DATA KETEBALAN BEJANA TEKAN 1-v 520A

LOKASI
A B C
POSISI I II III I II III I
17.1 17 16.9 17.1 16.9 16.7 17.1
Short Short Long Short Short Long Short
12
17.1 17 17 17.1 16.2 14.96 17.1
Short Short Long Short Short Long Short
3
17.1 17.09 16.4 17.1 16.8 16.4 17.1
Short Short Long Short Short Long Short
6
17.1 17.09 16.8 17.1 16.8 16.4 17.1
Short Short Long Short Short Long Short
9

Diameter 62" Material A515-70 100% RT, 440 Psi, Temp 100F

LOKASI
Posisi A B C
I II III I II III I
12 17.1 17 16.9 17.1 16.9 16.7 17.1
Short Short Long Short Short Long Short
Corrosion Rate
Remaining Life

Criticallity
MAWP

Conclussion
3 17.1 17 17 17.1 16.2 14.96 17.1
Short Short Long Short Short Long Short
Corrosion Rate
Remaining Life

Probability of Failure
Consequences
Criticallity
MAWP
Inspection Freq.
Conclussion
6 17.1 17.09 16.4 17.1 16.8 16.4 17.1
Short Short Long Short Short Long Short
Corrosion Rate
Remaining Life
Probability of Failure
Consequences
 Criticallity
MAWP
Inspection Freq.
Conclussion
9 17.1 17.09 16.8 17.1 16.8 16.4 17.1
Short Short Long Short Short Long Short
Corrosion Rate
Remaining Life
Probability of Failure
Consequences
Criticallity
MAWP
Inspection Freq.
Conclussion
Recommendation T
LOKASI
C D E
II III I II III I II III
15.09 13.02 17.1 17 16.9 17.1 17 16.8
Short Long Short Short Long Short Short Long

17.09 14.09 17.1 17.09 16.8 17.1 16.8 15.8

Short Long Short Short Long Short Short Long

17.1 16.8 2.3 2.3 2.3 17.1 16.4 15.9

Short Long Short Short Long Short Short Long

16.8 16.4 17.1 16.8 15.4 17.1 16.4 14.8

Short Long Short Short Long Short Short Long

LOKASI
C D E
II III I II III I II III
15.09 13.02 17.1 17 16.9 17.1 17 16.8
Short Long Short Short Long Short Short Long

17.09 14.09 17.1 17.09 16.8 17.1 16.8 15.8

Short Long Short Short Long Short Short Long

17.1 16.8 2.3 2.3 2.3 17.1 16.4 15.9

Short Long Short Short Long Short Short Long
16.8 16.4 17.1 16.8 15.4 17.1 16.4 14.8
Short Long Short Short Long Short Short Long

T
 TUGAS RISK BASED INSPECTION (RBI)

KELOMPOK IV

P&ID Dehidration Unit

A B C 12

9 3

Proces piping Line No 52501 Thickness Data

LOKASI
A B C
POSISI I II III I II III I II III
12.2 12.01 11.09 12.201 12.109 12.1 3.2 3.2 3.21
12 Short Short Long Short Short Long Short Short Long

12.19 12.01 12.01 12.2 12.108 12.107 3.4 3.4 3.4

3 Short Short Long Short Short Long Short Short Long

12.201 12.2 12.109 12.202 12.201 12.2 3.2 3.2 3.2

6 Short Short Long Short Short Long Short Short Long

12.109 12.108 12.107 12.2 12.2 12.18 12.2 12.1 12.01

9 Short Short Long Short Short Long Short Short Long

Rumus Corrosion Rate: B3.1.3 / API 570

Corrosion Mapping
MAWP
Criticality Ranking Based on individual Pipe System (Non Pressure)
Diameter 3" Material A5L B Schedule 80, tn= 0,3" High Consequences UTM 100, 1200 Psi, Temp 200⁰F
the histroy of maintenance record is
INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE STRATEGY
Summary & Recommendation

Remaining life E =
rumus: = (tA - t) / CR P = Psi
D = Inci = mm
ketebalan (t) = P*D/2(SE+P*Y) T = Deg F
minimum pressure
= mm S = Psi
vessel
(tmin) = (t+CA) mm Y =
= mm CA=CR =

MAWP (11,09mm) = 2SEt/D t MAWP = mm

= Psi
= mm
MAWP (3,2mm) = 2SEt/D
= Psi

Corrosion Rate
LO KAS I
Posisi A B C
I II III I II III I II III
12 12.2 12.01 11.09 12.201 12.109 12.1 3.2 3.2 3.21
Short Short Long Short Short Long Short Short Long
Corrosion Rate

Remaining Life

MAWP

Conclussion

LO KAS I
Posisi A B C
I II III I II III I II III
3 12.19 12.01 12.01 12.2 12.108 12.107 3.4 3.4 3.4
Short Short Long Short Short Long Short Short Long
Corrosion Rate

Remaining Life

MAWP

Conclussion
 Conclussion

LO KAS I
Posisi A B C
I II III I II III I II III
6 12.201 12.2 12.109 12.202 12.201 12.2 3.2 3.2 3.2
Short Short Long Short Short Long Short Short Long
Corrosion Rate

Remaining Life

MAWP

Conclussion

LO KAS I
Posisi A B C
I II III I II III I II III
9 12.109 12.108 12.107 12.2 12.2 12.18 12.2 12.1 12.01
Short Long Short Short Long Short Short Long Short
Corrosion Rate

Remaining Life

MAWP

Conclussion

Summary Lokasi Kritis Berdasarkan Remaining Life (RL) < 4Thn

Posisi A B C Total/3
12
3
6
9
Average =
note: See the Reason below POF =

I. Probability of Failure (PoF)

Remaining Life (RL) Probability of Failure (PoF)

RL ≤ 4 tahun tinggi 1
4 < RL < 8 tahun menengah 2
RL ≥ 8 tahun rendah 3

Remaining Life = 4 < RL < 8 tahun sehingga Probability of Failure (PoF) ....

II. Consequence of Failure (CoF)

1. Stand by availibility (S)

Stand by availibility (S) Rating

emergency shutdown (stop produksi) tinggi 1
partial shutdown (produksi berkurang) menengah 2
tanpa pengurangan produksi rendah 3

Apabila terjadi kegagalan pada bejana tekan maka akan terjadi emergency shutdown sehingga rating stand by availiability-nya (S) tinggi (1)

2. Financial Model (F)

Financial Model (F)

Rating
Waktu perbaikan (M) Biaya (B)
M ≥ 7 hari B ≥ $ 100.000 tinggi 1
1 ≤ M < 7 hari $10.000 ≤ B < $100.000 menengah 2
M ≤ 1 hari B ≤ $ 10.000 rendah 3

Apabila terjadi kegagalan pada bejana tekan waktu perbaikan 7 hari dana biaya yang dibutuhkan sebesar $150.000, sehingga rating Financial Model (F) tinggi (1)

3. Location (L)

Location (L) Rating

Area publik, padat penduduk, rumah pompa tinggi 1
lokasi umum dan dapat dimonitor menengah 2
daerah tertutup (gathering, refinery) yang rendah 3
dipagari dan ada security

bejana tekan berada di refinery, maka rating Location (L) adalah rendah (3)

Consequence of Failure (CoF) adalah

III. Penilaian Atas Rangking RBI

Consequence of Failure (CoF)

Probability of Failure (PoF) Rendah Menengah Tinggi
Tinggi 3 2 1
Menengah 4 3 2
Rendah 5 4 3

IV. Indeks Angka Keyakinan (CI)

 - Kode 0 = tidak ada keyakinan atau tidak ada data
- Kode 1 = deteriorasi dapat diprediksi dan data tidak lengkap
- Kode 2 = deteriorasi dapat diprediksi, data cacat diterima standar dan data lengkap
- Kode 3 = tidak ada mekanisme terjadinya kegagalan yang aktif, lingkungan operasi yang stabil dan data lengkap

Berdasarkan data pengukuran ketebalan pipa yang dilakukan,

V. Penentuan Interval Inspeksi

CI
0 1 2 3
Kekritisan
1 1 2 6 N/A
2 2 4 6 N/A
3 2 4 8 8
4 3 8 10 10
5 3 8 10 10

Berdasarkan tabel diatas maka interval inspeksi yang dilakukan

VI. Penentuan Ruang Lingkup Inspeksi

Consequence of Failure (CoF)

Rendah Menengah Tinggi
(3) (2) (1)

Optic Borescope dan NDT eksternal NDT eksternal dan pemantauan korosi serta review proses
atau atau atau
NDT eksternal Entry internal
atau atau
Entry internal
Review proses Review proses dan NDT eksternal

Rating Consequence of Failure (CoF) adalah

VII. Penentuan Metoda Inspeksi

Jenis Kegagalan Mekanisme Metoda Inspeksi

Penipisan bagian dinding sebelah dalam Korosi internal Ultrasonic
Erosi Radiography
Kavitasi
Korosi pengelasan
Penipisan bagian dinding sebelah luar Korosi eksternal Inspeksi Visual
Korosi dibawah isolasi Radiography
Retak (cracking) Kelelahan (fatigue) Ultrasonic
Radiography
Retak akibat korosi tegangan (SCC)
Magnetic Particle
Liquid Penetran
Retak akibat penggetasan hidrogen (wet
hydrogen cracking)

Yang lain Creep Ultrasonic

Hot hydrogen damage (penggetasan suhu Radiography
tinggi) Magnetic Particle

Kemungkinan Konsekuensi Tingkat Tingkat Metoda Luas Area

Kegagalan Kegagalan Kekritisan Inspeksi Inspeksi Inspeksi

VIII. Kesimpulan

Beberapa lokasi memiliki remaining Lebih dari 7thn oleh karena itu perlu dilakukan langkah-langkah sebagai berikut :