Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EDTC630-AUP Assignment
Employee AUP:
http://www.boarddocs.com/mabe/garrett/Board.nsf/goto?open&id=9X57AG6B96B9
Student AUP:
http://www.boarddocs.com/mabe/garrett/Board.nsf/goto?open&id=9X59J3714183
Dear Mrs. Rinker and Members of the Board,
I’ve thoroughly read the Garrett County Public Schools’ Acceptable Use Policy for
Students and Acceptable Use Policy for Employees and I’ve also researched various resources
for information. I’ve concluded that the content of the policies is sound but should include a
couple of elements.
Following a checklist from Scholastic (Why Have a Technology Policy in Your School or
Library?, n.d.), considerations from Common Sense Education (1-to-1 Essentials - Acceptable
Use Policies, n.d.), and tips from a Department of Education article (Student-Centered
Acceptable Use Policy, n.d.), I recommend that the following areas should be included in an
updated revision:
a statement that all purposes are in compliance with local, state, federal, and
international laws;
GCPS’ AUP for Students includes an agreement that is expected to be signed by the
student and parent. However, the AUP document does not include 1) parental responsibilities
for their child using the network or devices or 2) parents, themselves, using the network or
devices. While parents are unable to monitor their child’s usage during school hours, if students
were to commit a criminal act on the network, parents will have to assume some responsibility
for their underage child. Additionally, if parents connect to the network (many students know the
“Guest” WIFI password) or assist their child on a school device, there should be detailed
procedures written.
While students and employees understand that some acts may initiate legal action (theft,
copyright, plagiarism, etc.) neither AUPs use terminology to express that all usage on the
network should be in compliance with local, state, federal, and international laws. The AUP
reads as if it’s a violation of the school- not the law- if infractions occur. It’s important that both
students and employees know that the implications of their actions may extend beyond the
school system.
Social media (social networks, blogs, social bookmarking sites, media sharing, wikis,
etc.) is not mentioned in either AUP or in the signed agreements. Many social media sites are
blocked for student use, but are advancing as educational tools (Pinterest, Instagram, blogs,
YouTube, closed Facebook groups, etc.). The AUPs should state the guidelines and
expectations for social media use with school devices and personal devices, during school
recommend a parallel document that is designed for elementary age students. A multimedia
presentation with engaging visuals and audio, and fewer written words, would help students
Overall, both policies are reliable, realistic documents that are easy for users to
Acceptable and Responsible Use of Technological Resources for Employees. (2015). Procedures.
Retrieved from:
http://www.boarddocs.com/mabe/garrett/Board.nsf/goto?open&id=9X59J3714183#
Acceptable and Responsible Use of Technological Resources for Students. (2015). Procedures.
Common Sense (n.d.). 1-to-1 essentials- Acceptable use policies. Retrieved from:
https://www.commonsensemedia.org/educators/1to1/aups
https://tech.ed.gov/stories/student-centered-acceptable-use-policy/
Why Have a Technology Policy in Your School or Library? (n.d.) Retrieved from
http://www.scholastic.com/librarians/tech/techpolicy.htm