Social relationships are geared toward achievement
confers social acceptance; whereas, deviancy is of specific goals or ends.
viewed as costly because it brings social discomfort  Identity of members
and results in various forms of punishments - persons interact with people they know intimately –
such people are crucial in marking their social
identity, their community of friends, and their sphere
LINKAGES IN GROUP of daily activity
 Cohesiveness
 Diagramming Social Relationships - refers to the intensity of conformity or the degree to
SOCIOMETRY which members of a group cooperate and show
- approach that studies the mix of feelings that social participation, feelings of satisfaction, and level
persons have about one another in any social of productivity in a group
relationship - Group cohesiveness is usually measured through:
- helps us understand how people interrelate in social o Researchers ask individuals to list a specified
relationships in which everyone knows number of friends. The more friends common by
everybodyelse members, the higher the cohesiveness of the
SOCIOGRAM group.
- a graph in which social choices or ties are o Individuals are asked to rate their feelings toward
diagrammed the group as an entity. The greater the esteem
 Social Networks directed, the greater the cohesiveness.
IMPORTANCE OF KNOWING ONE’S SOCIAL o Individuals are asked to evaluate their sense of
NETWORKS: belonging to the group. The more individuals feel
o Social networks help people who are interested in rooted, the greater the cohesiveness.
the adoption of innovations or the transmission of o Individuals ranks whether they want to remain in
information to people. the group. The greater the commitment, the
greater the cohesiveness.

Property of JENNY R. ABARQUEZ | SOCSCI011-K1 3


 Leadership styles behavior of all individuals who occupy the
- Sociologists found that groups in which the leaders positions. All members know what is expected of
and followers had similar personality styles such as them, and each person can be held accountable for
autocratic, democratic, or laissez-faire, generally get his/her behavior.
along better than groups in which the personality  Impartiality
styles of the leaders and followers differ. - No exceptions are made on the rules and
- Both autocratic and democratic groups could get regulations because of social and psychological
tasks performed efficiently. But democratic groups differences among individuals. The positions
were marked by a sense of cooperation, friendliness, belong to the organization itself; they cannot
and supportiveness; whereas, autocratic groups become the personal property of those who
were less cooperative, more dependent on leaders occupy them.
for directions and guidance, and quite critical of  Employment based on technical qualifications
lower-esteemed members. - People are hired because they have the ability and
skills to do the job, not because they have personal
contact within the organization. Advancement is
FORMAL STRUCTURE: BUREAUCRACY based on how well a person does the job.
Promotion and job security go to those who are
Bureaucracy most competent.
- refers to a formal, rationally organized, and highly  Distinction between public and private spheres
organized social structure with clearly define patterns - The employee’s personal life is distinguished from
of activity in which, ideally, every series of action is his/her working life.
fundamentally related to the organization’s purpose
- Bureaucratic pattern
 a pyramid of personnel who could conduct BUREAUCRACY TODAY: THE REALITY
rationally the work of a large organization
- Features of Bureaucracy: Less than ideal bureaucracy may result in the following:
o specialization
o merit appointment  Alienation
o impersonality - used by Karl Marx to describe the sense of loss and
o chain of command to see that orders are faithfully disconnectedness that is supposed to be present
followed among workers in the capitalistic societies
- Max Weber provided the first detailed study of the - comes about because automation and division of
nature and origins of bureaucracy. labor eliminate the pride and self-expression that
workers would normally derive from the products
of their labor
WEBER’S MODEL OF BUREAUCRACY  Ritualism
- overconformity to rules
Ideal type - rules may take on a symbolic meaning far beyond
- Weber’s model of bureaucracy their original rational intent
 Incompetence
Six Characteristics of Bureaucracies: - bureaucracies often are havens for the inept
 A clear-cut division of labor - Peter Principle
- Activities are clearly broken down into clearly  popularized by Laurence J. Peter and Raymond
defined, limited tasks. This requires a great deal of Hull
specialization and a high degree of expertise.  in bureaucracies, employees are promoted until
 Hierarchical delegation of power and responsibility they rise to their level of incompetence
- Each position is given sufficient power to do - many unqualified persons manage to reach high-
assigned work adequately and compel level jobs where they often try to hide their
subordinates to follow instructions. incompetence by becoming ritualistic devotees of
 Rules and regulations the rules and regulations
- The rights and duties attached to various positions
are clearly stated in writing and governing the

Property of JENNY R. ABARQUEZ | SOCSCI011-K1 4

You might also like