The case between ICICI Bank and Sanjay was scheduled for the complainant's evidence but the complainant witness was not present. The defense requested an adjournment which the judge granted until September 23rd for the complainant to present its full evidence and to file a response to the application to substitute its authorized representative.
The case between ICICI Bank and Sanjay was scheduled for the complainant's evidence but the complainant witness was not present. The defense requested an adjournment which the judge granted until September 23rd for the complainant to present its full evidence and to file a response to the application to substitute its authorized representative.
The case between ICICI Bank and Sanjay was scheduled for the complainant's evidence but the complainant witness was not present. The defense requested an adjournment which the judge granted until September 23rd for the complainant to present its full evidence and to file a response to the application to substitute its authorized representative.
Present: Advocate Sh.Jatin Khullar, counsel for complainant.
Accused on bail with Advocate Sh.Surinder Rana.
Today, the case was fixed for evidence of complainant. No CW is present.
Reply not filed to the application for substituting of the authorized representative Power of Attorney of the complainant bank. Learned counsel for the accused prayed for adjournment. Heard. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances and interest of justice, adjournment prayed is allowed Now, case is adjourned to 23.09.2019 for entire evidence of the complainant to be produced at own responsibility as well as filing reply the application for substituting of the authorized representative ,subject to last opportunity.
Nazmeen Singh, PCS
Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Date of Order : 05.09.2019 Chandigarh. Hitesh Kumar UID No.PB0551 Stenographer Gr-III