International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology E-ISSN 0976-3945

Research Paper
STUDY OF WIND LOAD EFFECTS ON TALL RC CHIMNEYS
B. Siva Konda Reddy1 V.Rohini Padmavathi 2 Ch. Srikanth3

Address for Correspondence

1
Assistant Professor Dept. of Civil Engg., 2 PG Student JNTUH College of Engineering,
Hyderabad, A.P India
3
Assistant Professor in Civil Engineering, Samskruthi College of Engg & Tech Hyderabad, A.P India
ABSTRACT
Wind is essentially the large scale movement of free air due to thermal currents. It plays an important role in design of tall
structures because it exerts static and dynamic loads whose effects on a slender structure, such as a chimney are significant.
The wind load exerted at any point on a chimney can be considered as the sum of quasistatic and a dynamic load component.
This paper presents the Study of along and across wind effects on a 275m tall RCC lined chimneys for Ist & VIth wind zones
of India and the results indicate that in shell completed condition, for zone I (i.e basic wind speed 33m/s) across winds are
governing and for highest wind zone of VI (i.e basic wind speed 55m/s), along wind loads are governing rather than the
across wind loads. The analysis is carried out using STAAD PRO &MS excel spread sheets.
KEYWORDS RCC Chimney, Along & across wind, Vortex shedding, Different methods, Wind zones, Natural frequency.
1. INTRODUCTION: on a 275m high RCC twin flue chimney for two wind
A chimney is a system for venting hot flue gases or zones (i.e Minimum basic wind speed of 33m/s in
smoke from a boiler, stove, furnace or fireplace to the zone I and Maximum basic wind speed of 55m/s in
outside atmosphere. They are typically almost zone VI). The 275m chimney as shown in Fig.1
vertical to ensure that the hot gases flow smoothly, consists of a self-supporting 275m tall twin flue RCC
drawing air into the combustion through the chimney chimney lined with mild steel and stainless steel
effect. Chimneys are tall to increase their draw of air whose unit weight is 78.5 KN/m3. The Chimney shell
for combustion and to disperse the pollutants in flue is discretized into 33 segments/zones along the height
gases over a greater area in order to reduce the for calculation purpose. STAAD.PRO is used for
pollutant concentrations in compliance with calculation of the Natural frequency of the chimney
regulatory or other limits. The first industrial due to self-weight including lining. MS Excel spread
chimneys were built in the mid 17th century when it sheets are generated to calculate the wind loads, shear
was first understood how they could improve the forces and bending moments at different locations in
combustion of a furnace by increasing the draft of air the chimney.
into the combustion zone. As such, they played an 3. ESTIMATION OF WIND LOAD EFFECTS
important part in the development of refractory ON A CHIMNEY:
furnaces and a coal-based metallurgical industry, one 3.1 ALONG WIND EFFECTS: Along-wind loads
of the key sectors of the early Industrial Revolution. are caused by the ‘drag’ component of the wind force
Most 18th century industrial chimneys generally on the chimney. This is accompanied by ‘gust
located adjacent to a steam-generating boiler or buffeting’ causing a dynamic response in the
industrial furnace and the gases are carried to it with direction of the mean flow. Along-wind effect is due
ductwork. Chimneys with height exceeding 150 m to the direct buffeting action, when the wind acts on
are considered as tall chimneys. However it is not the face of a structure. For the purpose of estimation
only a matter of height but also the aspect ratio when of these loads the chimney is modeled as a cantilever
it comes to classifying a chimney as tall. Today, fixed to the ground. The wind is then modeled to act
Reinforced Concrete is the dominant material used on the exposed face of the chimney causing
for the construction of tall chimneys and for short predominant moments in the chimney. Additional
chimneys precast concrete with or without pre complications arise from the fact that the wind does
stressing, Modern industrial chimneys consists of a not generally blow at a fixed rate. Wind generally
concrete windshield with a number of steel stacks on blows as gusts, this requires that the corresponding
the inside. loads and hence the response be taken as dynamic.
Wind is essentially the large-scale movement of free True evaluation of the along-wind loads involves
air due to thermal currents. It plays an important role modeling the concerned chimney as a bluff body
in chimney design because of its capacity to transport having incident turbulent wind flow. However, the
and disperse pollutants and also because it exerts mathematical rigor involved in such an analysis is not
static and dynamic loads whose effects on a slender acceptable to practicing engineers. Hence most codes
structure, such as a chimney, are significant. It is very use an ‘equivalent static’ procedure known as the
difficult to predict wind effects precisely by gust factor method (GFM). This helps in simplifying
analytical procedures because of winds uncertain the incident load due to the mean wind. The actual
variability and therefore a designer is forced to use wind load is calculated and the results are amplified
approximate design techniques. by means of a gust factor to take care of the dynamic
2. OBJECTIVE: nature of the loading. The gust factor is defined as the
The main objective of this paper is to get the ratio of the expected peak load to the mean load.
comparative study of along and across wind effects

IJAET/Vol.III/ Issue II/April-June, 2012/92-97

 International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology
Fig-1. Section showing 275m tall RCC chimney
modeled in Staad Pro.
3.2 ACROSS WIND EFFECTS: Across -wind
loads are caused by the corresponding ‘lift’
component of the wind force on the chimney. This is
associated with the phenomenon of ‘vortex shedding’
which causes the chimney to oscillate in a direction
perpendicular to the direction of wind flow. The
across wind response of a chimney occurs mainly due
to vortex shedding and velocity dependent forces.
The across-wind response of tall slender structures in
atmospheric turbulence involves a number of
complex fluid-structure interaction phenomena. The
principal source of excitation arises from vortex
shedding, but if the motion induced is significant,
other velocity dependent forces begin to play an
important role. Further, the longitudinal and lateral
fluctuations in the approaching flow give rise to
across-wind buffeting forces. The shedding of
vortices is fairly regular in the sub critical range
when Reynolds number (Re) <3x105 and ultra-critical
range (Re>3x106), whereas it is random in the super
critical range (3x105<Re<3x106). Normally for
chimneys, Re is sub critical and this permits design to
be based on an assumption that the excitation is
periodic. When Re is super- critical, excitation is
random and the response being small, this case does
not generally control design. Across wind analysis of
chimney is required only if the critical wind speeds
for any mode of oscillation is less than the mean
design wind speed.
Fig.2 Vortex formation due to wind
Figure-2 shows how the airflow pattern changes with
increase in wind speed. At low wind speed two
stationary vortices form immediately behind the
section. As air speed increases the vortices detach
themselves alternately, forming a ‘vortex street’
IJAET/Vol.III/ Issue II/April-June, 2012/XXXX
E-ISSN 0976-3945
behind the section. At a critical wind speed the point
of separation moves back and the ‘vortex street’
becomes narrower. At this wind speed the position of
point of separation is not stable and moves from one
point to the other. Because of this vortex shedding
across-wind oscillation takes place.
4. CALCULATION OF STATIC WIND LOAD:
4.1 Along wind load –Simplified method (Peak
factor method):
Static wind pressure Pz, acting normal to the surface
of chimney shall be taken as specified in IS 875 (Part
3): 1987 for the appropriate wind zone, terrain and
topography. To determine the wind force acting at
different heights of chimney, the chimney shall be
divided into ten or more sections along its height.
The along wind load or drag force per unit height of
the chimney at any level shall be calculated from the
equation as per Clause No A-4.1 of IS 4998 (Part
1):1992.
Fz, = Pz CD d z (1)
Where
Pz = design wind pressure obtained in accordance with IS
875 (part3):1987.
Z = height of any section of the chimney in m measured
from the top of foundation.
CD = diameter of chimney at height z in m.
d z = external diameter of chimney of Kth zone.
NOTE — Take the appropriate factor depending upon the class of
the structure as defined in the IS 875 (part3):1987.
4.2 Along wind load –Random response method
(Gust factor method):
The along wind load per unit height at any height z
on a chimney shall be calculated from the equation:
Fz = Fzm + Fzf (2)
Where, Fzm is the wind load in N/m height due to
Hourly mean wind speed at height z and is given by:
Fzm = Pz CD d z (3)
Fzf is the wind load in N/m height due to the
fluctuating component of wind at height z and is
given by:
Fzf = 3 (G-1)/H2 (z/H) ∫0H Fzm z d z (4)
Pz=Design pressure at height z, due to HMW is
obtained as 0.6V2 z (N/m2)
G = 1+gr r √ {B+SE/β}
gr = Peak factor defined as the ratio of the expected
peak value to RMS of the fluctuating load
= √ (2 logevT) + 0.577/√ (2logeVT)
VT = 3600f1/(1+Bβ/SE)1/2
r = twice the turbulence intensity
0.622-0.178 log10H
B = [1 + (H/265)0.63]-0.88
E=[123(f1/V10) H0.21]/[1+330f1/V10]2 H0.42]0.83
S= size reduction factor
= [1 + 5.78 (f1/V10)1.14 H0.98]-0.88
V10 = hourly mean wind speed in m/s at 10m above ground
level=Vb k2
f1 = natural frequency of chimney in the first mode of
vibration in HZ
5. CALCULATION OF DYNAMIC WIND
LOADS
5.1 Across wind load –Simplified method:
The amplitude of vortex excited oscillation
perpendicular to direction of wind for any mode of
oscillation shall be calculated by the formula:
 International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology
H The amplitude of vortex excited oscillation
∫ d z φzi d z
ηoi = 0 s
H
∫φ
2
dz
zi
0 π 2 S n2
ηoi = peak tip deflection due to vortex shedding in the ith
mode of vibration in m
d z = external diameter of chimney.
CL= peak oscillatory lift coefficient to be taken as 0.16
H = height of chimney in m.
Ksi = mass damping parameter for the ith mode of vibration
Sn= Strouhal number to be taken as 0.2
Øzi= mode shape function normalized with respect to the
dynamic amplitude at top of the chimney in the ith mode of
vibration
Calculation of mass damping parameter (Ksi ) :
Periodic response of the chimney in the ith mode of
vibration is very strongly dependent on
dimensionless mass damping parameter Ksi
calculated by the formula:
2m ei .δ s
K si =
σ .d 2
Where
mei= equivalent mass per unit length in kg/m in the ith
mode of vibration, as defined in A-4.2.3
δs= logarithmic decrement of structural damping=2πβ
β= structural damping as a fraction of critical damping to
be taken as 0.016
σ= mass density of air to be taken as 1.2kg/m3
d = effective diameter taken as average diameter over the
top 1/3 height of chimney in m
Calculation of Equivalent mass per unit length
(mei):
The equivalent mass per unit length in ith mode of
vibration (mei ) shall be calculated by the formula:
H d co
∫m
0
z φ 2 dz zi
mei = s
H dco= Outside diameter of chimney at 1/3 height from
∫φ d
2
zi z top in m.
0 6. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
When the mass per unit length has to be used in a
numerical method of integration, it is recommended
that the mass of the segment above section
considered be added to the mass of the segment
below the section and the total mass so obtained
divided by the total length of the two segments.
5.2 Across wind load –Random response method:
Calculation of across wind load is made by first
calculating the peak response amplitude at the
specified mode of vibration (usually the first or
second). The relevant expressions for chimneys with
taper less than or equal to 1 in 50 in Eq 16 below
respectively.
Taper is defined as {2(dav-dtop)/H} where dav is the
average outer diameter over the top half of chimney
and dtop is the outer diameter at top.
1. For chimneys with little or no tapper (i.e. If the
average Taper over the top one third height is
less than or equal to 1 in 50)- The modal
response, at a critical wind speed shall be
calculated by the formula:
f1d
Vcri =
Sn
IJAET/Vol.III/ Issue II/April-June, 2012/XXXX
E-ISSN 0976-3945
(5)
perpendicular to direction of wind for any mode of
oscillation shall be calculated by the formula:
2
1 . 25 C L d φ Hi σ d { (π L ) / 2 ( I + 2 )
×
m ei
η oi = H
∫φ
2 2
[1 / H zi d z ]( β − k a σ d / m ei
0
(9)
ηoi= peak tip deflection due to vortex shedding in the ith
mode of vibration
CL = RMS lift coefficient to be taken as 0.12
L = Correlation length in diameters, which may be taken
as 1.0 in the absence of field data.
Ka= Aero dynamic damping coefficient to be taken as 0.5
Calculation of shear force and Bending Moment:
The sectional shear force and bending moment (Mzoi)
at any height z0, for the ith mode of vibration, shall be
calculated from the following equations:
H
Fzoi = 4π 2 f12η oi ∫ m zφ zi d z (9)
(6) zo
H
M zoi = 4π 2 f12ηoi ∫ mzφzi ( z − zo)d z (10)
zo
Where
f1= natural frequency of the chimney in Hz in the mode of
vibration
mz= mass per unit length of the chimney at section z in
kg/m
Calculation of Natural Frequency of Vortex
Shedding:
The frequency of vortex shedding can be calculated
from the equation:
S nV
f1 = (11)
S= Strouhal number assumed as 0.2
V= Wind speed (Ve-at resonance) in m/s. and
(7)
Keeping all basic design parameters of chimney
(shell height, top and bottom diameter of the shell)
constant a comparison of wind pressures for along
wind and across wind, associated shear forces,
bending moments, deflections in each wind zone are
presented table 1 & in the Fig 3 to Fig 8. The results
are compared with respect to the values of along
wind (simplified method) as datum in each zone.
6.1 Wind load Effects in wind Zone I:
From figures 3, 4& 5, it is observed that the shear
force, bending moment and deflections at critical
section in a chimney located in wind zone I are very
high in across wind condition (SFM).These values
are increased by 137%, 161%, & 96.50%
respectively compared to simplified method. At the
base of the chimney shear force, bending moment
and deflections are increased by 33%, 48% & 93.0%
respectively.
6.2 Wind load Effects in wind Zone VI:
From figures 6, 7& 8, it is observed that the shear
force, bending moment and deflections at critical
section in a chimney located in wind zone VI are
(8)
very high in along wind condition (GFM).These
values are increased by 41%, 44% & 44%
 International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology E-ISSN 0976-3945

respectively compared to simplified method. At the
base of the chimney shear force, bending moment
and deflections are increased by 21%, 31% & 51%
respectively.
7. CONCLUSIONS
• At critical section (i.e 1/2 to 1/3rd height
from top), across wind methods are
maximum than the along wind methods.
This is due to the reason that at critical
section, vortex shedding effect on chimney
structure will be more.
• The shear force, bending moment and the
deflection in the across wind methods are
same in both the zones due to this reason,
the across wind calculation is directly
proportional to the weight of the chimney,
frequency and its mode shapes, but not on
the wind speed. Hence across wind load is
not increasing with the increasing wind
speed.
• For zone I, The shear force bending moment
and deflection are maximum and governing
in across wind (SFM).
• For zone VI, along wind methods are
increased with increasing wind speed. The
shear force bending moment and deflection
are maximum and governing in along wind
(GFM).

TABLE 1- Comparison of wind load effects for I and VI wind zones for a 275m tall RCC chimney
S.NO DESCRIPTION ZONE I ZONE VI
Critical Critical
At top section At bottom At top section At bottom
Along wind(simplified method)
1 Basic speed(m/s) 33 55
2 Design wind pressure(N/m2) 1274 1194 685 3744 3512 2014
3 Shear force(kN) 15 1440 4060 13 4240 11920
4 Bending Moment (kNM) 0 69430 595960 0 204030 1751390
5 Deflection (mm) 166 72 0 213 487 0
Along wind(gust factor method)
1 Design wind speed(N/m2) 837 767 356 2461 2255 1045
2 Shear force(kN) 0 1600 4120 0 5950 14430
3 Bending Moment (kNM) 0 78590 631130 0 293070 2278260
4 Deflection (mm) 190 88 0 698 321 0
Across wind(simplified method)
1 Shear force(kN) 150 2970 4140 15 2970 4140
2 Bending Moment (kNM) 0 179990 865670 0 179990 865670
3 Deflection (mm) 326 139 0 326 122.50 0
Across wind(Random response
method)
1 Shear force(kN) 1860 2580 9.13 1860 2580
2 Bending Moment (kNM) 0 112490 541040 0 112490 541040
3 Deflection (mm) 204 87 0 204 87

Figure-3 Variation of shear force for different methods along height in wind Zone I

IJAET/Vol.III/ Issue II/April-June, 2012/XXXX

 International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology E-ISSN 0976-3945

Figure-4 Variation of Bending moment for different methods along height in wind Zone I

Figure-5 Variation of Chimney Deflection for different methods along height in wind Zone I

Figure-6 Variation of shear force for different methods along height in wind Zone VI

Figure-7 Variation of Bending moment for different methods along height in wind Zone VI

IJAET/Vol.III/ Issue II/April-June, 2012/XXXX

 International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology E-ISSN 0976-3945

.
Figure-8 Variation of Chimney Deflection for different methods along height in wind Zone VI

REFERENCES Earth sciences and Engineering, October 2011, pp. 508-

1. Batham, J.P., “Parameters required for the wind-tunnel
simulation of the wind loads on large power station
chimneys”, Wind Engineering and Industrial dynamics,
Elsevier science publishers -Amsterdam, Vol.18, 1985,
pp.75-90.
2. Milford R.V., “Structural reliability and cross wind
response of tall chimneys”. Engineering structures,
Butterworth & Co. (Publishers) Ltd, Vol.4, 1982,
pp.263-270.
3. Reddy K.R.C, Jaiswal O.R and Godbole P.N, “Wind
response control of tall RC chimneys”,Wind and
Engineering, Vol. 8, 2011, pp. 1- 9.
4. Reddy K. R. C, Jaiswal O. R. and P. N. Godbole.,
“Wind and Earthquake Analysis of Tall RC Chimneys”,
511.
5. Vickery B.J. and Basu.R. “Simplified approaches to the
evaluation of the across wind Response of chimneys”,
Wind Engineering and Industrial dynamics, Elsevier
science Publishers -Amsterdam, 1983, pp. 153-166.
6. Manohar, S.N., “Tall Chimneys”, Tata McGraw-Hill
Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi, 1981.
7. Code of practice for design loads for buildings and
structures, IS: 875(Part-III):1987, published by Bureau
of Indian standards.
8. Criteria for design of Reinforced concrete Chimneys,
IS: 4998(Part-I):1992, published by Bureau of Indian
standards.

IJAET/Vol.III/ Issue II/April-June, 2012/XXXX