Professional Documents
Culture Documents
J. B. Yianatos
Department of Chemical, Biotechnological and Environmental Processes, Santa Maria University,
Valparaı́so, Chile.
Abstract: In this paper, fluid flow and kinetic models related to minerals flotation process are
presented and the advantages and limitations of using this type of models are discussed. The
modelling of such processes was firstly developed assuming perfect mixing for the whole
system as a black box. Then, a more realistic approach was developed recognizing the inter-
action between two zones, the particle –bubble collection zone and the froth transport zone.
From a hydrodynamic point of view, experimental data showed that single large mechanical
flotation cells can deviate significantly from perfect mixing, while the mixing conditions in a flo-
tation bank of mechanical cells (three to nine cells in series) can be well described as a
series of continuous perfectly mixed reactors. From plant experience, it was observed that per-
formance of large industrial pneumatic flotation columns, originally regarded as a counter-current
operation, also operate closer to a single perfectly mixed reactor.
Advances in the field of modelling and design of flotation cells and columns, have been achieved
because the fluid flow regime, the mass transport conditions at the pulp/froth interface and the
froth transport mechanisms are better known and understood. Key parameters such as the
bubble surface area flux, related to the bubble generation and the rate of particle collection,
bubble loading related to the mass transport across the pulp-froth interface and froth recovery,
which is mainly related to the gas residence time in the froth, are relevant for a deeper understand-
Correspondence to:
Professor J.B. Yianatos,
ing of this type of equipment.
Department of Chemical,
Biotechnological and
Keywords: modelling; froth flotation; flotation machines; residence time distribution.
Environmental Processes,
Santa Maria University,
P.O. Box 110-V, Valaparaiso,
Chile.
E-mail: juan.yianatos@usm.cl INTRODUCTION flotation DAF for the water treatment and dis-
persed air flotation for minerals separation.
DOI: 10.1205/cherd07068
Flotation is a widely used process within min- Studies on DAF modelling are rather scarce
0263–8762/07/ erals processing industry in the last century, as and mainly related to hydrodynamics (i.e.,
$30.00 þ 0.00 well as being used for water and waste water Kwon et al., 2006). Recently, Emmanouil
treatment, and more recently for de-inking et al. (2006) presented the basis for a three
Chemical Engineering
of recycled paper and electrolyte cleaning (oil phase modelling of an industrial scale DAF
Research and Design
separation) among other less conventional tank, using flotation kinetic concepts.
Trans IChemE, applications. In the last decade, flotation equipment
Part A, December 2007 In the case of water and waste water treat- related to mineral processing industry has
ment the aim of the process is to remove very shown a dramatic increase in size, reaching
# 2007 Institution
of Chemical Engineers
fine particles of few microns, in very low con- values of 250 m3 in unitary mechanical flo-
centrations, which are collected by small tation cells (Weber et al., 2005) and more
bubbles of 50–100 mm. In mineral processing, than 250 m3 in pneumatic columns (De
however, particles from few microns to several Aquino et al., 1998). The general feeling,
hundred of microns, in 10–40% solid suspen- however, is that despite the great advances
sions, are selectively collected by bubbles of observed in terms of process knowledge,
0.5 –2 mm. This makes a difference in terms the mechanisms and principles as well as
of the type of flotation used, i.e., dissolved air the design and scale-up of industrial flotation
cells, are still not fully understood. Thus, the scope of this
paper is mainly addressed to mineral processing flotation
applications, particularly columns and mechanical cells.
From a unit operation point of view, flotation is a solid –solid
separation, where fine solid particles, suspended in water,
contact an air bubble swarm, in a well-mixed air– pulp dis-
persion. Particles are classified as floatable if they
adhere to the bubbles and are transported up to a froth
layer. Flotation separation is based on different mineral
surface properties. Hydrophobic particles can attach to air
bubbles, while hydrophilic particles do not. In this form
hydrophobic particles can be selectively separated by levita- Figure 2. Mechanical flotation cells.
tion against gravity in the aqueous medium. Thus, it can be
seen that flotation is a multi-component, multiphase and
heterogeneous separation process. at the pulp/froth interface level was dB ¼ 1.0–1.5 mm, in order
From a conceptual point of view flotation can be observed to maximize the bubble surface area flux, SB ¼ 50–100 s21.
as a sequence of two operations, ‘reaction’ and ‘separation’ Otherwise several constraints, i.e., loss of pulp/froth interface
(Finch, 1995), as it is shown in Figure 1. (flooding) or greater disturbance at the interface level (boiling),
The reactor is fed with the slurry containing the solids to be limit the flotation process (Finch et al., 2007).
separated. Chemical reagents (collector, frother, depressant,
and so on.) are added to induce differences in particle sur- Mechanically Agitated Cells
face properties in order to promote the selective aggregation
of particles with air bubbles. Energy is required to keep the Figure 2(a) shows the schematic view of the forced-air cell,
solids in suspension, typical particle size around 50–150 with the rotor located near the bottom, and Figure 2(b) shows
microns, and to disperse the air into fine bubbles, typically the self-aerated cell, with the rotor located near the top. In
of 1–2 mm. The specific power used at present in large both designs, pulp circulation through the rotor is required
size industrial flotation cells is about 1 kW m23. to enhance the particle collection performance. Recently, a
The probability of collection and transfer of a mineral par- mid-rotor cell has been developed where the rotor is located
ticle from the pulp to the froth can be described as a product at the center of the cell (Lelinski et al., 2005). Also, froth crow-
of probabilities of occurrence of several sub-processes (Ek, ders and internal radial launders have been incorporated in
1992). However, for practical purposes it is very difficult to order to enhance the froth transport.
quantify most of these probabilities. Alternatively, the collec-
tion process has been represented similar to a chemical reac- Pneumatic Cells
tion. In this approach the ‘reactants’ are hydrophobic mineral
particles that collide with and adhere to air bubbles. The reac- Pneumatic flotation columns are devices of simple construc-
tion ‘product’ is a particle-bubble aggregate that is less dense tion in which a gas is distributed at the bottom and rises up in
than the medium and moves upwards against gravity while the form of a dispersed phase of bubbles in a continuous fluid
hydrophilic particles are reported down to the tails. phase which also contains suspended fine particles.
A necessary condition for mineral separation in a flotation
process is the existence of a froth zone with a distinctive Counter-current column
pulp-froth interface. Conditions for the co-existence of the Figure 3(a) shows a scheme of the classical flotation
froth and fluid (pulp) phases in a flotation column has been column design, considering counter-current contact between
theoretically derived from hydrodynamics for two phase sys-
tems (air– water), i.e., Pal and Masliyah (1990), Xu et al.
(1991a), Langberg and Jameson (1992). The critical bound-
ary conditions for industrial flotation equipment in terms of
bubble size and superficial gas rate, regarding the loss of
the pulp –froth interface, froth stability and limiting carrying
capacity has been reported by Yianatos and Henrı́quez
(2007). Thus, it was found that for typical superficial gas
rates, JG ¼ 1–2 cm s21, the optimal range of bubble diameter
Figure 1. Conceptual flotation design. Figure 3. Counter-current and co-current pneumatic flotation.
Trans IChemE, Part A, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2007, 85(A12): 1591–1603
COLUMNS AND MECHANICALLY AGITATED CELLS 1593
the pulp feed and a bubble swarm, generated by the gas et al., 2001). A different approach to model the flotation pro-
sparger near the bottom of the column (Finch and Dobby, cess considers the specific floatability of particles as a func-
1990). The feed pulp descends by gravity allowing that tion of particle size, degree of liberation and chemical
hydrophobic particles collide and adhere to the bubbles. adsorption of reagents (Niemi, 1995). However, quantitative
The froth zone consists of an approximately 1 m froth bed. models of flotation cell performance do not at present make
At the top of the froth wash water is distributed over the any significant use of quantitative chemical parameters
column cross-section. The water plays an important role in such as the pH of the slurry and the concentration of chemi-
eliminating fine particles entrainment (Yianatos et al., 1987). cal collectors or frothers to define overall process behaviour
Industrial columns are circular in cross-section with diameter (King, 2001).
up to 4.5 (m), square up to 4 (m) side and rectangular, i.e.,
2 8 or 4 6 (m) in side. The total column height varies
typically between 10–15 (m) height (De Aquino et al., 1998). Flotation Rate Models
From a practical point of view, the overall flotation process
Co-current contact cells was generally represented by a first order system with
An interesting point of discussion has been related to the lumped parameters, assuming the collection zone was per-
inefficient collision mechanism for attaching mineral particles fectly mixed. Equation (1) shows the first order model for a
to a large number of small bubbles in the pulp zone of flo- perfect mixed batch flotation process (Ek, 1992),
tation columns. In this sense, alternative designs of pneu-
R
matic cells considering intensive contact of pulp and ¼ 1 ekt (1)
bubbles in a downflow co-current column have been devel- R1
oped. Figure 3(b) shows a typical co-current flotation
where R represents the mineral recovery at time t, R1 rep-
device (Jameson, 1988). In this device, pulp and air bubbles
resents the maximum flotation recovery at infinite time, and
flow co-currently downwards against the buoyancy of
k is the kinetic rate constant which involves all the micro-
the bubbles which creates high gas holdups. Here, the
scopic sub-processes. A similar first order model can also
active collection zone is located in the downcomer tube,
be used to describe the operation, closer to plug flow, in lab-
which provides an efficient particle –bubble interaction.
oratory and pilot flotation columns (Finch and Dobby, 1990).
On the other hand, the mineral recovery of a continuous
FLOTATION MODELLING flotation process can be described by the general equation
(Polat and Chander, 2000),
Fundamental Collection Models
Historically, a large number of fundamental models have ð1
1 ð
R
been developed to describe the flotation process, mainly ¼ (1 ekt )F(k)E(t)dkdt (2)
R1
related to the collection zone in terms of hydrodynamics. 0 0
A comprehensive description on fundamentals of the flotation
process modeling of mechanical cells has been presented by where the term (1 2 e 2kt) represents the mineral recovery of
King (2001), and for column flotation by Finch and Dobby a first order process with invariant kinetic constant k, as a
(1990), Rubinstein (1995) and Finch et al. (1995). A general time function. F(k) is the kinetic constant distribution function
flotation model for bubble –particle capture occurring within a for mineral species with different flotation rates, and E(t) is the
turbulent environment was reported by Pyke et al. (2003). residence time distribution function for continuous processes
Recently, Kostoglou et al. (2006) presented a critical review with different mixing characteristics. According to equation
on the state of the art of flotation fundamental modelling, (2), the mineral recovery depends on the mixing regime in
and also introduces a new generalized particle –bubble the collection zone and the actual mean residence time that
aggregation model, developed for a combined gravitational is related to the effective pulp volume in flotation equipment.
and turbulent flow field. Also, particle collision and Equation (1) can be derived from equation (2) considering the
detachment frequencies in flotation have been related to batch condition E(t) ¼ d(t), equivalent to plug flow, and a
the turbulent energy density (Bloom and Heindel, 2002). In single rate constant k for the whole operation, assuming
addition, the number of bubble –particle collisions has been F(k) ¼ d(k).
predicted by CFD simulation of flotation cells (Koh et al.,
2000; Koh and Schwarz, 2003). Another complex problem
Industrial Flotation: Model Structure
is to link the model parameters with the surface-chemical
properties such as the degree of hydrophobicity. In this Industrial flotation processes are continuous and multi-
sense, the surface forces measurement has been used to stage. Also, the presence of different mineral species and
model pulp flotation rates, including particle –bubble attach- the critical effect of different particle sizes, among other con-
ment and detachment, in terms of surface chemistry par- ditions, make it necessary to develop flexible and different
ameters (contact angle, zeta potential, Hamaker constant approaches to describe the flotation performance. For
and surface tension), by relating the energy barriers to the example, assuming that the gas and pulp phases are com-
kinetic energies of the bubble – particle interaction (Yoon, pletely mixed, or partially mixed, different model approaches
2000). Recent evidence indicates that the surface properties can be developed. In all cases, the residence time of the
of the solid, the type and concentration of dissolved gas, and phases as well as the mechanisms for particle –bubble
surface microbubbles all influence the stability of the thin, aggregate formation and separation must be known. Math-
aqueous film that forms between a particle and a gas ematical models for flotation cells and columns are based
bubble during the final stages of the capture process (Ralston on the law of conservation and can have various structures.
Trans IChemE, Part A, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2007, 85(A12): 1591–1603
1594 YIANATOS
The single phase model time in the cell. Multiphase models including more than two
The flotation process was originally characterized as a phases have been described, i.e., two froth phases plus
well-mixed cell, where the froth zone was neglected. Accord- one pulp phase, or two pulp phases plus one froth phase
ing to Harris (1978), problems which may be encountered (Harris, 1978).
are: (1) inadequate solids suspension and dispersion; (2) Laplante et al. (1983a, b) developed a two phase model for
particle, density and size distribution gradients in pulp; transient studies on the mass transfer from the pulp to the
(3) inadequate dispersion of air throughout the pulp. froth and from the froth over the cell lip. This allowed the
identification of the flotation rate from the slurry to the froth
using a specially designed batch flotation cell.
Multiphase models A different approach was presented by Deglon et al. (1999)
A two-phase model was introduced in order to account for and Deglon (2003) who introduced a bubble population
the presence of two distinct zones, pulp and froth, in flotation balance methodology applied to a mechanical flotation cell.
machines. Assumptions made in the original model are: This approach together with an attachment –detachment
(1) the pulp and froth phases are each ideally mixed and model for the collection process allowed for description of
(2) material transport occurs between the phases in one or the non-linear dependence among the flotation rate constant
both directions, and first order flotation rates in both direc- (s21), the specific power input (W kg21) and the bubble sur-
tions was most favoured. Harris (1978) pointed out that divid- face area flux SB (s21) for mechanical flotation cells of
ing the cell contents into froth and pulp is not an assumption different volume. Here, the new relevant parameter was the
of the model but the recognition of a fact of flotation cell gas residence time in the collection zone.
operation. Vera et al. (1999), Alexander et al. (2003) and Seaman
Flint (1974) refers to equation (1) as the apparent cell per- et al. (2004) also considered a two phase model (pulp and
formance where the net result of all processes occurring froth) to characterize the flotation process, but they still kept
within a cell to be first-order with respect to concentration. the idea of using an apparent flotation rate constant k to
In this case an apparent first-order rate constant can be account for the overall cell performance. The apparent rate
obtained, but the problem is to relate this apparent recovery constant k was related to the collection zone rate constant
rate to process conditions which affect the various transport kC and the froth recovery Rf, by equation (3).
rates within a cell. With this in aim, Flint (1974) developed
a multiphase model (Figure 4) to include material transfer k ¼ kC Rf (3)
steps in the sub-processes occurring in the cell. Thus, the
internal transport rates such as bubble transport, entrain- Equation (3) is strictly valid only if the maximum collection
ment, drainage, particle attachment and detachment, were zone recovery R1 is equal to 100%, which is an ideal
identified. In formulating the model, first order rate equations condition.
were used to describe particle collection by bubbles. The Recently, Savassi (2005) described a compartment model
contribution of this work lies in the general structure of the to account for the mass transfer inside a conventional flo-
model and the application of it to experimental systems, as tation cell. In this model the total volume of the cell was
a means of gaining insight into flotation processes, rather divided into three compartments: pulp collection zone, pulp
than in the particular forms of the model equations quiescent zone and froth region. The model also takes into
themselves. account the simultaneous mechanisms of true flotation and
Harris et al. (1975) derived a recycle flow model for the col- entrainment, and considers a first order process for particle
lection zone of mechanical cells assuming that the pulp circu- collection. The principal mass transfer factors are identified
lates between two perfectly mixed regions: an intensely as: the flotation rate constant, the mean residence time in
stirred impeller region and the remainder of the cell volume. the collection zone, the froth recovery of attached particles,
The model also considered the effective liquid residence the degree of entrainment through the froth and the water
recovery from the feed to the concentrate. In this approach
the overall recovery was obtained as the interaction of
three independent zones (collection, quiescent and froth).
Despite the effort to separate both phases, a single overall
flotation rate constant has been typically used to represent
the combined effect of particle collection and froth transport.
This approach has been used for design, simulation
and optimization of flotation cells and circuits. However, it is
widely recognized that the knowledge and characterization
of the sub-processes involved in flotation are more powerful
regarding the effect that multiple variables have on flotation
performance. Unfortunately, most of the more complex
models are not practical, because they involve a large
number of parameters, which are generally difficult to
measure.
Alternatively, a good compromise to characterize industrial
flotation equipment has been described by Finch and Dobby
(1990), where the collection zone and froth recoveries are
identified and considered independently in order to estimate
Figure 4. Concept of the multipath model (Flint, 1974). the overall flotation performance, according to Figure 5.
Trans IChemE, Part A, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2007, 85(A12): 1591–1603
COLUMNS AND MECHANICALLY AGITATED CELLS 1595
From a mass balance, The residence time distribution function E(t) depends on
the hydrodynamic regime and is related to cell design and cir-
RC Rf cuit arrangement. A common assumption for process model-
R¼ (4) ling has been the perfect mixing condition in the collection
1 RC (1 Rf )
zone of flotation cells (King, 2001). Equation (8) represents
where R is the overall flotation recovery, RC is the collection the RTD function E(t) of a perfectly mixed cell,
zone recovery and Rf is the froth zone recovery. Bubble load-
ing, a key parameter in developing the model further, needs e(t=tF )
E(t) ¼ (8)
to be evaluated to calculate froth recovery. tF
Bubble loading BL corresponds to the apparent density
(ton m23) of the particle– bubble aggregates entering the where tF is the fluid mean residence time in the flotation cell
froth. The bubble load can be estimated from the bubble sur- (¼V/Q), where V is the cell volume and Q is the volumetric
flowrate through it. However, since early times, observations
face coverage, assuming that the bubble surface area occu-
pied by a particle of diameter dp was equal to d2p (Szatkowski and discussions about the non-perfect mixing behaviour in
and Freiberger, 1985; Li et al., 2004), flotation cells has been reported, i.e., due to back-mixing
flow, dead zones and short-circuiting (Harris, 1978; Mehrotra
K1 prp dp and Saxena, 1983; Mavros, 1992a). Thus, a more realistic
BL ¼ (5) approach to describe the mixing condition in the pulp of
dB
industrial cells is the use of the actual RTD function (Niemi,
where K1 is the fraction of bubble surface coverage with a 1995; Polat and Chander, 2000).
monolayer of particles, rp is the mineral density, dp is the
mean particle diameter and dB is the bubble diameter. Other RTD of single industrial flotation cells
estimates upon the bubble surface coverage with particles Mixing data on single large industrial flotation cells is
have been derived assuming different particle projection scarce. Some preliminary testing has been reported by
areas or using shape factors (Patwardhan and Honaker, Burgess (1997), who showed that the RTD of a 100 m3
2000; Gallegos et al., 2006). OK100 tank cell, provided with forced air, was close to well-
The bubble loading, BL, and the superficial gas velocity, JG, mixed. Also, Lelinski et al. (2002) reported the comparison
allow for the calculation of the superficial mass transport Mi between the RTD of three single flotation cells, 148 to
(ton h21m22) of floatable mineral (true flotation) across the 160 m3, tested in parallel. Here it was observed that cells
pulp–froth interfacse, according to the following relationship operating with forced air plus the rotor located near the
bottom, Figure 2(a), showed a RTD close to well-mixed,
Mi ¼ BL JG (6)
while the self-aerated cells, Figure 2(b), showed a more
Then, the froth recovery of the floatable mineral RF can be significant deviation from perfect mixing. Neither model was
estimated by reported to correlate this data.
New experimental data on RTD of single large cells has
MC been recently reported by Yianatos et al. (2007). Here the
Rf ¼ (7) model given by equation (9), consisting of one large perfect
Mi
mixer and one small perfect mixer in series, gave the best
where MC is the superficial mass overflow (ton h21m22) of fitting to describe the mixing conditions in a 130 m3 Wemco
floatable mineral recovered into the concentrate by true flo- SmartCell.
tation. Direct measurement of bubble loading in a range of
30–60 g L21 has been reported (Alexander et al., 2003; e(tL)=tS e(tL)=tL
E(t) ¼ (9)
Seaman et al., 2004; Hidalgo, 2006). (t S t L )
Trans IChemE, Part A, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2007, 85(A12): 1591–1603
1596 YIANATOS
where tL is the residence time of the large mixer, tS is the Other more complex models can include a large number of
residence time of the small mixer and L is the lag time. parameters, such as dead zones, pure delay or back-mixing
Figure 6 shows the good agreement of equation (9) for mod- (Wilson and Frew, 1986; Ando et al., 1990). Recent trends in
elling the RTD of liquid, fine solid (245 microns), medium flotation circuit designs are towards the use of flotation banks
solid (2150 þ 45 microns) and coarse solid (þ150 microns), consisting of a low number (4 –6) of large cells, where neither
in a large mechanical flotation cell. The experimental open flow nor back-mixing flow is present between adjacent
work was developed using liquid (Br-82 in solution) and cells (Bourke, 2002).
solid (mineral) radioactive tracers (Tello, 2006). Industrial banks of large cells have been characterized as
perfect mixers in series (Yianatos et al., 2000, 2001; Arbiter,
2000). Using the radioactive tracer technique, it was shown
RTD of industrial flotation banks that the RTD of flotation banks consisting of 4, 8 and 9
Because of the large short circuit in single continuous cells, cells (42.5 m3) can be well represented by a tank in series
the industrial flotation operation considers the arrangement of model (Yianatos et al., 2005a).
cells in banks. Thus, banks of 5– 10 cells in series are com- Figure 7 shows the good agreement between experimental
monly used. data, from banks of 3, 5 and 7 cells of 130 m3 in series, and
In order to characterize the hydrodynamic performance of the classical N tank-in-series model, equation (10), while for
an industrial flotation bank, the following equation, describing the first (single) cell the best fit corresponds to the model
the continuous operation of ‘N’ perfectly mixed tanks in described by equation (9), (Tello, 2006).
series, has shown to be a realistic and efficient model.
t N1 e(tN=t)
E(t) ¼ (10) Flotation Columns
(t=N)N G(N)
The fluid mechanical behaviour in a flotation column is
where t is the mean residence time of the bank, G(N) is the complex, since two fluid phases, characterized by very differ-
Gamma function, which allows to account for the non integer ent masses and with one far more compressible than the
solutions of N. other, are in contact with each other. The multiphase flow in
Trans IChemE, Part A, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2007, 85(A12): 1591–1603
COLUMNS AND MECHANICALLY AGITATED CELLS 1597
Trans IChemE, Part A, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2007, 85(A12): 1591–1603
1598 YIANATOS
by Tuteja et al. (1994) where the associated shortcomings vessel dispersion numbers larger than 0.14 which is normally
were discussed. the case for industrial flotation columns.
The first approach to model the column flotation process Experimental observations in pilot columns (50 mm in
was developed by Sastry and Fuerstenau (1970), who diameter) with H/D ratio about 100 –200 have shown Nd
considered the axial dispersion model ADM in a counter- values of 0.03 –0.08, which are closer to a plug flow operation
current process with a first order flotation rate. Later (Laplante et al., 1988; Mills et al., 1992). For industrial
this approach become the most popular for column flotation columns with H/D ratio about 4 –12, the Nd values are
modelling and scale-up (Dobby and Finch, 1986; Finch and 0.4 –2.7 (Laplante et al., 1988; Mills et al., 1992; Yianatos
Dobby, 1990; Luttrell et al., 1993). All these models are et al., 2005a).
one-dimensional. Deckwer and Schumpe (1987) presented an extensive dis-
In general, two kinds of problems have been addressed cussion on phenomenological and empirical studies on
using the axial dispersion model. The first one is to predict bubble columns, and they also claimed that some postulates
the mineral recovery, which is a primary objective of model- of the ADM model are questionable, i.e., such as the use of
ling column flotation, and consists of using the ADM model only one lumped parameter to account for the macroscopic
combined with the first order flotation rate equation. Finch circulatory flows and the axial and radial mass flows, and
and Dobby (1990), adopted this approach to describe the col- the capability to describe the gas phase residence time distri-
lection zone recovery RC related to the collection rate con- bution due to the occurrence of different bubble classes.
stant kC, particle residence time tP and vessel dispersion However, despite the ADM model not being a good physical
number Nd, according to the following relationship description of the industrial column flotation process, it has
been generally considered to provide a good data fitting.
4a e(1=2Nd ) Ityokumbul (1992) presented an alternative approach to
RC ¼ 1 (16)
(1 þ a)2 e(a=2Nd ) (1 a)2 e(a=2Nd) describe the flotation column operation using the analogy of
interface mass transfer. The main assumptions are the rate
where of particle attachment to air bubbles is proportional to the
concentration of floatable solids and uncovered bubble sur-
a ¼ (1 þ 4 kC tP Nd )1=2 (17) face, while the rate of particle detachment is proportional to
the surface concentration of solid particles on the air bubbles
Equation (16) defaults to equation (1) for plug flow transport (bubble load), the same as suggested by Sastry and Fuerste-
(Nd ¼ 0) and it corresponds to the perfect mixing operation nau (1970), and the solid behaviour in the collection zone
for Nd ¼ 1. may be described using the sedimentation convection
The second type of problem is the transient solution often model. Despite the use of some simplifying conditions (i.e.,
used to fit the residence time distribution (RTD) data in order plug flow and constant parameters), this approach empha-
to obtain Nd, which describes the intensity of dispersion in sizes the fact that in some cases column height can be
a column and the mean residence time, t. In this case a much shorter than usually built.
suitable technique for flotation columns is the pulse injection More sophisticated hydrodynamic models to describe the
of a liquid or solid tracer at the top of the collection zone, collection zone in flotation columns, i.e., two-dimensional
followed by sampling and tracer analysis of the discharge. models (axial and radial dispersion) such as proposed by
Deng et al. (1996), cell models with back-flow such as the cir-
culation cells model of Joshi and Sharma (1979), or the eddy-
RTD of Industrial Flotation Columns
cell model of Zehner (1986), as suggested by Deckwer and
In modelling the RTD of flotation columns using the axial Schumpe (1987) and Mavros (1992a), have not yet been
dispersion approach, the choice of boundary conditions and considered in modelling of flotation columns, i.e., in the calcu-
fitting routines is important and has been thoroughly dis- lation of recovery and performance by means of solving the
cussed (Ityokumbul et al., 1988; Xu et al., 1991b; Tokoro material balance equations.
and Okano, 2001). The usual assumption in plant work is Alternatively, other researchers have proposed that it
to consider both boundaries as either open or closed. Also, may be more appropriate to use the tanks-in-series model
because the use of wash water prevents most tracers from with back-mixing flow (Mavros et al., 1989) or the tank in
exiting within the froth product (Dobby and Finch, 1985; series model (Mills and O’Connor, 1990; Goodall and
Yianatos et al., 1987; Yianatos and Bergh, 1992) and the O’Connor, 1991) for describing the fluid flow regime (RTD)
detection point in the underflow line is a good approximation of laboratory flotation columns. Also, because the operation
of a closed boundary compared with inside the column, most of industrial columns is much closer to perfect mixing, the
of the experimental conditions correspond to the ‘closed – RTD of large industrial flotation columns can be described
closed’ boundary conditions. Even so, sometimes the by the tank-in-series model, equation (10), considering a
‘open–open’ solution is used because a relatively simple non-integer number, between one and two, of perfect
analytical solution exists and for small dispersion numbers mixers in series.
(Nd , 0.25) the analytical solution is adequate. More recently, Yianatos et al. (2005a) presented a better fit
For closed–closed boundaries in a flotation column, the using a model consisting of one large perfect mixer (resi-
analytical solution was described by (Xu et al., 1991b; dence time tL) and two small perfect mixers in series (resi-
Mavros, 1992b). According to Xu et al. (1991b), the most suit- dence time tS). Figure 8 shows the model structure where
able combination is the numerical solution to the closed the column local mixing conditions, described by the two
vessel case with a least squares fitting routine. Also, small mixers, can be related to the feed input and the
Mavros (1992b) has shown that the numerical solution, expli- bubble generation zones, while the single large mixing
citly developed for a Dirac delta impulse, is applicable for stage was related to the volume of the baffled section of
Trans IChemE, Part A, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2007, 85(A12): 1591–1603
COLUMNS AND MECHANICALLY AGITATED CELLS 1599
Figure 8. Conceptual model for mixing in big flotation columns Equation (21) represents the lower recovery condition for the
(Yianatos et al., 2005a). column flotation model, which can also be derived from
equation (2) considering the RTD of a perfect mixer, given
in equation (8).
the column, typically extended from below the feed entrance On the other hand, the maximum recovery condition for the
to the bubble generation level. column flotation model corresponds to the operation near
The analytical solution for this model is given by the plug flow observed in a pilot size column, and it is shown in
following equation equation (22):
½(t L)=(ts a) e(tL)=ts þ a e(tL)=tL RC 1
E(t) ¼ (18) ¼ 1 (1 ekM t ) (22)
(t L t S ) R1 kM t
Figure 9 shows good agreement between the model and Effect of baffles on fluid flow in flotation columns
experimental data for liquid RTD (Br-82 radioactive liquid Moys et al. (1991) showed that vertical baffles contained
tracer) and solid RTD (radioactive mineral tracer), in an entirely within the liquid phase and which divided the
industrial flotation column of dimensions 2 6 13 m. column into several parallel and independent flow chambers
Following the good results of the RTD model, equation actually reduced the quality of mixing in the column. This
(18), a new model for predicting the mineral recovery in the effect was related to pulp circulation due to mal-distribution
collection zone of industrial flotation columns was derived. of gas flux at the bottom of the column. Kawatra and Eisele
The new analytical solution, equation (20), was obtained (1995) studied the use of horizontal baffles at laboratory
Figure 9. Model fitting for liquid and solid in industrial flotation column.
Trans IChemE, Part A, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2007, 85(A12): 1591–1603
1600 YIANATOS
scale, and they claimed that back mixing and short-circuiting hydrophobicity and turbulence on froth recovery remains as
can be reduced in a much shorter column, provided that the a challenge to froth phase modelling.
flow in the column approaches plug-flow. The use of baffles in In the middle of 1980s, studies on column flotation froths
large size columns seems not affect the overall mixing but pre- introduced the froth recovery concept. The froth recovery is
vents the macro-circulation between baffled zones (Yianatos, a practical parameter describing the recovery to the concen-
2003). Yigang et al. (2001) reported the liquid RTD in a labora- trate launders of floatable minerals entering the froth from the
tory packed flotation column which showed a significant collection zone (Van Deventer et al., 2001). The froth recov-
mixing, despite the presence of ripple packing. ery has been directly measured using modified pilot flotation
columns (Falutsu and Dobby, 1989; Vera, 1995). Also, froth
recovery estimates have been indirectly derived by extrapol-
Froth Transport Modelling
ation to zero froth depth (Feteris et al., 1987; Yu and Finch,
Early works showing the distributed nature of the fluid 1990; Vera et al., 1999) and by fitting grade profiles from
transport through the froth have been reported, i.e., Bishop industrial column froths (Yianatos et al., 1998).
and White (1976) developed empirical studies on hydrophilic A new alternative approach for froth recovery estimation is
particle entrainment into the froth and the rate of recovery as based on direct measurement of the bubble load near the
a function of water recovery and pulp density. They con- pulp –froth interface, in flotation cells and columns (i.e.,
cluded that the most important factor in the rate of particle Alexander et al., 2003; Seaman and Franzidis, 2004;
recovery is the residence time in the froth. Recently, Johnson Hidalgo, 2006). Thus, the froth recovery Rf can be directly
(2005) presented a comprehensive review of the entrainment obtained from equations (6) and (7) provided that superficial
mechanisms and its modelling in industrial flotation gas rate and concentrate mass flowrate of floatable minerals
processes. are known. These studies have shown that operating vari-
Moys (1978) developed a plug flow model to describe the ables affect the pulp and froth zones performance in a differ-
mass transport along the froth, in a steady state batch oper- ent and often opposite way. Experimentally, it was found that
ation. Moys (1984) developed a theoretical model, based on a significant fraction of particles entering the froth return to
the Laplace equation, to provide a two-dimensional descrip- the collection zone.
tion of the streamlines in the froth as it moves towards the So far, refined hydrodynamic models have not been taken
concentrate weir. The froth model was used for estimating into account in the actual modeling of flotation equipment,
mass transport in continuous and steady state batch flotation i.e., in the calculation of recovery and performance of the flo-
froths. More recently, a model considering only vertical and tation equipment by means of solving the material balance
horizontal paths was presented by Zheng et al. (2004), equations, because still most of the simplifying assumptions,
from which an analytical relationship was derived to estimate parameters and boundary conditions need to be validated.
the froth residence time distribution. Other studies have been
focused on characterizing the froth structure and transport
CONCLUSIONS
mechanisms (i.e., Ross and Van Deventer, 1988; Falutsu
and Dobby, 1992). Industrial flotation is a complex separation process involving
An extensive review on froth modelling in steady and non- the interaction of physico-chemical and hydrodynamic
steady state flotation systems was reported by Mathe et al. phenomena. The modeling of such processes was firstly
(1998, 2000). It was found that despite the significant pro- developed by analogy with a chemical reaction, where a
gress made in froth characterization and understanding of single overall rate constant was considered to describe the
the frothing phenomena, the information obtained from whole process, assuming perfect mixing for the whole
these studies has a very limited use in flotation circuit system as a black box. Then, a more realistic approach has
design, modelling and optimization. The problem is that included the interaction between two zones, the collection
these studies have been mainly developed in environments zone and the froth transport zone (separation).
with ideal characteristics, such as the equilibrium cell, From plant experience it has been observed that the flow
because of the difficulty of sampling the froth phase. regime in the collection zone of single self-aerated mechan-
Thus, the froth parameters that can be used to relate froth ical cells was not perfectly mixed. Thus, the mixing condition
performance in different flotation systems are still not fully in the collection zone of a single cell, with internal recircula-
identified. Also, the authors claimed that no research has tion, was better characterized by the tank in series approach.
been performed considering the effect of chemical factors The fluid flow in industrial flotation banks, consisting of
into froth transport models. three to nine mechanical cells, has been well characterized
In recent years, a significant number of fundamental using the N tanks in series model, where N corresponds to
studies on froth modeling have been developed describing the actual number of cells in the bank.
the gas, liquid and solid motion in flowing froths (Neethling The collection zone of industrial pneumatic flotation columns
et al., 2000; Neethling and Cilliers, 2002, 2003; Finch et al., operates in the bubbly flow regime and has been typically
2007). Stevenson et al. (2003) studied the dispersion in a characterized by the axial dispersion model. Even considering
two-dimensional rising froth, and the numerical solutions of that this approach was not realistic the model structure allows
foam drainage in rising systems were also presented at for a good data fitting. Alternatively, a new approach for indus-
values of background liquid holdup relevant to the flotation trial flotation columns allowed a better fitting considering a
process. Zheng et al. (2006) reported the evaluation of differ- simple model, based on large and small tanks in series.
ent models of water recovery in flotation froths, where the The study of fluid transport in the froth zone of flotation
fundamental approach adopted by Neethling and Cilliers equipment has been of great attention, specifically in recent
(2003) was useful to predict the water recovery. However, years. Fundamental and empirical correlations on fluid and
the interactive effects of particle size, particle shape, gas transport in the froth allowed the estimation of the solid
Trans IChemE, Part A, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2007, 85(A12): 1591–1603
COLUMNS AND MECHANICALLY AGITATED CELLS 1601
Trans IChemE, Part A, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2007, 85(A12): 1591–1603
1602 YIANATOS
Flint, L.R., 1974, A mechanistic approach to flotation kinetics, Trans Mathe, Z., Harris, M., O’Connor, C. and Franzidis, J.P., 1998, Review
Inst Min Metall, 83: C90– 95. of froth modelling in steady state flotation systems, Miner Eng,
Gallegos, P.M., Pérez, R. and Uribe, A., 2006, Maximum bubble 11(5): 397– 421.
loads: Experimental measurements vs. analytical estimation, Mavros, P., 1992a, Mixing and hydrodynamics in flotation cells, in
Miner Eng, 19: 12–18. Mavros, P. and Matis, K.A. (eds). Innovation in Flotation Technol-
Goodall, C.M. and O’Connor, C.T., 1991, Residence time distribution ogy, Vol. E208, 211– 234 (NATO Series, Kluwer Academic Publish-
studies in a flotation column. Part 1: the modelling of residence ers, The Netherlands).
time distribution in a laboratory column flotation cell, Int J Miner Mavros, P., 1992b, Validity and limitations of the closed-vessel
Process, 31: 97– 113. analytical solution to the axial dispersion model, Miner Eng, 5(9):
Harris, C.C., 1978, Multiphase models of flotation machines beha- 1053–1060.
viour, Int J Miner Process, 5: 107– 129. Mavros, P., Lazaridis, N.K. and Matis, K.A., 1989, A study and
Harris, C.C., Chakravarti, A. and Degaleesan, S.N., 1975, A recycle modelling of liquid phase mixing in a flotation column, Int J Miner
flow flotation machine model, Int J Miner Process, 2(1): 39– 58. Process, 26(1–2): 1– 16.
Hidalgo, L., 2006, Determinación de recuperación de espuma en Mehrotra, S.P. and Saxena, A.K., 1983, Effects of process
celdas de flotación. Chem Eng thesis, Santa Maria University, variables on the residence time distribution of a solid in a
Chile. continuously operated flotation cell, Int J Miner Process, 10:
Ityokumbul, M.T., 1992, A mass transfer approach to flotation column 255– 277.
design, Chem Eng Sci, 47(13–14): 3605–3612. Mills, P.J.T. and O’Connor, C.T. 1990, The modeling of liquid and
Ityokumbul, M.T., Kosaric, N. and Bulani, W., 1988, Parameter esti- solids mixing in a flotation column, Miner Eng, 3(6): 567– 576.
mation with simplified boundary conditions, Chem Eng Sci, 43(9): Mills, P.J.T., Yianatos, J.B. and O’Connor, C.T., 1992, The effect of
2457–2462. particle size on the mixing characteristics of a flotation column,
Jameson, G.J., 1988, New concept in flotation column design, Miner Miner Eng, 3(6): 567– 576.
Metall Process, 5(1): 44–47. Moys, M.H., 1984, Residence time distributions and mass transport
Johnson, N.W., 2005, A review of the entrainment mechanism and its in the froth phase of the flotation process, Int J Miner Process,
modelling in industrial flotation processes, in Centenary of Flotation 13: 117–142.
Symposium, 487– 496 (Brisbane, Australia). Moys, M.H., 1978, A study of a plug-flow model for flotation froth
Joshi, J.B. and Sharma, M.M., 1979, A circulation cell model for behavior, Int J Miner Process, 5: 21– 38.
bubble columns, Trans Instn Chem Engrs, 57: 244–251. Moys, M.H., Engelbrecht, J. and Terblanche, N., 1991, The design of
Kawatra, S.K. and Eisele, T.C., 1995, Laboratory baffled-column baffles to reduce axial mixing in flotation columns, in Agar, G.E.,
flotation of mixer lower/middle Kittanning seam bituminous coal, Huls, B.J. and Hyma, D.B. (eds). Proc International Conference
Miner Metall Process, 12(2):103–107. Column’91, Vol. 1, 275 –288 (CIM, Canada).
King, R.P., 2001, Modeling and Simulation of Mineral Processing Neethling, S.J. and Cilliers, J.J., 2003, Modelling flotation froths, Int J
Systems, 1st edition, (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK). Miner Process, 72: 267– 287.
Klimpel, R., 1980, Selection of chemical reagents for flotation, in Neethling, S.J. and Cilliers, J.J., 2002, Solids motion in flowing froths,
Mular, A.L. and Bhappu, R. (eds). Mineral Processing Plant Chem Eng Sci, 57: 607 –615.
Design, 2nd edition 907 –934 (SME, Littleton, USA). Neethling, S.J., Cilliers, J.J. and Woodburn, E.T., 2000, Prediction
Koh, P.T.L. and Schwarz, M.P., 2003, CFD modeling of bubble- of the water distribution in a flowing foam, Chem Eng Sci, 55:
particle collision rates and efficiencies in a flotation cell, Miner 4021–4028.
Eng, 16: 1055– 1059. Niemi, A.J., 1995, Role of kinetics in modelling and control of flotation
Koh, P.T.L., Manickam, M. and Schwarz, M.P., 2000, CFD simulation plants, Powder Technol, 82: 69–77.
of bubble-particle collisions in mineral flotation cells, Miner Eng, Pal, R. and Masliyah, J., 1990, Flow characteristics of a flotation
13(14–15): 1455–1463. column, Can J Chem Eng, 29(2): 97–103.
Kostoglou, M., Karapantsios, T.D. and Matis, K.A., 2006, Modeling Patwardhan, A. and Honaker, R.Q., 2000, Development of a carrying-
local flotation frequency in a turbulent flow field, Advances in capacity model for column froth flotation, Int J Miner Process, 59:
Colloid and Interface Science, 122: 79–91. 275– 293.
Kwon, S.B., Park, N.S., Lee, S.J., Ahn, H.W. and Wang, C.K., 2006, Polat, M. and Chander, S., 2000, First order flotation kinetics models
Examining the effect of length/width ratio on the hydro-dynamic and methods for estimation of the true distribution of flotation rate
behaviour in a DAF system using CFD and ADV techniques, constant, Int J Miner Process, 58: 145–166.
Water Science and Technology, 53(7): 141–149. Pyke, B., Duan, J., Fornasiero, D. and Ralston, J., 2003, From
Langberg, D.E. and Jameson, G.J., 1992, The coexistence of the turbulence and collision to attachment and detachment: A
froth and liquid phases in a flotation column, Chem Eng Sci, 47: general flotation model, in Proc of the Strategic Conference
4345–4355. Flotation and Flocculation: From Fundamentals to Applications,
Laplante, A.R., Yianatos, J.B. and Finch, J.A., 1988, On the mixing Ralston, J., Miller, J. and Rubio, J. (eds). 77–89 (Snap Printing,
characteristics of the collection zone in flotation columns, in, Australia).
Sastry, K.V.S. (ed.). Column Flotation’ 88, 69–80 (SME, Littleton, Ralston, J., Fornasiero, D. and Mishchuk, N., 2001, The hydrophobic
USA). force in flotation: a critique, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physico-
Laplante, A.R., Toguri, J.M. and Smith, H.W., 1983a, The effect of air chemical and Engineering Aspects, 192(1–3): 39– 51.
flowrate on the kinetics of flotation. (I): The transfer of material from Ross, V.E., 1991, The behavior of particles in flotation froths, Int J
the slurry to the froth, Int J Miner Process, 11: 203– 219. Miner Process, 4(7 –11): 959–974.
Laplante, A.R., Toguri, J.M. and Smith, H.W., 1983b, The effect of air Ross, V.E. and Van Deventer, J.S.J., 1988, Mass transport in flotation
flowrate on the kinetics of flotation. (II) The transfer of material from column froths, in Sastry, K.V.S. (ed.). Proc Int Symposium
the froth over the cell lip, Int J Miner Process, 11: 221 –234. Column’88, 129– 139 (SME, Littleton, USA).
Lelinski, D., Allen, J., Redden, L. and Weber, A., 2002, Analysis of Rubinstein, J.B., 1995, Column Flotation: Processes, Designs and
the residence time distribution in large flotation machines, Miner Practices, 1st edition (Gordon and Breach Science Publishers,
Eng, 15(7): 499–505. Basilea, Switzerland).
Lelinski, D., Redden, L.D. and Nelson, M.G., 2005, Important con- Sastry, K.V.S. and Fuerstenau, D.W., 1970, Theoretical analysis
siderations in the design of mechanical flotation machines, in of a counter-current flotation column, Transactions, SME of
Centenary of Flotation Symposium, 217 –223 (Brisbane, Australia). AIME, 247: 46–52.
Li, H., Del Villar, R. and Gomez, C.O., 2004, Reviewing the exper- Savassi, O.N., 2005, A compartment model for the mass transfer
imental procedure to determine the carrying capacity in flotation inside a conventional cell, Int J Miner Process, 77: 65– 79.
columns, Can Met Quart, 43(4): 513–520. Seaman, D.R., Franzidis, J.P. and Manlapig, E.V., 2004, Bubble load
Luttrell, G.H., Mankosa, M.J. and Yoon, R.H., 1993, Design and measurement in the pulp zone of industrial flotation machines-a
scale-up criteria for column flotation, in XVIII IMPC, 785– 791 new device for determining the froth recovery of attached particles,
(Sydney, Australia). Int J Miner Process, 74: 1 –13.
Mathe, Z., Harris, M. and O’Connor, C., 2000, A review of methods to Shah, Y.T., Kelkar, B.G., Goldbole, S.P. and Deckwer, W.D., 1982,
model the froth phase in non-steady state flotation systems, Miner Design parameters estimation for bubble column reactors,
Eng, 13(2): 127–140. AICHE J, 28(3): 353–379.
Trans IChemE, Part A, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2007, 85(A12): 1591–1603
COLUMNS AND MECHANICALLY AGITATED CELLS 1603
Stevenson, P., Sullivan, S.P. and Jameson, G.J., 2003, Short-time Yianatos, J.B., Bucarey, R., Larenas, J., Henrı́quez, F. and Torres, L.,
tracer dispersión in a two-dimensional rising froth, Chem Eng 2005b, Collection zone kinetic model for industrial flotation
Sci, 56: 5025– 5043. columns, Miner Eng, 18: 1373– 1377.
Szatkowski, M. and Freiberger, W.L., 1985, Kinetics of flotation with Yianatos, J.B., 2003, Current status of column flotation, in Ralston, J.,
fine bubbles, Trans Instn Min Metal, 94: C61– 70. Miller, J. and Rubio, J., (eds). Proceedings Strategic Conference,
Tello, K., 2006, Caracterización hidrodinámica y metalúrgica de un Flotation and Flocculation: From Fundamentals to Applications,
banco de flotación industrial, Met Eng thesis, Santa Maria Univer- 213– 220 (Snap Printing, Australia).
sity, Chile. Yianatos, J.B., Bergh, L.G. and Aguilera, J., 2000, The effect of grind-
Tokoro, C. and Okano, Y., 2001, Boundary conditions for column ing on mill performance at División Salvador, Codelco-Chile, Miner
flotation—A study by transfer function representation of an axial Eng, 13(5): 485–495.
diffusion model, Miner Eng, 14(1): 49–64. Yianatos, J.B., Bergh, L.G., Condori, P. and Aguilera, J., 2001,
Tuteja, R.K., Spottiswood, D.J. and Misra, V.N., 1994, Mathematical Hydrodynamic and metallurgical characterization of industrial
models of the column flotation process: a review, Miner Eng, 7(12): flotation banks for control purposes, Miner Eng, 14(9): 1033–1046.
1459–1472. Yianatos, J.B., Bergh, L.G. and Cortés, G.A., 1998, Froth zone mod-
Vandenberghe, J., Choung, J., Xu, Z. and Masliyah, J., 2005, Drift eling of an industrial flotation column, Miner Eng,11(5): 423 –435.
flux modelling for a two-phase system in a flotation column, Can Yianatos, J.B. and Bergh, L.G., 1992, RTD studies in an industrial
J Chem Eng, 83: 169 –176. flotation column: use of the radioactive tracer technique, Int J
Van Deventer, J.S.J., Feng, D. and Burger, A.J., 2004a, Transport Miner Process, 36: 81–91.
phenomena at the pulp-froth interface in a flotation column: 1. Yianatos, J.B., Finch, J.A., Dobby, G.S. and Xu, M., 1988, Bubble
Recovery profiles, Int J Miner Process, 74: 201–215. size estimation in a bubble swarm, J Colloid Inter Sci, 126(1):
Van Deventer, J.S.J., Feng, D. and Burger, A.J., 2004b, Transport 37–44.
phenomena at the pulp-froth interface in a flotation column: 2. Yianatos, J.B., Finch, J.A. and Laplante, A.R., 1987, The cleaning
Detachment, Int J Miner Process, 74: 201– 215. action in column flotation froths, Trans Inst Min Metall, Section
Van Deventer, J.S.J., Feng, D. and Burger, A.J., 2001, The use of C(96): C199–C205.
bubble loads to interpret transport phenomena at the pulp-froth Yigang, D., Yuanxin, W., Dinghuo, L. and Jiashen, Z., 2001, A study
interface in a flotation column, Chem Eng Sci, 56: 6313–6319. on the mixing characteristics of a packed flotation column, Miner
Vera, M.A., 1995, The determination of the collection zone rate con- Eng, 14(9): 1101–1105.
stant and froth zone recovery by column flotation, Master thesis, Yoon, R.-H., 2000, The role of hydrodynamic and surface forces
Queensland University, Australia. in bubble-particle interaction, Int J Miner Process, 58(1–4):
Vera, M.A., Franzidis, J.P. and Manlapig, E.V., 1999, Simultaneous 129– 143.
determination of collection zone rate constant and froth recovery Yu, S. and Finch, J.A., 1990, Froth zone recovery in a flotation
in a mechanical flotation environment, Miner Eng, 12(10): 1163– column, Can Metall Quart, 29(3): 237– 238.
1176. Zehner, P., 1986, Momentum, mass and heat transfer in bubble
Weber, A., Meadows, D., Villanueva, F., Palomo, R. and Prado, S., columns. Part I. Flow models of the bubble column and liquid
2005, Development of the world’s largest flotation machine, in velocities, Int Chem Eng, 26: 22–28.
Centenary of Flotation Symposium, 285 –291 (Brisbane, Australia). Zheng, X., Franzidis, J.P. and Johnson, N.W., 2006, An evaluation
Wilson, S.G. and Frew, J.A., 1986, Effect of operating variables of different models of water recovery in flotation, Miner Eng, 19:
upon liquid backmixing in a laboratory flotation bank, Int J Miner 871– 882.
Process, 16: 281 –298. Zhang, X., Franzidis, J.P. and Manlapig, E., 2004, Modelling of froth
Xu, M., Finch, J.A. and Uribe-Salas, A., 1991a, Maximum gas and transportation in industrial flotation cells Part 1. Development of
bubble surface rates in flotation columns, Int J Miner Process, froth transportation models for attached particles, Miner Eng, 17:
32: 233–250. 981– 988.
Xu, M., Finch, J.A. and Laplante, A.R., 1991b, Numerical solution to
axial dispersion model in flotation column studies, Can Metall
Quart, 30(2): 71– 77.
Yianatos, J.B. and Henrı́quez, F., 2007, Boundary conditions for gas
rate and bubble size at the pulp-froth interface in flotation equip- ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ment, Miner Eng, 20: 625–628.
Yianatos, J.B., Bergh, L.G., Tello, K., Dı́az, F. and Villanueva, A., Funding for process modelling and control research is provided by
2007, Residence time distribution in single big industrial flotation CONICYT, project Fondecyt 1070106, and Santa Marı́a University,
cells, Miner Metall Process J, accepted for publication. project 270522.
Yianatos, J.B., Bergh, L., Diaz, F. and Rodriguez, J., 2005a, Mixing
characteristics of industrial flotation equipment, Chem Eng Sci, The manuscript was received 3 May 2007 and accepted for
60: 2273– 2282. publication after revision 23 August 2007.
Trans IChemE, Part A, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2007, 85(A12): 1591–1603