In around 1541, after being defeated in battle at Chausa and Kannauj,
Mughal emperor Humayun retreated from Bikaner and was offered shelter by the raja of Amarkot. Here, at Amarkot, in 1542, one of the greatest Mughal rulers, Akbar, was born. Akbar succeeded his father Humayun at the age of 13 and under the guidance of his tutor Bairam Khan, expanded and reconsolidated the Mughal domains in India. During the 15 century, many rulers in the country made an attempt to th
promote greater understanding between the Hindus and the Muslims.
They did so by giving patronage to local languages and literature, having secular and religious literature in Sanskrit translated into Persian, and adopting a more liberal policy of religious tolerance. In some instances, Hindus were even given important jobs in the army and in services at the court. These attempts of secular and religious tolerance are seen through the works of popular saints such as Kabir, Chaitanya and Nanak, who emphasized the essential unity of Islam and Hinduism in different parts of the country, and laid stress upon religious practices that were based on love and devotion, rather than those which were based on rituals and the literal interpretations of books of devotion. This appeared to create an atmosphere of liberal sentiment where views could grow in an educated manner, and where religious narrow- mindedness began to be looked down upon. It was during the emergence of this atmosphere that Akbar was born and brought up. After ascending the thrown, one of the first actions taken by Akbar was to abolish jizyah or the poll tax which all non-Muslims were required to pay in a Muslim state. The removal of this tax was more an act of symbolism because the tax was not a heavy amount, rather it was disliked because it made a big distinction between subjects, and sometimes was used by the ulama to humiliate non-Muslims. Furthermore, jizyah was often considered to be a symbol of Muslim domination and superiority. Similarly, in places such as Prayag and Banaras, he abolished pilgrim taxes. The forced conversion of prisoners of war to Islam was also abolished during Akbar’s reign. Inculcating such liberal principles into his kingdom created the essential foundation of an empire based on equal rights to all citizens, irrespective of their religious beliefs. These new liberal principles were further strengthened by the addition of Hindus, especially those who were associated to the Rajput rajas, to the nobility. Many of these relations occurred by entering into matrimonial relations with Akbar. The union of Muslim and Hindu rulers through marriages between the Muslim rulers and the daughters of Hindu monarchs was not an unusual practice, but most of these marriages had not created any stable personal relations between the concerned families, rather, the girls generally never came back home after marriage and were lost to their families, such as Maldeo, the powerful ruler of Jodhpur who had his daughter married the Sultan Mahmud of Gujarat, and his other daughter to the Sur ruler. Akbar, however, did not follow these established policies and instead gave complete religious freedom to his Hindu wives, and honoured their parents and relations by giving them place in the nobility. This policy of Akbar’s towards the Rajputs was combined with a much broader policy of religious toleration and proved mutually beneficial to both parties. Akbar succeeded in cementing his alliance with the Rajput rulers through his policy of inducting them into Mughal service and treating them on par with the Mughal grandees, and through his courteous behavior to former opponents. In doing so, Akbar established an empire which Rajput rajas did not consider harmful as they were allowed a large measure of autonomy to cater to their best interests. This Mughal alliance with the Rajputs, established through Akbar’s Rajput policy, was continued by his successors Jahangir and Shah Jahan. It proved beneficial to the Mughal state as well as securing them with the services of the bravest warriors in India, which played an prominent factor in the consolidation and expansion of the empire. Though there is some controversy amongst historians as to whether the famous ‘Jodha Bai’ was Akbar’s wife or daughter in law, her wedding proves to be prime example of Akbar’s willingness to be open to Hinduism. In order to strengthen his position with the Mughal rulers, Udai Singh is said to have married his daughter Jagat Gosain or as she is popularly known Jodha Bai, to Akbar’s eldest son, Salim. Unlike the dola form of earlier marriages, the Mughal groom went to the raja’s house in a barat that is traditional of Hindu weddings. Many other Hindu practices were followed as well during the proceedings. Another example of Akbar’s compassionate policies towards Hindu rulers is seen through his personal relations with the rulers of Bikaner and Bundi. When the son in law of Rai Singh Bikaner died in 1593, Akbar personally went to the raja’s house and consoled him, along with dissuading his daughter from performing sati, an act through which a woman would to throw herself on her husband’s funeral pyre so as to not live without him. The attitude Akbar held towards his Hindu subjects was closely linked with his views of how a sovereign should behave. Abdul Fazl, Akbar’s biographer, explained that this attitude was some amalgamation of Timurid, Persian and Indian ideas of sovereignty. He felt that the office of a true ruler was responsible and depended on ‘divine illumination’ so that no one could stand between God and a true ruler. He elaborated on this by distinguishing a true ruler through paternal love towards his subjects without distinction of sect or creed, rather through a large heart so that the wishes of his subjects are attended to by prayer and devotion to God, the real ruler. Along with this Akbar believed that it was the duty of the ruler to maintain equilibrium in society by not allowing people of one rank or profession to interfere with the duties or obligations of another. He believed that all these constituted, along with not allowing a sectarian strife to rise, to create a policy to provide peace to all. In the beginning of his life, Akbar followed the practices of an orthodox Muslim, but by the time he reached adulthood he began to be influenced by the mysticism that was being preached throughout the country. It is told that he spent whole nights and days in thoughts of God and in prayer and contemplation. Turning away from the narrow path of orthodoxy, he gathered a band of talented people with liberal ideas at the court. Akbar built a hall called Ibadat Khana or the Hall of Prayer at his new capital of Fatehpur Sikri in 1575, and selected theologians, mystics, and those of his courtiers who were known for their scholarship and intellectual attainments. It was here that Akbar discussed religious and spiritual topics with them trying to find out the principles of true religion. Initially these proceedings were confined to Muslims, but after the mullahs displayed narrow-minded pride and conceit in their learning, Akbar opened the Ibadat Khana to people of all religion, from Christians, Zoroastrians, Hindus, Jains, to even atheists. This broadened the discussions and debates on which all Muslims generally agreed on. This act of Akbar’s horrified the theologians and rumours of all kinds began to circulate about Akbar’s desire to forsake Islam. Rebellion broke out in the east in 1580 and a number of fatwas were given by the qazis that declared Akbar to be heretic. The qazis received drastic punishment and Akbar suppressed the rebellion. Following this he also issued a declaration, known as mahzarnama which asserted that if there were conflicting views among those who were fit to interpret the Quran, then he was entitled to choose any one of the said interpretations which would benefit the nation and be in the interest of good order, as he being a just and wise king ranked higher in the eyes of God. However, the debates of the Ibadat Khana led to great bitterness rather than a better understanding between different religions, as the representatives of each religion denounced the others in order to prove that theirs was truly superior to the others. Finally in 1582 Akbar had to discontinue the debates in the Ibadat Khana. He did not however give up on his quest for true understanding of religious practices. He invited Purushottam and Devi to illustrate to him the doctrines of Hinduism, and Maharji Rana to explain the doctrines of Zoroastrianism. In order to better understand Christian doctrines, he sent an emissary to Goa and requested them to send two learned missionaries to his court. Akbar listened to the learned works of various religions and made contact with their spiritual leaders, and gradually through meeting with the Sufi saints and yogis, he was convinced of the fact that while there might be differences of sect and creed, at the core all religions had a number of good points and that behind all the multiplicity of name and forms, there was only one God, but also these valuable points were often forgotten in the heat of a controversy. Akbar felt that if the good points of various religions were all emphasized the atmosphere of harmony and amity would prevail which would be good for the country. Abd al-Qadir Bada’uni asserts that as a result of this education, Akbar turned away from Islam and set up a new religion, called tauhid-i-Ilahi, that was a compounded form of Hinduism, Christianity, Zoroastrianism and many others. Modern historians however do not accept this view and believe it to be highly exaggerated as there is little evidence to prove that Akbar ever even intended to promulgate a new religion. In actuality however, tauhid-i-Ilahi was a Sufistic type of order where those who were willing to join, and of whom the emperor approved, were allowed to become members. According to Bada’uni, those who were selected were to promise sacrifice of property, life, honour and religion, and they were called murids. In enrolling such murids, Akbar had a political purpose as well. What he wanted was a group of nobles who were personally loyal to him and who would support him in his concept of a state based on equal tolerance and respect to all sections of society, irrespective of the religious beliefs they had. Bada’uni apparently neither sympathized with or supported such a state but ascribes this move of Akbar’s to being a way to create unworthy flatterers who would suggest to him that he was the insdan-i-kamil or the “Perfect Man” of the age. The tauhid-i-Ilhai died along with Akbar, but the practice of enrolling murids did continue for some time under the rule of Jahangir. Akbar’s attempt of tying the nobles to the emperor by personal bonds, however, succeeded and many nobles continued to pride themselves as being the murids of the emperor. There were other ways as well through which Akbar tried to emphasize and inculcate the concept of peace and harmony among different religions. He set up a big translation department, for example, to translate works of Sanskrit and Arabic into Persian. There were also a number of social and educational reforms which Akbar introduced during his reign. He stopped the act of sati almost entirely, except for when the woman, of her own free will, chose and persistently desired it. Women of a younger age who hadn’t even shared a bed with their husbands were not allowed to be burnt at all. The remarriage of widows was also legalized, and the marriageable age was raised by him to 14 for girls and 16 for boys. He was also against the sale of spirits, and of anyone having more than one wife unless the first wife was barren. The arts which promoted secular attitudes also were given more patronage. The education system at the time was also revised by Akbar where he desired more emphasis on moral education, mathematics and on secular subjects such as agriculture, geometry, astronomy, rules of government, logic and history. Though he lived in an age of superstition which restricted the success of his vast social reforms and policies, Akbar’s policies of secular tolerance and religious freedom were fundamental to the spread of ideas of peace, unity and tolerance in times to come. Bibliography