Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/271479414
CITATIONS READS
0 14
6 authors, including:
hl Peng
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
65 PUBLICATIONS 302 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by hl Peng on 17 February 2017.
S w2l
[D m ] 0.233wl 2
0.044l 3 xx
16
zz (2)
where w is the width and l is the length of the slot. y is the unit
vector normal to the slot plane, x and z are the unit vectors
along the length and width of the slot, respectively.
(a) The coupling can be computed as [11-12]:
N
C 20 log | ¦ Fn | dB (3)
n 1
Z § P0D m ·
| Fn | ¨ H 0H rD e ¸ (4)
P10 © Z10 2 ¹
where Fn is the coupling coefficient of the nth slot with the
number of N. Z10 is the wave impedance and P10 =2×wsh/Z10 is
the power normalization constant. ω is the operating
frequency and εr is the relative permittivity of the substrate.
From (1), (2), (3) and (4), the relationship of the coupling
ratio versus the slot length and the number of slots can be
obtained as shown in Fig. 5. For 3 dB coupling ratio, the
(b)
Fig. 2. (a) Equivalent circuit for the CRLH FSIW unit-cell; (b) S-parameters initial slot length is set to be 7.6 mm and the number of slots is
relation between CRLH FSIW and its equivalent circuit, the parameters 9. The slot width and distance are then optimized with the
values are: w3 = 0.12 mm, w4 = 0.7 mm, l3 = 6 mm, ws = 10 mm, p3 = 18 mm, dimensions of the CRLH FSIW. We have found that the slot
g = 1 mm, d = 1 mm, p = 2 mm, wt = 2.2 mm, lt = 9 mm. LR = 2.64 nH, CR =
4.453 pF, LL = 0.28 nH, CL = 0.953 pF, Ct = 1.115 pF, Lt = 1.41e-8 nH. width and distance have little effect on Fn.
IV. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
A dual-band coupler operating at 2.4 GHz/3.8 GHz is
fabricated and measured for verification. The substrate is
Rogers RO4350B with εr = 3.48, thickness h = 0.762 mm. All
the metallic vias have a diameter d = 1 mm and a center to
center spacing p = 2 mm. The photograph of the fabricated
coupler is shown in Fig. 6 with the design parameters list
below. The dimension is 100 mm × 25 mm × 3.9 mm.
Fig. 7 presents the frequency responses of the simulation
and measurement results. The performances in both passbands
are summarized in Table I. Reasonable agreements are
obtained. The first center frequency is located at 2.40 GHz
(a) 3-D view with a fractional bandwidth about 6.67% and the measured
insertion loss of the through and coupling ports is 4.06 dB and
4.24 dB, respectively. Both the return loss and isolation are
better than 17 dB.
The second center frequency is located at 3.67 GHz with a
fractional bandwidth about 2.99% and the measured result
(b) Top view shows that insert loss is 4.57 dB and the coupling ratio is 4.71
Fig. 4. Configuration of the proposed CRLH FSIW coupler, (a) 3-D view, (b) dB, the return loss and isolation are less than -14 dB. However,
top view. a shift about 100 MHz is observed, it is probably due to the
inaccuracy in the PCB manufacturing process.
Fig. 5. The relationship of the coupling ratio versus the slot length and the (b) Bottom view
number of slots. The operating frequency is at 3.8 GHz with ws = 12 mm, w = Fig. 6. Photograph of the fabricated dual-band coupler, (a) the top view, (b)
1.4 mm, slot = 5.9 mm. the bottom view. The parameter values are: w3 = 0.26 mm, w4 = 0.65 mm, l3 =
5.8 mm, ws = 12 mm, g = 1 mm, p3 = 16.5 mm, l = 9.6 mm, w = 1.4 mm, slot =
5.9 mm, wt = 2 mm, lt = 13 mm, wm = 0.84 mm, rm = 2 mm, lstrip = 3 mm,
The design procedures of the dual-band CRLH FSIW wpad = 1.5 mm, wcpw = 1.78 mm, scpw = 0.35 mm.
coupler can be summarized as follows.
1) Choose the center frequencies (f1 and f2) of two
passbands.
2) Parameters ws and g are selected with the
predetermined dielectric of the standard PCB
technology. The value of ws should be determined
according to the second center frequency.
3) With desired first center frequency and Fig. 3, we can
select the initial values of w3, w4 and l3, and Change
them to adjust the first center frequency with little
impact on the second one.
4) Using (1), (2), (3) and (4) or Fig. 5 to obtain the values
of w, l and slot for arbitrary coupling ratio.
5) Finally, the coupler structure is further optimized to
meet the specifications using commercial software (a) First passband of simulation.
HFSS.
TABLE I
PERFORMANCE OF THE TWO PASSBANDS
Simulation Measurement
The first passband 2.43 GHz 2.40GHz
Return loss (S11) 19.23 dB 21.39 dB
Through (S21) 4.14 dB 4.06 dB
Isolation (S31) 17.86 dB 17.83 dB
Coupling (S41) 4.16 dB 4.24 dB
BW±0.5dB 4.12% 6.67%
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by the National Basic Research
Program of China under Grant 2009CB320206, National
Natural Science Foundation of China 60901024.
REFERENCES
[1] Z. C. Hao, W. Hong, J. X. Chen, H. X. Zhou and K. Wu, “Single-layer
(c) First passband of measurement. substrate integrated waveguide directional couplers,” IEE Proc.
Microwave Antennas Propag., vol. 153, no. 5, pp. 426-431, October 2006.
[2] D. S. Eom, J. Byun and H. Y. Lee, “Multilayer Substrate Integrated
Waveguide Four-Way Out-of-Phase Power Divider,” IEEE Trans.
Microwave Theory & Tech., vol. 57, no. 12, pp. 3469-3476, December
2009.
[3] A. A. M. Ali, N. J. G. Fonseca, F. Coccetti and H. Aubert, “Design and
Implementation of Two-Layer Compact Wideband Butler Matrices in
SIW Technology for Ku-Band Applications,” IEEE Trans. Antennas
Propag., vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 503-512, February 2011.
[4] W. Che, L. Geng, K. Deng and Y. L. Chow, “Analysis and Experiments of
Compact Folded Substrate-Integrated Waveguide,” IEEE Trans.
Microwave Theory & Tech., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 88-93, December 2008.
[5] K. K. M. Cheng and F. L. Wong, “A Novel Approach to the Design and
Implementation of Dual-Band Compact Planar 90o Branch-Line
Coupler,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory & Tech., vol. 52, no. 11,
pp.2458-2463, November 2004.
[6] C. Caloz and T. Itoh, Electromagnetic Metamaterials: Transmission Line
(d) Second passband of measurement. Theory and Microwave Applications. New York: Wiley-IEEE Press, 2005.
[7] V. A. Labay and J. Bornemann, “Design of dual-band substrate integrated
Fig. 7. Measured and simulated responses of the dual-band coupler, (a) the waveguide E-plane directional couplers,” Proc. 2009 Asia Pacific
first passband S-parameters of simulation, (b) the second passband S- Microwave Conf., TH2D-3, 4 p., Singapore, December 2009.
parameter of simulation, (c) the first passband S-parameters of measurement, [8] Y. Dong and T. Itoh, “Application of Composite Right/Left-Handed Half-
(d) the second passband S-parameter of measurement. Mode Substrate Integrated Waveguide to the Design of a Dual-Band Rat-
Race Coupler,” in IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp. Dig., May 2010,
pp. 712-715.
V. CONCLUSION [9] Y. Dong and T. Itoh, “Miniaturized Substrate Integrated Waveguide Slot
Antennas Based on Negative Order Resonance,” IEEE Trans. Microwave
In this paper, a compact 3 dB multilayer dual-band 2.4 Theory & Tech, vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 3856-3864, December 2010.
GHz/3.8 GHz coupler based on CRLH FSIW is proposed. The [10] J. F. Miao, T. Itoh, “Coupling Between Microstrip Line and Image Guide
Through Small Apertures in the Common Ground Plane,” IEEE Trans.
dual-band properties are implemented by the interdigital slot Microwave Theory & Tech, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 361-363, April 1983.
creating the unbalance case. Moreover, the closed-form [11] D. M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering, 3rd ed. New York: Wiley, 2005,
equations are derived for the coupling ratio. The simulated and pp. 323-333.
[12] H. A. Bethe, “Theory of diffraction by small holes,” Phys. Rev., vol. 66,
measured results are shown reasonable agreements. pp. 163-182, 1944.