Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Display - PDF - 2022-11-28T212349.476

    Uploaded by

    AAKASH BHATIA
    12 views1 page
    The case of Naresh Vs. Nirmala involved a hearing to address defendant 2's failure to file a written statement and reply to an injunction application. The court granted an adjournment to November 25, 2019 for defendant 2 to file these documents, as well as a power of attorney. The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Rohtak, Ravi, presided over the hearing and issued the order.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    display_pdf - 2022-11-28T212349.476

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The case of Naresh Vs. Nirmala involved a hearing to address defendant 2's failure to file a written statement and reply to an injunction application. The court granted an adjournment to November 25, 2019 for defendant 2 to file these documents, as well as a power of attorney. The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Rohtak, Ravi, presided over the hearing and issued the order.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    12 views1 page

    Display - PDF - 2022-11-28T212349.476

    Uploaded by

    AAKASH BHATIA
    The case of Naresh Vs. Nirmala involved a hearing to address defendant 2's failure to file a written statement and reply to an injunction application. The court granted an adjournment to November 25, 2019 for defendant 2 to file these documents, as well as a power of attorney. The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Rohtak, Ravi, presided over the hearing and issued the order.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Naresh Vs. Nirmala etc.

    506
    Present: Sh. Vinod Singh Malik, counsel for plaintiff.
    Sh. Shiv Partap, counsel for defendant No. 1.
    Sh. N. S. Nandal, counsel for defendant No. 2.
    Fresh memo of appearance on behalf of defendant No. 2 filed. Written
    statement and reply to injunction application not filed. Adjournment sought. Heard.
    Allowed. Now, the case is adjourned to 25.11.2019 for filing written statement and
    reply to injunction application. Power of attorney on behalf of defendant No. 2 be
    also filed on the date fixed.
    (Ravi)
    CJ(JD), Rohtak.
    UID No. HR0409
    26.09.2019

    " I attest to the accuracy and


    authenticity of this document."
    Digitally signed by PRIYANKA SHARMA
    Date: 2019.09.26 16:43:08 +0530

    You might also like