Doc #

Institute of Space Technology Date of Issue

AVE-ELC_IIL-LP-
CS No: 39
Assessment Rubrics
Page No. 1 of 6

DEPARTMENT & PROGRAM: Department of Avionics Engineering Program

COURSE CODE-COURSE NAME: 208151 Electronics-II Lab Lab CR: 0-1

ASSESMENT:
Lab Reports 15-20 %
Semester Project 20-25 %
Lab Mid 25- 30 %
Final Exam 40 - 45 %
___________________________________
Total 100%

Assessment Criteria
1. Lab report

The prime objective of the lab report is to guide the students towards the practical
environment, produce a practical working mechanism, assess their results critically,
indicate the sources of error, reach some concrete outcome and document it in a proper
report. Students would submit their lab report based on the criteria given below:
Lab Report Delivery and Assessment

Students would deliver the Lab report one week after performing the experiment. The
report should be based on the following format:

1. Title page (Includes Experiment title, class, department, Instructor’s name, Date)
2. Theory (brief account)
3. Procedure
4. Observation and Calculations
5. Plots/Graphs
6. Results / discussions
7. Safety precautions

Lab Report Assessment Rubrics: The assessment of the lab report would be based on the
rubrics given in Table-1 below.
 Doc #
Institute of Space Technology Date of Issue
AVE-ELC_IIL-LP-
CS No: 39
Assessment Rubrics
Page No. 2 of 6

Average (50%
Parameter Good (>75%) Poor (˂50 %)
to 75%)
Followed
Format Followed Partially Did not Follow
Completely
Gave little details
Gave relevant Gave incomplete
Theory or no details of the
theory completely theory
theory
Took complete Took partially Took insufficient
Observations
observations observations. observation.
Performed Performed
Performed correct
Calculations partially correct incorrect
calculations.
calculations. calculations.
Compromised on Did not use proper
Proper graphs used
the use of proper graphs along with
along with
Plots/Graphs graphs and appropriate
appropriate
appropriate captions, and
captions.
captions. illustrations.
Moderate answer Not very
Critical about the
of the conclusion. convincing
Conclusion conclusions/reasons
Not all reasons are conclusion based
behind the result.
given. on the results.

Table 1: Lab Report Assessment Rubrics

Performance Assessment Rubrics

2. Performance
 Doc #
Institute of Space Technology Date of Issue
AVE-ELC_IIL-LP-
CS No: 39
Assessment Rubrics
Page No. 3 of 6

Students shall be checked for their work during the experiment and making calculations.
The assessment criterion for it is given below.

Average (50% to
Parameter Good (>75%)
75%)
Poor (˂50 %)

All safety
Safety precautions
precautions Careless about
Safety Precautions were observed
were safety precautions.
partially.
observed
Confidence
and Partially
Don’t know how to
Procedure for starting knowing confidence about
start.
how to how to start
start
Observed
the proper Partially followed Followed wrong
Procedure for shutting
sequence the sequence. sequence to stop.
to stop.
Observation of the
Accurate Partially accurate Inaccurate
experiment

Table 2: Performance Assessment Rubrics

3. Final Viva/Final Performance

Excellent Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory

 Doc #
Institute of Space Technology Date of Issue
AVE-ELC_IIL-LP-
CS No: 39
Assessment Rubrics
Page No. 4 of 6

Objectives >80%-100% >60%-80% >40%-60% 0-40%

Assembled circuit Correct set-up Circuit is Circuit connection is
accurately, all of equipment, generally not accurate; help is
Circuit connections are well managed. workable with required with several
accurately joined. several details major details.
Connections
that need
20 refinement.
Technique Technique Technique Technique developed
developed to developed is developed for lacks major aspect of
solve problem is just suitable experiments experiment
highly thoughtful for execution need refinement. execution. Data is
accurate. of Some data is poorly organized or
Measurements experiment missing and / or grossly incomplete,
taken are .Data collected data deviates result is not relevant
consistent and is accurate and drastically from with the data
Data exact. Draws consistent. the expected recorded. Did the lab
Measurements correct and norms. but needs help to
The data
useful conclusion manipulate the
appreciably
40 of experiment
within the
result.
and capture
expected
related
norms. Lab
parameters
tasks assigned
without any help.
are done well
Lab tasks
and In time.
assigned are
done well and In
time.

Elucidation The student The student The student The student could
expresses with states in was just able not speak well
30 detail about some detail to speak with clarity about
how the about the clearly about the details of
experiment experiment what was experiment. He
was conducted and explains learned in the have just
and explains the parts research completed the
how problems that went process and process of
 Doc #
Institute of Space Technology Date of Issue
AVE-ELC_IIL-LP-
CS No: 39
Assessment Rubrics
Page No. 5 of 6

were well and was able to experiment

overcome. those that offer some
did not. An examples
The student
explanation
focuses on
of how
several points
difficulties
with greater
were
depth resulting
overcome is
in greater
not included
clarity.

Wrap-up Winded up all Winded-up Student Student needed

eqpt all eqpt needed a several reminders
10 efficiently. timely and reminder to or teacher
Returned all returned clean-up and intervention to
materials materials. return return material.
appropriately Usually left materials. Do not take care
& responsibly. working area of materials.
Left test and in good
measurement condition
equipment in
orderly
manner

Table 3: Final Viva/Performance Assessment Rubrics

4. Project Assessments Rubrics

Performance Excellent Good Satisfactory

>80%-100% >60%-80% >40%-60%
 Doc #
Institute of Space Technology Date of Issue
AVE-ELC_IIL-LP-
CS No: 39
Assessment Rubrics
Page No. 6 of 6

All components accurately Correct set-up of Assembling of

placed, very neat and components, well component is
Components
organized managed generally workable
assembling
with several details
10 that need
refinement.
Assigned project is Assigned project is Assigned project is
designed meeting all designed meeting designed meeting
requirements & is requirements & is few requirements &
workable. Results and
Design & workable. Results is half-way efficient.
conclusions drawn are
Analysis accurate. Methods and conclusions Results and
proposed for improvement drawn are well. conclusions drawn
40 are also correct. Methods proposed are partially correct.
for improvement are Methods proposed
also up to the mark. for improvement are
insufficient.
Report well organized, Report reasonably Report is
appropriately sectioned, no well documented. satisfactory,
Project Report grammar or spelling errors, May be lacking some a lot of mistakes.
uses professional style minor aspects
25
Project Presented a comprehensive Presented good Have limited
Demonstration knowledge regarding overview of project understanding of
project and answer all and support their project, but not well
(5-10)minutes questions with excellent recommendations supported or argued
justifications and evidence with good reasons for.
25 and evidence.