Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lampiran 8. Uji Beda: Descriptive Statistics

    Uploaded by

    muhrom
    10 views3 pages
    The document contains statistics and test results comparing the pre-test and post-test scores of students in the control and experimental groups. It finds that: 1) There was a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test scores of the experimental group who used the whiteboard animation method, with post-test scores improving greatly. 2) The control group who used conventional methods also saw improved scores but to a lesser extent than the experimental group. 3) An independent samples T-test showed a significant difference in the post-test scores of the two groups, with the experimental group performing much better.

    Original Description:

    a

    Original Title

    Lampiran 8 Uji Beda

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document contains statistics and test results comparing the pre-test and post-test scores of students in the control and experimental groups. It finds that: 1) There was a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test scores of the experimental group who used the whiteboard animation method, with post-test scores improving greatly. 2) The control group who used conventional methods also saw improved scores but to a lesser extent than the experimental group. 3) An independent samples T-test showed a significant difference in the post-test scores of the two groups, with the experimental group performing much better.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    10 views3 pages

    Lampiran 8. Uji Beda: Descriptive Statistics

    Uploaded by

    muhrom
    The document contains statistics and test results comparing the pre-test and post-test scores of students in the control and experimental groups. It finds that: 1) There was a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test scores of the experimental group who used the whiteboard animation method, with post-test scores improving greatly. 2) The control group who used conventional methods also saw improved scores but to a lesser extent than the experimental group. 3) An independent samples T-test showed a significant difference in the post-test scores of the two groups, with the experimental group performing much better.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3

    Lampiran 8.

    Uji Beda
    Statistik Diskriptif
    Descriptive Statistics
    N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
    Pre-Test Kontrol 19 36 78 55.95 10.916
    Post-Test Kontrol 19 59 96 72.63 8.908
    Pre-Test Eksperimen 23 30 63 50.96 7.951
    Post-Test Eksperimen 23 54 99 88.52 10.162
    Valid N (listwise) 19

    Uji Normaitas

    Tests of Normality
    Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
    Kelas Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
    Kemampuan Pre-Test Eksperimen
    Mahasiswa (metode Whiteboard .138 23 .200* .953 23 .345
    Mengembangkan Annimation)
    PTK Post-Test
    Eksperimen (metode
    .175 23 .065 .822 23 .001
    Whiteboard
    Annimation)
    Pre-Test Kontrol
    .110 19 .200* .983 19 .972
    (Konfensional)
    Post-Test Kontrol
    .142 19 .200* .944 19 .312
    (Konfensional)
    a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
    *. This is a lower bound of the true
    significance.
    Uji Homogenitas

    Test of Homogeneity of Variances


    Kemampuan Mahasiswa Mengembangkan PTK
    Levene
    Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
    .665 3 80 .576

    Uji Paired Sample T-Test

    Paired Samples Test


    Sig. (2-
    Paired Differences t df tailed)
    95% Confidence
    Std. Interval of the
    Std. Error Difference
    Mean Deviation Mean Lower Upper
    Pair 1 Pre-Test Eksperimen
    (metode Whiteboard
    Annimation) - Post-Test -37.565 11.688 2.437 -42.620 -32.511 -15.413 22 .000
    Eksperimen (metode
    Whiteboard Annimation)
    Pair 2 Pre-Test Kontrol
    (Konfensional) - Post-Test -16.684 9.528 2.186 -21.277 -12.092 -7.633 18 .000
    Kontrol (Konfensional)

    Uji Independent Sample T-test


    Group Statistics
    Std. Error
    Kelas N Mean Std. Deviation Mean
    Kemampuan Mahasiswa Pre-Test Eksperimen
    Mengembangkan PTK (metode Whiteboard 23 50.96 7.951 1.658
    Annimation)
    Post-Test Eksperimen
    (metode Whiteboard 23 88.52 10.162 2.119
    Annimation)
    Independent Samples Test
    Levene's Test
    for Equality of
    Variances t-test for Equality of Means
    95% Confidence
    Sig. Interval of the
    (2- Mean Std. Error Difference
    F Sig. t df tailed) Difference Difference Lower Upper
    Kemampuan Equal
    -
    Mahasiswa variances .468 .497 -13.962 44 .000 -37.565 2.690 -42.987
    32.143
    Mengembangk assumed
    an PTK Equal
    -
    variances not -13.962 41.595 .000 -37.565 2.690 -42.996
    32.134
    assumed

    You might also like