You are on page 1of 1

In,

The Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate,

Gaya.

Tekari P. S. Case No - 487/17

U/S – 341,323,504,506,379 and 34 of I P C

State

Vs

Pawan kumar.................................Accused

That the humble compromise


petition on behalf of informant
Vijay Kumar s/o late Lalu Yadav
R/o- Pandey Bigha P.s. Tekari.

Most Respectfully showeth:-

1. That due to intervention of friend, co-villagers and relatives both the


parties compromises the case.
2. That due to compromise both the parties do not want to proceed with the
case.
3. That good feeling has been restored between the parties.
4. That all sections are compoundable.
5. That the both parties put their signature on this compromise petition.
It is therefore prayed that
your honour may be pleased
to enlarge the compromise
petition and pass order
which deems fit and proper.

And for this petitioner shall ever pray

Informant accused

You might also like